A novel cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence, short-term outcome

Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Current Status and Future Proposals

BACKGROUND

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition with a significant impact on the quality of life of female patients. The limitations of current treatment strategies have prompted the exploration of new effective and minimally invasive alternative approaches, including cell therapy.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to update the current clinical status of stem cell therapy in the management of female stress urinary incontinence.

RESULTS

Over thirty clinical studies have been designed to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of cell therapy for female SUI. Despite differences in cell types and protocols, the overall treatment procedures were similar. Standard subjective and objective assessment tools, and follow-up periods ranged from 6 weeks to 6 years have been used. Cell injection has shown to be a safe therapy in the treatment of female SUI. However, the results from more recent randomized trials have shown less promising results than expected in restoring continence. Heterogeneous research methodologies using different cell types and doses make it difficult to draw conclusions about effectiveness. Several key points remain that need to be further explored in future clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

To advance in the development of cell therapy, it is essential to know the mechanisms involved to be able to direct it properly, its efficacy and the durability of the injected cells. Rigorous and homogenized preclinical and clinical studies that demonstrate its scope and improve its application are necessary for validation in the treatment of female SUI.

Mixed treatment for same-severe mixed urinary incontinence: A novel method

Key Clinical Message

Innovative mixed treatment offers hope for persistent mixed urinary incontinence (MUI): PRP-Fibrin Glue-Stem Cell injection, Botox, and TVT in a single session. Successful case study reveals promising outcomes, emphasizing the need for further research.

Abstract

Mixed urinary incontinence is a complaint of stress and urge incontinence which affects patients' quality of life and dramatic changes in patients' physical, mental, and socioeconomic status. The treatment is challenging and depends on the dominance of one of the complaints to the other. The progress in the method of treatment is still under discussion. This study reports treatment of a MUI case in a 56-year-old, with a history of MUI of 7-year duration, which was persistent to pharmacological treatment, pelvic muscle training, biofeedback, and anti-incontinence surgery (Burch Colposuspension). PRP-Fibrin Glue-Stem Cell injection, Botox injection, and TVT were performed in a one surgery session. Patient was discharged with ability to urinate with acceptable amount of post void residue. After 3-month follow-up, patient was completely satisfied and happy. Further research is needed to substantiate the efficacy of these mixed treatments for MUI.

Body fluid-derived stem cells - an untapped stem cell source in genitourinary regeneration

Somatic stem cells have been obtained from solid organs and tissues, including the bone marrow, placenta, corneal stroma, periosteum, adipose tissue, dental pulp and skeletal muscle. These solid tissue-derived stem cells are often used for tissue repair, disease modelling and new drug development. In the past two decades, stem cells have also been identified in various body fluids, including urine, peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid, synovial fluid, breastmilk and menstrual blood. These body fluid-derived stem cells (BFSCs) have stemness properties comparable to those of other adult stem cells and, similarly to tissue-derived stem cells, show cell surface markers, multi-differentiation potential and immunomodulatory effects. However, BFSCs are more easily accessible through non-invasive or minimally invasive approaches than solid tissue-derived stem cells and can be isolated without enzymatic tissue digestion. Additionally, BFSCs have shown good versatility in repairing genitourinary abnormalities in preclinical models through direct differentiation or paracrine mechanisms such as pro-angiogenic, anti-apoptotic, antifibrotic, anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. However, optimization of protocols is needed to improve the efficacy and safety of BFSC therapy before therapeutic translation.

Current status of stem cell treatments and innovative approaches for stress urinary incontinence

Stem cells are capable of self-renewal, differentiation, and the promotion of the release of chemokines and progenitor cells essential for tissue regeneration. Stem cells have the potential to develop into specialized cells if given the right conditions, to self-renew and maintain themselves, to generate a large number of new differentiated cells if injured, and to either generate new tissues or repair existing ones. In the last decade, it has become clear that treating lower urinary tract dysfunction with the patient's own adult stem cells is an effective, root-cause method. Regenerative medicine is predicated on the idea that a damaged rhabdosphincter can be repaired, leading to enhanced blood flow and improved function of the sphincter's exterior (striated) and internal (smooth) muscles. Stem cell therapy has the potential to cure stress urinary incontinence according to preclinical models. In contrast, stem cell treatment has not been licensed for routine clinical usage. This article reviews the current state of stem cell for stres urinary incontinence research and recommends future avenues to facilitate practical uses of this potential therapy modality.

