Ultrasonography in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: comparison of cross-sectional area and swelling ratio with electrophysiological severity

Ultrasound of the Ulnar Nerve: A Pictorial Review: Part 2: Pathological Ultrasound Findings

This is the second part of a two-part article in which we focus on the ultrasound (US) appearance of the pathological ulnar nerve (UN) and its main branches. Findings in a wide range of our pathological cases are presented with high-resolution US images obtained with the latest-generation US machines and transducers.

Cubital tunnel syndrome: anatomy, pathology, and imaging

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common peripheral neuropathy in the upper limb. It occurs due to ulnar nerve compression within the fibro-osseous cubital tunnel at the elbow joint. Although CuTS is typically diagnosed clinically and with electrodiagnostic studies, the importance of imaging in evaluating the condition is growing. Knowing the typical imaging findings of ulnar nerve entrapment is necessary for precise diagnosis and proper treatment. In this article, we focus on the clinical features, workup and complex imaging of the "anatomic" cubital tunnel and relevant pathological entities.

Gray-Scale and Power Doppler Ultrasound Findings Predictive of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Severity

BACKGROUND

The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is an attractive alternative to electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies, but its utility is binary with poor severity correlation. We hypothesize that increasing ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) and power Doppler measurement of intraneural vascularity may predict the extent of disease.

METHODS

We identified 20 elbows from patients with a history of CuTS and 20 elbows in 10 asymptomatic controls. Electrodiagnosis was performed for symptomatic patients. Gray-scale ultrasound and power Doppler ultrasound were performed to measure CSA and intraneural vascularity in all participants. Functional measures, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System surveys were also completed.

RESULTS

A strong positive correlation was found between CSA and motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) decrease between elbow and forearm, which increased when BCTQ >2 was used as a screening criterion. Increased CSA also demonstrated a high positive predictive value (PPV) in predicting MNCV changes, but poor ability to predict axonal loss. In contrast, power Doppler ultrasound demonstrated 100% PPV and 94% negative predictive value (NPV) in predicting severe CuTS (defined as compound motor action potential [CMAP] amplitude <6 mV and electromyography [EMG] findings).

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-sectional area is a sensitive method for identifying changes in MNCV and amplitude but does not stratify disease severity, as defined by diminished CMAP amplitude and/or evidence of denervation on EMG. The presence of increased intraneural vascularity is relatively sensitive but highly specific for axonal loss. The combination of nerve CSA, BCTQ screening, and power Doppler ultrasound may provide an alternative means for CuTS assessment.

Volumetric assessment of ulnar nerves in cubital tunnel syndrome with 3D modeling of the MRI and its relationship with electrodiagnostic findings

BACKGROUND

Thickened nerve cross-sectional areas (CSA) have been investigated in compressive neuropathy, but the longitudinal extent of nerve swelling has yet to be evaluated. We did a volumetric assessment of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) with three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modeling and investigated this relationship with clinical and electrodiagnostic parameters.

METHODS

We compared 40 CuTS patient elbow MRIs to 46 patient elbow MRIs with lateral elbow epicondylitis as controls. The ulnar nerve was modeled with Mimics software and was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. The CSA and ulnar nerve volumes were recorded, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for diagnostic performance. We analyzed clinical and electrodiagnostic parameters to investigate their relationship with the 3D ulnar nerve parameters.

RESULTS

For the diagnosis of CuTS, the area under the curve value was 0.915 for the largest CSA and 0.910 for the volume in the ROC curve. The optimal cut-off was 14.53 mm2 and 529 mm3 respectively. When electrodiagnostic parameters were investigated, the 3D ulnar nerve volume was significantly inversely associated with motor conduction velocity, although there was no association between the largest CSA and any of the electrodiagnostic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D ulnar nerve volume, which is an integration or multilevel measurement of CSAs, showed diagnostic usefulness similar to CSA, but it correlated better with conduction velocity, indicating demyelination or early-to-moderate nerve damage in CuTS.

Neuromuscular ultrasound: Impact on diagnosis and management

INTRODUCTION/AIM

High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) is increasingly used in evaluating neuromuscular conditions. Its potential advantages include its ability to discern anatomic information and make specific etiological diagnoses. Although many studies have demonstrated HRUS effectiveness, especially in mononeuropathies, more information is needed to better determine how often and to what extent useful information is obtained; how it influences diagnosis, clinical decision-making, and patient management; and how it is used with electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients referred for HRUS at a university laboratory during 2021. Demographic information, referral diagnoses, clinical information, HRUS findings, and follow-up patient management were analyzed. For patients who had EDx, results were compared with HRUS. Determinations were made whether HRUS did or did not aid in the diagnosis. For patients in whom HRUS resulted in a diagnosis, determination was made whether it confirmed the diagnosis made clinically or by EDx but did not change management; added additional important information; and/or made a decisive impact on subsequent management.

RESULTS

Five hundred two patients were analyzed, most referred for mononeuropathy, brachial plexopathy, and polyneuropathy. HRUS was abnormal in 81.7% of patients. HRUS added additional useful information in 79.0% and was decisive in management in 62.7%. In patients who also had abnormal EDx, HRUS resulted in decisive management in 49.5%.

DISCUSSION

HRUS is an effective diagnostic tool that frequently adds localizing and structural information that is otherwise not obtainable by clinical and EDx evaluation. In a substantial number of patients selected for HRUS, it is decisive in guiding further management.

Diagnosis of Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow Using Ultrasound - A Comparison to Electrophysiologic Studies

PURPOSE

Given the relatively high false negative rate of electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) in patients with clinically diagnosed ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), we sought to determine whether an alternative objective test could more effectively detect UNE. Additionally, we proposed to determine the relationship between the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve on ultrasound (US), EDX, and clinical symptoms.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients presenting with symptomatic UNE. The performance characteristics of EDX versus ultrasound were calculated using the clinical diagnosis of UNE as the reference standard. Standard EDX studies and US of the ulnar nerve were analyzed. Maximal CSA of the ulnar nerve and EDX severity were analyzed for patients with each combination of US-positive/negative and EDX-positive/negative findings.

