Hydrodissection for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Perineural Hydrodissection as a Minimally Invasive Treatment in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Ultrasound-guided perineural hydrodissection (HD) is a novel technique that has been found to be effective in providing mechanical release of perineural adhesions and decompression of the nerve, reducing inflammation and edema and restoring its physiological function. It has a significant impact on chronic neuropathic pain (20 ± 4 weeks with VAS < 5 or VAS diminished by 2 points after the procedure). Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common entrapment mononeuropathy, and its distribution is typically innervated by the median nerve. Patients with mild or moderate CTS may benefit from nonsurgical treatments or conservative therapies. This review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines. Four investigators assessed each title, abstract, and full-text article for eligibility, with disagreements being resolved by consensus with two experienced investigators. The qualitative assessment of the studies was carried out using the modified Oxford quality scoring system, also known as the modified Jadad score. Furthermore, risk of possible biases was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration tool. The results of this review suggest that US-guided HD is an innovative, effective, well-tolerated, and safe technique (11 out of 923 patients had collateral or side effects after the procedure). However, further studies comparing all drugs and with a larger sample population are required to determine the most effective substance.

Local injection therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Objective: Clinical research has shown that local injections for carpal tunnel syndrome reduce the symptoms of patients and enhance their quality of life considerably. However, there are several therapy options, and the optimal choice of regimen remains uncertain. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated the variations in clinical efficacy and safety of several medications for treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: Computer searches of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were used to collect articles of randomized controlled trials on local injections for treating carpal tunnel syndrome from database creation till 10 June 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted information, evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies, and performed network Meta-analysis using Stata 17.0 software. Drug efficacy was assessed using symptom severity/function and pain intensity. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking was used to determine the advantage of each therapy. Results: We included 26 randomized controlled trials with 1896 wrists involving 12 interventions, such as local injections of corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, 5% dextrose, progesterone, and hyaluronidase. The results of the network meta-analysis showed the following: (i) symptom severity: at the 3-month follow-up, D5W combined with splinting (SUCRA = 95%) ranked first, and hyaluronidase (SUCRA = 89.6%) at 6 months; (ii) functional severity: either at the 3-month follow-up (SUCRA = 89.5%) or 6 months (SUCRA = 83.6%), iii) pain intensity: 5% dextrose in water combined with splinting was the most effective at the 3-month (SUCRA = 85%) and 6-month (SUCRA = 87.6%) follow-up. Conclusion: Considering the combination of symptoms/function and pain intensity, combining 5% dextrose in water with splinting is probably the treatment of choice for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. It is more effective than glucocorticoids and no adverse effects have been observed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022370525.

Ultrasound-Guided Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment, and recently, ultrasound-guided perineural injection (UPIT) and percutaneous flexor retinaculum release (UPCTR) have been utilized to treat CTS. However, no systematic review or meta-analysis has included both intervention types of ultrasound-guided interventions for CTS. Therefore, we performed this review using four databases (i.e., PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane) to evaluate the quality of evidence, effectiveness, and safety of the published studies on ultrasound-guided interventions in CTS. Among sixty studies selected for systemic review, 20 randomized treatment comparison or controlled studies were included in six meta-analyses. Steroid UPIT with ultrasound guidance outperformed that with landmark guidance. UPIT with higher-dose steroids outperformed that with lower-dose steroids. UPIT with 5% dextrose in water (D5W) outperformed control injection and hydrodissection with high-volume D5W was superior to that with low-volume D5W. UPIT with platelet-rich plasma outperformed various control treatments. UPCTR outperformed open surgery in terms of symptom improvement but not functional improvement. No serious adverse events were reported in the studies reviewed. The findings suggest that both UPIT and UPCTR may provide clinically important benefits and appear safe. Further treatment comparison studies are required to determine comparative therapeutic efficacy.

