Is triceps hypertrophy associated with ulnar nerve luxation?

Cubital tunnel syndrome: anatomy, pathology, and imaging

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common peripheral neuropathy in the upper limb. It occurs due to ulnar nerve compression within the fibro-osseous cubital tunnel at the elbow joint. Although CuTS is typically diagnosed clinically and with electrodiagnostic studies, the importance of imaging in evaluating the condition is growing. Knowing the typical imaging findings of ulnar nerve entrapment is necessary for precise diagnosis and proper treatment. In this article, we focus on the clinical features, workup and complex imaging of the "anatomic" cubital tunnel and relevant pathological entities.

Prevalence of bilateral ulnar nerve subluxation among professional baseball pitchers

BACKGROUND

Radiographic and physical examination findings of ulnar nerve instability have been recognized in overhead throwing athletes, despite the fact that some of these abnormalities may be asymptomatic and represent adaptive changes. While recommendations for screening and early detection have been made that can adversely impact an athletes' career, the presence of bilateral ulnar nerve subluxation and its relationship with medial elbow symptoms has not been characterized in professional overhead throwing athletes.

PURPOSE

To characterize the prevalence of bilateral ulnar nerve subluxation among professional baseball pitchers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational analysis was conducted utilizing standardized ultrasonographic examinations of bilateral elbows in 91 consecutive professional baseball pitchers (median age, 22 years; range, 17-30 years). The relationship between ulnar nerve subluxation and ulnar nerve signs, symptoms, and provocative physical examination maneuvers was also investigated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of bilateral ulnar nerve subluxation was 26.4% (95% CI, 17.7%-36.7%; 24 of the 91 athletes). Thirty-five athletes (38.5%; 95% CI, 28.4%-49.2%) had subluxation in at least 1 elbow. No athletes with subluxation had positive ulnar nerve signs, symptoms, or provocative tests.

CONCLUSION

Ulnar nerve subluxation is common among professional pitchers, and is more often than not bilateral. In this population of athletes, ulnar nerve subluxation does not appear to be associated with pathological findings.

Physical Examination Versus Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers

Background

Despite the importance of accurately detecting ulnar nerve subluxation in vulnerable athletes, few studies have compared the performance of physical examination and ultrasound in this population.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic validity of physical examination versus ultrasound in detecting ulnar nerve subluxation at the cubital tunnel of the elbow in professional baseball pitchers. It was hypothesized that ultrasound would more sensitively detect ulnar nerve subluxation.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

Physical and sonographic examinations for ulnar nerve subluxation were performed on 186 elbows of 95 consecutive male professional baseball pitchers (age, 17-30 years) as a routine part of their spring training assessments. Provocative maneuvers consisting of the Tinel and elbow flexion-compression tests were evaluated over the cubital tunnel. The validity of physical examination for detecting ulnar nerve subluxation at the elbow was determined using ultrasonographic examination for comparison.

Results

Ulnar nerve subluxation was detected by physical examination in 58 (31.2%) elbows and by ultrasonography in 61 (32.8%) elbows. Of the 58 elbows with positive physical examination, 47 were positive on ultrasound. Using a positive ultrasound as a reference, the accuracy of the physical examination was 86.6%, with 77% sensitivity and 91.2% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values of physical examination were 81% and 89.1%, respectively. There was no relationship between nerve instability and positive provocative tests overall, in dominant versus nondominant arms, or in right versus left arms (P > .05 for all).

Conclusion

Physical examination had moderate sensitivity and high specificity for detecting ulnar nerve subluxation at the cubital tunnel of the elbow when compared with ultrasound. These findings suggest that when detecting the presence of a subluxating ulnar nerve is most important, it may be advisable to obtain an ultrasound evaluation instead of relying on a physical examination; however, physical examination alone may be appropriate for ruling out subluxation.

Hearing and Seeing Nerve/Tendon Snapping: A Systematic Review on Dynamic Ultrasound Examination

Nerve/tendon snapping can occur due to their sudden displacement during the movement of an adjacent joint, and the clinical condition can really be painful. It can actually be challenging to determine the specific anatomic structure causing the snapping in various body regions. In this sense, ultrasound examination, with all its advantages (especially providing dynamic imaging), appears to be quite promising. To date, there are no comprehensive reviews reporting on the use of dynamic ultrasound examination in the diagnosis of nerve/tendon snapping. Accordingly, this article aims to provide a substantial discussion as to how US examination would contribute to 'seeing' and 'hearing' these pathologies' different maneuvers/movements.

