The myotonic dystrophy health index: Japanese adaption and validity testing

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy Health Index: Japanese translation and validation study

PURPOSE

The Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Health Index (FSHD-HI) is a patient-reported outcome measure developed for patients with FSHD. This study aimed to translate the FSHD-HI into Japanese (FSHD-HI-J), evaluate cultural adaptation, and examine its psychometric properties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We created two forward translations, integrated them into a single Japanese version, and evaluated the back-translated version of the FSHD-HI. After finalizing the translation and cultural adaptation, we conducted a survey of 66 patients with FSHD to examine the reliability and validity of the FSHD-HI-J. For psychometric evaluations, we used Cronbach's alpha to assess internal consistency, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability, and assessed validity based on the associations between FSHD-HI-J, clinical variables, and quality of life measures.

RESULTS

The FSHD-HI-J was found to be clinically relevant, indicating high internal consistency and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92 [95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.95] for the total score), as well as significant associations with clinical variables (D4Z4 repeats and functional impairment) and other quality of life measures (|rho| = 0.25-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

The FSHD-HI-J is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure for Japanese patients with FSHD. This validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome is essential for future clinical practice and clinical trials.

Quality of instruments assessing activity and participation of people with muscular dystrophy: A systematic review of participant-reported outcome measures

AIM

To identify the standardized assessment scales for people with muscular dystrophy and investigate the quality/level of evidence of their measurement properties.

METHOD

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures was conducted on the MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, DiTA, and PsycINFO databases in August 2020. We included psychometric studies that investigated the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of instruments assessing activity and participation for muscular dystrophy of any type (Duchenne, Becker, limb-girdle, facioscapulohumeral, congenital, and myotonic) or age. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the instruments' quality and level of evidence following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.

RESULTS

The searches identified 6675 references; a total of 46 studies with 28 condition-specific or general instruments were included. The measurement properties of most instruments had sufficient (68.8%) or indeterminate (25.7%) results according to COSMIN. The quality of evidence of the measurement properties was moderate (23.8%) or low (22.6%) according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).

INTERPRETATION

There is a lack of high-quality instruments whose psychometric properties are adequately measured. The highest quality instrument is the Muscular Dystrophy Functional Rating Scale. The Motor Function Measure (general instrument), Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Upper-limb Patient-reported Outcome Measure, North Star Ambulatory Assessment, and Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Activity and Participation Scale for Clinical Use (specific) are also recommended.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

There are 28 available instruments for activity and participation of people with muscular dystrophy. The evidence quality is moderate or low because of imprecision and indirectness. The Muscular Dystrophy Functional Rating Scale is the highest quality instrument. The Motor Function Measure is the second most recommended instrument. The Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Upper-limb Patient-reported Outcome Measure, North Star Ambulatory Assessment, and Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Activity and Participation Scale for Clinical Use are also recommended.

The Huntington's Disease Health Index: Initial Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure

BACKGROUND

When developed properly, disease-specific patient reported outcome measures have the potential to measure relevant changes in how a patient feels and functions in the context of a therapeutic trial. The Huntington's Disease Health Index (HD-HI) is a multifaceted disease-specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM) designed specifically to satisfy previously published FDA guidance for developing PROMs for product development and labeling claims.

OBJECTIVE

In preparation for clinical trials, we examine the validity, reliability, clinical relevance, and patient understanding of the Huntington's Disease Health Index (HD-HI).

METHODS

We partnered with 389 people with Huntington's disease (HD) and caregivers to identify the most relevant questions for the HD-HI. We subsequently utilized two rounds of factor analysis, cognitive interviews with fifteen individuals with HD, and test-retest reliability assessments with 25 individuals with HD to refine, evaluate, and optimize the HD-HI. Lastly, we determined the capability of the HD-HI to differentiate between groups of HD participants with high versus low total functional capacity score, prodromal versus manifest HD, and normal ambulation versus mobility impairment.

RESULTS

HD participants identified 13 relevant and unique symptomatic domains to be included as subscales in the HD-HI. All HD-HI subscales had a high level of internal consistency and reliability and were found by participants to have acceptable content, relevance, and usability. The total HD-HI score and each subscale score statistically differentiated between groups of HD participants with high versus low disease burden.

CONCLUSION

Initial evaluation of the HD-HI supports its validity and reliability as a PROM for assessing how individuals with HD feel and function.

Quality of life and subjective symptom impact in Japanese patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

BACKGROUND

Although functional impairment in patients with myotonic dystrophy is an important determinant of the quality of life (QoL), patients' subjective evaluation of their symptoms may also affect their QoL. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between subjective symptom impact and the QoL of patients with myotonic dystrophy, after controlling for functional impairment.

METHODS

Eligible patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) were recruited from four hospitals in Japan. The subjective symptom impact of four symptoms (muscle weakness, fatigue, pain, and myotonia) and overall QoL were evaluated using the Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life (INQoL) questionnaire. Functional impairment was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients with DM1 were included in this study. Overall QoL was significantly associated with subjective symptom impact of muscular weakness, fatigue, pain, myotonia, swallowing difficulty, and droopy eyelids. In the regression models, disease duration (beta = 0.11) and moderate to severe functional impairment (beta = 0.33) explained a significant part of the overall QoL. Furthermore, muscular weakness, fatigue, and myotonia significantly explained additional variance of the overall QoL (beta = 0.17-0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective symptom impact and functional impairment are independent features influencing the QoL of Japanese patients with DM1.