CO2 laser-induced pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials in peripheral neuropathies: correlation between electrophysiological and histopathological findings

Promises of natural products as clinical applications for cancer

Cancer represents a substantial threat to human health and mortality, necessitating the development of novel pharmacological agents with innovative mechanisms of action. Consequently, extensive research has been directed toward discovering new anticancer compounds derived from natural sources, including plants, microbes, and marine organisms. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of natural anticancer agents that are either currently undergoing clinical trials or have been integrated into clinical practice. A comprehensive understanding of the historical origins of natural anticancer agents, alongside traditional targets for tumor treatment and the distinct characteristics of cancer, can significantly facilitate researchers in the discovery and development of innovative anticancer drugs for clinical use. Furthermore, the exploration of microbial and marine sources is currently a prominent area of focus in the clinical application and advancement of new anticancer therapies. Detailed classification and elucidation of the functions and antitumor properties of these natural products are essential. It is imperative to comprehensively summarize and comprehend the natural anticancer drugs that have been and continue to be utilized in clinical settings.

Which Method for Diagnosing Small Fiber Neuropathy?

Introduction: Small fiber neuropathies (SFN) induce pain and/or autonomic symptoms. The diagnosis of SFN poses a challenge because the role of skin biopsy as a reference method and of each neurophysiological test remain to be discussed. This study compares six methods evaluating small sensory and autonomic nerve fibers: skin biopsy, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), quantitative sweat measurement system (Q-Sweat), Laser Evoked Potentials (LEP), Electrochemical Skin Conductance (ESC) measurement and Autonomic CardioVascular Tests (ACVT). Methods: This is a single center, retrospective study including patients tested for symptoms compatible with SFN between 2013 and 2016 using the afore-mentioned tests. Patients were ultimately classified according to the results and clinical features as "definite SFN," "possible SFN" or "no SFN." The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of each test were calculated based on the final diagnosis and the best diagnostic strategy was then evaluated. Results: Two hundred and forty-five patients were enrolled (164 females (66.9%), age: 50.4 ± 15 years). The results are as follows: skin biopsy: Se = 58%, Sp = 91%; QST: Se = 72%, Sp = 39%; Q-Sweat: Se = 53%, Sp = 69%; LEP: Se = 66%, Sp = 89%; ESC: Se = 60%, Sp = 89%; Cardiovascular tests: Se = 15%, Sp = 99%. The combination of skin biopsy, LEP, QST and ESC has a Se of 90% and a Sp of 87%. Conclusion: Our study outlines the benefits of combining skin biopsy, ESC, LEP and QST in the diagnosis of SFN.

Clinical neurophysiology of pain

Clinical neurophysiologic investigation of pain pathways in humans is based on specific techniques and approaches, since conventional methods of nerve conduction studies and somatosensory evoked potentials do not explore these pathways. The proposed techniques use various types of painful stimuli (thermal, laser, mechanical, or electrical) and various types of assessments (measurement of sensory thresholds, study of nerve fiber excitability, or recording of electromyographic reflexes or cortical potentials). The two main tests used in clinical practice are quantitative sensory testing and pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs). In particular, PREPs offer the possibility of an objective assessment of nociceptive pathways. Three types of PREPs can be distinguished depending on the type of stimulation used to evoke pain: laser-evoked potentials, contact heat evoked potentials, and intraepidermal electrical stimulation evoked potentials (IEEPs). These three techniques investigate both small-diameter peripheral nociceptive afferents (mainly Aδ nerve fibers) and spinothalamic tracts without theoretically being able to differentiate the level of lesion in the case of abnormal results. In routine clinical practice, PREP recording is a reliable method of investigation for objectifying the existence of a peripheral or central lesion or loss of function concerning the nociceptive pathways, but not the existence of pain. Other methods, such as nerve fiber excitability studies using microneurography, more directly reflect the activities of nociceptive axons in response to provoked pain, but without detecting or quantifying the presence of spontaneous pain. These methods are more often used in research or experimental study design. Thus, it should be kept in mind that most of the results of neurophysiologic investigation performed in clinical practice assess small fiber or spinothalamic tract lesions rather than the neuronal mechanisms directly at the origin of pain and they do not provide objective quantification of pain.

Electrophysiology of Cranial Nerve Testing: Trigeminal and Facial Nerves

The clinical examination of the trigeminal and facial nerves provides significant diagnostic value, especially in the localization of lesions in disorders affecting the central and/or peripheral nervous system. The electrodiagnostic evaluation of these nerves and their pathways adds further accuracy and reliability to the diagnostic investigation and the localization process, especially when different testing methods are combined based on the clinical presentation and the electrophysiological findings. The diagnostic uniqueness of the trigeminal and facial nerves is their connectivity and their coparticipation in reflexes commonly used in clinical practice, namely the blink and corneal reflexes. The other reflexes used in the diagnostic process and lesion localization are very nerve specific and add more diagnostic yield to the workup of certain disorders of the nervous system. This article provides a review of commonly used electrodiagnostic studies and techniques in the evaluation and lesion localization of cranial nerves V and VII.

