Onion-bulb patterns predict acquired or inherited demyelinating polyneuropathy

Conduction slowing, conduction block and temporal dispersion in demyelinating, dysmyelinating and axonal neuropathies: Electrophysiology meets pathology

Nerve conduction studies are usually the first diagnostic step in peripheral nerve disorders and their results are the basis for planning further investigations. However, there are some commonplaces in the interpretation of electrodiagnostic findings in peripheral neuropathies that, although useful in the everyday practice, may be misleading: (1) conduction block and abnormal temporal dispersion are distinctive features of acquired demyelinating disorders; (2) hereditary neuropathies are characterized by uniform slowing of conduction velocity; (3) axonal neuropathies are simply diagnosed by reduced amplitude of motor and sensory nerve action potentials with normal or slightly slow conduction velocity. In this review, we reappraise the occurrence of uniform and non-uniform conduction velocity slowing, conduction block and temporal dispersion in demyelinating, dysmyelinating and axonal neuropathies attempting, with a translational approach, a correlation between electrophysiological and pathological features as derived from sensory nerve biopsy in patients and animal models. Additionally, we provide some hints to navigate in this complex field.

The role of electrodiagnosis in focal neuropathies

Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing plays an important role in confirming a mononeuropathy, localizing the site of nerve injury, defining the pathophysiology, and assessing the severity and prognosis. The combination of nerve conduction studies (NCS) and needle electromyography findings provides the necessary information to fully assess a nerve. The pattern of NCS abnormalities reflects the underlying pathophysiology, with focal slowing or conduction block in neuropraxic injuries and reduced amplitudes in axonotmetic injuries. Needle electromyography findings, including spontaneous activity and voluntary motor unit potential changes, complement the NCS findings and further characterize chronicity and degree of axon loss and reinnervation. EDX is used as an objective marker to follow the progression of a mononeuropathy over time.

The diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of MR neurography in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). We also compared various MRN parameters and determined the best performing one.

METHODS

Through literature searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid MEDLINE and ClinicalTtrials.gov until March 1, 2023, we selected studies with the diagnostic performance of MRN in CIDP patients. The pooled estimated sensitivity and specificity of quantitative MRN parameters were determined by a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the proper quantitative parameters and nerve sites.

RESULTS

A total of 14 quantitative MRN studies with 23 results gave a pooled sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.92). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95%CI 0.86-0.92). Subgroup analysis of quantitative parameters showed the fractional anisotropy (FA) with the highest sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.90) and cross-sectional area (CSA) with the highest specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.85-0.99). The pooled correlation coefficient for interobserver agreements was 0.90 (95%CI 0.82-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative MRN has considerable diagnostic value in CIDP patients with accuracy and reliability. FA and CSA can be promising parameters in the future diagnosis of CIDP patients.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first meta-analysis of quantitative MRN in the diagnosis of CIDP.We have selected reliable parameters with cut-off value and provided new insights for subsequent diagnosis of CIDP.

Candidate imaging biomarkers for PMP22-related inherited neuropathies

OBJECTIVE

Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (HNPP) are caused by mutations to the peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) gene. A need exists for sensitive and reliable biomarkers of progression and treatment response. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics of nerve pathology and morphology were investigated for this purpose.

METHODS

MRI was performed at 3.0 T in the thigh of CMT1A (N = 11) and HNPP patients (N = 12) and controls (N = 23). Three potential imaging biomarkers of the sciatic nerve were investigated: 1) magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), which assays myelin content, and 2) cross-sectional area (CSA) and 3) circularity, which assay morphological changes. Potential imaging biomarkers were compared across cohorts and assessed for relationships with disability in the legs (CMTESL ), compound motor action potentials (CMAP), and motor conduction velocities (MCV). Inter-rater reliability and test-retest repeatability were established for each imaging metric.

