Clinical and urodynamic effect of methylphenidate for the treatment of giggle incontinence (enuresis risoria)

Giggle incontinence: a scoping review

Giggle incontinence (GI) is poorly described, defined, and understood. It is considered a bladder storage disorder in which laughter causes an uncontrollable episode of urinary incontinence that cannot be stopped until the bladder is completely emptied. It has been confused with stress urinary incontinence and overactive bladder. A thorough analysis of 26 articles on the subject of "giggle incontinence" and associated terms was performed, including all articles since the phrase first appeared. To date, 351 GI cases have been reported. It occurs mainly in women (69.5%) at 5 years of age, with a prevalence ranging from 8.4 to 16.2 years (average age of 12.4 years), and some cases have a family history of the disease (13-16.7%). This review discusses the historical background, current understanding, and challenges related to GI. It primarily affects females after the age of 5 years, causing complete bladder emptying during uncontrollable laughter. The exact cause is unknown, but hypotheses suggest involvement of the central nervous system. Diagnosis relies on clinical history, physical tests, and urine frequency evaluation. Management involves urotherapy techniques, biofeedback, and methylphenidate. Understanding GI will aid in developing more effective management techniques. IMPACT: Highlights limited awareness among healthcare professionals about giggle incontinence as a distinct condition, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic criteria and assessment tools. Addresses insufficient understanding of the underlying mechanisms and contributing factors, providing valuable insights for better diagnosis and treatment. Emphasizes the importance of patient education and support, calling for improved resources and counseling. Urges further research and evidence-based guidelines to enhance treatment strategies.

The effect of methylphenidate for giggle incontinence in children

INTRODUCTION

Giggle incontinence (GI) is a rare form of urinary incontinence that occurs during or immediately after laughing due to involuntary and complete bladder emptying. Few studies in the literature report that methylphenidate can be effective in treatment of this condition.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to characterize children with GI and evaluate their response to methylphenidate, as well as describe treatment duration, dosage of methylphenidate, relapse rates after discontinuation of medication, and side effects.

METHODS

Medical records and 48-h frequency-volume charts from children treated with methylphenidate for GI in the period January 2011-July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighteen children were diagnosed with GI and fulfilled inclusion criteria. Fifteen patients were included in analysis, as 3 out of 18 children decided not to take the methylphenidate that was prescribed. In total, 14 out of the 15 GI patients treated with methylphenidate experienced clinical effect. All patients included in the study had methylphenidate prescribed in a dose range of 5-20 mg daily. Treatment duration ranged from 30 to 1001 days, with a median of 152 days (IQR 114, 243.5). Ten children experienced complete response and two of those reported symptom relapse after discontinuation of the methylphenidate. Only mild and short-lasting side effects were reported by two patients.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates that methylphenidate is an effective treatment in children diagnosed with GI. Side effects are mild and uncommon.

Urodynamic characterization of giggle incontinence in children

AIMS

Giggle incontinence is a rare condition resulting in excessive urinary incontinence with laughter, where bladder function is otherwise "normal." Urodynamic descriptions of the condition to date are limited. We believe that giggle incontinence has characteristic urodynamic findings. We tested this hypothesis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the urodynamic investigations of patients with giggle incontinence managed in a tertiary regional bladder unit between February 2014 and November 2019.

RESULTS

We identified the studies of seven patients, median age 13.5 years (10.4-15.7) of whom 6 were female. All had videourodynamics. Two went on to have further invasive investigation; one had urethral pressure profile and one had ambulatory urodynamics. Detrusor overactivity (DO) was observed in six. DO was asensate in all. In five DO was triggered by laughter and was associated with laughter induced incontinence in four. Six had DO that was not provoked by laugher. In one amplitude of DO was proportional to vigour of laughter. In three patients there was identification of sudden pelvic floor relaxation during laughter resulting in incontinence. Stress urinary incontinence was not observed in any.

CONCLUSIONS

Giggle incontinence is a complex phenomenon. Urodynamic diagnosis is challenging and is dependent on eliciting laughter. We present the first urodynamic demonstration that giggle incontinence is associated with laughter-induced, asensate DO and concurrent, momentary pelvic floor relaxation. We hope this will provide a more consistent basis for defining this condition in the future.

Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?

Introduction:

To evaluate possible factors that can guide the clinician to predict potential cases refractoriness to medical treatment for giggle incontinence (GI) and to examine the effectiveness of different treatment modalities.

Material and methods:

The data of 48 children referred to pediatric urology outpatient clinic between 2000 and 2013 diagnosed as GI were reviewed. Mean age, follow-up, GI frequency, associated symptoms, medical and family history were noted. Incontinence frequency differed between several per day to less than once weekly. Children were evaluated with uroflowmetry-electromyography and post-void residual urine. Clinical success was characterized as a full or partial response, or nonresponse as defined by the International Children's Continence Society. Univariate analysis was used to find potential factors including age, sex, familial history, GI frequency, treatment modality and dysfunctional voiding to predict children who would possibly not respond to treatment.