Hydrodissection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Hydrodissection is an ultrasound-guided technique that has received more attention recently for its role in nerve entrapment syndromes. The purposes of this systematic review were to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hydrodissection in carpal tunnel syndrome and to investigate the ideal parameters for injectate type, dosage, volume, and frequency; injection approach and technique; as well as operator experience and training required. We searched the Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases with supplemental searches in the CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for relevant randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome measures were adverse outcomes and clinical effectiveness. Six randomized controlled trials involving 356 wrists were included. All studies used ultrasound guidance in their interventions. No safety-related adverse outcomes were found, although not all studies declared this. Only one study was placebo controlled and revealed symptomatic as well as functional improvements at 6 mos, whereas the rest investigated hydrodissection with different injectate types. We concluded that nerve hydrodissection for carpal tunnel syndrome can be safely performed under ultrasound guidance. However, it is unclear whether the hydrodissection mechanism truly causes improvements in clinical outcomes. We were also unable to draw conclusions regarding the ideal procedure-related parameters. We recommend that future work should not only investigate safety and clinical effectiveness but also attempt to clarify the ideal procedure-related parameters.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment and the Subsequent Alterations in Median Nerve Transverse Mobility

OBJECTIVES

The mobility (transverse movement) of the median nerve (MN) is decreased in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and can be measured noninvasively by ultrasound. To date, there are few prognostic features to help predict the outcome of 2 commonly performed treatments: surgical carpal tunnel release and corticosteroid injection. This study aimed to assess the changes in nerve mobility after the intervention and to correlate this with treatment and the disease severity.

METHODS

A total of 181 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome with different electrophysiologic severities were recruited and assessed by dynamic ultrasound scanning of the MN before and after treatment. The dynamic ultrasound images were collected while the patients performed finger and wrist flexion.

RESULTS

For both injection and carpal tunnel release, the nerve displacement increased with wrist flexion, from a mean ± SD of 7.0 ± 2.4 to 7.9 ± 2.7 mm (P < .005). Patients who underwent surgery showed greater improvement (P < .005) in nerve mobility compared to those who underwent injection. We also observed that the increase in nerve mobility was predominantly in patients with more nerve damage at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the dynamic behavior of the MN changes in response to treatment and lays a foundation for future studies to assess the prognostic potential of nerve mobility measurement.

Comparison of short- and long-axis nerve hydrodissection for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective randomized, single-blind trial

Background: This study is to compare the efficacy of short-axis hydrodissection with long-axis hydrodissection for patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: Forty-seven patients with mild-to-moderate CTS were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial (6 months follow-up). With ultrasound guidance, patients in both groups (short-axis or long-axis groups) were injected with normal saline (5 mL per session). Assessments were performed before and 2 weeks after the injection, as well as at 1, 3, and 6 months post-intervention. The primary outcome measure was the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) score and secondary outcomes included the cross-sectional area of the median nerve and electrophysiological studies. Results: Forty-four patients (21 wrists in the short-axis group and 23 wrists in the long-axis group) completed the study. Compared with the baseline, both groups showed improved BCTQ and cross-sectional area at all follow-up assessments (p<0.05). The short-axis group was not more effective except significant improvements in BCTQ-severity and BCTQ-function 1 month post-injection compared to the long-axis group (p = 0.031 and p = 0.023, respectively). Conclusions: Both short- and long-axis hydrodissection were effective for patients with mild-to-moderate CTS and the short-axis approach was not more effective than long-axis injection. Further studies with larger sample sizes, multiple injections, and larger injection volume are encouraged in the future.

Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodissection With Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

Corticosteroid injections can provide (temporary) relief in patients with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Hydrodissection as part of an injection has been associated with positive clinical outcomes but data for CTS so far has been scarce. This study is designed to assess patient tolerance and secondarily provide pilot data on the added effect of hydrodissection.