RESULTS

Analysis was performed on 89 patients and 115 nerves with signs and symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome. In total, 56 (49%) nerves were diagnosed as mild UNE, 32 (28%) nerves were diagnosed as moderate UNE, 17 (15%) nerves were diagnosed as severe UNE, and 10 (8%) nerves were negative for UNE by EDX. Maximal-maximal CSA was highly correlated with disease severity as determined by nerve conduction studies/electromyography. Compared with EDX+/US+, patients with EDX-/US+ showed higher rates of ulnar sensory loss and elbow tenderness with similar rates of positive Tinel and intrinsic muscle atrophy. In this sample of patients with clinically diagnosed UNE, 91.3% of the patients demonstrated positive EDX studies, whereas 94.8% had a positive US.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound is an alternative to EDX that could be incorporated clinically in the diagnosis and management of UNE. Ultrasound was able to consistently detect clinically positive cubital tunnel syndrome demonstrating its utility as a confirmatory or supplemental test to the clinical assessment if one is required. Ultrasound additionally may be able to better identify patients with early stages of UNE with negative EDX findings.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic IV.

Where Does Ultrasound Fit in the Diagnostic Algorithm for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome?

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a promising supplement to electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) and has potential to be performed by novice operators. Our objective is to understand the discrepancies in assessment between the two modalities and to assess the utility of US in CuTS diagnosis by a novice operator.

METHODS

Patients who presented to a single tertiary academic medical center and clinically diagnosed with CuTS were prospectively enrolled. Electrodiagnostic studies were performed along with US measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve by both a board-certified physiatrist and novice operator. Electrodiagnostic study and US outcomes were compared among four diagnostic impression groups: EDX-/US-, EDX+/US-, EDX-/US+, and EDX+/US+.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were classified as abnormal by both EDX and US, 14 were classified abnormal by US only, 3 were classified abnormal by EDX only, and 6 were classified normal by both EDX and US (P = .008, K = 0.14). The EDX+/US+ group had a significantly reduced sensory amplitude compared with the EDX-/US+ (P = .04) group. Diagnostic classifications between a board-certified physiatrist and novice operator were in moderate agreement (K = 0.58, P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound detected a greater proportion of patients as abnormal than EDX. A subset of patients with clinical diagnoses of CuTS had normal sensory amplitudes but increased maximum nerve CSAs. Competency in US may be easily acquired with minimal training, suggesting its potential to be extended for use by other members of the health care team.

Ulnar nerve thickness at the elbow on longitudinal ultrasound view in control subjects

INTRODUCTION

Ulnar mononeuropathy at the elbow is the second most frequent neuropathy in humans. Diagnosis is based on clinical and electrophysiological criteria and, more recently, also on ultrasound. Cross-sectional ultrasound is currently the most valued, although longitudinal ultrasound allows assessment of the entire affected trajectory of the nerve in a single view, but always in a straight line with no changes in direction, as in the extended elbow. The main aim of this work is to propose normative values ​​for longitudinal ultrasound of the ulnar nerve at the elbow.

METHODS

The neurological exploration of upper extremity, and electrophysiological and ultrasound parameters at the elbow of ulnar nerve were evaluated in 76 limbs from 38 asymptomatic subjects.

RESULTS

The diameters of the nerve as well as the distal and proximal areas were larger at the proximal region of the ulnar groove, and even more so in older individuals. In most of these elderly subjects, we found a small, non-significant slowdown in motor conduction velocity at the elbow with respect to the forearm (less than 5 m/s).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a good correlation between the longitudinal and cross-sectional ultrasounds of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Longitudinal ultrasound proved to be sensitive, reliable, simple and rapid, but its greatest contribution was allowing the visualization of the entire nerve trajectory in an integrated way, providing an image with good definition of the outline, proportions and intraneural characteristics of the nerve.

Continuous Scanning and Inching in Ultrasonographic Localisation of Ulnar Neuropathy: A Comparative Study of Sensitivity

Background: This study compares the sensitivity of continuous ultrasonographic scanning and ultrasonographic inching in the localisation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow to diagnose the two common entrapment sites: retroepicondylar groove and cubital tunnel. Methods: The charts of 30 patients who were diagnosed with ulnar neuropathy of the elbow and underwent ultrasonographic examinations using the inching and the continuous technique between April 2015 and September 2019 were reviewed. Sensitivities of ultrasonographic inching and continuous scanning were compared. Results: A total of 34 elbows from 30 patients were examined. The sensitivities of continuous ultrasonographic scanning method and ultrasonographic inching were 85% and 71%, respectively, but this was not significant (p = 0.06). The maximum cross-sectional areas (CSAs) in continuous scanning were mainly found within the area from the medial epicondyle to the 2-cm distal point in the cubital tunnel entrapment, while a majority of the largest CSAs in ultrasonographic inching was observed at the medial epicondyle level in both entrapment sites. The mean of the maximum CSAs in continuous scanning (17.04 ± 6.75 mm²) was higher than that in ultrasonographic inching (14.13 ± 6.63 mm²), although this difference remained non-significant (p = 0.08). However, continuous scanning differed more significantly (p < 0.0001) from the cut-off value than the ultrasonographic inching (p < 0.0066). Conclusions: Continuous scanning might be more suitable than ultrasonographic inching to localise ulnar neuropathy, which inherently has variations in the cubital tunnel anatomy and its entrapment points, when selecting optimal treatment based on the entrapment site. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

A Comprehensive Review of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome (CuTS) is the compression of the ulnar nerve as it courses through the cubital tunnel near the elbow at the location colloquially referred to as the "funny bone". CuTS is the most commonly diagnosed mononeuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. Cubital tunnel syndrome can manifest as numbness, tingling, or pain in the ring/small fingers and dorsoulnar hand. Repetitive pressure, stretching, flexion, or trauma of the elbow joint are known causes of CuTS. Chronic ulnar nerve compression and CuTS, when left untreated, can lead to atrophy of the first dorsal interosseus muscle and affect one's quality of life to the point that they are no longer able to participate in daily activities involving fine motor function. It is estimated that up to 5.9% of the general population have had symptoms of CuTS. CuTS is underdiagnosed due to lack of seeking of treatment for symptoms. Compression or damage to the ulnar nerve is the main cause of symptoms experienced by an individual with CuTS. Repetitive elbow pressure or a history or elbow joint trauma or injury are additional known causes that can lead to CuTS. Common presentations of CuTS include paresthesia, clumsiness of the hand, hand atrophy and weakness. The earliest sign of CuTS is most commonly numbness and tingling of the ring and 5th finger. Older patients tend to present with motor symptoms of chronic onset; younger patients tend to have more acute symptoms. Pain and point tenderness at the medial elbow may also be seen. CuTS lacks universally agreed upon diagnostic and treatment algorithms. CuTS can be diagnosed by physical exam using Tinel's sign, flexion-compression tests, palpating the ulnar nerve for thickening presence of local tenderness along the nerve. Ultrasound and nerve conduction studies may be used in combination with physical exam for diagnosis. Conservative treatment for CuTS is almost always pursued before surgical treatment and includes elbow splints, braces, and night-gliding exercises. Surgical treatment may be pursued in severe CuTS refractory to conservative treatment. Surgical options include open and endoscopic in-situ decompression, medial epicondylectomy, and anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. CuTS is a prevalent disease that, if left untreated, can significantly alter an individual's quality of life. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment is paramount in reducing further damage and preventing worsening or future symptoms.