Functional Characterization of At-Level Hypersensitivity in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

At-level and above-level hypersensitivity was assessed in patients with chronic complete thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI). Patients were classified using somatosensory mapping (brush, cold, pinprick) and assigned into 2 groups (ie, patients with at-level hypersensitivity [SCIHs, n = 8] and without at-level hypersensitivity [SCINHs, n = 7]). Gender and age-matched healthy subjects served as controls. Quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrically- and histamine-induced pain and itch, laser Doppler imaging, and laser-evoked potentials (LEP) were recorded at-level and above-level in SCI-patients. Six of 8 SCIHs, but 0 of 7 SCINHs patients suffered from neuropathic below-level pain. Clinical sensory mapping revealed spreading of hypersensitivity to more cranial areas (above-level) in 3 SCIHs. Cold pain threshold measures confirmed clinical hypersensitivity at-level in SCIHs. At-level and above-level hypersensitivity to electrical stimulation did not differ significantly between SCIHs and SCINHs. Mechanical allodynia, cold, and pin-prick hypersensitivity did not relate to impaired sensory function (QST), axon reflex flare, or LEPs. Clinically assessed at-level hypersensitivity was linked to below-level neuropathic pain, suggesting neuronal hyperexcitability contributes to the development of neuropathic pain. However, electrically evoked pain was not significantly different between SCI patients. Thus, SCI-induced enhanced excitability of nociceptive processing does not necessarily lead to neuropathic pain. QST and LEP revealed no crucial role of deafferentation for hypersensitivity development after SCI.

PERSPECTIVE

At-level hypersensitivity after complete thoracic SCI is associated with neuropathic below-level pain if evoked by clinical sensory stimuli. QST, LEP, and electrically-induced axon reflex flare sizes did not indicate somatosensory deafferentation in SCIHs.

Inhibitory effects of heterotopic noxious counter-stimulation on perception and brain activity related to Aβ-fibre activation

Heterotopic noxious counter-stimulation (HNCS) inhibits pain and pain processes through cerebral and cerebrospinal mechanisms. However, it is unclear whether HNCS inhibits non-nociceptive processes, which needs to be clarified for a better understanding of HNCS analgesia. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of HNCS on perception and scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in two counter-balanced sessions, including non-nociceptive (selective Aβ-fibre activation) or nociceptive electrical stimulation, combined with HNCS. HNCS was produced by a 20-min cold pressor test (left hand) adjusted individually to produce moderate pain (mean ± SEM: 42.5 ± 5.3 on a 0-100 scale, where 0 is no pain and 100 the worst pain imaginable). Non-nociceptive electrical stimulation was adjusted individually at 80% of pain threshold and produced a tactile sensation in every subject. Nociceptive electrical stimulation was adjusted individually at 120% of RIII-reflex threshold and produced moderate pain (45.3 ± 4.5). Shock sensation was significantly decreased by HNCS compared with baseline for non-nociceptive (P < 0.001) and nociceptive (P < 0.001) stimulation. SEP peak-to-peak amplitude at Cz was significantly decreased by HNCS for non-nociceptive (P < 0.01) and nociceptive (P < 0.05) stimulation. These results indicate that perception and brain activity related to Aβ-fibre activation are inhibited by HNCS. The mechanisms of this effect remain to be investigated to clarify whether it involves inhibition of spinal wide-dynamic-range neurons by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, supraspinal processes or both.

The effect of heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation on Aδ-, C- and Aβ-fibre brain responses in humans

Human studies have shown that heterotopic nociceptive conditioning stimulation (HNCS) applied to a given body location reduces the percept and brain responses elicited by noxious test stimuli delivered at a remote body location. It remains unclear to what extent this effect of HNCS relies on the spinal-bulbar-spinal loop mediating the effect of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNICs) described in animals, and/or on top-down cortical mechanisms modulating nociception. Importantly, some studies have examined the effects of HNCS on the brain responses to nociceptive input conveyed by Aδ-fibres. In contrast, no studies have explored the effects of HNCS on the responses to selective nociceptive C-fibre input and non-nociceptive Aβ-fibre input. In this study, we measured the intensity of perception and event-related potentials (ERPs) to stimuli activating Aδ-, C- and Aβ-fibres, before, during and after HNCS, obtained by immersing one foot in painful cold water. We observed that (i) the perceived intensity of nociceptive Aδ- and C-stimuli was reduced during HNCS, and (ii) the ERPs elicited by Aδ- and Aβ- and C-stimuli were also reduced during HNCS. Importantly, because Aβ-ERPs are related to primary afferents that ascend directly through the dorsal columns without being relayed at spinal level, the modulation of these responses may not be explained by an influence of descending projections modulating the transmission of nociceptive input at spinal level. Therefore, our results indicate that, in humans, HNCS should be used with caution as a direct measure of DNIC-related mechanisms.

Laser-evoked potentials mediated by mechano-insensitive nociceptors in human skin

OBJECTIVES

Laser-evoked potentials (LEP) were assessed after peripheral nerve block of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) in healthy volunteers from partially anesthetized skin areas to differentially stimulate mechano-insensitive nociceptors.

METHODS

An ultrasound-guided nerve block of the LFCN was performed in 12 healthy male subjects with Ropivacain 1%. After 30 min, the nerve block induced significantly larger anesthetic areas to mechanical stimuli than to electrical stimuli revealing an area of differential sensitivity. LEPs, reaction times and pain ratings were recorded in response to the laser stimuli of (1) completely anesthetic skin, (2) mechano-insensitive, but electrically excitable skin ('differential sensitivity'), (3) normal skin.

