Impact on quality of life and sexual satisfaction of continent cystostomy with enterocystoplasty in an adult neurologic population

Decisional regret and impacts on quality of life following genitourinary reconstruction for neurogenic bladder: A comparison between acquired and congenital spinal cord injury

INTRODUCTION

Patient expectations and baseline health are important drivers of outcomes following major genitourinary reconstructive surgery for neurogenic bladder (NGB). Differences in expectations and quality of life (QoL) improvements among different populations with NGB remain insufficiently explored in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To compare decisional regret (DR) and urinary-related QoL (UrQoL) in patients undergoing urinary diversion for NGB arising from spinal cord injury of acquired (A-SCI) and congenital (C-SCI) etiologies. We hypothesize that patients with A-SCI have higher expectations of improvement in QoL following surgery when compared with C-SCI, which may lead to higher DR and decreased UrQoL, postoperatively.

DESIGN

In this cross-sectional survey study, we compared A-SCI to C-SCI in terms of DR, UrQoL, and postoperative changes in self-reported physical health, mental health, and pain using validated patient-reported outcome measures.

SETTING

Participants were enrolled from a quaternary care institution via mail and MyChart.

PARTICIPANTS

The A-SCI group consistied of 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury the C-SCI group was composed of 20 patients with spina bifida.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Decisional Regret Scale, Short form- Qualiveen (SF-Qualiveen), and Patient-reported outcomes measurement Information system-10 (PROMIS-10) Global Health surveys.

RESULTS

The A-SCI group displayed poorer preoperative physical health than the C-SCI cohort, but absolute postoperative changes in this score, along with mental health score and pain level, were not significant after adjusting for baseline scores and follow-up time. SF-Qualiveen scores revealed significantly worse impact of NGB in UrQoL for A-SCI than for C-SCI when adjusted for other factors. No differences in DR were seen between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with A-SCI demonstrate lower self-reported baseline physical health compared with patients with C-SCI, which may have implications in setting patient expectations when undergoing urinary diversion. In this small cohort, we found a milder self-reported postoperative impact of NGB in UrQoL in patients with C-SCI.

Standardized one-day evaluation before urinary reconstructive surgery for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: Feasibility and impact on surgical strategy and care pathway

OBJECTIVES

To describe a concept of standardized preoperative one-day evaluation before urinary reconstructive or diversion surgery for the treatment of neurogenic lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction, and to evaluate its feasibility and its impact on the care pathway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent a one-day standardized evaluation before a urinary reconstructive or derivation surgery for the treatment of neurogenic LUT dysfunction between January 2017 and December 2021 in our institution were included. Data were collected retrospectively from standardized reports. The main outcome was the rate of completion of the tests and consultations planned during this evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the findings from the one-day evaluation and changes in the urological surgical strategy at different time points within one year.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-one patients benefited from this one-day standardized evaluation. The overall completeness rate of the data collected was 77.5%, increasing from 62.3% in 2017 to 89.3% in 2021. The urological surgical plan was modified for 19.1% of patients following this preoperative evaluation. The indication was then confirmed for 114 patients (87.0%) by the multidisciplinary meeting and was carried out unchanged during the following year for 89 patients (67.9%). An associated colostomy procedure was proposed for 18.3% of patients and was finally performed in 11.5%.

CONCLUSION

A standardized multidisciplinary preoperative one-day evaluation before performing reconstructive or diversion surgery for the treatment of neurogenic LUT dysfunction seems feasible and makes it possible to optimize the surgical plan and adapt the course of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4