RESULTS

Significant differences in MTR, CSA, and circularity were observed in CMT1A relative to controls (p = 0.02, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively, via Wilcoxon rank-sum tests). Differences were not observed in the HNPP cohort. Significant relationships were observed between MTR and clinical metrics (CMTESL : p = 0.003, CMAP: p = 0.03, MCV: p = 0.01); and between CSA and electrophysiology (CMAP: p = 0.002, MCV: p < 0.001). All metrics were reliable and repeatable with MTR the most reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >0.999, CV = 0.30%) and repeatable (ICC = 0.84, CV = 3.16%).

INTERPRETATION

MTR, CSA, and circularity showed promise as reliable and sensitive biomarkers of CMT1A, but not HNPP. These warrant longitudinal investigation as response biomarkers in upcoming clinical trials of CMT1A, while other methods should be considered for HNPP.

Usefulness and prognostic value of diagnostic tests in patients with possible chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Recent guidelines define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and possible CIDP. The aims of our study were to evaluate the value of diagnostic tests to support the diagnosis of CIDP in patients with possible CIDP and to identify prognostic factors of therapeutic success.

METHODS

We conducted an observational retrospective two-center study between 2014 and 2019. We selected patients with a clinical presentation suggesting CIDP, but whose electrodiagnostic (EDX) test results did not meet the EFNS/PNS 2021 criteria. We analyzed epidemiologic and clinical features, axonal loss on EDX, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nerve biopsy, and therapeutic response.

RESULTS

We selected 75 patients, among whom 30 (40%) responded to treatment. The positivity rates of CSF analysis, MRI and SSEPs were not influenced by the clinical presentation or by the delay between symptom onset and medical assessment. A high protein level in CSF, female gender, and a relapsing-remitting course predicted the therapeutic response.

DISCUSSION

It is important to properly diagnose suspected CIDP not meeting EFNS/PNS 2021 EDX criteria by using supportive criteria. Specific epidemiological factors and a raised CSF protein level predict a response to treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to improve diagnosis and the prognostic value of diagnostic tests in CIDP.

Review of general and head and neck/oral and maxillofacial features of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and dental management considerations

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMTD) is an uncommon progressive neuromuscular disorder of the peripheral nervous system and primarily leads to distal extremity weakness and sensory deficits. Frequently, affected patients manifest pes cavus, drop foot, and digit contractures that may pose significant challenges in ambulation and grasping objects. Although there are numerous articles of this syndrome in the medical literature, there is a limited number of dental publications. The objective of this article is to review the general and head and neck/oral and maxillofacial features of CMTD. General guidelines for dental management are also provided.

Pathology of the peripheral neuropathy Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4H in Holstein Friesian cattle with a splice site mutation in FGD4

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is a hereditary sensory and motor peripheral neuropathy that is one of the most common inherited neurological diseases of humans and may be caused by mutations in a number of different genes. The subtype Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4H (CMT4H) is caused by homozygous mutations in the FGD4 (FYVE, RhoGEF, and PH domain-containing 4) gene. A previous genome-wide association study involving 130,783 dairy cows found 6 novel variants, one of which was a homozygous splice site mutation in the FGD4 gene. Descendants of carriers were genotyped to identify 9 homozygous Holstein Friesian calves that were raised to maturity, of which 5 were euthanized and sampled for histopathology and electron microscopy at 2 and 2.5 years of age. Three control Holstein Friesian animals were raised with the calves and euthanized at the same time points. No macroscopic lesions consistent with CMT4H were seen at necropsy. Microscopically, peripheral nerves were hypercellular due to hyperplasia of S100-positive Schwann cells, and there was onion bulb formation, axonal degeneration with demyelination, and increased thickness of the endoneurium. On electron microscopy, decreased axonal density, onion bulb formations, myelin outfoldings, and increased numbers of mitochondria were present. These changes are consistent with those described in mouse models and humans with CMT4H, making these cattle a potential large animal model for CMT.