Morphological Changes of Medial Epicondyle-Olecranon Ligament and Ulnar Nerve in the Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: An Ultrasonic Study

Objective

Few studies have performed detailed ultrasound measurements of medial epicondyle‐olecranon (MEO) ligament that cause the entrapment of ulnar nerve. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate dynamic ultrasonographic characteristics of MEO ligament and ulnar nerve for clinical diagnosis and accurate treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS).

Methods

Thirty CuTS patients (CuTS group) and sixteen healthy volunteers (control group) who underwent ultrasound scanning from October 2016 to October 2020 were retrospectively collected, with 30 elbows in each group. Primary outcomes were thickness at six points, length and width of MEO ligament. Secondary outcomes were thickness of ulnar nerve under MEO ligament at seven parts and the cross‐sectional area (CSA) of ulnar nerve at proximal end of MEO ligament (P_0 mm). The thickness of MEO ligament and ulnar nerve in different points of each group was compared by one‐way ANOVA analysis with Bonferroni post hoc test, other outcomes were compared between two elbow positions or two groups using independent‐samples t test.

Results

Thickness of MEO ligament in CuTS group at epicondyle end, midpoint in transverse view, olecranon end, proximal end, midpoint in axial view, and distal end was 0.67 ± 0.31, 0.37 ± 0.18, 0.89 ± 0.35, 0.39 ± 0.21, 0.51 ± 0.38, 0.36 ± 0.25 at elbow extension, 0.68 ± 0.34, 0.38 ± 0.27, 0.77 ± 0.39, 0.32 ± 0.20, 0.48 ± 0.22, 0.32 ± 0.12 (mm) at elbow flexion, respectively. Compared with control group, they were significantly thickened except for proximal end at elbow flexion. MEO ligament thickness at epicondyle end and olecranon end was significantly larger than midpoint in two groups. No significant difference was found in length and width of MEO ligament among different comparisons. Ulnar nerve thickness at 5 mm proximal to MEO ligament (P_5 mm, 3.25 ± 0.66 mm) was significantly increased than midpoint of MEO ligament (Mid), distal end of MEO ligament (D_0 mm), 5 mm (D_5 mm), 10 mm (D_10 mm) distal to MEO ligament at extension in CuTS group. Compared with control group, ulnar nerve thickness at P_5 mm in CuTS group was significantly increased at extension position, at D_5 mm and D_10 mm was significantly decreased at flexion position. CSA of ulnar nerve at extension position (14.44 ± 4.65 mm²) was significantly larger than flexion position (11.83 ± 3.66 mm²) in CuTS group, and CuTS group was significantly larger than control group at two positions.

Conclusions

MEO ligament in CuTS patients was thickened, which compressed ulnar nerve and caused its proximal end swelling. Ultrasonic image of MEO ligament thickness was a significant indicator for CuTS and can guide surgeons in selecting the appropriate treatment.

Neuromuscular Ultrasound: Indications in the Electrodiagnostic Laboratory

ABSTRACT

Accurate assessment of neuromuscular disorders is critical to facilitate timely treatment and achieve the best outcomes. Historically, electrodiagnostic studies have filled this role, but recently, neuromuscular ultrasound is being used in the electrodiagnostic laboratory. This review discusses the uses of neuromuscular ultrasound in the electrodiagnostic laboratory that have strong evidence, emphasizing those that could be adopted in a typical electrodiagnostic laboratory with a reasonable level of equipment and training. The evidence currently supports using neuromuscular ultrasound to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar neuropathies at the elbow and as a supplementary test when electrodiagnostic studies are suspected to be falsely negative or in axonal nonlocalizing lesions. Neuromuscular ultrasound can identify the causes of focal mononeuropathies, which can change treatment in specific cases. It is sensitive at identifying fasciculations and providing complementary evidence of autoimmune demyelinating polyneuropathies. It is particularly helpful in assessing nerves after trauma. Neuromuscular ultrasound is likely to prove even more useful in the electrodiagnostic laboratory as the technology continues to advance.

Evidence-based guideline: Neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

The purpose of this literature review is to develop an evidence-based guideline for the use of neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). The proposed research question was: "In patients with suspected UNE, does ulnar nerve enlargement as measured with ultrasound accurately identify those patients with UNE?"

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, and studies were classified according to American Academy of Neurology criteria for rating articles for diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Based on Class I evidence in four studies, it is probable that neuromuscular ultrasound measurement of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, either of diameter or cross-sectional area (CSA), is accurate for the diagnosis of UNE.

RECOMMENDATION

For patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of ulnar neuropathy, clinicians should offer ultrasonographic measurement of ulnar nerve cross-sectional area or diameter to confirm the diagnosis and localize the site of compression (Level B).

Expert consensus on the combined investigation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow using electrodiagnostic tests and nerve ultrasound

The addition of ultrasound (US) to electrodiagnostic (EDX) tests can significantly enhance the accuracy of testing for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). We aimed to obtain expert consensus to guide clinicians on the combined use of EDX and US in UNE investigation. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. Two consecutive anonymised questionnaires were submitted to 15 experts, who were asked to choose their level of agreement with each statement. Consensus was pre-defined as ≥ 80% rating agreement. The experts concluded that all investigations of UNE should include both nerve conduction studies and US. There was consensus that US should include cross-sectional area measurement and assessment of nerve mobility at the elbow, and that the entire ulnar nerve should be imaged. This study defined expert opinion on the 'core' techniques that should be used routinely in the UNE investigation using EDX and US. Areas with lack of consensus highlighted some controversial issues in the current use of these diagnostic modalities and the need for future research. This document is an initial step to guide clinicians on the combined investigation of UNE using EDX and US, to be regularly updated as new research emerges.