METHODS

Twenty CTS patients were randomized to an ultrasound-guided betamethasone injection with hydrodissection (5 mL) or without (2 mL). Patient tolerance was assessed directly after intervention and patient-reported outcome after 4 and 24 weeks. Intra-group data were compared using Wilcoxon Signed Rank and inter-group with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

Tolerance and pain scores did not differ between the two groups. Symptom scores decreased in both groups, but to a lesser extent in the hydrodissection group with a mean difference of -0.8 versus -1.5 in the control group at 4 weeks (P = .02). At 6 months, this difference was no longer present (P = .81). No statistically significant differences were found between the hydrodissection and control groups in the function or pain scores at follow-up at either time point.

CONCLUSION

After injection, both symptomatic and functional scores improved, but the hydrodissected group did not show additional improvement. Data presented can be used to support larger studies to assess the value of hydrodissection in CTS management.

Targeted Ultrasound-Guided Perineural Hydrodissection of the Sciatic Nerve for the Treatment of Piriformis Syndrome

Piriformis syndrome is a common cause of lumbar, gluteal, and thigh pain, frequently associated with sciatic nerve symptoms. Potential etiologies include muscle injury or chronic muscle stretching associated with gait disturbances. There is a common pathological end pathway involving hypertrophy, spasm, contracture, inflammation, and scarring of the piriformis muscle, leading to impingement of the sciatic nerve. Ultrasound-guided piriformis injections are frequently used in the treatment of these pain syndromes, with most of the published literature describing injection of the muscle. We describe a safe, effective ultrasound-guided injection technique for the treatment of piriformis syndrome using targeted sciatic perineural hydrodissection followed by therapeutic corticosteroid injection.

Median Nerve Transverse Mobility and Outcome after Carpal Tunnel Release

Nerve movement is decreased in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and can be assessed with ultrasound. In addition to morphologic features, this study describes a novel approach in which nerve movement and the association with short-term patient-reported outcome are assessed. Ultrasound images at the carpal tunnel inlet were acquired during finger and wrist flexion. Linear regression models were used with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire as main outcome. Eighty-five patients were included; 93% completed the 3-mo follow-up. Pre-surgical mean nerve area was 14.5 ± 4.2 mm2 and decreased to 13.3 ± 3.8 mm2 (p < 0.001). Displacement in dorsal direction with wrist flexion increased from 1.9 ± 1.3 to 2.4 ± 1.3 mm (p < 0.01). A pre-surgical larger nerve area was associated with more functional improvement (β = -0.024, p = 0.02), but baseline mobility was not. Change in excursion with finger flexion was associated with symptomatic improvement, but with a small effect (β = -0.05, p = 0.01). This indicates that there is limited prognostic potential for dynamic transverse ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Dexamethasone versus Hyaluronidase as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetics in the Ultrasound-guided Hydrodissection of the Median Nerve for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients

Background:

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common focal entrapment neuropathies. Although the exact etiology remains unclear, high-pressure-related intracarpal tunnel compression of the median nerve (MN), progressing ischemia, and mechanical strangulation are common mechanisms. The therapeutic managements for CTS depend on the disease severity, varying from a conservative treatment to surgical interventions. Conservative treatment is helpful for most of the patients with mild-to-moderate CTS. Hydrodissection is a minimally invasive procedure of injecting solutions into some anatomical spaces to facilitate dissection and adhesiolysis. Steroids as an anti-inflammatory drugs are used to treat chronic pain conditions. Hyaluronidase as an adhesolysis agent can also be used for epidural injections with local anesthetics (LAs) and steroids for control of chronic back pain.

Aim of the Study:

This study was carried out to compare the efficacy of hyaluronidase versus dexamethasone as adjuvants to the mixture of LAs in ultrasound (US)-guided hydrodissection of the median nerve in mild to moderate cases of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Settings and Design:

This study was a prospective randomized controlled double-blinded clinical study.

