Clinical and electrophysiological examination of pinch strength in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Split Phenomenon of Fasciculation between Antagonistic Muscles in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: An Ultrasound Study

OBJECTIVE

Paresis of muscle groups in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) tends to present split phenomena. We explored the split phenomenon of fasciculation in multiple antagonistic muscle groups in ALS patients.

METHODS

One hundred and forty ALS patients and 66 non-ALS patients were included from a single ALS center. Muscle ultrasonography (MUS) was performed to detect fasciculation in elbow flexor-extensor, wrist flexor-extensor, knee flexor-extensor, and ankle flexor-extensor. Split phenomena of fasciculation between different antagonistic muscle groups were summarized, and the possible influence factors were analyzed through stratified analysis.

RESULTS

The frequency of split phenomenon of fasciculation intensity was significantly higher than those of muscle strength (26.1% vs. 7.1% for elbow flexor-extensor, 38.3% vs. 5.7% for wrist flexor-extensor, 37.9% vs. 3.0% for knee extensor-flexor, and 33.6% vs. 14.4% for ankle flexor-extensor) (P < 0.01). For muscles with 0-1 level of muscle strength (the Medical Research Council, MRC, score), significance difference in mean fasciculation intensity was observed only in ankle flexor-extensor. For muscles with 2-5 level of muscle strength, significant dissociation of fasciculation grade was common, especially among patients with slow rapid progression rate and both upper and lower motor neuron (UMN and LMN) involvement. As for non-ALS patients, no significant difference was observed in fasciculation intensity between antagonistic muscles.

CONCLUSION

Split phenomenon of fasciculation between antagonistic muscles was common and relatively specific in ALS patients. Muscle strength, progression rate, and UMN involvement were influence factors of the split phenomenon of fasciculation intensity.

Split hand in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the frequency of split hand (SI) and its diagnostic performance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, OVID and other databases were searched systematically up to March 2021 for relevant reports about the split hand syndrome. Two reviewers screened and selected the titles and abstracts of the studies independently during the database searches and performed full-text reviews and extracted available data. In our study, AA_CMAP was calculated by AA_CMAP = APB_CMAP/ADM_CMAP and split-hand index (SI) was calculated by SI_CMAP = (APB_CMAP × FDI_CMAP)/ADM_CMAP. The mean differences (MD) in APB/ADM_CMAP and SI_CMAP between patients with ALS and control group were calculated (APB the abductor pollicis brevis muscle; ADM the abductor digiti minimi muscle; CMAP compound muscle action potentials). Meta-analysis was performed to determine summary sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SI_CMAP.

RESULTS

Pooled results of five studies including 339 patients showed that 50% (95%CI: 35%-65%) of patients with ALS presented split hand. APB/ADM_CMAP in patients with ALS was significantly lower than healthy population (MD: -0.38, 95%CI: -0.48, -0.28). SI_CMAP in patients with ALS was significantly lower than healthy controls (MD: -5.87, 95%CI: -6.28, -5.46) and neuromuscular controls (MD: -5.60, 95%CI: -5.78, -5.42). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the AUC was 0.860 [95%CI: 0.808, 0.911] for SI_CMAP. The sensitivity and specificity for SI_CMAP were 78% and 81% (cut-off value: 5.2-11.8), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Half of ALS patients might show split hand sign. SI_CMAP could be a potential biomarker in the diagnosis of ALS.