Comparison of electrodiagnosis, neurosonography and MR neurography in localization of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

INTRODUCTION

In patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) the precise determination of the site of lesion is important for subsequent differential diagnostic considerations and therapeutic management. Due to a paucity of comparable data, to better define the role of different diagnostic tests, we performed the first prospective study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of short segment nerve stimulation, nerve ultrasonography, MR neurography (MRN), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in patients with UNE.

METHODS

UNE was clinically diagnosed in 17 patients with 18 affected elbows. For all 18 affected elbows in patients and 20 elbows in 10 healthy volunteers, measurements of all different diagnostic tests were performed at six anatomical positions across the elbow with measuring points from distal (D4) to proximal (P6) in relation to the medial epicondyle (P0). Additional qualitative assessment regarding structural changes of surrounding nerve anatomy was conducted.

RESULTS

The difference between affected arms of patients and healthy control arms were most frequently the largest at measure intervals D2 to P0 and P0 to P2 for electrophysiological testing, or measure points P0 and P2 for all other devices, respectively. At both levels P0 and at P2, T2 contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of MRN and mean diffusivity (MD) of DTI-based MRN showed best accuracies.

DISCUSSION

This study revealed differences in diagnostic performance of tests concerning a specific location of UNE, with better results for T2 contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in MRN and mean diffusivity of DTI-based MRN. Additional testing with MRN and nerve ultrasonography is recommended to uncover anatomical changes.

Sonographic Follow-Up of Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Undergoing in Situ Open Neurolysis or Endoscopic Release: The SPECTRE Study

Background:The measurement of cross-sectional area (CSA) is a diagnostic tool to detect entrapments syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome in elbows undergoing endoscopic and "in situ" open cubital tunnel release for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) using ultrasound-related changes in the largest CSA of the ulnar nerve. The purpose is to determine the association between clinical outcome and CSA. Methods: From May 2011 to April 2016, 60 patients with CuTS were prospectively followed and not randomly divided in two groups: 30 patients undergoing an endoscopic release (ER) and 30 patients with "in situ" open neurolysis (OR). A sonographic examination was performed by the senior authors at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgical decompression. Results: CSA values were statistically significantly lower in the ER. Hand grip strength difference with Jamar test was not statistically significant a 12 months (39 kg vs 27 kg). Static-2 point discrimination test difference was only statistically significant lower in the endoscopic group at 3, 6 and 12 months but not clinically relevant (5 mm vs 6 mm). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow questionnaire (ASES-e) function score, ASES-e Pain score, and ASES-e Satisfaction score were not statistically significant different between the two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months post operatively. Conclusions: The study confirms that in spite of lower values of CSA in the ER, there is not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques in terms of subjective outcomes. Ultrasound (US) measurements seem to have a limited value in clinical results of patients treated for entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve.Type of study/LOE: Prognostic Level III.

Is There an Association Between Ulnar Nerve Hypermobility and Neuropathy at the Elbow?

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the association between ulnar nerve hypermobility (UNH) at the elbow and ulnar neuropathy (UNE).

DATA SOURCES

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for English language studies published up to July 4, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

We included case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled studies that established the presence or absence of UNH and UNE. Twenty out of 654 studies identified met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted data for analysis. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We compared rates of UNH between patients diagnosed with and without UNE and found no significant difference. The meta-analysis pooled rate of UNH was 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.57) for those without UNE and 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.45) for those with UNE.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical finding of UNH is unhelpful when assessing for UNE, as the presence of UNH does not make the diagnosis of UNE more likely.

Enhancing diagnostic accuracy using a side-to-side cross-sectional area ratio for the diagnosis of unilateral ulnar mononeuropathy at the elbow

INTRODUCTION

Neuromuscular ultrasonography (NMUS) is a valuable adjunct to electrodiagnostic testing for the diagnosis of entrapment neuropathy. The aim of this study was to determine whether diagnostic accuracy of NMUS could be enhanced in patients with unilateral ulnar mononeuropathy at the elbow (UNE) by utilizing side-to-side ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) ratios.

METHODS

Retrospective case-control analysis of unilateral UNE cases identified cutoff values for elbow segment ulnar nerve maximum CSA (MCSA) of the symptomatic/asymptomatic limb (M ratio), as well as side-to-side ratios comparing MCSA with ipsilateral CSA at the Guyon canal (E/G), middle forearm (E/F), and middle humerus (E/H). Diagnostic accuracy values were calculated.

RESULTS

The optimal M-ratio cut-off was 1.22 (sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 97.8%; accuracy, 95.4%). Optimal cutoffs for inter-E/G, -E/F, and -E/H ratios were 1.07 (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 78%; accuracy, 87.7%), 1.11 (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 80%; accuracy, 87.2%), and 1.18 (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 93%; accuracy, 94%), respectively.

DISCUSSION

The M ratio and inter-E/H ratio exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for unilateral UNE. Prospective studies are needed to compare the accuracy of the new measures with a single MCSA measurement.

Ultrasound Ulnar Nerve Measurement in a Healthy Population

Introduction

Ulnar tunnel syndrome at the elbow is a common pathology. The ultrasound cross-sectional area is a well-known metric widely accepted in radiology for the description of nerve entrapment. However, the pathological cut-off value remains challenging. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the ultrasound cross-sectional area measurement of the ulnar nerve at three locations, and (2) to evaluate the inter-observer reliability by two independent ultrasonographers.

Methods

One-hundred ulnar nerves of 50 asymptomatic individuals were scanned using B-mode and power Doppler ultrasonography. The ultrasound cross-sectional area measurements of the ulnar nerve were performed at three different levels: 2 cm proximal to the epicondyle, at the level of the epicondyle, and 2 cm distal to the epicondyle.

Results

In our healthy population, we found 21, 24 and 7% of ultrasound cross-sectional area ulnar nerve > 8 mm², respectively, at three different levels of measurement and 4, 7, and 0% US-CSA ulnar nerve > 10 mm². The intraclass correlation coefficient measured at three different site levels were good (0.7943, 0.7509) to moderate (0.5701).

