Optimal E2 (reference) electrode placement in fibular motor nerve conduction studies recording from the tibialis anterior muscle

Revisiting the compound muscle action potential (CMAP)

The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) is among the first recorded waveforms in clinical neurography and one of the most common in clinical use. It is derived from the summated muscle fiber action potentials recorded from a surface electrode overlying the studied muscle following stimulation of the relevant motor nerve fibres innervating the muscle. Surface recorded motor unit potentials (SMUPs) are the fundamental units comprising the CMAP. Because it is considered a basic, if not banal signal, what it represents is often underappreciated. In this review we discuss current concepts in the anatomy and physiology of the CMAP. These have evolved with advances in instrumentation and digitization of signals, affecting its quantitation and measurement. It is important to understand the basic technical and biological factors influencing the CMAP. If these influences are not recognized, then a suboptimal recording may result. The object is to obtain a high quality CMAP recording that is reproducible, whether the study is done for clinical or research purposes. The initial sections cover the relevant CMAP anatomy and physiology, followed by how these principles are applied to CMAP changes in neuromuscular disorders. The concluding section is a brief overview of CMAP research where advances in recording systems and computer-based analysis programs have opened new research applications. One such example is motor unit number estimation (MUNE) that is now being used as a surrogate marker in monitoring chronic neurogenic processes such as motor neuron diseases.

Recovery of foot drop in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Foot drop is common in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), but its prognosis is uncertain.

METHODS

CIDP patients with less than anti-gravity strength (<3/5 power) of ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) on Medical Research Council manual muscle testing on presentation at our center were identified by retrospective review. After initiation of standard treatment, ADF power was serially tabulated, and predictors of recovery were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 27 identified patients, ADF power at presentation was <3/5 in 48/54 legs. At 1 y after treatment, ADF power improved to >/= 3/5 in 17/27 patients in one (N = 6) or both (N = 11) legs. On multi-variate analysis, predictors of recovery of ADF power were tibialis anterior compound muscle action potential amplitude at presentation, shorter disease duration, and female gender.

DISCUSSION

Foot drop improves to anti-gravity power in most treated CIDP patients depending in part on the severity of fibular motor axon loss at onset of treatment.

Proximal fibular nerve conduction studies to tibialis anterior: Optimal E2 (reference electrode) placement

BACKGROUND

Several E2 (reference electrode) positions are described for fibular (peroneal) nerve conduction studies to tibialis anterior (TA).

METHODS

This study compared the contribution of different E2 sites to the TA motor response, using remote referential recordings and different bipolar montages.

RESULTS

The medial knee contributes minimal electrical activity to the bipolar TA recordings, whereas tibial, ankle, and toe references resulted in very similar, moderate amplitude contributions consistent with far field potentials. These observations were very similar in controls and in patients with lower leg symptoms and signs.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard montages using distal leg or foot E2 sites result in lower amplitudes with distortion arising from the E2 electrode, compared with the TA-Knee montage. Optimal measurement of the TA motor response is achieved using a medial knee reference, without compromising measures of fibular nerve conduction across the knee.

Influence of reference electrode position on the compound muscle action potential

OBJECTIVE

When the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) is recorded in motor nerve conduction studies, the reference (E2) electrode can make a significant contribution to the CMAP. This study investigates the E2 recorded signal and its effect on CMAP measurements when E2 electrode is placed at different sites.

METHODS

The CMAP was recorded using the active electrode on the muscle belly and 4 different E2 electrodes placed at distal and proximal sites. The signal recorded by each electrode was also measured using a reference electrode on the contralateral limb. Signals were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, tibialis anterior and biceps muscles.

RESULTS

The E2 recorded a smaller signal when it was placed near or off the proximal tendon or muscle origin. This affected CMAP latency, duration for tibialis anterior. Contrary to expectation, initial upward deflection was noted for E2 signal.

CONCLUSION

A proximal E2 position records a lower volume conducted signal and yields a CMAP that is more representative of the muscle over which the E1 (active) electrode is placed.

SIGNIFICANCE

The proposed 'Proximal E2' montage may be better suited to assess pathology.