Small‐fiber neuropathy associated with autoinflammatory syndromes in children and adolescents

Small fiber neuropathy in children, adolescents, and young adults with chronic orthostatic intolerance and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

To determine in children, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) patients presenting with Orthostatic Intolerance (OI) or Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) associated with the additional symptoms of neuropathic discomfort (pain, paresthesia and/or allodynia): 1) the incidence of small fiber neuropathy, and 2) assess if there was serologic evidence for an underlying inflammatory or autoimmune state.

METHODS

A cohort of 109 CAYA patients with the above symptoms underwent epidermal skin biopsy for nerve fiber density. Blood biomarkers for inflammation were tested (CRP, ESR, ANA, complement (C3), thyroid function testing with antibodies (thyroid peroxidase antibody and thyroglobulin antibody), and cytokine panel 13). Patients completed a Quality of Health questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.

RESULTS

In CAYA patients with OI or POTS and neuropathic symptoms, skin biopsy for small fiber neuropathy was abnormal in 53 %. The sample population was predominantly female and Caucasian with moderately decreased perceived quality of health. OI /POTS patients with small fiber neuropathy had a 3-fold probability of having a positive ANA or anti-thyroid antibody, suggesting an underlying autoimmune or inflammatory process.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest a link between OI and POTS and small fiber neuropathy. Small fiber neuropathy was found by skin biopsy in over half of the patients tested. OI and Postural orthostatic tachycardia patients with small fiber neuropathy expressed multiple markers suggesting an underlying autoimmune or inflammatory process. Future research will be done to evaluate the symptomatic implication of SFN and whether immune or pharmacologic manipulation can alter patient symptoms.

Aconitine - A promising candidate for treating cold and mechanical allodynia in cancer induced bone pain

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients suffering from cancer induced bone pain (CIBP) have a poor quality of life that is exacerbated by the lack of effective therapeutic drugs. Monkshood is a flowering plant that has been used in traditional Chinese medicine where it has been used to relieve cold pain. Aconitine is the active component of monkshood, but the molecular mechanism for how this compound reduces pain is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, we employed molecular and behavioral experiments to explore the analgesic effect of aconitine. We observed aconitine alleviated cold hyperalgesia and AITC (allyl-isothiocyanate, TRPA1 agonist) induced pain. Interestingly, we found aconitine directly inhibits TRPA1 activity in calcium imaging studies. More importantly, we found aconitine alleviated cold and mechanical allodynia in CIBP mice. Both the activity and expression of TRPA1 in L4 and L5 DRG (Dorsal Root Ganglion) neurons were reduced with the treatment of aconitine in the CIBP model. Moreover, we observed aconiti radix (AR) and aconiti kusnezoffii radix (AKR), both components of monkshood that contain aconitine, alleviated cold hyperalgesia and AITC induced pain. Furthermore, both AR and AKR alleviated CIBP induced cold allodynia and mechanical allodynia.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, aconitine alleviates both cold and mechanical allodynia in cancer induced bone pain via the regulation of TRPA1. This research on the analgesic effect of aconitine in cancer induced bone pain highlights a component of a traditional Chinese medicine may have clinical applications for pain.

Small fiber neuropathy

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a peripheral nervous system disease due to affection of A-delta or C-fibers in a proximal, distal, or diffuse distribution. Selective SFN (without large fiber affection) manifests with pain, sensory disturbances, or autonomic dysfunction. Though uniform diagnostic criteria are unavailable, most of them request typical clinical features and reduced intra-epidermal nerve fiber density on proximal or distal skin biopsy. Little consensus has been reached about the treatment of SFN, why this narrative review aims at summarizing and discussing treatment options for SFN. Treatment of SFN can be classified as symptomatic, pathophysiologic, or causal. Prerequisites for treating SFN are an established diagnosis, knowledge about the symptoms and signs, and the etiology. Pain usually responds to oral/intravenous pain killers, antidepressants, anti-seizure drugs, or topical, transdermal specifications. Some of the autonomic disturbances respond favorably to symptomatic treatment. SFN related to Fabry disease or hATTR are accessible to pathogenesis-related therapy. Immune-mediated SFN responds to immunosuppression or immune-modulation. Several of the secondary SFNs respond to causal treatment of the underlying disorder. In conclusion, treatment of SFN relies on a multimodal concept and includes causative, pathophysiologic, and symptomatic measures. It strongly depends on the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and etiology, why it is crucial before initiation of treatment to fix the diagnosis and etiology. Due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation and multi-causality, treatment of SFN should be individualized with the goal of controlling the underlying cause, alleviating pain, and optimizing functionality.