Results:

Mean age of the patients was 8.4 years (range 5 to 16). Mean follow-up time and mean duration of asymptomatic period were noted as 6.7±1.4 years and 14.2±2.3 months respectively. While 12 patients were treated with only behavioral urotherapy (Group-1), 11 patients were treated with alpha-adrenergic blockers and behavioral urotherapy (Group-2) and 18 patients with methylphenidate and behavioral urotherapy (Group-3). Giggle incontinence was refractory to eight children in-group 1; six children in-group 2 and eight children in-group 3. Daily GI frequency and dysfunctional voiding diagnosed on uroflowmetry-EMG were found as outstanding predictive factors for resistance to treatment modalities.

Conclusions:

A variety of therapies for GI have more than 50% failure rate and a standard treatment for GI has not been established. The use of medications to treat these patients would not be recommended, as they appear to add no benefit to symptoms and may introduce severe adverse effects.

Does Methylphenidate Affect Cystometric Parameters in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats?

PURPOSE

Methylphenidate (MPH) is one of the most commonly prescribed psychostimulants for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, there is limited research on its effects on lower urinary tract function. This study investigated changes in cystometric parameters after intragastric administration of MPH in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), an animal model of ADHD.

METHODS

Fourteen- to 16-week-old male SHRs (n=10), weighing between 280 and 315 g, were used. Three micturition cycles were recorded before administering MPH. One hour after each intragastric MPH injection, three cycles of cystometrogram were obtained in the awake condition. Various cystometric parameters were evaluated, including basal pressure (BP), maximal pressure (MP), threshold pressure (TP), bladder capacity (BC), micturition volume (MV), micturition interval (MI), and residual volume (RV). The data were analyzed using paired Student t-tests.

RESULTS

Five SHRs were each administered a dose of 3-mg/kg MPH, and the other five received a dose of 6-mg/kg MPH. BP and MP increased significantly in the rats that received the 3-mg/kg MPH injection, but not in those that received the 6-mg/kg injection. BC, MV, and MI significantly increased in the rats that received the 6-mg/kg MPH injection, but not in those that received the 3-mg/kg injection. There were no significant changes in TP after either injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant increases in BC, MV, and MI after the 6-mg/kg MPH injection suggest that the peripheral and the central nervous systems may play important roles in bladder function in those receiving MPH for ADHD.

Comorbidity of ADHD and incontinence in children

ADHD and incontinence are common childhood disorders which co-occur at much higher rates than expected by chance. The aim of this review was to provide an overview both of the comorbidity of nocturnal enuresis (NE), daytime urinary incontinence (DUI) and faecal incontinence (FI) in children with ADHD; and, vice versa, of the co-occurrence of ADHD in children with NE, DUI and FI. Most clinical studies have focussed on the association of ADHD and NE. Population-based studies have shown that children with DUI have an even greater risk for ADHD than those with NE. While children with FI have the highest overall comorbidity rates of psychological disorders, these are heterogeneous with a wide range of internalising and externalising disorders--not necessarily of ADHD. Genetic studies indicate that ADHD and NE, DUI and FI do not share the same genetic basis. The comorbidity is conferred by non-genetic factors. Possible aetiological and pathogenetic links between ADHD and incontinence are provided by neurophysiological, imaging and pharmacological studies. The co-occurrence has clinical implications: children with ADHD and NE, DUI and FI are more difficult to treat, show lower compliance and have less favourable treatment outcomes for incontinence. Therefore, both groups of disorders have to be assessed and treated specifically.

The management of childhood urinary incontinence

The International Children's Continence Society (ICCS) has undertaken an enormous effort to standardize both the terminology and management of various aspects of incontinence in children, including enuresis, bladder overactivity, dysfunctional voiding and psychological comorbidities. A number of guidelines have been published to aid those involved in the care of children with lower urinary tract symptoms. This review addresses a number of recommended diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, including urotherapy and pharmacological treatment, with emphasis on a focused medical history, information acquired from bladder diaries and uroflow evaluations. The major role of urotherapy is underlined with supportive pharmacotherapy, when indicated. The article provides both a summary of ICCS guidelines and a brief review of recently published papers related to the contemporary management of childhood incontinence, a health issue still underestimated by both the child's caregivers and healthcare providers.

Acute dose-related differential effects of methylphenidate on murine cystometric parameters

Purpose

Methylphenidate is the most widely used central nervous system stimulant in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. However, few studies have assessed its effects on voiding. Various doses of methylphenidate were investigated for their effects on cystometric parameters in conscious mice.

Methods

Ten male C57BL/6 mice, weighing between 20 and 23 g, were used in this study. To compare the acute drug responses before and after the oral medication was administered in the awake condition, we injected the solution through a catheter inserted into the stomach. Methylphenidate (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg) in an injection volume of 0.05 mL was administered.

Results

Four mice that received high doses of methylphenidate (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) showed no voiding contraction, with urine leakage. Six mice that received a low dose of methylphenidate (1.25 mg/kg) showed typical micturition cycles before and after administration. The micturition pressure decreased and bladder capacity increased without an increased residual volume after administration.

Conclusions

Methylphenidate has differential, dose-dependent effects on the function of the lower urinary tract, due to the dependent relationship between the brain and lower urinary tract. Especially at higher doses, this drug may interfere with normal micturition. Therefore, more detailed clinical or experimental studies are warranted in the future.