A systematic review of stem cell therapy treatment for women suffering from stress urinary incontinence

BACKGROUND

Stem cell therapy (SCT) is used for regeneration of injured tissues. This seems a novel promising strategy for restoring urethral sphincter function in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the clinical trials available to date on SCT for treatment of SUI in women.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Embase.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective interventional case series, randomized prospective interventional study and prospective cohort study assessing women aged 18 years and over diagnosed with SUI and treated by SCT were included. The quality of studies was finally assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists according to the PRISMA guidelines.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Nineteen studies (n = 773 patients) were selected for final analysis. These were conducted worldwide between the years 2005 and 2016. Although different cell types were used, general processing steps were similar. The follow-up period ranged between 6 weeks and 6 years and included common subjective and objective evaluation tools.

RESULTS

Overall, the studies imply that SCT for treatment of SUI is a safe and effective treatment.

CONCLUSION

In our opinion, the initial results of SCT for the treatment of SUI seem promising. Standardization and validation of this treatment modality is required before it can be recommended for routine use.

Regenerated Cell Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of regenerated cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence (UI) in humans.

METHODS

We searched articles from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database published before February 24, 2020. Of 396 records identified, 23 articles on human clinical research met our criteria, including a total of 890 patients. Stata/SE12.0 software was used to analyze cure, efficiency (cure rate plus improvement rate), and complication rates.

RESULTS

No significant differences in cure rates and effective rates were observed for any cell type in males. However, in females, the myocytes with fibroblasts subgroup (82%) and nucleated cells with platelets subgroup (89%) exhibited significantly higher cure rates compared with the other two subgroups (25% and 36%). Pooled effective rates of myocytes and fibroblasts (92%) and nucleated cells with platelets (97%) were also higher compared with the other two subgroups (72% and 60%). Pooled complication rates were 23% and 26% in males and females, respectively, and there were some differences among subgroups. Although some studies reported postoperative complications, no serious complications were reported and most recovered within 1-2 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited studies have indicated the safety and effectiveness of regenerated cells for treating stress UI in the follow-up period, which may be an ideal method to treat stress UI in the future. Moreover, nucleated cells with platelets and myocytes with fibroblasts were markedly effective, but whether cell injection therapies elicit superior effects need further confirmation.

Current and Future Directions of Stem Cell Therapy for Bladder Dysfunction

Stem cells are capable of self-renewal and differentiation into a range of cell types and promote the release of chemokines and progenitor cells necessary for tissue regeneration. Mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent progenitor cells with enhanced proliferation and differentiation capabilities and less tumorigenicity than conventional adult stem cells; these cells are also easier to acquire. Bladder dysfunction is often chronic in nature with limited treatment modalities due to its undetermined pathophysiology. Most treatments focus on symptom alleviation rather than pathognomonic changes repair. The potential of stem cell therapy for bladder dysfunction has been reported in preclinical models for stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, detrusor underactivity, and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Despite these findings, however, stem cell therapy is not yet available for clinical use. Only one pilot study on detrusor underactivity and a handful of clinical trials on stress urinary incontinence have reported the effects of stem cell treatment. This limitation may be due to stem cell function loss following ex vivo expansion, poor in vivo engraftment or survival after transplantation, or a lack of understanding of the precise mechanisms of action underlying therapeutic outcomes and in vivo behavior of stem cells administered to target organs. Efficacy comparisons with existing treatment modalities are also needed for the successful clinical application of stem cell therapies. This review describes the current status of stem cell research on treating bladder dysfunction and suggests future directions to facilitate clinical applications of this promising treatment modality, particularly for bladder dysfunction.

Stem cell applications in regenerative medicine for stress urinary incontinence: A review of effectiveness based on clinical trials

Objective

To evaluate the current state, therapeutic benefit and safety of urethral injection of autologous stem cells for the treatment stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Materials and methods

A selective database search of PubMed, the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was conducted to validate the effectiveness of stem cell-based therapy. The search included clinical trials published up until 4 January 2020, written in English, and included cohorts of women and men who had received stem cell-based therapy for SUI. The search used the following keywords in various combinations: ‘stem cell therapy’, ‘cell-based therapy for SUI’, ‘regenerative medicine for SUI’, and ‘tissue engineering’. The success rates were assessed according to cough test, urodynamics, pad tests, and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. The primary endpoint was continence rate to measure objectively the effect of the treatment.

Results

We identified four clinical trials using local injections of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), 11 trails with muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs), and two trails with human umbilical cord blood stem cells (HUCBs) and total nucleated cells (TNCs). The median improvement rate of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after ADSCs, MDSCs, TNCs, HUCBs injections were 88%, 77%, 89%, 36% (improvement rate: 1–2 pads) at a mean (range) follow-up of 6 (1–72) months. The cell sources, methods of cell processing, cell number, and implantation techniques differed considerably between studies. Most of the periurethral injections were at the 3, 5, 7, and 9 o’clock positions and for submucosa were at the 4, 6, and 8 o’clock positions. No significant postoperative complications were reported.