Methods:

40 patients aged from 20 to 60 years old with clinical, electrophysiologic, and ultrasonographic evidence of mild to moderate CTS were included in this study. Each patient was assessed at the baseline (prior to injection) and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months intervals after injection: (1) The Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) which is a frequently used patient-based questionnaire for measurement of CTS. primary outcome. (2) Median motor and sensory nerve conduction studies (NCS) secondary outcome. (3) Median nerve ultrasonography. The ultrasound examination included measurement of the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at the distal wrist crease (DWC). Also, the median nerve echogenicity, mobility, and vascularity at the DWC were assessed by US. Secondary outcome. All outcome assessments were assessed by single investigator who was blinded to the study details. All patients received US guided hydrodissection of the median nerve at the distal wrist crease. The selected patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups containing 20 patients each according to the study drugs; Group (D) received 5 mL (3 mL plain bupivacaine 0.5% and 2 mL (8 mg) dexamethasone), and Group (H) received 5 mL (3 mL plain bupivacaine 0.5% and 2 mL normal saline containing 300 international units (IU) hyaluronidase. Ultrasound-guided intracarpal injection using ultrasonography (Sono Scape A5; Shinzhen, China) with a 10-18-MHZ linear array transducer was performed by the same physician who was not aware of study groups, the MN was observed at the inlet of the carpal tunnel, 3 ml of solution was injected via the in-plane ulnar approach, to detach the MN from the transverse carpal ligament and an additional 2 ml was injected to separate the MN from underlying flexor tendons. All patients were observed for 30 minutes post injection for possible side effects before discharge. Normally distributed numerical data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and differences between the groups were compared using the independent Student's t-test. Chi-square test was used for categorical data. Intragroup data at different follow up time points were evaluated using paired Student's t-test. All statistical tests were two-tailed, with P < 0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Results:

The demographic data of the patients in both groups were statistically insignificant (P-value >0.05). In the pre-injection time, there were no statistically significant differences between both groups as regards BCTQ (SSS, FSS), electrophysiological studies (SNCV, DML), and sonographic data (CSA, echogenicity score, mobility score, and vascularity score). The comparison between both groups showed that measured parameters as regards BCTQ (SSS, FSS), electrophysiological studies (SNCV, DML), and sonographic data (CSA, echogenicity score, mobility score, and vascularity score) were significantly improved in group H compared with group D in the follow up periods at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-injection (P-value <0.05). The comparison within each group showed that in group D, the measured parameters; BCTQ (SSS, FSS), electrophysiological studies (SNCV, DML), and sonographic data (CSA, echogenicity score, mobility score, and vascularity score) were statistically significantly improved at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months follow up post-injection times but they were not significantly improved at 6 months post-injection time compared with the pre-injection data (P-value >0.05). While in group H, these measured parameters were statistically significantly improved in the all follow up post-injection times; at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and even at 6 months periods compared with the baseline pre-injection data (P-value < 0.05).

Conclusion:

In this study, it was concluded that MN hydrodissction using hyaluronidase (as an adhesolysis agent) significantly improved patients with mild to moderate CTS compared to steroid (as an anti-inflammatory agents) hydrodissection of MN as regards BCTQ (SSS, FSS), electrophysiological studies (SNCV, DML), and sonographic data (CSA, echogenicity score, mobility score, and vascularity score) not only at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months follow up post-injection times but these parameters were also significantly improved at 6 months post-injection time in bupivacaine- hyaluronidase hydrodissection group compared to bupivacaine-steroid hydrodissection group.

Nerve hydrodissection for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

In this study we explored the efficacy of nerve hydrodissection for mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

METHODS

Thirty-four participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. One 5-ml dose of normal saline was injected into the intracarpal and subcutaneous regions in subjects of both groups, respectively. The primary outcome measure was the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) score. Secondary outcomes were cross-sectional area of the median nerve and electrophysiological studies. Assessments were performed before the injection and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postintervention.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvement at the second and third posttreatment months according to BCTQ severity score and at all time-points for cross-sectional area of the median nerve (P < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates the therapeutic effects of nerve hydrodissection for mild-to-moderate CTS. Muscle Nerve 59:174-180, 2019.