Sensory potentials evoked by magnetic stimulation of the cervical spine

Controversies and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Transspinal Magnetic Stimulation: A Critical Review and Exploratory Trial in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

Magnetic stimulation is a safe, non-invasive diagnostic tool and promising treatment strategy for neurological and psychiatric disorders. Although most studies address transcranial magnetic stimulation, transspinal magnetic stimulation (TsMS) has received recent attention since trials involving invasive spinal cord stimulation showed encouraging results for pain, spasticity, and Parkinson’s disease. While the effects of TsMS on spinal roots is well understood, its mechanism of action on the spinal cord is still controversial. Despite unclear mechanisms of action, clinical benefits of TsMS have been reported, including improvements in scales of spasticity, hyperreflexia, and bladder and bowel symptoms, and even supraspinal gait disorders such as freezing and camptocormia. In the present study, a critical review on the application of TsMS in neurology was conducted, along with an exploratory trial involving TsMS in three patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. The goal was to understand the mechanism of action of TsMS through H-reflex measurement at the unstimulated lumbosacral level. Although limited by studies with a small sample size and a low to moderate effect size, TsMS is safe and tolerable and presents consistent clinical and neurophysiological benefits that support its use in clinical practice.

Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects

•

We studied excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation.

•

CRMS elicited direct and reflex responses in hand muscles.

•

CRMS is painless and well tolerated and, therefore, applicable to clinical studies.

Objectives

To characterize direct and reflex hand muscle responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation (CRMS) in healthy volunteers during sustained voluntary contraction.

Methods

In 18 healthy volunteers, we recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle the responses to CRMS of progressively increasing intensity and level of muscle contraction. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and the silent period (SP) were compared to those obtained with plexus, midarm and wrist stimulation. Additionally, in a smaller number of subjects, we obtained the peristimulus time histogram (psth) of single motor unit firing in the FDI, examined the effects of vibration and recorded the modulation of sustained EMG activity in muscles of the lower limbs.

Results

Increasing CRMS intensity led to larger CMAP with no relevant changes in SP1 or SP2, except for lower amplitude of the burst interrupting the silent period (BISP). Increasing the level of muscle contraction led to reduced CMAP, shorter SP duration and increased BISP amplitude. The psth analysis showed the underlying changes in the motor unit firing frequency that corresponded to the changes seen in the CMAP and the SP with surface recordings. Progressively distal stimulation led to CMAPs of shorter latency and increased amplitude, SPs of longer latency and shorter duration, and a BISP of longer latency. Vibration led to reduction of the SP. CRMS induced SPs in muscles of the lower limb.

Conclusions

CRMS induces excitatory and inhibitory responses in hand muscles, fitting with the expected behavior of mixed nerve stimulation at very proximal sites.

Significance

Characterization of the effects of CRMS on hand muscles is of physiological and potentially clinical applicability, as it is a painless and reliable procedure.

Axonal stimulation under MRI magnetic field z gradients: a modeling study

The stimulation of axons under MRI magnetic fields is analyzed solving the cable equation along the axons in the presence of magnetic field z gradients. Axons are represented using a one-dimensional compartmental cable model including the kinetics of mammalian myelinated fibers. Computer simulations of the model were performed for sinusoidal and trapezoidal fields. Several axon and field parameters were tested to determine the threshold values for axonal stimulation of the magnetic field, induced electric field and time derivative of the magnetic field. The results indicate that 1) threshold for stimulation is lowest for the largest diameter axons terminating in the region where the magnetic field is maximum, 2) trapezoidal waveforms can be optimized to allow better sub-threshold resolution than sinusoidal waveforms, and 3) the induced electric field is better than the magnetic field and time derivative of the magnetic field as indicators of stimulation threshold.