Acute to Subacute Atraumatic Entrapment Neuropathies in Patients With CMT1A: A Report of a Distinct Phenotypic Variant of CMT1A

Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) is typically characterised as a childhood-onset, symmetrical, length-dependent polyneuropathy with a gradual progressive clinical course. Acute to subacute neurological deterioration in CMT1A is rare, and has been reported secondary to overlap pathologies including inflammatory neuropathy. We identified two patients with CMT1A who presented with acute to subacute, atraumatic, entrapment neuropathies as an initial symptom. A superimposed inflammatory neuropathy was excluded. Both patients had a diffuse demyelinating polyneuropathy, with markedly low motor nerve conduction velocities (<20 m/s). In both patients, we demonstrated symptomatic and asymptomatic partial conduction blocks at multiple entrapment sites. Nerve ultrasound findings in our patients demonstrated marked diffuse nerve enlargement, more pronounced at non-entrapment sites compared to entrapment sites. We discuss ways to distinguish this condition from its other differentials. We propose pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this condition. We propose that CMT1A with acute to subacute, atraumatic, entrapment neuropathies to be a distinct phenotypic variant of CMT1A.

Nerve biopsy: Current indications and decision tools

After initial investigation of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of neuropathy, a clinical decision is made for a minority of patients to undergo further assessment with nerve biopsy. Many nerve biopsies do not demonstrate a definitive pathological diagnosis and there is considerable cost and morbidity associated with the procedure. This highlights the need for appropriate selection of patients, nerves and neuropathology techniques. Additionally, concomitant muscle and skin biopsies may improve the diagnostic yield in some cases. Several advances have been made in diagnostics in recent years, particularly in genomics. The indications for nerve biopsy have consequently changed over time. This review explores the current indications for nerve biopsies and some of the issues surrounding its use. Also included are comments on alternative diagnostic modalities that may help to supplant or reduce the use of nerve biopsy as a diagnostic test. These primarily include extraneural biopsy and neuroimaging techniques such as magnetic resonance neurography and nerve ultrasound. Finally, we propose an algorithm to assist in deciding when to perform nerve biopsies.

[Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy]

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a dysimmune neuropathy with sensory and/or motor symptoms due to destruction of the myelin sheat secondary to an auto-immune attack. A quarter to a third of patients do not respond to immunomodulatory first line recommended therapies. No second line treatment has shown its effectiveness with a sufficient level of evidence. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a promising therapy for autoimmune disease, especially for CIDP in recent works. We present in this article an update on the diagnosis of CIDP, its conventional treatments as well as the results of AHSCT in this indication, which was the subject of French recommendations under the aegis of the SFGMTC and neuromuscular disease french faculty (FILNEMUS) as a third line therapy after failure of two first-line and one second-line treatments.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease and Other Hereditary Neuropathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an overview of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) and other inherited neuropathies. These disorders encompass a broad spectrum with variable motor, sensory, autonomic, and other organ system involvement. Considerable overlap exists, both phenotypically and genetically, among these separate categories, all eventually exhibiting axonal injury and neurologic impairment. Depending on the specific neural and non-neural localizations, patients experience varying morbidity and mortality. Neurologic evaluations, including neurophysiologic testing, can help diagnose and predict patient disabilities. Diagnosis is often complex, especially when genetic and acquired components overlap.

RECENT FINDINGS

Next-generation sequencing has greatly improved genetic diagnosis, with many third-party reimbursement parties now embracing phenotype-based panel evaluations. Through the advent of comprehensive gene panels, symptoms previously labeled as idiopathic or atypical now have a better chance to receive a specific diagnosis. A definitive molecular diagnosis affords patients improved care and counsel. The new classification scheme for inherited neuropathies emphasizes the causal gene names. A specific genetic diagnosis is important as considerable advances are being made in gene-specific therapeutics. Emerging therapeutic approaches include small molecule chaperones, antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference, and viral gene delivery therapies. New therapies for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis and Fabry disease are discussed.

