Development of grading scales of pedal sensory loss using Mokken scale analysis on the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery data

Does Lower Extremity Nerve Decompression Surgery Improve Quality of Life?

BACKGROUND

Entrapment neuropathies are more prevalent in patients with diabetes than in healthy patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of lower extremity nerve decompression surgery on quality of life and clarify predictors of this surgical outcome and the incidence of surgical site problems.

METHODS

Patients who underwent lower extremity nerve decompression surgery between September of 2017 and March of 2019 were followed prospectively at the outpatient clinic of University Medical Center Utrecht. The common, superficial, and deep peroneal nerve and tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel and soleal sling were decompressed if an entrapment was diagnosed. The primary study outcome was quality of life as measured by the Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy questionnaire. Secondary outcomes of interest were change in Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument score, predictors of the Norfolk score at follow-up, and the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent surgery (45 unilateral, 15 bilateral), with a median postoperative follow-up of 13.0 months (interquartile range, 7.3 to 18.0 months). Quality of life improved significantly in this period of observation [baseline median, 46.0 (34.0 to 62.0) versus follow-up median, 37.0 (20.0 to 60.0); p = 0.011], as did Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument scores [7.0 (5.0 to 9.0) versus 3.0 (0.0 to 6.5); p < 0.01]. Predictors of quality of life were a higher baseline quality of life score [β, 0.59 ( p = 0.001)], longer follow-up time [β, 2.34 ( p < 0.001)], and hypertension [β, 16.38 ( p = 0.03)]. A total of 26.7 percent of patients had surgical site problems, including wound infections (18.3 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower extremity nerve decompression surgery significantly improves quality of life by reducing neuropathy symptoms in patients with lower extremity nerve compressions. Attention should be given to lowering the risk of wound complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Combined Utility of the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament and the Timed Vibration Test in the Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

BACKGROUND

Neurologic screening tests are often used to identify and stratify patients at risk for diabetic foot complications such as infections, ulcers, and amputations. Two of the most commonly cited methods are the 5.07 Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) for loss of protective sensation and vibratory sensation testing. The aim of this study was to determine whether combined SWM and the timed vibration test (TVT) more effectively predicts diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) development compared with each test alone.

METHODS

An electronic medical record database search was performed restricted to podiatric medical clinic patients with diabetes and DFU ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Of 200 patients who met the criteria, 24 developed DFUs. A statistical analysis was performed comparing the SWM and TVT at various cutoff times and the combined SWM/TVT in their ability to predict DFUs.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed that the TVT cutoff time of less than 4 sec was superior to the other times for prediction of DFUs. The combined SWM/TVT results at less than 4 sec were superior to each test individually: sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 84.7%; positive predictive value, 43.8%; and receiver operating characteristics area under the curve, 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

The SWM combined with TVT was shown to be superior compared with either test alone in discriminating DFU risk. In addition, the TVT cutoff time of less than 4 sec proved to have greater diagnostic yield than other times, including 0 sec. This unexpected finding might impact providers relying on the absence of vibration sensation via tuning fork testing as an optimal marker of DFU risk.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lower Extremity Nerve Decompression Surgery in the Prevention of Ulcers and Amputations: A Markov Analysis

BACKGROUND

The costs and health effects associated with lower extremity complications in diabetes mellitus are an increasing burden to society. In selected patients, lower extremity nerve decompression is able to reduce symptoms of neuropathy and the concomitant risks of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations. To estimate the health and economic effects of this type of surgery, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention compared to current nonsurgical care was studied.

METHODS

To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of lower extremity nerve decompression over a 10-year period, a Markov model was developed to simulate the onset and progression of diabetic foot disease in patients with diabetes and neuropathy who underwent lower extremity nerve decompression surgery, compared to a group undergoing current nonsurgical care. Mean survival time, health-related quality of life, presence or risk of lower extremity complications, and in-hospital costs were the outcome measures assessed. Data from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study were used as current care, complemented with information from international studies on the epidemiology of diabetic foot disease, resource use, and costs, to feed the model.

RESULTS

Lower extremity nerve decompression surgery resulted in improved life expectancy (88,369.5 life-years versus 86,513.6 life-years), gain of quality-adjusted life-years (67,652.5 versus 64,082.3), and reduced incidence of foot complications compared to current care (490 versus 1087). The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was -€59,279.6 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, which is below the Dutch critical threshold of less than €80,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

CONCLUSIONS

Decompression surgery of lower extremity nerves improves survival, reduces diabetic foot complications, and is cost saving and cost-effective compared with current care, suggesting considerable socioeconomic benefit for society.