Possible Points of Ulnar Nerve Entrapment in the Arm and Forearm: An Ultrasound, Anatomical, and Histological Study

Background: Ulnar nerve entrapment is one of the most common entrapment neuropathies, usually occurring in the cubital tunnel of the elbow and in Guyon’s canal of the wrist. However, it can also occur at other anatomical locations. Purpose: Our aim was to review other possible locations of ulnar nerve entrapment in an ultrasound and anatomical study. Material and Methods: Eleven upper limbs from eight adult corpses were ultrasonographically examined and subsequently dissected in a dissection laboratory. Four specific anatomical points were analysed, and any anatomical variations were documented. Moreover, six samples of the nerve were taken for histological analysis. Results: Distinct anatomical relationships were observed during ultrasound and dissection between the ulnar nerve and the medial intermuscular septum, the triceps aponeurosis, Osborne’s fascia at the elbow, the arcuate ligament of Osborne and the intermuscular aponeurosis between the flexor carpi ulnaris and the flexor digitorum superficialis muscles. A statistical study showed that these locations are potential areas for ulnar nerve compression. In addition, a fourth head of the triceps brachii muscle was found in some specimens. Conclusion: Results demonstrate that ultrasound is a good tool to investigate ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy and to identify other anatomical points where the nerve can remain compressed.

Mass effect of the distal triceps brachii muscle on ulnar nerve movement during elbow flexion

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Hypertrophic triceps brachii contributes to ulnar nerve movement, but the location of the mass effect of the triceps brachii muscle is not known This study aimed to investigate mass effect of distal medial head of the triceps brachii (DMTB) muscle on ulnar nerve movement.

METHODS

In 48 arms, the movement of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle and muscle thickness (the medial and long head of the triceps brachii [MLTB], medial head of the triceps brachii [MTB], DMTB, and the biceps brachii [BB]) were measured using ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Ulnar nerve movement at the elbow was consistently correlated with the DMTB muscle thickness (horizontal ulnar nerve movement at the elbow [HM]/vertical ulnar nerve movement at the elbow [VM] with 90-degree elbow flexion: r=0.668/r=0.313, HM/VM with full elbow flexion: r=0.481/r=0.391). With multiple linear regression, the DMTB was the most important muscle with regard to the contribution of thickness to ulnar nerve movement. Individuals with partial and complete dislocation showed a thicker DMTB than those without dislocation.

DISCUSSION

Our data suggest that the mass effect of the triceps brachii muscle is exerted primarily by its distal portion. When ulnar nerve dislocation is observed, thickness and anatomical variation of DMTB in the retrocondylar area during elbow flexion should be assessed.

The ultrasonographic assessment of the morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel in Japanese volunteers: relationship between dynamic ulnar nerve instability and clinical symptoms

Background

We investigated the differences in the prevalence of ulnar nerve instability (UNI) by hand dominance and evaluated the relationship between UNI and morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve and the clinical findings and upper limb function.

Methods

This study examined 153 healthy participants (n = 306 elbows; 44 men, 112 women; mean age 65.4 years) who underwent ultrasonography to assess the ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (UNCSA) at three points of the bilateral cubital tunnel at 30° of elbow flexion. Participants were divided into three groups based on the ultrasonography findings of UNI: no instability (type N), subluxation (type S), and dislocation (type D). For the dominant and nondominant sides, we assessed the relationship between the UNCSA and clinical factors, including the age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, fat mass, grip strength, key pinch strength, UNCSA, and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation score.

Results

We identified 75 cases without instability in both elbows and 78 cases with some instability. The prevalence of UNI was 51%. No significant difference was found between hand dominance and the prevalence of UNI. The UNCSA at 1 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle on the bilateral sides in type S was the most increased among three types.

Conclusion

UNI was identified in almost half of the participants, with no marked difference found in the hand dominance. The UNCSA at 1 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle was significantly increased the most in type S. UNI does not appear to be associated with elbow symptoms in the general population.

Ulnar Nerve Dislocation and Subluxation from the Cubital Tunnel Are Common in College Athletes

Background: Hypermobility of the ulnar nerve from the cubital tunnel reportedly occurs in healthy people without symptoms of ulnar neuropathy. However, the occurrence rate in athletes is unknown. We examined the occurrence rate of ulnar nerve hypermobility using ultrasonography, symptoms, and physical findings in athletes and compared the results of four types of sports. Methods: Medical charts of college athletes competing in baseball, rugby, soccer, and long-distance running between March and November 2018 were retrospectively examined. Dynamic evaluation of the ulnar nerve was performed using ultrasonography and categorized as Types N, S, and D respectively, indicating normal position, subluxation, and dislocation. Subjective and objective findings were evaluated. Results: The present study included 246 male athletes (mean age, 19.7 years; 492 elbows) including 46% Type D, 29.8% Type S, and 24.2% Type N. Subjective findings showed pain and dysesthesia in 9% and 4.5% of participants, respectively, whereas objective findings showed Tinel sign in 6%, nerve tension test in 1.3%, Froment’s sign in 0.5%, and weakness of strength of opponens digiti minimi muscle in 8% of patients with Types D and S. Conclusions: There was a high-frequency hypermobility of the ulnar nerve from the cubital tunnel with or without subjective and objective findings in college athletes.