Conclusions

Almost one-quarter of our healthy population had an ultrasound cross-sectional area ulnar nerve more than 8 mm² and few more than 10 mm². A cut-off of ultrasound cross-sectional area ulnar nerve measurement more than 10 mm² could be considered as pathological. No abnormal elbow ulnar nerve vascularization has been seen. This is the first step towards normal B-mode ulnar nerve values at the elbow to further detect pathological US findings as ulnar nerve entrapment.

Optimal Choice of Ultrasound-Based Measurements for the Diagnosis of Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow: A Meta-Analysis of 1961 Examinations

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal ultrasound (US) measurement technique and cutoff value for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic literature search was conducted of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of US of patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow before April 2019. Random-effects modeling was performed to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of different US measurements, including diameter and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerve at the medial epicondyle or proximal and distal levels, maximal diameter, maximal CSA, and nerve ratios. Sensitivity and metaregression analyses were performed to assess the impact of clinical and imaging-based variables on the DOR of US. RESULTS. Among 820 retrieved studies, 19 studies (1961 examinations) were included. Measuring the CSA of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle with a cutoff value greater than 10-10.5 mm² had higher sensitivity (80.4%, 95% CI, 75.4-84.7%) than other techniques. Nerve ratios had higher specificity (89.1%, 95% CI, 85.8-91.8%) than other measurements; however, the definition of ratios and cutoff values varied across studies. ROC analysis showed higher diagnostic performance for measuring CSA at the medial epicondyle (AUC, 0.931). The mean CSA value was a significant predictor of the DOR of US (β coefficient, 0.307 ± 0.074; p < 0.001). Every 1-mm² larger CSA was associated with a 36% increase in DOR. The diagnostic performance of US was the same in any degree of elbow flexion. CONCLUSION. Measuring CSA of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle has sensitivity and diagnostic performance superior to those of other techniques for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Current and future applications of ultrasound imaging in peripheral nerve disorders

Neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) is a rapidly evolving technique used in neuromuscular medicine to provide complimentary information to standard electrodiagnostic studies. NMUS provides a dynamic, real time assessment of anatomy which can alter both diagnostic and management pathways in peripheral nerve disorders. This review describes the current and future techniques used in NMUS and details the applications and developments in the diagnosis and monitoring of compressive, hereditary, immune-mediated and axonal peripheral nerve disorders, and motor neuron diseases. Technological advances have allowed the increased utilisation of ultrasound for management of peripheral nerve disorders; however, several practical considerations need to be taken into account to facilitate the widespread uptake of this technique.

Analysis of the Anatomical Factors Associated with Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Previous studies demonstrated that soft tissues, such as retinaculum, fibrous band, and anconeus, cause ulnar nerve compression, whereas other studies showed that the bony structures strain the ulnar nerve that runs directly behind the medial epicondyle constituting the boundary of the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion. However, no studies have reported the association of the shape of the bony structure with cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms. Are computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-measured parameters of the bony cubital tunnel related to idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms?

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that CT and MRI-measured parameters of the bony cubital tunnel were related to idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the radiographic parameters based on CT and MRI and idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed 224 elbows (77 affected elbows of patients with idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome, 77 unaffected elbows of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome, 70 elbows of patients without cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms) using CT and MRI. Cubital tunnel cross-sectional area, cubital tunnel volume, and ulnar nerve cross-sectional area were measured in the three groups at flexion and extension. A new cubital tunnel center with a new boundary was proposed that could play a role in ulnar nerve compression symptoms.

RESULTS

The cross-sectional areas and volumes of the cubital tunnel measured in the elbow flexion state were the smallest among the group with the affected elbows in patients. There was no difference between unaffected elbows and the non-patient group. The cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve highly correlated with cubital tunnel symptoms in the flexion state.

DISCUSSION

The shape of the cubital tunnel is an important factor in cubital tunnel syndrome, and normal variations in the volume and cross-sectional area of the cubital tunnel and ulnar nerve could influence the occurrence of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Therapeutic study.

Perineural Dextrose and Corticosteroid Injections for Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow: A Randomized Double-blind Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of perineural corticosteroid and 5% dextrose water (D5W) injections in patients with mild to moderate ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (6-month follow-up).

SETTING

Outpatients of local medical center settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=36) with mild to moderate UNE were randomized, and 33 participants were included in the final data analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were administered a single perineural injection with 5 mL D5W and 3 mL corticosteroid (triamcinolone acetonide, 10mg/mL) mixed with 2 mL normal saline under ultrasound guidance in the dextrose and steroid groups, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The visual analog scale digital pain or paresthesia/dysesthesia score was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, motor nerve conduction velocity, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve. The measurement assessment was conducted before and 1, 3, 4, and 6 months after injection.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients completed the study. Both injections were found to be equally effective at most measurement points, although the dextrose group experienced larger reductions in symptom severity and CSA of the ulnar nerve from the third month onward.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest D5W as a more suitable injectate for perineural injection in patients with UNE.

Validity of computed tomographic measurements and morphological comparison of cubital tunnel in idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome

Background

Ulnar neuropathy is a common reason for referral to hand surgeons, and 10 to 30% of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is idiopathic. We hypothesized that the cause of idiopathic CuTS is in the bony structure.

Methods

We analyzed 79 elbows (39 idiopathic CuTS and 40 without CuTS symptom) using computed tomography and Materialize Mimics software to compare the differences between the two groups. We proposed a new bony cubital tunnel with a new boundary that could play a role in ulnar nerve compression symptom.

Results

The mean cubital tunnel volume was 1245.6 mm³ in all patients, 1180.6 mm³ in CuTS patients, and 1282.3 mm³ in the control group. A significant difference (p = 0.015) between two groups was found. Bony cubital tunnel cross-sectional area, cubital tunnel depth, and cubital tunnel angle also showed significant differences.

Conclusion

The shape of the bony cubital tunnel is an important cause of CuTS, and the normal variation of the volume and cross-sectional area of the cubital tunnel and cubital tunnel angle could influence the occurrence of idiopathic CuTS.

Features of the Ulnar Nerve Predicting Postoperative Prognosis in Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Three Distinct Features of the Ulnar Nerve

PURPOSE

This retrospective case-control study was performed to determine the relationships between features of the ulnar nerve and postoperative outcomes following in situ decompression in idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS).