RESULTS

LEP latencies in the area of differential sensitivity were increased compared to unaffected skin (228 ± 8.5 ms, vs. 181 ± 3.6 ms, p < 0.01) and LEP amplitudes were reduced (14.8 ± 1.2 μV vs. 24.6 ± 1.7 μV, p < 0.01). Correspondingly, psychophysically assessed response latencies in the differentially anesthetic skin were increased (649 ms vs. 427 ms, p < 0.01) and pain ratings reduced (1.5/10 vs. 5/10 NRS, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The increase in LEP latency suggests that mechano-insensitive heat-sensitive Aδ nociceptors (MIA, type II) have a slower conduction velocity or higher utilization time than mechano-sensitive type II Aδ nociceptors. Moreover, widely branched, slowly conducting and mechano-insensitive branches of Aδ nociceptors can explain our finding. LEPs in the differentially anesthetized skin provide specific information about a mechanically insensitive but heat-sensitive subpopulation of Aδ nociceptors. These findings support the concept that A-fibre nociceptors exhibit a similar degree of modality specificity as C-fibre nociceptors.

Assessment of small fibers using evoked potentials

Background and purpose

Conventional neurophysiological techniques do not assess the function of nociceptive pathways and are inadequate to detect abnormalities in patients with small-fiber damage. This overview aims to give an update on the methods and techniques used to assess small fiber (Aδ- and C-fibers) function using evoked potentials in research and clinical settings.

Methods

Noxious radiant or contact heat allows the recording of heat-evoked brain potentials commonly referred to as laser evoked potentials (LEPs) and contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs). Both methods reliably assess the loss of Aδ-fiber function by means of reduced amplitude and increased latency of late responses, whereas other methods have been developed to record ultra-late C-fiber-related potentials. Methodological considerations with the use of LEPs and CHEPs include fixed versus variable stimulation site, application pressure, and attentional factors. While the amplitude of LEPs and CHEPs often correlates with the reported intensity of the stimulation, these factors may also be dissociated. It is suggested that the magnitude of the response may be related to the saliency of the noxious stimulus (the ability of the stimulus to stand out from the background) rather than the pain perception.

Results

LEPs and CHEPs are increasingly used as objective laboratory tests to assess the pathways mediating thermal pain, but new methods have recently been developed to evaluate other small-fiber pathways. Pain-related electrically evoked potentials with a low-intensity electrical simulation have been proposed as an alternative method to selectively activate Aδ-nociceptors. A new technique using a flat tip mechanical stimulator has been shown to elicit brain potentials following activation of Type I A mechano-heat (AMH) fibers. These pinprick-evoked potentials (PEP) have a morphology resembling those of heat-evoked potentials following activation of Type II AMH fibers, but with a shorter latency. Cool-evoked potentials can be used for recording the non-nociceptive pathways for cooling. At present, the use of cool-evoked potentials is still in the experimental state. Contact thermodes designed to generate steep heat ramps may be programmed differently to generate cool ramps from a baseline of 35◦C down to 32◦C or 30◦C. Small-fiber evoked potentials are valuable tools for assessment of small-fiber function in sensory neuropathy, central nervous system lesion, and for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. Recent studies suggest that both CHEPs and pinprick-evoked potentials may also be convenient tools to assess sensitization of the nociceptive system.

Conclusions

In future studies, small-fiber evoked potentials may also be used in studies that aim to understand pain mechanisms including different neuropathic pain phenotypes, such as cold- or touch-evoked allodynia, and to identify predictors of response to pharmacological pain treatment.

Implications

Future studies are needed for some of the newly developed methods.

Selective nociceptor activation in volunteers by infrared diode laser

Background

Two main classes of peripheral sensory neurons contribute to thermal pain sensitivity: the unmyelinated C fibers and thinly myelinated Aδ fibers. These two fiber types may differentially underlie different clinical pain states and distinctions in the efficacy of analgesic treatments. Methods of differentially testing C and Aδ thermal pain are widely used in animal experimentation, but these methods are not optimal for human volunteer and patient use. Thus, this project aimed to provide psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence that whether different protocols of infrared diode laser stimulation, which allows for direct activation of nociceptive terminals deep in the skin, could differentially activate Aδ or C fiber thermonociceptors in volunteers.

Results

Short (60 ms), high intensity laser pulses (SP) evoked monomodal "pricking" pain which was not enhanced by topical capsaicin, whereas longer, lower power pulses (LP) evoked monomodal "burning" pain which was enhanced by topical capsaicin. SP also produced cortical evoked EEG potentials consistent with Aδ mediation, the amplitude of which was directly correlated with pain intensity but was not affected by topical capsaicin. LP also produced a distinct evoked potential pattern the amplitude of which was also correlated with pain intensity, which was enhanced by topical capsaicin, and the latency of which could be used to estimate the conduction velocity of the mediating nociceptive fibers.

