The relationship between multisite peripheral joint pain and physical activity levels in older adults: A cross-sectional survey

Perspectives of the World Health Organization's physical activity guidelines among patients with musculoskeletal conditions: A mixed-methods survey

INTRODUCTION

Physical activity (PA) promotion is a core element of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Many people with musculoskeletal conditions do not meet PA guidelines, such as those provided by the World Health Organization (WHO). This study aimed to explore the level of awareness and perspectives on the WHO PA guidelines among people with musculoskeletal conditions and identify how patients can be supported with PA in clinical practice.

METHODS

A mixed-method cross-sectional survey was conducted using a uniquely developed questionnaire, which was disseminated to patients attending outpatient physiotherapy or occupational therapy appointments. The questionnaire collected data on participant characteristics, awareness and perspectives on the WHO guidelines and suggestions for supporting patients with PA in clinical practice. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse the quantitative and qualitative data respectively.

RESULTS

One-hundred and two responses were included in the analysis. Forty-two percent of respondents were aware of the guidelines, 50% knew why they existed and 53% felt they were achievable. Perspectives varied, ranging from the guidelines being positive and aiding motivation to being unachievable. Some respondents felt an individualised approach is required. Suggestions for supporting patients with PA included facilitating social support, providing education, exercise groups and personalised advice, and signposting to community services.

CONCLUSION

There is limited awareness of the WHO PA guidelines and a variety of perspectives on the guidelines among patients with musculoskeletal conditions. There is a need to enhance the promotion of the guidelines in clinical practice, whilst considering local context and individual patient's circumstances.

The acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a walking intervention for older people with persistent musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A mixed methods evaluation of the iPOPP pilot trial

INTRODUCTION

Persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is associated with physical inactivity in older people. While walking is an acceptable form of physical activity, the effectiveness of walking interventions in this population has yet to be established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the effectiveness of a healthcare assistant-led walking intervention for older people with persistent MSK pain (iPOPP) in primary care.

METHODS

A mixed method, three arm pilot RCT was conducted in four general practices and recruited patients aged ≥65 years with persistent MSK pain. Participants were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to: (i) usual care, (ii) usual care plus a pedometer intervention, or (iii) usual care plus the iPOPP walking intervention. Descriptive statistics were used in an exploratory analysis of the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. A triangulation protocol was used to integrate the analyses from the mixed methods.

RESULTS

All pre-specified success criteria were achieved in terms of feasibility (recruitment, follow-up and iPOPP intervention adherence) and acceptability. Triangulation of the data identified the need, in the future, to make the iPOPP training (for intervention deliverers) more patient-centred to better support already active patients and the use of individualised goal setting and improve accelerometry data collection processes to increase the amount of valid data.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot trial suggests that the iPOPP intervention and a future full-scale RCT are both acceptable and feasible. The use of a triangulation protocol enabled more robust conclusions about acceptability and feasibility to be drawn.

Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Oxford Knee Score in breast cancer survivors experiencing hormone treatment-related knee dysfunction

Objective

To test the validity, reliability, and acceptability of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) Mandarin Chinese version for measuring knee pain and function among Chinese breast cancer survivors.

Methods

This validation study was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey that was conducted at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China. Recruited from a larger arthralgia-related survey cohort, those who experienced knee arthralgia and completed the OKS Chinese version were selected for the current analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated to identify the internal consistency reliability of the OKS. Spearman’s correlations were adopted to identify the concurrent validity of the OKS. The discriminate performance of the OKS via subgroup analysis of breast cancer survivors with or without arthritis, as well as different exercise levels, cancer stages, chemotherapy protocols, and occupations, was also conducted.

Results

One hundred and fifty-nine breast cancer survivors were included. There were significant correlations between the OKS and the FACT-B, the SF-36, and the BPI in measuring knee pain symptoms and their impact on daily living activities. The Cronbach’s alpha for the OKS total scores was 0.90. The participants with arthritis reported significantly lower OKS scores than those without arthritis (P ​= ​0.040). The difference in OKS total scores between the participants with different exercise levels (P ​< ​0.001) and the participants with different occupations (P ​= ​0.006) was statistically significant. Considerable ceiling effects (>15%) of the OKS Chinese version were found in 11 of 12 items.

Conclusions

The OKS Mandarin Chinese version is a short, valid, reliable, and sensitive tool for knee pain and function assessment among breast cancer survivors.