Positive acetylcholine receptor antibody in non-myasthenic patients

Thymus alterations and susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the therapeutic landscape in oncology. However, ICI can induce uncommon life-threatening autoimmune T-cell-mediated myotoxicities, including myocarditis and myositis. The thymus plays a critical role in T cell maturation. Here we demonstrate that thymic alterations are associated with increased incidence and severity of ICI myotoxicities. First, using the international pharmacovigilance database VigiBase, the Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris-Sorbonne University data warehouse (Paris, France) and a meta-analysis of clinical trials, we show that ICI treatment of thymic epithelial tumors (TET, and particularly thymoma) was more frequently associated with ICI myotoxicities than other ICI-treated cancers. Second, in an international ICI myocarditis registry, we established that myocarditis occurred earlier after ICI initiation in patients with TET (including active or prior history of TET) compared to other cancers and was more severe in terms of life-threatening arrythmias and concurrent myositis, leading to respiratory muscle failure and death. Lastly, we show that presence of anti-acetylcholine-receptor antibodies (a biological proxy of thymic-associated autoimmunity) was more prevalent in patients with ICI myocarditis than in ICI-treated control patients. Altogether, our results highlight that thymic alterations are associated with incidence and seriousness of ICI myotoxicities. Clinico-radio-biological workup evaluating the thymus may help in predicting ICI myotoxicities.

Clinical Reasoning: An Unusual Cause of Diplopia and Ptosis in a 67-Year-Old Woman

Diplopia is a relatively common chief complaint encountered in an outpatient neurology clinic and carries a broad differential diagnosis. In this case, a 67-year-old woman presented with new horizontal, binocular diplopia and ptosis of 8-month duration, which persisted without significant progression. This case highlights the need for a comprehensive list of differential diagnoses for patients with acquired ophthalmoplegia and ptosis. Key learning points include an illustration of the stepwise diagnostic approach to evaluate for common etiologies, the importance of interpreting test results in the appropriate clinical setting, and the significance of recognizing specific signs and symptoms in achieving the correct diagnosis.

A multicentre, prospective, double-blind study comparing the accuracy of autoantibody diagnostic assays in myasthenia gravis: the SCREAM study

BACKGROUND

Laboratory determination of autoantibodies against acetylcholine receptor (AChR), muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) and other autoantigens have been integrated into the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). However, evidence supporting the selection of methodologies is lacking.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we recruited patients with suspected MG to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cell-based assay (CBA), radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in detecting AChR and MuSK autoantibodies. This study is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT05219097.

FINDINGS

2272 eligible participants were recruited, including 2043 MG, 229 non-MG subjects. AChR antibodies were detected in 1478, 1310, and 1280 out of a total of 2043 MG patients by CBA, RIPA, and ELISA, respectively; sensitivity, 72.3% (95% CI, 70.3-74.3), 64.1% (95% CI, 62.0-66.2), 62.7% (95% CI, 60.5-64.8); specificity, 97.8% (95% CI, 95.0-99.3), 97.8% (95% CI, 95.0-99.3), 94.8% (95% CI, 91.9-97.7). MuSK antibodies were found in 59, 50, and 54 from 2043 MG patients by CBA, RIPA and ELISA, respectively; sensitivity, 2.9% (95% CI, 2.2-3.7), 2.4% (95% CI, 1.8-3.2), 2.6% (95% CI, 2.0-3.4); specificity, 100% (95% CI, 98.4-100), 100% (95% CI, 98.4-100), and 99.1% (95% CI, 96.9-99.9). The area under the curve of AChR antibodies tested by CBA was 0.858, and there were statistical differences with RIPA (0.843; p = 0.03) and ELISA (0.809; p < 0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

CBA has a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to RIPA or ELISA in detecting AChR and MuSK autoantibodies for MG diagnosis.

FUNDING

New Terrain Biotechnology, Inc., Tianjin, China.

Incidence and causes of overdiagnosis of myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

We have encountered non-myasthenic patients being given a diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). This study aims to investigate the frequency of, and factors contributing to, overdiagnosis of MG.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of patients referred to our tertiary neuromuscular center for evaluation due to a previously suspected/confirmed MG diagnosis during a 6-year span.

RESULTS

A total of 531 patients sought a second opinion regarding their MG diagnosis, and 77 (14.5%) were found to have non-myasthenic conditions. A total of 11 patients tested positive for acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies. Repeated AChR antibodies became negative in five patients while in four patients, AChR binding antibody titers were persistently low. In seven patients, striational antibody was the only positive antibody identified. In 25 patients, a prior electrodiagnostic (EDX) study was deemed positive, including 14 patients with abnormal repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and 12 with abnormal single fiber electromyography (SFEMG). Technical issues were noted on prior RNS studies in 8 patients, and repeat RNS was negative in 10 patients. In eight patients with previously abnormal SFEMG, results showed minimal or equivocal abnormalities. In two patients, a repeat SFEMG was normal. Further analysis revealed atypical clinical presentation, deceptively positive ice pack test, clinically insignificant antibody result and misleading EDX finding as main contributors to MG overdiagnosis.

DISCUSSION

Overdiagnosis of MG is not uncommon, and occurs more frequently in seronegative patients. To make an accurate diagnosis of MG, there is a need to recognize atypical presentations, and avoid overreliance on minor or non-specific serological and electrodiagnostic findings.