Development of a prediction model for foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes using easy-to-obtain clinical variables

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to develop a prediction model for foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes using easy-to-obtain clinical variables and to validate its predictive performance in order to help risk assessment in this high-risk group.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used data from a prospective analysis of 304 people with foot ulcer history who had 18-month follow-up for ulcer outcome. Demographic, disease-related and organization-of-care variables were included as potential predictors. Two logistic regression prediction models were created: model 1 for all recurrent foot ulcers (n=126 events) and model 2 for recurrent plantar foot ulcers (n=70 events). We used 10-fold cross-validation, each including five multiple imputation sets for internal validation. Performance was assessed in terms of discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0-1, 1=perfect discrimination), and calibration with the Brier Score (0-1, 0=complete concordance predicted vs observed values) and calibration graphs.

RESULTS

Predictors in model 1 were: a younger age, more severe peripheral sensory neuropathy, fewer months since healing of previous ulcer, presence of a minor lesion, use of a walking aid and not monitoring foot temperatures at home. Mean AUC for model 1 was 0.69 (2SD 0.040) and mean Brier Score was 0.22 (2SD 0.011). Predictors in model 2 were: a younger age, plantar location of previous ulcer, fewer months since healing of previous ulcer, presence of a minor lesion, consumption of alcohol, use of a walking aid, and foot care received in a university medical center. Mean AUC for model 2 was 0.66 (2SD 0.023) and mean Brier Score was 0.16 (2SD 0.0048).

CONCLUSIONS

These internally validated prediction models predict with reasonable to good calibration and fair discrimination who is at highest risk of ulcer recurrence. The people at highest risk should be monitored more carefully and treated more intensively than others.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR5403.

A two-step, test-guided Mokken scale analysis, for nonclustered and clustered data

Purpose

Mokken scale analysis (MSA) is an attractive scaling procedure for ordinal data. MSA is frequently used in health-related quality of life research. Two of MSA's prime features are the scalability coefficients and the automated item selection procedure (AISP). The AISP partitions a (large) set of items into scales based on the observed item scores; the resulting scales can be used as measurement instruments. There exist two issues in MSA: First, point estimates, standard errors, and test statistics for scalability coefficients are inappropriate for clustered item scores, which are omnipresent in quality of life research data. Second, the AISP insufficiently takes sampling fluctuation of Mokken’s scalability coefficients into account.

Methods

We solved both issues by providing point estimates and standard errors for the scalability coefficients for clustered data and by implementing a Wald-based significance test in the AISP algorithm, resulting in a test-guided AISP (T-AISP), that is available for both nonclustered and clustered test scores.

Results

We integrated the T-AISP into a two-step, test-guided MSA for scale construction, to guide the analysis for nonclustered and clustered data. The first step is performing a T-AISP and select the final scale(s). For clustered data, within-group dependency is investigated on the final scale(s). In the second step, the strength of the scale(s) is determined and further analyses are performed. The procedure was demonstrated on clustered item scores obtained from administering a questionnaire on quality of life in schools to 639 students nested in 30 classrooms.

Conclusions

We developed a two-step, test-guided MSA for scale construction that takes into account sample fluctuation of all scalability coefficients and that can be applied to item scores obtained by a nonclustered or clustered sampling design.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02840-2.

A new application of the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery: grading pedal sensory loss to predict the risk of foot ulceration

AIMS

To assess the relationship between the degree of loss of foot sensation at baseline and incidence of foot ulceration (DFU).

METHODS

Diabetic patients (n = 416) participating in the observational Rotterdam Diabetic Foot (RDF) Study were followed prospectively (median 955.5 days (IQR, 841.5-1121)). Subjects underwent sensory testing of the feet (39-item RDF Study Test Battery) at baseline and were assessed regarding incident DFU. Seven groups of incremental degree of sensory loss were distinguished, according to the RDF-39 sum score. Kaplan-Meier and regression analyses were used to determine the independent hazard of baseline variables for new DFU.