Implications of Nerve Fiber Density on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Juvenile Fibromyalgia

Juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a condition that presents as chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain and affects children and adolescents. JFM remains a challenging diagnosis, as it is both based on subjective criteria and the pathogenesis is poorly understood. Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a distinct condition, which is characterized by pathology of small A-delta and C fibers, and can present similarly to JFM. Small fiber pathology is characterized by reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) on skin biopsy. Recent studies have found that as many as half of patients with JFM can demonstrate decreased IENFD, in pattern similar to SFN. This phenomenon has been referred to as small fiber pathology. The meaning of these findings was disputed; however, the current consensus remains that fibromyalgia and SFN are distinct conditions. Additionally, among patients with fibromyalgia, there are two phenotypes: those with small fiber pathology and those without. The purpose of this review was to characterize the role assessment of IENFD plays in the clinical context. We conducted a narrative review of pertinent articles pertaining to JFM, SFN and small fiber pathology in fibromyalgia. We concluded that assessment of IENFD should be completed if SFN is suspected either when a patient first presents or in patients who were previously diagnosed with fibromyalgia and SFN is later suspected. Distinguishing between JFM and SFN is important because recommended therapies differ between the two conditions. However, there is no evidence to support the use of skin biopsy to distinguish between the two discussed fibromyalgia phenotypes. More studies are needed to elucidate whether IENFD varies with morbidity and if both fibromyalgia phenotypes vary in their response to different therapeutic regimens.

Acute monophasic erythromelalgia pain in five children diagnosed as small-fiber neuropathy

The small-fiber polyneuropathies (SFN) are a class of diseases in which the small thin myelinated (Aδ) and/or unmyelinated (C) fibers within peripheral nerves malfunction and can degenerate. SFN usually begins in the farthest, most-vulnerable axons, so distal neuropathic pain and symptoms from microvascular dysregulation are common. It is well known in adults, e.g. from diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus, or neurotoxins, but considered extremely rare in children, linked mostly with pathogenic genetic variants in voltage-gated sodium channels. However, increasing evidence suggests that pediatric SFN is not rare, and that dysimmunity is the most common cause. Because most pediatric neurologists are unfamiliar with SFN, we report the diagnosis and management of 5 Swiss children, aged 6-11y, who presented with severe paroxysmal burning pain in the hands and feet temporarily relieved by cooling-the erythromelalgia presentation. Medical evaluations revealed autoimmune diseases in 3 families and 3/5 had preceding or concomitant infections. The standard diagnostic test (PGP9.5-immunolabeled lower-leg skin biopsy) confirmed SFN diagnoses in 3/4, and autonomic function testing (AFT) was abnormal in 2/3. Blood testing for etiology was unrevealing, including genetic testing in 3. Paracetamol and ibuprofen were ineffective. Two children responded to gabapentin plus mexiletine, one to carbamazepine, two to mexiletine plus immunotherapy (methylprednisolone/IVIg). All recovered within 6 months, remaining well for years. These monophasic tempos and therapeutic responses are most consistent with acute post-infectious immune-mediated causality akin to Guillain-Barré large-fiber polyneuropathy. Skin biopsy and AFT for SFN, neuropathic-pain medications and immunotherapy should be considered for acute sporadic pediatric erythromelalgia.