Effect of neural activity on skeletal muscle phosphoproteins

Proteomic analysis of striated muscle

The techniques collectively known as proteomics are useful for characterizing the protein phenotype of a particular tissue or cell as well as quantitatively identifying differences in the levels of individual proteins following modulation of a tissue or cell. In the area of striated muscle research, proteomics has been a useful tool for identifying qualitative and quantitative changes in the striated muscle protein phenotype resulting from either disease or physiological modulation. Proteomics is useful for these investigations because many of the changes in the striated muscle phenotype resulting from either disease or changes in physiological state are qualitative and not quantitative changes. For example, modification of striated muscle proteins by phosphorylation and proteolytic cleavage are readily observed using proteomic technologies while these changes would not be identified using genomic technology. In this review, I will discuss the application of proteomic technology to striated muscle research, research designed to identify key protein changes that are either causal for or markers of a striated muscle disease or physiological condition.

Protein phosphorylation in fast and slow chicken skeletal muscles: effect of denervation

We have identified proteins in adult chicken skeletal muscle whose phosphorylation can be used as markers for the mature fast and slow muscle phenotype. These include phosphorylase, phosphorylase kinase, and a cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-stimulated, calmodulin-inhibited 28-kDa band (markers for fast muscle), a calmodulin-stimulated 50-kDa band, and two cAMP-stimulated bands at 44 and 46 kDa (markers for slow muscle), and the relative concentrations of the regulatory subunits of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (RI and RII). After denervation the pattern of phosphorylation in fast muscle changed to resemble that of slow muscle: phosphorylation of the fast phenotype markers decreased; the slow phenotype markers, barely detectable in normal fast muscle, appeared as significant phosphoproteins; and the concentration of RII increased with no change in RI. This is consistent with denervation-induced changes observed using other phenotypic markers and indicates the potential for using these phosphoprotein markers in studies of muscle development and pathophysiology.