Ultrasonographic prevalence of ulnar nerve displacement at the elbow in young baseball players

BACKGROUND

Overhead-throwing athletes are at risk of elbow injury because of valgus stress, leading to unstable ulnar nerves and neuropathy. Studies regarding ulnar nerve damage/displacement have been performed primarily in adults.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and related factors associated with ulnar nerve displacement at the elbow in young baseball players.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Youth baseball players ages 10-12 years were eligible to participate. Exclusion criteria were history of neuropathic pain, trauma, or prior surgery of the upper limb. Fifty-seven participants were eligible for inclusion in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Demographic data and ultrasonography findings of ulnar nerve dynamics at the cubital tunnel were analyzed in a total of 114 elbows. Elbows were grouped into nondislocation and displacement (subluxation or dislocation) groups according to ultrasound findings. Logistic generalized estimating equations were used to identify factors associated with ulnar nerve displacement.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (31.6%) elbows demonstrated sonographic findings of ulnar nerve displacement, with 13 (11.4%) subluxations and 23 (20.2%) dislocations. Fourteen (24.6%) participants experienced nerve displacement in the dominant elbow only, whereas nerve displacement in both elbows occurred in 11 (19.3%) participants. Nerve displacement in the nondominant elbow only was not observed. Hand dominance and tenderness of the arcade of Struthers' were factors associated with ulnar nerve displacement (odds ratio, 2.81, and 9.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-5.91 and 2.45-38.68; p = .006 and .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

One-third of the young baseball players evaluated had ultrasonographic findings compatible with ulnar nerve displacement at the elbow. Hand dominance and tenderness of Struthers arcade were the only factors associated with ulnar nerve displacement. Ultrasound may help identify patients with ulnar nerve displacement and contribute to the understanding of its pathophysiology in young baseball players.

Is There an Association Between Ulnar Nerve Hypermobility and Neuropathy at the Elbow?

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the association between ulnar nerve hypermobility (UNH) at the elbow and ulnar neuropathy (UNE).

DATA SOURCES

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for English language studies published up to July 4, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

We included case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled studies that established the presence or absence of UNH and UNE. Twenty out of 654 studies identified met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted data for analysis. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We compared rates of UNH between patients diagnosed with and without UNE and found no significant difference. The meta-analysis pooled rate of UNH was 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.57) for those without UNE and 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.45) for those with UNE.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical finding of UNH is unhelpful when assessing for UNE, as the presence of UNH does not make the diagnosis of UNE more likely.

Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: 2020 SARCUS update

PURPOSE

In 2018, the SARCUS working group published a first article on the standardization of the use of ultrasound to assess muscle. Recommendations were made for patient positioning, system settings and components to be measured. Also, shortcomings in knowledge were mentioned. An important issue that still required standardization was the definition of anatomical landmarks for many muscles.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Sciences looking for all articles describing the use of ultrasound in the assessment of muscle not described in the first recommendations, published from 01/01/2018 until 31/01/2020. All relevant terms used for older people, ultrasound and muscles were used.

RESULTS

For 39 muscles, different approaches for ultrasound assessment were found that likely impact the values measured. Standardized anatomical landmarks and measuring points were proposed for all muscles/muscle groups. Besides the five already known muscle parameters (muscle thickness, cross-section area, pennation angle, fascicle length and echo-intensity), four new parameters are discussed (muscle volume, stiffness, contraction potential and microcirculation). The former SARCUS article recommendations are updated with this new information that includes new muscle groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The emerging field of ultrasound assessment of muscle mass only highlights the need for a standardization of measurement technique. In this article, guidelines are updated and broadened to provide standardization instructions for a large number of muscles.

Ulnar nerve instability in the cubital tunnel of asymptomatic volunteers

PURPOSE

Ulnar nerve instability (UNI) in the cubital tunnel is defined as ulnar nerve subluxation or dislocation. It is a common disorder that may be noted in patients with neuropathy or in the asymptomatic. Our prospective, single-site study utilized high-resolution ultrasonography (US) to evaluate the ulnar nerve for cross-sectional area (CSA) and measures of shear-wave elastography (SWE). Mechanical algometry was obtained from the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel to assess pressure pain threshold (PPT).

METHODS

Forty-two asymptomatic subjects (n = 84 elbows) (25 males, 17 females) aged 22-40 were evaluated. Two chiropractic radiologists, both with 4 years of ultrasound experience performed the evaluation. Ulnar nerves in the cubital tunnel were sampled bilaterally in three different elbow positions utilizing US, SWE, and algometry. Descriptive statistics, two-way ANOVA, and rater reliability were utilized for data analysis with p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Fifty-six percent of our subjects demonstrated UNI. There was a significant increase in CSA in subjects with UNI (subluxation: 0.066 mm² ± 0.024, p = 0.027; dislocation: 0.067 mm² ± 0.024, p = 0.003) compared to controls (0.057 mm² ± 0.017) in all three elbow positions. There were no significant group differences in SWE or algometry. Inter- and intra-observer agreements for CSA of the ulnar nerves within the cubital tunnel were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and demonstrated moderate (ICC 0.54) and excellent (ICC 0.94) reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the asymptomatic volunteers demonstrated UNI. There was a significant increase in CSA associated with UNI implicating it as a risk factor for ulnar neuropathy in the cubital tunnel. There were no significant changes in ulnar nerve SWE and PPT. Intra-rater agreement was excellent for the CSA assessment of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. High-resolution US could be utilized to assess UNI and monitor for progression to ulnar neuropathy.