RESULTS

40 participants developed DFUs. The mean incident rate of new-onset ulceration from study start was 4.5 (95%CI: 3.3 to 6.1) per 100 person-years, which increased significantly from 0 to 67.70 in the seven groups (p < 0.0005). Predictors for DFUs were higher RDF-39 score (aHR: 1.173, p < 0.0005) and kidney function (aHR: 1.022, p = 0.016). Prior DFU suggests increased mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of sensory loss at baseline was associated with progression to DFU during follow-up. Grading the loss of sensation using the RDF Study Test Battery may result in a more precise risk stratification compared to the use of the 10 g monofilament according to current guidelines.

Vibrotactile perception on the sole of the foot in an older group of people with normal glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate vibrotactile sense in an older group of people with normal glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes relative to other sensory tests.

METHODS

Vibration perception thresholds on the sole of the foot (Multifrequency vibrametry and Biothesiometer) were compared to the results from evaluation of touch (monofilament), electrophysiology (sural nerve) and thermal sensation (Thermotest®).

RESULTS

Vibration perception and temperature thresholds, as well as sural nerve function, differed between normal glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes. Measuring vibration perception thresholds at lower frequencies with multifrequency vibrametry versus biothesiometer provided correlations similar to sural nerve amplitude. Temperature thresholds correlated with vibration perception thresholds and sural nerve function. Monofilaments revealed pathology in only a few participants with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

In an older group of people, vibration perception thresholds show a correlation similar to sural nerve amplitude on tactile and non-tactile surfaces. Measuring a vibration perception threshold on a tactile surface in type 2 diabetes provides no clear advantage over measuring it on the medial malleolus. In older type 2 diabetes subjects, both large and small diameter nerve fibers are affected.

Item reduction of the 39-item Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery using decision tree modelling

AIMS

Pedal sensory loss due to diabetes-related neuropathy can be graded by testing static two-point discrimination (S2PD), moving two-point discrimination (M2PD), static one-point discrimination (S1PD; eg, 10-g monofilament), and vibration sense and is included in the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot (RDF) Study Test Battery. The aim of this study is to investigate if decision tree modelling is able to reduce the number of tests needed in estimating pedal sensation.

METHODS

The 39-item RDF Study Test Battery (RDF-39) scores were collected from the prospective RDF study and included baseline (n = 416), first follow-up (n = 364), and second follow-up (n = 135) measurements, supplemented with cross-sectional control data from a previous study (n = 196). Decision tree analysis was used to predict total RDF-39 scores using individual test item data. The tree was developed using baseline RDF study data and validated in follow-up and control data. Spearman correlation coefficients assessed the reliability between the decision tree and original RDF-39.

RESULTS

The tree reduced the number of items from 39 to 3 in estimating the RDF-39 sum score. M2PD (hallux), S2PD (first dorsal web, fifth toe), vibration sense (interphalangeal joint), and S1PD (first dorsal web, fifth toe) measurements proved to be predictive. The correlation coefficients to original scores were high (0.76 to 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The decision tree was successful at reducing the number of RDF Test Battery items to only 3, with high correlation coefficients to the scores of the full test battery. The findings of this study aids medical decision making by time efficiently estimating pedal sensory status with fewer tests needed.

(Cost-)effectiveness of lower extremity nerve decompression surgery in subjects with diabetes: the DeCompression (DECO) trial-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The peripheral nerves of patients with diabetes are often pathologically swollen, which results in entrapment at places of anatomical narrowing. This results in nerve dysfunction. Surgical treatment of compression neuropathies in the lower extremities (lower extremity nerve decompression (LEND)) results in relief of symptoms and gain in peripheral nerve function, which may lead to less sensory loss (short term) and less associated detrimental effects including foot ulceration and amputations, and lower costs (long term). The aim of the DeCompression trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and (cost-)effectiveness of surgical decompression of compressed lower extremity nerves (LEND surgery) compared with patients treated with conventional (non-surgical) care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A stratified randomised (1 to 1) controlled trial comparing LEND surgery (intervention) with conventional non-surgical care (control strategy) in subjects with diabetes with problems of neuropathy due to compression neuropathies in the lower extremity. Randomisation is stratified for participating hospital (n=11) and gender. Patients and controls have the same follow-up at 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 48 months. Participants (n=344) will be recruited in 12 months and enrolled in all affiliated hospitals in which they receive both the intervention or conventional non-surgical care and follow-up. Outcome assessors are blinded to group assignment.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

disease-specific quality of life (Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire-Diabetic Neuropathy).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D5L), 36-item Short Form (SF-36)), plantar sensation (Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Test Battery), incidence of ulcerations/amputations, resource use and productivity loss (Medical Cost Questionnaire, Productivity Cost Questionnaire) during follow-up. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be estimated on the basis of the collected empirical data and a cost-utility model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been granted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Utrecht University Medical Center (reference: NL68312.041.19v5, protocol number: 19-335/M). Dissemination of results will be via journal articles and presentations at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NetherlandsTrial Registry NL7664.