Conclusions

Psychophysical and electrophysiological data were consistent with the ability of short high intensity infrared laser pulses to selectively produce Aδ mediated pain and of longer pulses to selectively produce C fiber mediated thermal pain. Thus, the use of these or similar protocols may be useful in developing and testing novel therapeutics based on the differential molecular mechanisms underlying activation of the two fiber types (e.g., TRPV1, TRPV2, etc). In addition, these protocol may be useful in determining the fiber mediation of different clinical pain types which may, in turn be useful in treatment choice.

Functional exploration for neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain (NP) may become refractory to conservative medical management, necessitating neurosurgical procedures in carefully selected cases. In this context, the functional neurosurgeon must have suitable knowledge of the disease he or she intends to treat, especially its pathophysiology. This latter factor has been studied thanks to advances in the functional exploration of NP, which will be detailed in this review. The study of the flexion reflex is a useful tool for clinical and pharmacological pain assessment and for exploring the mechanisms of pain at multiple levels. The main use of evoked potentials is to confirm clinical, or detect subclinical, dysfunction in peripheral and central somato-sensory pain pathways. LEP and SEP techniques are especially useful when used in combination, allowing the exploration of both pain and somato-sensory pathways. PET scans and fMRI documented rCBF increases to noxious stimuli. In patients with chronic NP, a decreased resting rCBF is observed in the contralateral thalamus, which may be reversed using analgesic procedures. Abnormal pain evoked by innocuous stimuli (allodynia) has been associated with amplification of the thalamic, insular and SII responses, concomitant to a paradoxical CBF decrease in ACC. Multiple PET studies showed that endogenous opioid secretion is very likely to occur as a reaction to pain. In addition, brain opioid receptors (OR) remain relatively untouched in peripheral NP, while a loss of ORs is most likely to occur in central NP, within the medial nociceptive pathways. PET receptor studies have also proved that antalgic Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS), indicated in severe refractory NP, induces endogenous opioid secretion in key areas of the endogenous opioid system, which may explain one of the mechanisms of action of this procedure, since the secretion is proportional to the analgesic effect.

Pathophysiology of neuropathic pain in type 2 diabetes: skin denervation and contact heat-evoked potentials

OBJECTIVE

Neuropathic pain due to small-fiber sensory neuropathy in type 2 diabetes can be diagnosed by skin biopsy with quantification of intra-epidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density. There is, however, a lack of noninvasive physiological assessment. Contact heat-evoked potential (CHEP) is a newly developed approach to record cerebral responses of Aδ fiber-mediated thermonociceptive stimuli. We investigated the diagnostic role of CHEP.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

From 2006 to 2009, there were 32 type 2 diabetic patients (20 males and 12 females, aged 51.63 ± 10.93 years) with skin denervation and neuropathic pain. CHEPs were recorded with heat stimulations at the distal leg, where skin biopsy was performed.

RESULTS

CHEP amplitude was reduced in patients compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects (14.8 ± 15.6 vs. 33.7 ± 10.1 μV, P < 0.001). Abnormal CHEP patterns (reduced amplitude or prolonged latency) were noted in 81.3% of these patients. The CHEP amplitude was the most significant parameter correlated with IENF density (P = 0.003) and pain perception to contact heat stimuli (P = 0.019) on multiple linear regression models. An excitability index was derived by calculating the ratio of the CHEP amplitude over the IENF density. This excitability index was higher in diabetic patients than in control subjects (P = 0.023), indicating enhanced brain activities in neuropathic pain. Among different neuropathic pain symptoms, the subgroup with evoked pain had higher CHEP amplitudes than the subgroup without evoked pain (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

CHEP offers a noninvasive approach to evaluate the degeneration of thermonociceptive nerves in diabetic neuropathy by providing physiological correlates of skin denervation and neuropathic pain.

Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency?

Although laser-evoked electroencephalographic (EEG) responses are increasingly used to investigate nociceptive pathways, their functional significance remains unclear. The reproducible observation of a robust correlation between the intensity of pain perception and the magnitude of the laser-evoked N1, N2, and P2 responses has led some investigators to consider these responses a direct correlate of the neural activity responsible for pain intensity coding in the human cortex. Here, we provide compelling evidence to the contrary. By delivering trains of three identical laser pulses at four different energies, we explored the modulation exerted by the temporal expectancy of the stimulus on the relationship between intensity of pain perception and magnitude of the following laser-evoked brain responses: the phase-locked N1, N2, and P2 waves, and the non-phase-locked laser-induced synchronization (ERS) and desynchronization (ERD). We showed that increasing the temporal expectancy of the stimulus through stimulus repetition at a constant interstimulus interval 1) significantly reduces the magnitudes of the laser-evoked N1, N2, P2, and ERS; and 2) disrupts the relationship between the intensity of pain perception and the magnitude of these responses. Taken together, our results indicate that laser-evoked EEG responses are not determined by the perception of pain per se, but are mainly determined by the saliency of the eliciting nociceptive stimulus (i.e., its ability to capture attention). Therefore laser-evoked EEG responses represent an indirect readout of the function of the nociceptive system.

