Urethral retro-resistance pressure: association with established measures of incontinence severity and change after midurethral tape insertion

[Urodynamic studies prior to urinary incontinence surgery : What is useful?]

Surgery is often necessary after failure of conservative therapy for urinary incontinence. Guidelines recommend urodynamic studies before surgery. A distinction is made between non-invasive (uroflowmetry) and invasive methods (cystometry and pressure-flow study, if necessary as combined videourodynamics, as well as urethral pressure profile). All examinations serve to objectify and quantify the symptoms, to correctly assign symptoms to the pathophysiology and anatomy as well as to identify risk factors, which often have a significant influence on the success of surgical therapy. Given appropriate experience, complications and often significant sequelae of bladder dysfunction affecting the patient's quality of life and life expectancy can be recognized. Urodynamic studies are performed to help narrow down potential diagnoses, to develop therapeutic strategies, and to obtain prognostic parameters. The following article is intended to provide some support.

The evidence for urodynamic investigation of patients with symptoms of urinary incontinence

Urodynamic studies are the gold standard to objectively diagnose dysfunction of the lower urinary tract. The widely available evidence for the clinical relevance is, however, fragmented. This article summarizes the published knowledge supporting the use of urodynamic studies in urinary incontinence in female, male and frail patients, as well as patients with relevant neurological disease. Five technological innovations are discussed briefly. Standard urodynamic cystometry can, on the basis of a solid body of evidence, objectively unveil the entire function of the lower urinary tract in all patients with urinary incontinence, regardless of the patients' perception of (ab-)normality of signs and or symptoms.