Conclusion

Despite many challenges in stem cell-based therapy for treating SUI, it appears to provide, in both male and female patients, acceptable functional results with minimal side-effects and complications. In the future, more clinical trials should be funded in order to optimise stem cell-based therapy and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Abbreviations

ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; BMSCs: bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell; CLPP: cough leak-point pressure; FPL: functional profile length; HUCB: human umbilical cord blood stem cell; ICIQ-(QOL)(SF)(UI): International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (Quality of life) (-Urinary incontinence Short Form) (-Urinary Incontinence); IIQ-7: Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-short form; I-QOL: Incontinence quality of life questionnaire; ISD: intrinsic urinary sphincter deficiency; MDSC: muscle-derived stem cell; MUCP: maximum urethral closure pressure; NR: not reported; Pdet-max: maximum detrusor pressure; PVR: post-void residual urine volume; Q_max: maximum urinary flow; QOL: quality of life; RP: radical prostatectomy; TNC: total nucleated cell; (S)UI: (stress) urinary incontinence; UDSCs: urine-derived stem cells; UTUS: upper tract ultrasonography; VLPP: Valsalva leak-point pressure

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of autologous muscle derived cells in female subjects with stress urinary incontinence

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess safety and efficacy of autologous muscle derived cells for urinary sphincter repair (AMDC-USR) in female subjects with predominant stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial examined intra-sphincteric injection of 150 × 10⁶ AMDC-USR versus placebo in female subjects with stress or stress predominant, mixed urinary incontinence. AMDC-USR products were generated from vastus lateralis needle biopsies. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive AMDC-USR or placebo and 1:1 to receive 1 or 2 treatments (6 months after the first). Primary outcome was composite of ≥ 50% reduction in stress incontinence episode frequency (IEF), 24-h or in-office pad weight tests at 12 months. Other outcome data included validated subject-recorded questionnaires. Subjects randomized to placebo could elect to receive open-label AMDC-USR treatment after 12 months. Subject follow-up was up to 2 years.

RESULTS

AMDC-USR was safe and well-tolerated with no product-related serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. Interim analysis revealed an unexpectedly high placebo response rate (90%) using the composite primary outcome which prevented assessment of treatment effect as designed and thus enrollment was halted at 61% of planned subjects. Post hoc analyses suggested that more stringent endpoints lowered placebo response rates and revealed a possible treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary efficacy finding was inconclusive, these results inform future trial design of AMDC-USR to identify clinically meaningful efficacy endpoints based on IEF reduction, understanding of placebo response rate, and refinement of subject selection criteria to more appropriately align with AMDC-USR's proposed mechanism of action.

Cell Therapy Clinical Trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Current Status and Perspectives

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects 200 million people worldwide. Standard therapies often provide symptomatic relief, but without targeting the underlying etiology, and show tremendous patient-to-patient variability, limited success and complications associated with the procedures. We review in this article the latest clinical trials performed to treat SUI using cell-based therapies. These therapies, despite typically including only a small number of patients and short term evaluation of results, have proven to be feasible and safe. However, there is not yet a consensus for the best cell source to be used to treat SUI and not all patients may be suitable for these therapies. Therefore, more clinical trials should be promoted recruiting large number of patients and evaluating long term results.

Targeted therapy for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review based on clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists regarding the therapeutic benefit of cell-based therapy in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate evidence regarding the therapeutic effect and safety of cell-based therapy in the treatment of SUI and to propose a new approach to SUI treatment utilizing tissue engineering methodologies. We have thoroughly reviewed the literature using PubMed in order to identify only original, clinical studies involving cell therapy for SUI.

EXPERT OPINION

Cell-based therapy, as practiced today, is a safe but ineffective method for SUI treatment. The key to an optimal therapeutic outcome in SUI is accurate diagnosis combined with targeted therapy. Targeted therapy in SUI should be based on cell implantation to restore and regenerate the damaged urethral sphincter and/or the construction of a neo-pubourethral ligament utilizing tissue engineering methodologies.

Stress urinary incontinence in women and cell therapy: What can we expect from the future?