Diagnostic validity of epidermal nerve fiber densities in painful sensory neuropathies

In this prospective study, intraepidermal nerve fiber densities (IENFD) and subepidermal nerve plexus densities (SENPD) were quantified by immunostaining in skin punch biopsies from the distal calf in 99 patients with clinical symptoms of painful sensory neuropathy and from 37 age-matched healthy volunteers. The clinical diagnosis was based on history and abnormal thermal thresholds on quantitative sensory testing (QST). In patients with neuropathy, IENFD and SENPD were reduced to about 50% of controls. Elevated warm detection thresholds on QST correlated with IENFD but not with SENPD. Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of IENFD values, the diagnostic sensitivity for detecting neuropathy was 0.80 and the specificity 0.82. For SENPD, sensitivity was 0.81 and specificity 0.88. With ROC analysis of both IENFD and SENPD together, the diagnostic sensitivity was further improved to 0.92. The combined examination of IENFD and SENPD is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool in patients suspected to suffer from painful sensory neuropathies but with normal values on clinical neurophysiological studies.

Conduction Velocities of Aδ-fibers and C-fibers in Human Peripheral Nerves and Spinal Cord After CO2 Laser Stimulation

Conduction velocities (CVs) in two nociceptive afferents were estimated to clarify the mechanism of pain transmission. Late and ultra-late laser evoked potentials (LEPs) were recorded by stimulating Adelta- and C-nociceptive nerve endings at different skin sites (the hand, foot, and skin overlying the 7th cervical and 12th thoracic vertebrae), by which data CVs of the arm (CVA), leg (CVL), and spinothalamic tract (CVSTT) were estimated. In late LEPs, Adelta-CVA and Adelta-CVL respectively were between 6.7 and 23.7 (mean +/- SD, 12.8 +/- 5.2) m/s, and 9.0 and 26.7 (17.2 +/- 5.6) m/s. Adelta-CVSTT was between 4.1 and 22.1 m/s (10.6 +/- 5.8). In ultra-late LEPs, C-CVA and C-CVL respectively varied between 1.0 and 2.1 (mean +/- SD, 1.5 +/- 0.3) m/s, and 1.0 and 1.9 (1.4 +/- 0.2) m/s. C-CVSTT was between 1.0 and 3.9 (1.8 +/- 0.8) m/s. No significant difference was found among CVA, CVL, and CVSTT values calculated from late or ultra-late LEP latencies. Nociceptive signals of the primary Adelta- and C-afferents therefore may be conveyed separately by myelinated (Adelta-) and unmyelinated (C) axons through peripheral nerves and spinal cord.

Selektive C-Faser-Stimulation durch Stimulation winziger Hautareale

BACKGROUND

It has been found difficult to stimulate the primary C-fibre afferents separately from those of Adelta fibres. A necessary and sufficient condition for the investigation of the C-fibre system is the selective stimulation of C fibres without activation of Adelta fibres. The stimulation of tiny skin areas allows such a selective activation of C fibres.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The main aspects of the method for stimulation of tiny skin areas as well as some results obtained by this method are reported here. The application of this method is compared with applications of other methods that allow an investigation of central processing of human C-fibre input.

CONCLUSION

The stimulation of tiny skin areas represents a simple method for selective stimulation of C fibres.

Electrophysiological studies on human pain perception

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the recent progress in electrophysiological studies using electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on human pain perception.

METHODS

For recording activities following A delta fiber stimulation relating to first pain, several kinds of lasers such as CO2, Tm:YAG and argon lasers are now widely used. The activity is frequently termed laser evoked potential (LEP), and we reviewed previous basic and clinical reports on LEP. We also introduced our new method, epidermal stimulation (ES), which is useful for recording brain activities by the signals ascending through A delta fibers. For recording activities following C fiber stimulation relating to second pain, several methods have been used but weak CO2 laser stimuli applied to tiny areas of the skin were recently used.

RESULTS

EEG and MEG findings following C fiber stimulation were similar to those following A delta fiber stimulation except for a longer latency. Finally, we reviewed the effect of rTMS on acute pain perception. rTMS alleviated acute pain induced by intracutaneous injection of capsaicin, which activated C fibers, but it enhanced acute pain induced by laser stimulation, which activated A delta fibers.

CONCLUSIONS

One promising approach in the near future is to analyze the change of a frequency band. This method will probably be used for evaluation of continuous tonic pain such as cancer pain, which evoked response studies cannot evaluate.

Aδ nociceptor response to laser stimuli: selective effect of stimulus duration on skin temperature, brain potentials and pain perception

OBJECTIVE

To disclose a possible effect of duration of pulsed laser heat stimuli on Adelta nociceptor responses, skin temperature profiles, brain evoked potentials and pain perception.

METHODS

We used a laser stimulator which works in the millisecond range and allows us to change the duration of the pulse while keeping the total energy of the stimulus constant. In 10 healthy volunteers, we measured the intensity of perceived pain with a 0-10 scale and the latency and amplitude of the early N1 and late N2 components of the scalp potentials evoked by laser pulses of equal energy and three different stimulus durations (2, 10, and 20 ms). Using a specifically developed pyrometer with a temporal resolution lower than 1 ms we also measured stimulus-induced changes of skin temperature.

RESULTS

Stimulus duration significantly influenced temperature rise times, pain perception, and brain potentials. Shorter stimulus durations yielded steeper slopes in the skin temperature profiles and higher pain ratings, shortened the latency of the N1 and N2 components, and increased the amplitude of N1.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The shorter stimulus duration shortens receptor activation times and yields a more synchronous afferent volley, thus providing a stronger spatial-temporal summation at central synapses that enhances intensity of first pain and brain potentials. This may prove useful in clinical applications.