SUMMARY

Comprehensive genetic testing through a next-generation sequencing approach is simplifying diagnostic algorithms and affords significantly improved decision-making processes in neuropathy care. Genetic diagnosis is essential for pathogenic understanding and for gene therapy development. Gene-targeted therapies have begun entering the clinic. Currently, for most inherited neuropathy categories, specific symptomatic management and family counseling remain the mainstays of therapy.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy-Diagnostic pitfalls and treatment approach

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is characterized by progressive weakness and sensory loss, often affecting patients' ability to walk and perform activities of daily living independently. With the lack of a diagnostic biomarker, the diagnosis relies on clinical suspicion, clinical findings, and the demonstration of demyelinating changes on electrodiagnostic (EDx) testing and nerve pathology. As a result, patients can often be misdiagnosed with CIDP and unnecessarily treated with immunotherapy. Interpreting the EDx testing and cerebrospinal fluid findings in light of the clinical phenotype, recognizing atypical forms of CIDP, and screening for CIDP mimickers are the mainstays of the approach to patients suspected of having CIDP, and are detailed in this review. We also review the currently available treatment options, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids (CCS), and plasma exchange (PE), and discuss how to approach treatment-refractory cases. Finally, we emphasize the need to adopt objective outcome measures to monitor treatment response.

When botany inspired pathology of the peripheral nervous system

Medicine and botany are 2 distinct disciplines of "natural science," one focusing on humans, the other on plants. However, among the life sciences, both were quite close in earlier times. Moreover, the history of neuropathology, especially in the field of the peripheral nervous system, has been marked by many examples of "botanical images" used to describe certain histopathologic structures. We propose to better understand the reasons why neuropathologists used these botanical terms from a number of interesting anecdotes.

Contactin-1 autoimmunity: Serologic, neurologic, and pathologic correlates

OBJECTIVE

To determine serologic characteristics, frequency, phenotype, paraneoplastic associations, and electrodiagnostic and histopathologic features accompanying contactin-1 autoimmunity.

METHODS

Archived sera known to produce synaptic tissue-based immunofluorescence patterns were reevaluated, and contactin-1 specificity was confirmed by recombinant protein assays. Screening of 233 chronic/relapsing demyelinating neuropathies for additional cases was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 10 contactin-1 IgG seropositive cases. Frequency of contactin-1 immunoglobulin (Ig) G among tested Mayo Clinic chronic/relapsing demyelinating neuropathies was 2%. Sensory predominant presentations (n = 9, 90%), neuropathic pain (n = 6, 60%), and subacute progression (n = 5, 50%) were commonly encountered among contactin-1 neuropathies. Two patients had chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy-like phenotype at presentation. Electrodiagnostic studies were consistent with demyelination (slowed conduction velocities and/or prolonged distal latencies) without conduction block. Markedly elevated CSF protein (median 222 mg/dL, range 69-960 mg/dL), thickening/gadolinium enhancement of nerve roots (4/5), and subperineural edema on nerve biopsy (4/4) were other characteristic features. Three cases were diagnosed with paraneoplastic demyelinating neuropathies (thymoma, n = 1; breast cancer, n = 1; plasmacytoma, n = 1). Four of the 9 patients treated with IV immunoglobulin demonstrated initial clinical improvement, but the favorable response was sustained in only 1 case (median follow-up, 60 months). Sustained clinical stabilization or improvement was observed among 3 of the 6 cases in whom second-line therapies (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine) were used.

CONCLUSION

Contactin-1 IgG has a distinct sensory predominant presentation commonly associated with neuropathic pain, with demyelinating changes on electrophysiologic studies. A paraneoplastic cause should be considered. Testing of contactin-1 IgG among cases with similar presentations may guide immunotherapy selection, especially second-line immunotherapy consideration.