METHODS

The study population consisted of 86 patients who had undergone surgery for CuTS. We evaluated demographic factors, hand dominance, symptom onset time, time from diagnosis to surgery, findings of electrodiagnosis (nerve conduction velocity/electromyography), and preoperative clinical status. Intraoperatively, the ulnar nerve was defined as a definitively compressed, abnormally enlarged, or inflammatory lesion. Clinical improvements were evaluated at least 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients showed improvement after surgery in terms of the modified McGowan grade and were designated as group 1. Meanwhile, 32 patients with unchanged or aggravated status were classified as group 2. Preoperative status, as determined by the modified McGowan grade, Boston Symptom Severity Scale score, severity of electrodiagnosis, and predominant symptoms were similar between the groups (all, P > 0.05). On regression analysis, only the classification of nerve lesions and the time from diagnosis to surgery had an impact on postoperative outcome (all, P < 0.05). Especially, enlarged ulnar lesion predicted poor prognosis (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar nerve enlargement, grossly detected intraoperatively, and long interval between diagnosis and surgery were independently associated with poor prognosis of CuTS. Among the anatomic structures involved in the generation of CuTS, the medial epicondyle showed a strong association with enlarged nerve lesions.

Ultrasound Measurements and Assessments of the Ulnar Nerve at the Elbow and Cubital Tunnel: A Scoping Review

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most frequent peripheral nerve entrapment neuropathy in the upper extremity. The diagnosis is determined through a combination of history, physical examination, and electrodiagnostic testing. However, the use of high-resolution sonography is increasing, with sonographic measurements of ulnar nerve dimension established as a reliable diagnostic criterion for UNE. Sonographic imaging can describe anatomical features beyond ulnar nerve size, and therefore additional observations could potentially be used in UNE diagnosis and treatment follow-up. This review was a scoping of the literature on different sonographic measurements and assessments that have been reported to evaluate the ulnar nerve and cubital tunnel. This should provide a guide to scanning protocols for sonographers.

Retrospective study on the impact of ulnar nerve dislocation on the pathophysiology of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

Introduction

High resolution ultrasonography (US) has been used for diagnosis and evaluation of entrapment peripheral neuropathy. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common focal entrapment neuropathy. The ulnar nerve tends to move to the anteromedial side and sometimes subluxates or dislocates over the medial epicondyle as the elbow is flexed. Dislocation of the ulnar nerve during elbow flexion may contribute to friction injury. We aimed to investigate the effects which the dislocation of ulnar nerve at the elbow could have on the electrophysiologic pathology of UNE.

Materials

We retrospectively reviewed 71 arms of UNE. The demographic data, electrodiagnosis findings and US findings of ulnar nerve were analyzed. We classified the electrodiagnosis findings of UNE into three pathologic types; demyelinating, sensory axonal loss, and mixed sensorimotor axonal loss. The arms were grouped into non-dislocation, partial dislocation, and complete dislocation groups according to the findings of nerve dislocation in US examination. We compared the electrodiagnosis findings, ulnar nerve cross sectional areas in US and electrodiagnosis pathology types among the groups.

Results

A total of 18 (25.3%) arms showed partial dislocation, and 15 (21.1%) arms showed complete dislocation of ulnar nerve in US. In the comparison of electrodiagnosis findings, the partial and complete dislocation groups showed significantly slower conduction velocities and lower amplitudes than non-dislocation group in motor conduction study. In the sensory conduction study, the conduction velocity was significantly slower in partial dislocation group and the amplitude was significantly lower in complete dislocation group than non-dislocation group. In the comparison of US findings, patients in partial and complete dislocation groups showed significantly larger cross sectional areas of the ulnar nerve. The comparison of electrodiagnosis pathologic types among the groups revealed that there were significantly larger proportions of the axonal loss (sensory axonal loss or mixed sensorimotor axonal loss) in partial and complete dislocation groups than non-dislocation group.

Conclusion

The ulnar nerve dislocation could influence on the more severe damage of the ulnar nerve in patients with UNE. It might be important to evaluate the dislocation of the ulnar nerve using US in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy for predicting the prognosis and determining the treatment direction of UNE.

Neuromuscular ultrasound in electrically non-localizable ulnar neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the value of high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) in patients with ulnar neuropathy whose electrophysiology displayed an axonal, non-localizing pattern.

METHODS

A prospective study of patients referred to an electromyography laboratory for ulnar neuropathy was performed. Of the 56 patients with clinical and electrodiagnostic (EDx) evidence of ulnar neuropathy, 12 were identified with non-localizing electrophysiology who subsequently underwent HRUS of the ulnar nerve.

RESULTS

HRUS localized the ulnar neuropathy in all patients. In 2 patients, HRUS demonstrated structural lesions not at the elbow.

DISCUSSION

HRUS often adds complementary information to standard EDx studies, including ulnar neuropathy. Thus, HRUS should be employed in patients with a non-localizing ulnar neuropathy on EDx studies. Muscle Nerve 58: 655-659, 2018.

Investigation of the Diagnostic Value of Ultrasonography for Radial Neuropathy Located at the Spiral Groove

Objective

To determine a diagnostic cut-off value for the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the radial nerve using ultrasonography for radial neuropathy located at the spiral groove (SG).

Methods

Seventeen patients with electrodiagnostic evidence of radial neuropathy at the SG and 30 healthy controls underwent ultrasonography of the radial nerve at the SG . The CSAs at the SG were compared in the patient and control groups. The CSA at the SG between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides (ΔSx–Asx and Sx/Asx, respectively) were analyzed to obtain the optimal cut-off value. The relationship between the electrophysiological severity of radial neuropathy and CSA was also evaluated.

Results

Among the variables examined, there were statistically significant differences in the CSA between the patient and control groups, ΔSx–Asx, and Sx/Asx at the SG. In a receiver operating characteristics analysis, the cut-off CSA was 5.75 mm² at the SG (sensitivity 52.9%, specificity 90%), 1.75 mm² for ΔSx–Asx (sensitivity 58.8%, specificity 100%), and 1.22 mm² for Sx/Asx (sensitivity 70.6%, specificity 93.3%) in diagnosing radial neuropathy at the SG. There was no significant correlation between CSA and electrophysiological severity score for either patient group.

Conclusion

The reference value obtained for CSA of the radial nerve at the SG may facilitate investigation of radial nerve pathologies at the SG.

Accuracy of Preoperative Ultrasonography for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Comparison with Intraoperative Findings

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the consistency between preoperative ultrasonographic and intraoperative measurements of the ulnar nerve in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome.