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common disorder that affects a large number of women and their quality of life. The aim of SUI therapy is to restore the existing urethral function via physical therapy, biofeedback, pelvic floor rehabilitation, pharmacological therapy, bulking agents and surgical approaches. Currently, the gold standard for the management of SUI is the tension-free vaginal sling, which provides structural support to the female urethra. However, even minimally invasive surgical procedure such as “slings” carries risks for the patients, lost efficacy over the time and has long-term complications. For this reason, new therapeutic modalities are needed. Cell therapy has been emerged as an alternative to be used on the treatment of different diseases. The use of stem cells as a therapeutic option for SUI is an attractive alternative because, theoretically, injected cells could restore functional muscle cells and aid in sphincter closure in women with sphincter-associated incontinence. This study aims to review the current literature regarding evidences for using stem cell therapy on stress urinary incontinence in women.

A glance at methods for cleft palate repair

Context:

Cleft palate is the second most common birth defect and is considered as a challenge for pediatric plastic surgeons. There is still a general lack of a standard protocol and patients often require multiple surgical interventions during their lifetime along with disappointing results.

Evidence Acquisition:

PubMed search was undertaken using search terms including 'cleft palate repair', 'palatal cleft closure', 'cleft palate + stem cells', 'cleft palate + plasma rich platelet', 'cleft palate + scaffold', 'palatal tissue engineering', and 'bone tissue engineering'. The found articles were included if they defined a therapeutic strategy and/or assessed a new technique.

Results:

We reported a summary of the key-points concerning cleft palate development, the genes involving this defect, current therapeutic strategies, recently novel aspects, and future advances in treatments for easy and fast understanding of the concepts, rather than a systematic review. In addition, the results were integrated with our recent experience.

Conclusions:

Tissue engineering may open a new window in cleft palate reconstruction. Stem cells and growth factors play key roles in this field.

Urolastic-a new bulking agent for the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence: outcome of 12 months follow up

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new injectable implant, Urolastic, in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after 12-month followup. Materials and Methods. A prospective, cohort study included adult women with SUI. Patients were treated with Urolastic periurethral injections under local anaesthesia. The injection procedure was repeated after 6 weeks when indicated. Patients were evaluated for efficacy and safety parameters 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after therapy. Results. Twenty women 56 (33-71) years old were included. Thirteen patients (65%) received one injection each (overall average of 2,1 mL); 7 patients (35%) received a second injection. Nineteen patients complete the 12-month followup. The mean Stamey incontinence grade significantly decreased from 1.9 at baseline to 0.4 at 12 months (visit IV) (P < 0.001). None of the patients were dry at baseline; 68% of them were dry at 12 months. The mean number of incontinence episodes significantly decreased from 6/day at baseline to 1.6/day at visit IV (P < 0.001). Reduction in pad weight went from 20.2 to 7.8 g at one year. The mean I-QoL score significantly increased from 51 at baseline to 76 at visit IV (P < 0.001). Six patients (30%) developed minor complications related to the injection procedure. Conclusions. Urolastic is effective and long-standing urethral bulking agent with moderate adverse events.

Electroacupuncture improves bladder and bowel function in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: results from a prospective observational study

In order to explore the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) for chronic bowel and bladder dysfunction after traumatic spinal cord injury, 14 patients were treated with electroacupuncture once a day, five times a week for the first four weeks, and once every other day, three times a week for the following four weeks. The patients were then followed up for six months. After treatment, four (4/14, 28.57%) patients resumed normal voiding; six (6/14, 42.86%) resumed normal voiding for no less than half of all micturition behaviors; four (4/14, 28.57%) required supplementary urination methods for higher than half of all micturition behaviors. These effects persisted during followup. Mean postvoid RUV decreased by 190.29 ± 101.87 mL (P < 0.01) after treatment and by 198.86 ± 112.18 mL (P < 0.01) during followup. Patients' weekly urinary incontinence frequency decreased 7.14 ± 46.34 times/week (P = 0.036) after treatment and decreased 49.86 ± 44.38 times/week during followup. After treatment, four (4/14, 28.57%) patients resumed normal bowel movements (P = 0.025); five (5/14, 35.71%) reduced the dependence on supplementary defecation methods; five (5/14, 35.71%) had no changes. In patients with chronic bowel and bladder dysfunction after traumatic SCI, EA may provide a valuable alternative tool in improving patients' self-controlled bowel and bladder functions with minimal side effects.

Recent status of the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

The therapeutic options for management of stress urinary incontinence can be conservative, pharmacological or surgical. The treatment of patients with stress urinary incontinence should be tailored to the individual to optimize care. A multitude of surgical techniques have emerged to treat this condition in recent years. The objective of the present review was to present an overview of current practice in the management of stress urinary incontinence while considering the evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of these procedures.