Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the chinese version of the 15-item myasthenia gravis quality of life questionnaire

Reduced quality of life in myasthenia gravis patients: A study on 185 patients from China

Aims

To explore the quality of life (QOL) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and factors associated with QOL.

Methods

This observational study included patients with MG diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University between January 2020 and March 2022. The QOL of patients was evaluated with the 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QOL15). Current MG severity was evaluated with MGFA grade, MG-ADL score, MGC score, and MGFA Postintervention Status. The data about gender, age of onset, subgroup, antibodies, age, duration, education, employment state, marital status, skeletal muscle affected, thymic histology, and current treatment methods of the patient were collected.

Results

A total of 185 patients [72 males (38.9%), aged 45.2 years (14-77)] with MG were enrolled. Age at onset was 38.3 ± 17.9 years, and disease duration was 87.9 months (0-672). The median MG-QOL15 score was 12.5 (0-58). The item "have trouble using my eyes" was the highest scoring item in both ocular and generalized patients with MG. The MG-QOL15 score was significantly different among patients with OMG (9.2 ± 9.4, n = 63), GMG (9.0 ± 8.8, n = 22), and BMG (15.4 ± 14.2, n = 100) (P = 0.018). Patients with BMG had higher MG-QOL15 scores than OMG (P = 0.001) and GMG (P = 0.009), but there was no significant difference between OMG and GMG (P = 0.467). The MG-QOL15 score was significantly lower in patients who had undergone thymectomy (9.7 ± 9.8, n = 58) compared to those who had not (13.8 ± 13.4, n = 127, P = 0.022). MG-QOL15 score was significantly lower in patients who underwent thymectomy compared to those who did not (9.7 ± 9.8, n = 58 vs. 13.8 ± 13.4, n = 127, P = 0.022). MG-QOL15 score was different among MGFA grades (Remission: 5.2 ± 5.4, n = 41; I: 11.3 ± 10, n = 61; II: 11.6 ± 11.1, n = 40; III: 18.1 ± 12.1, n = 29; and IVa: 30.1 ± 20, n = 14, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients in MGFA grade I and II (P = 0.896), and there was no significant difference between patients in MGFA grade III and IVa (P = 0.052). MG-ADL (P < 0.001) and MGC (P < 0.001) were positively correlated with MG-QOL15. Men had higher MG-QOL15 than women (P = 0.094), and LOMG had higher MG-QOL15 than EOMG (P = 0.072). Multivariate linear regression identified that higher MG-ADL (P < 0.001), higher MGC (P = 0.02), and poor employment status (P = 0.045) were independently associated with higher MG-QOL15.

Conclusion

Having trouble using the eyes accounted for the highest score in MG-QOL15, eye symptoms affect QOL more than limb weakness in MG. Daily life activity, disease severity, and employment status were associated with patients' QOL. Adequate treatment should be applied to improve QOL, while mild symptoms can be accepted. Men and patients over the age of 50 years of onset may need more attention.

Studying the relationship between clinical features and mental health among late-onset myasthenia gravis patients

BACKGROUND

Mental disorders are common comorbidities among individuals with neurological diseases, and the prevalence of depressive and anxiety-related symptoms in newly referred patients at neurology outpatient clinics is high. There have been few studies on the mental health of patients with late-onset myasthenia gravis (MG).

AIM

To examine the relationship between clinical features and the mental health symptoms within late-onset MG patients.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients diagnosed with MG were recruited consecutively from a neuromuscular outpatient clinic between December 2020 and February 2021. Patients were classified into two groups: early-onset MG (age at onset < 50 years, n = 63) and late-onset MG (age at onset ≥ 50 years, n = 42). Social demographic data and information about marital status, education level, clinical symptoms, serum antibody levels, and therapies used were collected for all participants. Participants were also evaluated using the Myasthenia Gravis Composite scale, the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scale, the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15 (MG-QOL-15) questionnaire, the 17-item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). The relationship between clinical features and mental health in late-onset MG patients was examined using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Late-onset MG patients were more prone to dyspnea, had higher levels of serum anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, and higher total scores on the MG-QOL-15, HAM-D, and HAM-A questionnaires, than early-onset MG patients had (P < 0.05). Among those with late-onset MG, female patients had higher total HAM-D and HAM-A scores than male patients had (P < 0.05). High scores on the QOL-15 questionnaire were associated with higher incidences of anxiety and depression, and the association was found to be independent after adjusting for confounding risk factors. In the late-onset subgroup, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the MG-QOL-15 score-based diagnostic accuracy for anxiety and depression state were 0.816 (P = 0.001) and 0.983 (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Higher MG-QOL-15 scores were a risk factor for anxiety and depression in late-onset MG, and women with late-onset MG were more likely to have anxiety and depression than men were.

Utilization of MG-ADL in myasthenia gravis clinical research and care

The Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Living (MG‐ADL) scale is an 8‐item patient‐reported scale that measures myasthenia gravis (MG) symptoms and functional status. The objective of the current review is to summarize the psychometric properties of the MG‐ADL and published evidence of MG‐ADL use. A targeted literature review for published studies of the MG‐ADL was conducted using a database and gray literature search. A total of 48 publications and 35 clinical trials were included. Studies indicated that the MG‐ADL is a reliable and valid measure that has been used as an outcome in clinical trials and observational studies to measure MG symptoms and response to treatment. While most often used as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials, its use as a primary endpoint has increased in recent years. The most common MG‐ADL endpoint is change in MG‐ADL score from baseline, although there has been an increase in the analysis of a responder threshold using the MG‐ADL. A new concept of minimal symptom expression (MSE) has emerged more recently. Duration of treatment effect is another important construct that is being increasingly evaluated using the MG‐ADL. The use of the MG‐ADL as a primary endpoint in clinical trials and in responder threshold analyses to indicate treatment improvement has increased in recent years. MSE using the MG‐ADL shows promise in helping to determine success of treatment and may be the aspirational goal of MG treatment for the future once validated, particularly given the evolving treatment landscape in MG.