Methods

Twenty-six cases who underwent anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome were enrolled prospectively. On preoperative ultrasonography, largest cross-sectional diameters of the ulnar nerve were measured at the level of medial epicondyle (ME) and 3 cm proximal (PME) and distal (DME) to the ME on the transverse scan by a single experienced radiologist. Intraoperative direct measurements of the largest diameter at the same locations were performed by a single surgeon without knowledge of the preoperative values. The consistency between ultrasonographic and intraoperative values including the largest diameter and swelling ratio were assessed.

Results

Significant differences between ultrasonographic and intraoperative values of the largest diameter were found at all levels. The mean difference was 1.29 mm for PME, 1.38 mm for ME, and 1.12 mm for DME. The mean ME-PME swelling ratio for ultrasonographic and intraoperative measurements was 1.50 and 1.39, respectively, showing significant difference. The mean ME-DME swelling ratio for ultrasonographic and intraoperative measurements was 1.53 and 1.43, respectively, showing no significant difference.

Conclusions

Ultrasonographically measured largest diameters of the ulnar nerve at any levels were smaller than the real values determined intraoperatively. The ME-DME swelling ratio of the ulnar nerve measured by ultrasonography was consistent with the intraoperative measurement.

Ulnar neuropathy with abnormal non-localizing electrophysiology: Clinical, electrophysiological and ultrasound findings

OBJECTIVE

To systematically study demographic, clinical, electrophysiological and nerve ultrasound characteristics of ulnar neuropathy with abnormal non-localizing electrophysiology (NL-UN) and further define the utility of ultrasound over and above the conventional electro-diagnostic approach.

METHOD

NL-UNs were prospectively identified from 113 consecutive referrals with suspected ulnar neuropathy. All received electro-diagnostic tests and ulnar nerve ultrasound. NL-UN severity was graded using clinical and electrophysiological scales.

RESULTS

In 64 of 113 referrals, an ulnar mono- neuropathy was confirmed by electrophysiology. Sixteen of these 64 (25%) had NL-UN, predominantly males (14 out of 16 patients) with severe or moderate clinical and electrophysiological ratings. Ultrasound showed focal ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in 13 out of 16, and diffuse ulnar nerve abnormality in three, and identified a likely or possible causative mechanism in 11.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion (a quarter) of ulnar neuropathies with abnormal electrophysiology were NL-UN, of heterogeneous etiology; the majority were males with significant disability and axonal loss. Ultrasound had a significant role in localization and classification that facilitated management.

SIGNIFICANCE

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic prospective study that analyzes the demographic, clinical, electrophysiological and ultrasound characteristics of NL-UN in a routine clinical neurophysiology setting.

Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome presenting with symptoms in an ulnar nerve distribution: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Patients presenting with symptoms of pain/paresthesias primarily in an ulnar nerve distribution may be noted to have exclusive median mononeuropathy at the wrist on subsequent electrodiagnostic testing. There has been limited research looking at the prevalence of this clinical presentation.

METHODS

A cohort of adults were surveyed to assess for severity and localization of hand symptoms using the Katz hand diagram and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptoms Severity Scale. Thirty volunteers met our case definition for ulnar neuropathy and underwent a standardized physical examination, electrodiagnostic testing, and nerve ultrasound.

RESULTS

Eleven of 30 subjects (37%) were found to have exclusive median mononeuropathy at the wrist.

DISCUSSION

Carpal tunnel syndrome should remain high on the differential for patients presenting with symptoms of pain/paresthesias primarily in an ulnar nerve distribution. Muscle Nerve 59:60-63, 2019.

Optimal Measurement Level and Ulnar Nerve Cross-Sectional Area Cutoff Threshold for Identifying Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow by MRI and Ultrasonography

PURPOSE

Imaging criteria for diagnosing compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) have recently been established as the maximum ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (UNCSA) upon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or ultrasonography (US). However, the levels of maximum UNCSA and diagnostic cutoff values have not yet been established. We therefore analyzed UNCSA by MRI and US in patients with UNE and in controls.

METHODS

We measured UNCSA at 7 levels in 30 patients with UNE and 28 controls by MRI and at 15 levels in 12 patients with UNE and 24 controls by US. We compared UNCSA as determined by MRI or US and determined optimal diagnostic cutoff values based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

The UNCSA was significantly larger in the UNE group than in controls at 3, 2, 1, and 0 cm proximal and 1, 2, and 3 cm distal to the medial epicondyle for both modalities. The UNCSA was maximal at 1 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle for MRI (16.1 ± 3.5 mm²) as well as for US (17 ± 7 mm²). A cutoff value of 11.0 mm² for MRI and US was found to be optimal for differentiating between patients with UNE and controls, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 for MRI and 0.96 for US. The UNCSA measured by MRI was not significantly different from that by US. Intra-rater and interrater reliabilities for UNCSA were all greater than 0.77. The UNCSA in the severe nerve dysfunction group of 18 patients was significantly larger than that in the mild nerve dysfunction group of 12 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

By measuring UNCSA with MRI or US at 1 cm proximal to the ME, patients with and without UNE could be discriminated at a cutoff threshold of 11.0 mm² with high sensitivity, specificity, and reliability.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

[Diagnostic nerve ultrasonography]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

For the diagnostics of nerve lesions an imaging method is necessary to visualize peripheral nerves and their surrounding structures for an etiological classification.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Clinical neurological and electrophysiological investigations provide functional information about nerve lesions. The information provided by a standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination is inadequate for peripheral nerve diagnostics; however, MRI neurography is suitable but on the other hand a resource and time-consuming method.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Using ultrasonography for peripheral nerve diagnostics.

PERFORMANCE

With ultrasonography reliable diagnostics of entrapment neuropathies and traumatic nerve lesions are possible. The use of ultrasonography for neuropathies shows that a differentiation between different forms is possible.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Nerve ultrasonography is an established diagnostic tool. In addition to the clinical examination and clinical electrophysiology, structural information can be obtained, which results in a clear improvement in the diagnostics. Ultrasonography has become an integral part of the diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve lesions in neurophysiological departments.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Nerve ultrasonography is recommended for the diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve lesions in addition to clinical and electrophysiological investigations. It should be used in the clinical work-up of entrapment neuropathies, traumatic nerve lesions and spacy-occupying lesions of nerves.