Differential nociceptive deficits in patients with borderline personality disorder and self-injurious behavior: laser-evoked potentials, spatial discrimination of noxious stimuli, and pain ratings

Approximately 70-80% of women meeting criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) report attenuated pain perception or analgesia during non-suicidal, intentional self-mutilation. The aim of this study was to use laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and psychophysical methods to differentiate the factors that may underlie this analgesic state. Ten unmedicated female patients with BPD (according to DSM-IV) and 14 healthy female control subjects were investigated using brief radiant heat pulses generated by a thulium laser and five-channel LEP recording. Heat pulses were applied as part of a spatial discrimination task (two levels of difficulty) and during a mental arithmetic task. BPD patients had significantly higher heat pain thresholds (23%) and lower pain ratings (67%) than control subjects. Nevertheless, LEP amplitudes were either normal (N1, P2, P3) or moderately enhanced in BPD patients (N2). LEP latencies and task performance did not differ between patients and control subjects. The P3 amplitudes, the vertex potential (N2-P2), and the N1, which is generated near the secondary somatosensory cortex, were significantly reduced during distraction by mental arithmetic in both groups. In addition, P3 amplitudes reflected task difficulty. This study confirms previous findings of attenuated pain perception in BPD. Normal nociceptive discrimination task performance, normal LEPs, and normal P3 potentials indicate that this attenuation is neither related to a general impairment of the sensory-discriminative component of pain, nor to hyperactive descending inhibition, nor to attention deficits. These findings suggest that hypoalgesia in BPD may primarily be due to altered intracortical processing similar to certain meditative states.

Effect of a graded single constriction of the rat sciatic nerve on pain behavior and expression of immunoreactive NPY and NPY Y1 receptor in DRG neurons and spinal cord

In the present study, the rat sciatic nerve was constricted to varying degrees using only one ligature with a very thin polyethylene sheath placed between nerve and ligature thread. Complete nerve transection was studied for comparison. With a 40-80% constriction of the nerve we observed allodynia to a similar extent as in the so-called Bennett model based on four loose ligatures. We also monitored changes in the expression of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and the NPY Y1 receptor (Y1R) in the lumbar 4-5 dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and dorsal horn and found upregulation of NPY and downregulation of the Y1R in DRG neurons after injury. These results indicate that similar peptide and receptor changes occur in this model as after axotomy and in other nerve injury models, although the immunohistochemical and behavioral changes seem to be dependent on the degree of constriction of the nerve. Thus, it seems relevant to monitor the degree of constriction when evaluating pain and other post-injury events. The possibility that some of the changes in NPY-ergic neurotransmission are related to the generation of allodynia is discussed; as well as the possibility to use this mononeuropathic model based on a single ligature nerve constriction (SLNC) as a complementary approach to other widely used pain models.

Laser evoked potentials for assessing sensory neuropathy in human patients

Sensory neuropathy usually impairs tactile sensations related to large myelinated afferents (Abeta) as well as thermal-pain sense related to small myelinated (Adelta) and unmyelinated (C) afferents. By selectively affecting large or small fibres, some sensory neuropathies may also provoke a dissociated sensory loss. Standard nerve conduction studies and somatosensory evoked potentials assess Abeta-fibre function only. Laser pulses selectively excite free nerve endings in the superficial skin layers and evoke Adelta-related brain potentials (LEPs). From earlier studies and new cases we collected data on 270 patients with sensory neuropathy. LEPs often disclosed subclinical dysfunction of Adelta fibres and proved a sensitive and reliable diagnostic tool for assessing small-fibre function in sensory neuropathy.

Neurophysiological testing correlates with clinical examination according to fibre type involvement and severity in sensory neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate a comprehensive battery of neurophysiological tests for objective evaluation of sensory neuropathies including fibre type involvement and severity, and to determine the relation between neurophysiological data and clinical examination.

METHODS

45 patients referred for sensory neuropathy were studied using a standardised clinical evaluation of large and small fibre symptoms and an original neurophysiological battery. Clinical evaluation included: assessment of tactile, vibratory, and pin sensation; tendon reflexes; toe position sense; ataxia score; pain level; and presence of trophic, vasomotor, or sudomotor abnormalities. The neurophysiological battery included: recording of large fibre and small fibre components of the sural sensory nerve action potential; somatosensory evoked cortical potentials and soleus H reflex following tibial nerve electrical stimulation; laser evoked potentials following Nd:YAG laser stimulation of the foot; and plantar sympathetic skin response to median nerve stimulation. Neuropathy was classified according to the predominantly affected fibre type, and a severity score was established based on clinical and neurophysiological abnormalities.

RESULTS

On clinical examination there were 22 patients with large fibre sensory neuropathy (LFSN), 18 with mixed sensory neuropathy (MSN), and five with small fibre sensory neuropathy (SFSN). Neurophysiological classification identified 25 patients with LFSN, 13 with MSN, and seven with SFSN. Clinical and neurophysiological classifications and severity scores were correlated, whatever the type of neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between clinical examination and the results of an original neurophysiological test battery offers a comprehensive clinical and neurophysiological approach to the objective assessment of peripheral neuropathies according to fibre type involvement and overall severity.

