Development of an overactive bladder assessment tool (BAT): A potential improvement to the standard bladder diary

Validation of bladder health scales and function indices for women's research

BACKGROUND

Existing bladder-specific measures lack the ability to assess the full range of bladder health, from poor to optimal health.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report evidence of validity of the self-administered, multidimensional bladder health scales and function indices for research in adult women.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional population-based validation study with random assignment to paper or electronic administration was conducted using national address-based probability sampling supplemented by purposive sampling of women with lower urinary tract symptoms in 7 clinical research centers. Construct validity of the bladder health scales and function indices was guided by a multitrait-multimethod approach using health and condition-specific questionnaires, bladder diaries, expert ratings of bladder health, and noninvasive bladder function testing. Internal dimensional validity was evaluated using factor analysis; internal reliability was assessed using paired t-tests and 2-way mixed-effects intraclass correlation coefficient models. Chi-square, Fisher exact, or t-tests were used for mode comparisons. Convergent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlations with the external construct measures, and known-group validity was established with comparison of women known and unknown to be symptomatic of urinary conditions.

RESULTS

The sample included 1072 participants. Factor analysis identified 10 scales, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.74 to 0.94. Intraclass correlation coefficients of scales ranged from 0.55 to 0.94. Convergent validity of the 10 scales and 6 indices ranged from 0.52 to 0.83. Known-group validity was confirmed for all scales and indices. Item distribution was similar by mode of administration.

CONCLUSION

The paper and electronic forms of the bladder health scales and function indices are reliable and valid measures of bladder health for use in women's health research.

Validation of the Overactive Bladder-Bladder Assessment Tool (OAB-BAT): A Potential Alternative to the Standard Bladder Diary for Monitoring OAB Outcomes

BACKGROUND

An advisory board concluded that a new, comprehensive overactive bladder (OAB) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure should be developed in accordance with regulatory guidelines. The OAB-Bladder Assessment Tool (OAB-BAT) was developed with qualitative input from OAB patients and experts to measure symptoms, bother, impacts, and satisfaction with treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Psychometric evaluation of the OAB-BAT assessing PRO OAB symptoms, bother, and impacts during a 7-d recall period.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Psychometric testing was conducted for a 28-d observational study of 170 OAB patients. Eligibility criteria included clinician-confirmed OAB diagnosis with at least eight micturitions per day.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Assessments included the OAB-BAT, a 7-d bladder diary, and co-validating OAB PROs. Analysis included classical and modern test theories. A scoring algorithm was developed and psychometric properties were assessed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The majority of participants were women (72.4%) with moderate OAB symptom severity (53.5%). More than one-third of participants (34.1%) were incontinent. Responses were well balanced across bother and impact items, while symptom frequency items showed sparse responses. Analysis supported an eight-item unidimensional model based on bother and impacts. No items performed differently by gender or continence status. The OAB-BAT showed internal consistency (ω=0.918), retest reliability (two-way random intraclass correlation coefficient=0.81), and convergent validity with the OAB-q (r>0.4). Known groups showed the expected trend. Comparisons between OAB-BAT scores and components of the bladder diary showed a moderate effect size (r>0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The eight-item OAB-BAT with 7-d recall is valid and reliable as an OAB PRO measure. Structural modeling, balanced with content validity considerations, produced robust scores. The OAB-BAT is a useful addition to the clinical assessment of patients, designed to complement the use of bladder diaries for monitoring OAB outcomes, in clinical trial and clinical practice environments. Future studies will need to assess the treatment satisfaction items in a larger sample of patients receiving OAB treatment.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We tested a questionnaire designed to assess overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, bother, satisfaction, and impacts by asking patients to complete it on a weekly basis. We found that the questionnaire accurately captures the symptoms and impacts that are most important to patients with OAB. We conclude that the questionnaire could be a useful instrument and, after further assessment in clinical practice and research, a possible alternative to a bladder diary in measuring OAB outcomes.

Validating 7-items Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) through Arabic linguistic version

The scoring of the 7-item Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) questionnaire is unusual because its scale varies with the same maximum and minimum scoring values and quantifies all aspects of OAB. The questionnaire also contains a graded response for urgency. The current study is mainly concerned with the development and validation of the OABSS questionnaire for Jordanian patients. The process of translating the English OABSS questionnaire into the Arabic language involved forward and backward translations. Afterward, a prospective study was conducted to validate the Arabic version of the OABSS questionnaire by examining 235 patients from the outpatient clinics of Karak Governorate Teaching Hospital. The Arabic OABSS questionnaire was completed by all the enrolled patients before and after three months of treatment with solifenacin 5 mg taken once daily. The study included 235 regular patients (152 females and 83 males) diagnosed with OAB in accordance with the definition of the International Continence Society (ICS). The results showed major and significant differences on all seven domains of the questions on the OABSS questionnaire before and after receiving treatment (p < 0.05). Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to measure the reliability and the questionnaire was found to be highly reliable for the construct variables. The findings derived from the current study would be beneficial for local urologists and researchers, as the Arabic version of the OABSS questionnaire was proven to be a reliable instrument for use in the assessment of OAB. Future studies are needed to compare different translated questionnaires relating to OAB.Trial registration number: NCT04309890.