1
|
The relationship between psychological, cognitive, and contextual factors and rehabilitation outcomes in Achilles tendinopathy: A prospective feasibility cohort study. Phys Ther Sport 2023; 60:132-140. [PMID: 36796168 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of conducting a full-scale study investigating the influence of patient-related factors on rehabilitation outcomes in Achilles tendinopathy (AT). A secondary aim was to investigate preliminary relationships between patient-related factors and clinical outcomes at 12- and 26- weeks. DESIGN feasibility cohort. SETTING Australian healthcare settings. METHODS Participants with AT receiving physiotherapy in Australia were recruited via treating physiotherapists and online. Data were collected online at baseline, 12- and 26-weeks. Progression criteria for a full-scale study were recruitment rate of ≥10 per month, conversion rate ≥20%, and response rate to questionnaires ≥80%. The relationship between patient-related factors and clinical outcomes was investigated using Spearman's rho correlation coefficient. RESULTS The average recruitment rate was 5/month, conversion rate was 97%, and response rate to questionnaires was ≥97% at all timepoints. There was a fair to moderate correlation (rho = 0.225 to 0.683) between patient-related factors and clinical outcomes at the 12-week, but no to weak correlation at the 26-week (rho = 0.002 to 0.284). CONCLUSIONS Feasibility outcomes suggest a future full-scale cohort study is feasible with the caveat of utilizing strategies to improve recruitment rate. Preliminary bivariate correlations at 12-weeks warrant further investigations in larger studies.
Collapse
|
3
|
Edgar N, Clifford C, O'Neill S, Pedret C, Kirwan P, Millar NL. Biopsychosocial approach to tendinopathy. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2022; 8:e001326. [PMID: 35990762 PMCID: PMC9345071 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Tendinopathy describes a spectrum of changes that occur in damaged tendons, leading to pain and reduced function that remains extremely challenging for all clinicians. There is an increasing awareness of the influence that psychological and psychosocial components, such as self-efficacy and fear-avoidance, have on rehabilitation outcomes in musculoskeletal medicine. Although it is widely accepted that psychological/psychosocial factors exist in tendinopathy, there is currently a distinct lack of trials measuring how these factors affect clinical outcomes. Biopsychosocial treatments acknowledge and address the biological, psychological and social contributions to pain and disability are currently seen as the most efficacious approach to chronic pain. Addressing and modulating these factors are crucial in the pathway of personalised treatments in tendinopathy and offer a real opportunity to drive positive outcomes in patients. In this education review, we also provide the current evidence-based guidance on psychological and psychosocial developments in musculoskeletal medicine and how these may be translated to treating tendinopathy using a biopsychosocial model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Edgar
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Clifford
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK,Department of Physiotherapy, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Seth O'Neill
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Professionals, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Carles Pedret
- Sports Medicine and Imaging Department, Clinica Mapfre de Medicina del Tenis C/Muntaner, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul Kirwan
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Neal L Millar
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grävare Silbernagel K, Malliaras P, de Vos RJ, Hanlon S, Molenaar M, Alfredson H, van den Akker-Scheek I, Antflick J, van Ark M, Färnqvist K, Haleem Z, Kaux JF, Kirwan P, Kumar B, Lewis T, Mallows A, Masci L, Morrissey D, Murphy M, Newsham-West R, Norris R, O'Neill S, Peers K, Sancho I, Seymore K, Vallance P, van der Vlist A, Vicenzino B. ICON 2020-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Trials of Achilles Tendinopathy. Sports Med 2022; 52:613-641. [PMID: 34797533 PMCID: PMC8891092 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nine core domains for tendinopathy have been identified. For Achilles tendinopathy there is large variation in outcome measures used, and how these fit into the core domains has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE To identify all available outcome measures outcome measures used to assess the clinical phenotype of Achilles tendinopathy in prospective studies and to map the outcomes measures into predefined health-related core domains. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, sample size ≥ ten participants, age ≥ 16 years, and the study design was a randomized or non-randomized clinical trial, observational cohort, single-arm intervention, or case series. RESULTS 9376 studies were initially screened and 307 studies were finally included, totaling 13,248 participants. There were 233 (177 core domain) different outcome measures identified across all domains. For each core domain outcome measures were identified, with a range between 8 and 35 unique outcome measures utilized for each domain. The proportion of studies that included outcomes for predefined core domains ranged from 4% for the psychological factors domain to 72% for the disability domain. CONCLUSION 233 unique outcome measures for Achilles tendinopathy were identified. Most frequently, outcome measures were used within the disability domain. Outcome measures assessing psychological factors were scarcely used. The next step in developing a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy is to engage patients, clinicians and researchers to reach consensus on key outcomes measures. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42020156763.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Grävare Silbernagel
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
| | - Peter Malliaras
- Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robert-Jan de Vos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Shawn Hanlon
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA
| | - Mitchel Molenaar
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Håkan Alfredson
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jarrod Antflick
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Mathijs van Ark
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Care Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences and Peescentrum, Centre of Expertise Primary Care Groningen (ECEZG), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Zubair Haleem
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Arsenal Football Club, London, UK
| | - Jean-Francois Kaux
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Sports Traumatology, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Paul Kirwan
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bhavesh Kumar
- Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Trevor Lewis
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Adrian Mallows
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Lorenzo Masci
- Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Dylan Morrissey
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Myles Murphy
- National School of Nursing, Midwifery, Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Richard Newsham-West
- School of Allied Health, Department of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Norris
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
- Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Seth O'Neill
- School of Allied Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Koen Peers
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Igor Sancho
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Physiotherapy Department, University of Deusto, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Kayla Seymore
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA
| | - Patrick Vallance
- Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Arco van der Vlist
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bill Vicenzino
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vallance P, Hasani F, Crowley L, Malliaras P. Self-reported pain with single leg heel raise or single leg hop offer distinct information as measures of severity in men with midportion and insertional Achilles tendinopathy: An observational cross-sectional study. Phys Ther Sport 2020; 47:23-31. [PMID: 33125967 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate if self-reported pain with single leg heel raise (SLHR) or single leg hop (SLH) are concurrently valid to assess midportion (MPAT) or insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) symptom severity, compared to the VISA-A. Additionally, if SLHR or SLH pain accounts for VISA-A variability, and if they are associated with psychological factors. PARTICIPANTS 60 men with MPAT, 26 men with IAT. MAIN OUTCOMES Participants rated SLHR and SLH pain on a numerical rating scale (0 = none, 10 = worst). We investigated relationships between loading task pain, VISA-A, VISA-A constructs, and psychological outcomes (Pearson's correlation coefficients). Linear regression determined best model accounting for VISA-A variability. RESULTS In MPAT, load tests shared fair-negative relationship with VISA-A, and VISA-A function. In IAT, SLHR had moderately strong-negative relationship with VISA-A, and pain and function constructs, and SLH shared fair-negative relationship with VISA-A, and pain and function constructs. Relationships were negligible between load tests and VISA-A activity in both conditions, and VISA-A pain in MPAT. In IAT, there was fair-positive relationship between pain catastrophising and load tests. Remaining psychological outcome relationships were negligible. Best model accounting for VISA-A included SLH in MPAT, and SLHR in IAT. CONCLUSIONS Despite VISA-A and selected VISA-A construct associations, self-reported SLHR and SLH pain appears to provide distinct information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Vallance
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Peninsula Sports Medicine Group, Langwarrin, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Fatmah Hasani
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Liam Crowley
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Physio and Fitness Clinic, Seaford, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Peter Malliaras
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Complete Sports Care, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|