The natural history of tarsal tunnel syndrome in diabetic subjects

INTRODUCTION

Tibial nerve entrapment is highly prevalent in diabetic subjects, resulting in significantly more neuropathic complaints and concomitant sensory disturbances. The study aim was to assess the impact of tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) and sensory loss at baseline on incident diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) in diabetic patients, since decompressing the tibial nerve might change the natural history of the disease.

METHODS

In this study, 113 subjects with TTS (69 bilateral, 23 left-sided and 21 right-sided) participating in the prospective Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study were compared to 303 diabetic controls without TTS, regarding incident DFU. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox's regression analysis were used to determine the independent hazard of baseline variables for new DFU.

RESULTS

The median observation period was 836.5 days (IQR, 459-1077.8). In bilateral TTS, 17.4% (95% CI: 8.4-26.3%) of subjects experienced DFU versus 8.3% (95% CI: 5.1-11.6%) in controls (left or right) during follow-up (p = 0.0036). In left-sided TTS, no subjects versus 6.2% (95% CI: 3.4-9.0%) in controls had DFUs (p = 0.243). Incident ulceration was seen in 14.3% (95% CI: -0.7% to -29.3%) of right-sided TTS subjects versus 4.1% (95% CI: 1.5-6.3%) in controls (p = 0.034). Besides HbA1c, diminished sensation at the hallux independently increased the risk of ulceration, in patients with (HR: 4.692, p = 0.003) and without (HR: 2.307, p = 0.002) prior DFU.

DISCUSSION

Elevated sensory thresholds in TTS render diabetic patients at a higher risk for DFU. With effective surgery, TTS is likely to be an amenable factor to potentially prevent diabetic foot disease and thereby reduce amputation risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Balance, risk of falls, risk factors and fall-related costs in individuals with diabetes

AIMS

Sensory loss and impaired balance are considered risk factors of incident falls. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between degree of foot sensation and balance, risk of falls, incidence of fall-related injuries and costs in a cohort of patients with diabetes.

METHODS

(Non)-neuropathic subjects participating in the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study were followed prospectively. Subjects underwent sensory testing of the feet (39 item Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery (RDF-39)); balance was assessed at the second follow-up (Brief-BESTest) as were data on incident falls. Medical records and financial data were abstracted to estimate fall-related morbidity and in-hospital costs.

RESULTS

A higher RDF-39 score, cerebral artery disease, type 2 diabetes, height and age were predictors of the Brief-BESTest total score. 41/296 patients (13.9%) reported two or more falls during follow-up. Predictors for recurrent falls were a higher RDF-39 score (aOR: 1.124, p < 0.0005), male gender (aOR: 0.319, p = 0.016), age (aOR: 0.938, p = 0.003) and type 2 diabetes (aOR: 3.157, p = 0.100). Thirty-one patients used medical resources (median US$ 440.45 (IQR: 179-1162).

CONCLUSIONS

Degree of sensory loss correlates significantly with an increased imbalance and risk of falls. The RDF-39 may be used as stratification tool in medical decision-making and patient information.

Development of grading scales of pedal sensory loss using Mokken scale analysis on the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery data

INTRODUCTION

Loss of sensation due to diabetes-related neuropathy often leads to diabetic foot ulceration. Several test instruments are used to assess sensation, such as static and moving 2-point discrimination (S2PD, M2PD), monofilaments, and tuning forks.

METHODS

Mokken scale analysis was applied to the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study data to select hierarchies of tests to construct measurement scales.

RESULTS

We developed 39-item and 31-item scales to measure loss of sensation for research purposes and a 13-item scale for clinical practice. All instruments were strongly scalable and reliable. The 39 items can be classified into 5 hierarchically ordered core clusters: S2PD, M2PD, vibration sense, monofilaments, and prior ulcer or amputation.

DISCUSSION

Guided by the presented scales, clinicians may better classify the grade of sensory loss in diabetic patients' feet. Thus, a more personalized approach concerning individual recommendations, intervention strategies, and patient information may be applied.