Clinical usefulness of laser-evoked potentials

In contrast to the function of the visual or auditory pathways which are electrophysiologically accessible by visual or auditory evoked potentials, the somatosensory pathway cannot be investigated as a whole by conventional somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), because these only reflect function of large fibers, dorsal columns, medial lemniscus and their thalamo-cortical projections mediating sensations like touch and vibration. The other half of the somatosensory system, signaling temperature and pain perception, uses a different set of afferents and different central pathways, the function of which is accessible by laser-evoked potentials (LEPs). LEP can document lesions of the spinothalamic tract and (lateral) brainstem and of thalamo-cortical projections conveying thermo-nociceptive signals. In the peripheral nerve, LEP can help distinguish between large and small fiber neuropathies. The rapid heating of the skin by infrared laser pulses can easily be applied to non-glabrous skin in any dermatome. In recent years, many clinical studies have demonstrated that LEP can supply evidence for establishing clinical diagnoses when deficits of the nociceptive system are present. This review outlines principles and recording techniques for LEP in patients and compiles typical LEP findings in patients with lesions due to different diseases at various levels of the nociceptive pathways. Limitations for the use of LEP are pointed out, too, like the uncertainty of lesion location along these pathways and the fact that LEP can reliably show correlates of reduced nociceptive function but only rarely of enhanced transmission (like in hyperalgesia).

Functional assessment of A? and C fibers in patients with Fabry's disease

The pathophysiology of neuropathic pain in Fabry's disease (FD) is still largely unknown. Seven FD patients were studied by laser evoked potentials (LEPs) to assess the function of the A delta and C fibers. Laser pulses were delivered on the skin of the hand and perioral region at painful intensity to record LEPs related to A delta-fiber inputs and at nonpainful intensity to obtain LEPs related to C-fiber inputs. When the perioral region was stimulated, a vertex positive component was recorded with a mean latency of 260.3 ms and 376 ms after A delta- and C-fiber stimulation, respectively. The mean A delta-LEP amplitude was significantly lower in FD patients (N1/P1 mean values were 2.8 microV and 4.5 microV after hand and face stimulation, respectively, compared to 4 microV and 8.9 microV for controls; N2/P2 mean values were 8.2 microV and 11.1 microV after hand and face stimulation, respectively, and 16.7 microV and 22.3 microV in controls). Unlike the healthy subjects, 6 FD patients, suffering from neuropathic pain, showed a late positive potential related to C-fiber function (mean latency, 377.1 ms) also after facial stimulation at painful intensity, suggesting a relative overflow of C-fiber input, which may be relevant in the pathophysiology of pain in this disease.

Chapter 5 Central mechanisms of pain perception

Mechanisms of human nociception can be studied by the use of CO2 laser stimulation, which selectively activates nociceptive receptors, and by the use of various noninvasive techniques. In addition to the contralateral thalamus, at least several cortical areas including the contralateral SI, bilateral SII, anterior cingulated cortex, and insular cortices are involved in the pain sensation/perception. Pain perception (Fig. 8) is unique because these cortical structures seem to be activated in parallel at nearly the same latency after the stimulus presentation. SI seems to play a role in basic pain processing while SII and insula are involved in higher functions of pain perception. Emotional aspects of pain perception are mediated by anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insula/parietal operculum.

Increased movement pain in osteoarthritis of the hands is associated with A beta-mediated cutaneous mechanical sensitivity

The relationship between joint pain and hyperalgesia has been explored in animal models of articular inflammation, but is yet to be shown in the most common rheumatologic condition: osteoarthritis. In this study, cutaneous thermal and mechanical pain thresholds were measured over the thumb of patients with osteoarthritis of the hands. In symptomatic patients, pain was manipulated through resisted active movement of the thumb. Provocation of movement pain (MP) was associated with a sustained fall in mechanical pain thresholds. Thermal pain thresholds remained stable during increases in joint pain. Increased mechanical sensitivity after exacerbation of MP was alleviated by A beta fiber blockade. It appears that superficial tenderness over the osteoarthritic thumb fluctuates with pain arising from movement of the joint. It is concluded that dorsal horn mechanisms contribute to MP-related hyperalgesia in osteoarthritis of the hands.

How do we selectively activate skin nociceptors with a high power infrared laser? Physiology and biophysics of laser stimulation

This review presents and discusses the leading arguments justifying the use of high power laser stimulators to explore the nociceptive system. To grasp the particularity of such stimulators, fundamentals concerning the interaction of low-energy radiation with the skin will be recalled and focused on the optimal match between the wavelength of the emitting source and the thermophysical properties of the skin. This knowledge shall allow us to discuss critical characteristics of laser stimulators. Study of the cutaneous spectrum of receptors showed that laser stimulators allow the selective activation of A(delta) and C-fiber nociceptors. We will present different methods, which increase the selectivity of the laser stimulation, restricting the activation to isolated C-fiber nociceptors. These methods open new perspectives in the study of the cerebral processing of signals ascending through A(delta) and/or C nociceptors and should contribute to a better understanding of their central interaction and integration in normal and pathological states.

