Are nerve conduction studies useful for monitoring the adequacy of renal dialysis?

Sympathetic skin response in peritoneal dialysis patients

To determine if there is any difference in nerve conduction studies or sympathetic skin response (SSR) between patients on peritoneal dialysis and those on regular hemodialysis, we did a cross-sectional observational study. The study group consisted of 24 patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) (12 men, aged 45 +/- 17 years) and 20 patients on hemodialysis (HD) (11 men, aged 50 +/- 22 years). All of these patients were in stable clinical condition, they were receiving adequate dialysis, and none of them had systemic diseases. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies of the common and medial peroneal nerve and SSR were performed in all patients. There were no differences in motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities between PD and HD patients. All PD patients had detectable SSR. However, six patients on HD (30%) failed to show SSR (p < 0.05). Mean SSR amplitude was higher in PD patients than in HD patients (1233 +/- 843 vs. 605 +/- 771 microv, p < 0.05). There were no differences in mean SSR latency between PD and HD patients. PD modality (continuous ambulatory PD vs. automated PD) or the presence of residual renal function did not influence nerve conduction studies or SSR. In conclusion, using standard nerve conduction studies, no differences could be found between HD and PD. However, a higher proportion of patients on HD showed an impaired SSR, suggesting that subclinical neuropathy may be more common in HD than PD patients.