Ulnar Nerve Cross-Sectional Area for the Diagnosis of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Ultrasonographic Measurements

OBJECTIVE

To examine the performance of sonographic cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS).

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases, comprising PubMed and EMBASE, were searched for the pertinent literature before July 1, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Fourteen trials comparing the ulnar nerve CSA measurements between participants with and without CuTS were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study design, participants' demographic characteristics, diagnostic reference of CuTS, and methods of CSA measurement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Among different elbow levels, the between-group difference in CSA was the largest at the medial epicondyle (6.0mm²; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-7.4mm²). The pooled mean CSA in participants without CuTS was 5.5mm² (95% CI, 4.4-6.6mm²) at the arm level, 7.4mm² (95% CI, 6.7-8.1mm²) at the cubital tunnel inlet, 6.6mm² (95% CI, 5.9-7.2mm²) at the medial epicondyle, 7.3mm² (95% CI, 5.6-9.0mm²) at the cubital tunnel outlet, and 5.5mm² (95% CI, 4.7-6.3mm²) at the forearm level. The sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic odds ratios pooled from 5 studies, using 10mm² as the cutoff point, were .85 (95% CI, .78-.90), .91 (95% CI, .86-.94), and 53.96 (95% CI, 14.84-196.14), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ulnar nerve CSA measured by ultrasound imaging is useful for the diagnosis of CuTS and is most significantly different between patients and participants without CuTS at the medial epicondyle. Because the ulnar nerve CSA in healthy participants, at various locations, rarely exceeds 10mm², this value can be considered as a cutoff point for diagnosing ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow region.

Reproducibility of Ultrasonographic Measurements of the Ulnar Nerve at the Cubital Tunnel

The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve is thought to be indicative of ulnar nerve entrapment. The purpose of the study was to determine reproducibility of ultrasonographic measurements of CSA of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel in healthy adults. Two sonographers tested 69 participants using a standardized protocol. The inter-rater reliability intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.63, and the intra-rater reliability intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.85 for sonographer 1 and 0.88 for sonographer 2. The smallest detectable changes were 2.47 and 2.63 mm² (25% and 26% of the mean CSA). The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement for sonographers 1 and 2 were -0.13 (-2.56 to 2.29) and -0.38 (-2.93 to 2.18). Based on the fair to good inter-rater reliability, the excellent intra-rater reliability and the clinical applicable intra-rater agreement, ultrasonography seems to be a valuable tool with which to assess the CSA of the ulnar nerve for diagnostic and evaluative purposes.

Diagnostic Cutoff Value for Ultrasonography of the Common Fibular Neuropathy at the Fibular Head

Objective

To establish the diagnostic cutoff value of ultrasonographic measurement for common fibular neuropathy (CFN) at the fibular head (FH).

Methods

Twenty patients with electrodiagnostically diagnosed CFN at the FH and 30 healthy controls were included in the study. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of sciatic nerve at mid-thigh level, common fibular nerve at popliteal fossa (PF), and common fibular (CF) nerve at FH were measured. Additionally, the difference of CF nerve CSA at the FH between symptomatic side and asymptomatic side (ΔSx–Asx), the ratio of CF nerve CSA at FH to at PF (FH/PF), and the ratio of CF nerve CSA at the FH symptomatic side to asymptomatic side (Ratio Sx–Asx) were calculated.

Results

CSA at the FH, FH/PF, ΔSx–Asx, and Ratio Sx–Asx showed significant differences between the patient and control groups. The cutoff value for diagnosing CFN at the FH was 11.7 mm² for the CSA at the FH (sensitivity 85.0%, specificity 90.0%), 1.70 mm² for the ΔSx–Asx (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 97.0%), 1.11 for the FH/PF (sensitivity 47.1%, specificity 93.3%), and 1.24 for the Ratio Sx–Asx (sensitivity 72.2%, specificity 96.7%).

Conclusion

The ultrasonographic measurement and cutoff value could be a valuable reference in diagnosing CFN at the FH and improving diagnostic reliability and efficacy.

A reliable technique for ultrasound-guided perineural injection in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

INTRODUCTION

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is a common peripheral compression neuropathy and, in most cases, occurs at 2 sites, the retroepicondylar groove or the cubital tunnel. With regard to a potential therapeutic approach with perineural corticosteroid injection, the aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of injection fluid applied at a standard site.

METHODS

We performed ultrasound-guided (US-guided) perineural injections to the ulnar nerve halfway between the olecranon and the medial epicondyle in 21 upper limbs from 11 non-embalmed cadavers. In anatomic dissection we investigated the spread of injected ink.

RESULTS

Ink was successfully injected into the perineural sheath of the ulnar nerve in all 21 cases (cubital tunnel: 21 of 21; retroepicondylar groove: 19 of 21).

CONCLUSION

US-guided injection between the olecranon and the medial epicondyle is a feasible and safe method to reach the most common sites of ulnar nerve entrapment. Muscle Nerve 56: 237-241, 2017.

Peripheral nerve imaging

Disorders of peripheral nerve have been traditionally diagnosed and monitored using clinical and electrodiagnostic approaches. The last two decades have seen rapid development of both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound imaging of peripheral nerve, such that these imaging modalities are increasingly invaluable to the diagnosis of patients with peripheral nerve disorders. Peripheral nerve imaging provides information which is supplementary to clinical and electrodiagnostic diagnosis. Both MRI and ultrasound have particular benefits in specific clinical circumstances and can be considered as complementary techniques. These technologic developments in peripheral nerve imaging will usher in an era of multimodality assessment of peripheral nerve disorders, with clinical evaluations supported by anatomic information from imaging, and functional information from electrodiagnostic studies. Such a multimodality approach will improve the accuracy and efficiency of patient care.

Entrapment and traumatic neuropathies of the elbow and hand: An imaging approach

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging currently offer a detailed analysis of the peripheral nerves. Compressive and traumatic nerve injuries are the two main indications for imaging investigation of nerves with several publications describing the indications, technique and diagnostic capabilities of imaging signs. Investigation of entrapment neuropathies has three main goals, which are to confirm neuronal distress, search for the cause of nerve compression and exclude a differential diagnosis on the entire nerve. For traumatic nerve injuries, imaging, predominantly ultrasound, occasionally provides essential information for management including the type of nerve lesion, its exact site and local extension.