Sensory experiences in relation to pulpal nerve activation of human teeth in different age groups

There are no data on the correlation of intradental nerve activity and sensation from intact human teeth. We used microneurography to examine this relation and to determine whether it changes with age. Fifteen informed and healthy male volunteers were divided into three age groups: group A (18.6+/-1.82 years, mean+/-standard deviation (S.D.)), group B (38.4+/-2.70 years) and group C (64.0+/-4.06 years). Ratings of perceived pain intensity to thermal stimulation were obtained using a visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, each subject chose one or two words from the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire to describe perceived pain. A total of 90 single pulpal axons were studied with microneurography at the same time as the sensory experiences were recorded. Mean conduction velocities and variance estimates correlated closely with age. With advancing age, first, the percentage of teeth from which the subjects did not perceive any sensations to thermal stimulation increased, second, units responding to heat stimulus decreased, and third, latencies of sensation induced by thermal stimulation increased. In addition, a burst of afterdischarges following thermal stimulation and neural discharges evoked by thermal stimulation produced no sensation only in some of group B and C units. In contrast, no significant difference was found among three groups in VAS scores and words to describe the perceived pain to thermal stimulation. These results suggest that pulpal afferents were activated by the same mechanism(s); the hydrodynamic mechanism works immediately after thermal stimulation and is possibly followed by direct activation of some nerves, especially slow conducting fibres. In older tooth pulps, the decrease in the number of fast conducting afferents and mineral apposition of dentinal tubules impaired the nerve activation, especially by heat, as per the hydrodynamic mechanism. Spike discharges without sensation in older individuals were suggested to be due to insufficient spatial and temporal summation and may be involved with abnormal uncomfortable sensations.

Non-phase locked electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to CO2 laser skin stimulations may reflect central interactions between A partial partial differential- and C-fibre afferent volleys

OBJECTIVE

By co-activating A partial partial differential- and C-fibre nociceptors, intense CO2 laser heat stimuli produce a dual sensation, composed of first and second pain, but induce only a single A partial partial differential-fibre related late laser evoked potential (LEP). However, when avoiding concomitant activation of A partial partial differential-fibres, C-fibre related ultra-late LEPs are recorded. This poorly understood phenomenon was re-investigated using a method which, unlike time-domain averaging, reveals electroencephalogram (EEG) changes whether or not phase-locked to stimulus onset.

METHODS

CO2 laser stimuli were applied to the dorsum of the hand. Reaction-time was used to discriminate between A partial partial differential- and C-fibre mediated detections. Analyses were performed using a method based on the time-frequency wavelet transform of EEG epochs.

RESULTS

This study revealed: (1) a novel non-phase-locked component related to the activation of A partial partial differential-fibres occurring at similar latencies as the late LEP; and (2) a widespread post-stimulus event-related desynchronization (ERD) induced by both A partial partial differential- and C-fibres.

CONCLUSIONS

A partial partial differential- and C-fibre related LEPs could be electrophysiological correlates of similar brain processes, which, when already engaged by A partial partial differential-fibres, cannot or do not need to be reactivated by the later arriving C-fibre afferent volley. A partial partial differential-fibre related ERD could reflect a transient change of state of brain structures generating these responses.

Cerebral responses following stimulation of unmyelinated C-fibers in humans: electro- and magneto-encephalographic study

There are two kinds of pain, a sharp pain ascending through Adelta fibers (first pain) and a second burning pain ascending though C fibers (second pain). By using a novel method, the application of a low intensity CO(2) laser beam to a tiny area of skin using a very thin aluminum plate with numerous tiny holes as a spatial filter, we succeeded in selectively stimulating unmyelinated C fibers of the skin in humans, and could record consistent and clear brain responses using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). The conduction velocity (CV) of the C fibers of the peripheral nerve and spinal cord, probably spinothalamic tract (STT), is approximately 1-4 m/s, which is significantly slower than that of Adelta (approximately 10-15 m/s) and Abeta fibers (approximately 50-70 m/s). This method should be very useful for clinical application. Following C fiber stimulation, primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (SI and SII) are simultaneously activated in the cerebral hemisphere contralateral to the stimulation, and then, SII in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulation is activated. These early responses are easily detected by MEG. Then, probably limbic systems such as insula and cingulate cortex are activated, and those activities reflected in EEG components. Investigations of the cortical processing in pain perception including both first and second pain should provide a better understanding of pain perception and, therefore, contribute to pain relief in clinical medicine.

Pre-perceptual pain sensory responses (N1 component) in type 1 diabetes mellitus

We investigated the integrity of the ascending pathways for pain sensitivity in the early stage of type 1 diabetes mellitus, by measuring the N1 component and the conventional N2/P2 vertex potentials of laser evoked potentials (LEPs). Brain responses to laser stimuli were obtained in 21 healthy volunteers and 21 type 1 diabetic patients, without either clinical neuropathy or electrophysiological evidence of large-fiber damage. In diabetic patients N1 and P2 latencies were prolonged and the N1 and N2/P2 amplitudes were decreased after foot stimulation. A significant reduction of the conduction velocity of Adelta fibers in the lower limbs was also observed. LEPs reveal an early, subclinical and selective damage of pain sensation in diabetic patients. N1 and P2 potentials are delayed and decreased in parallel giving evidence that LEP abnormalities are not secondary to a cognitive dysfunction and mostly reflect a small-fiber dysfunction.