International Consultation on Incontinence 2016; Executive summary: Urodynamic testing

Research priorities for diagnostic instrumentation in urinary incontinence

The International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) captures current evidence on incontinence. The conference 'Incontinence: The Engineering Challenge XIII' in November 2021 heard an update on the most recent ICI summary on urodynamic testing. This paper summarises the ICI recommendations for future research in urodynamics, with a view to informing engineers of issues and challenges that could benefit from engineering solutions. Engineers are encouraged to contribute to the following areas of research, which will have a direct and positive effect on patients' quality of life and overall health: (a) Urine flow measurement: home- and app-based devices, machine learning analysis of flow shape, (b) Pressure measurement: normal values for and validation of new technologies, including air-filled, non-invasive and urethral pressure reflectometry, (c) Ultrasound imaging: bladder wall biomechanics, bladder shape analysis, (d) Assess normal and abnormal value ranges, and diagnostic performance and (e) Specific trials in understudied patient groups including those with symptoms resistant to treatment, children and the frail elderly.

Bicentric retrospective study comparing the postoperative outcomes of patients treated surgically for bladder stones with or without concomitant surgery for BPH

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative outcomes of male patients who underwent bladder stone (BS) removal, with or without concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All men aged > 50 years who underwent BS removal at two French university hospitals between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Four binary outcome criteria were identified during the follow-up: early postoperative complications, stone recurrence, subsequent surgery for BS or BPH, and late surgical complications. A composite score ranging from 0 to 4 was calculated by combining the four criteria.

RESULTS

A median follow-up period of 42 months was observed in 179 patients. Of these, 107 patients were in the "concomitant surgical treatment" (CST) group and 72 in the bladder "stone removal alone" (SRA) group. The CST group presented higher baseline post-void residual volume (105 vs. 30 ml, p = 0.005). Patients who underwent CST had a significantly lower rate of BS recurrence (12% vs. 39%; p = 0,001) and underwent fewer subsequent surgeries (14% vs. 44%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the early (51% vs. 35%, p = 0,168) and late (26% vs. 17%, p = 0,229) complications rates between the two groups. A better composite score was observed in the CST than in the SRA, but the difference was not significant (3.07 vs. 2.72, p = 0.078).

CONCLUSION

As CST increases morbidity and decreases the risk of reoperation, each situation should be considered, taking into account patient choice and comorbidities.

A Pilot Study: Detrusor Overactivity Diagnosis Method Based on Deep Learning

OBJECTIVE

To develop two intelligent diagnosis models of detrusor overactivity (DO) based on deep learning to assist doctors no longer heavily rely on visual observation of urodynamic study (UDS) curves.

METHODS

UDS curves of 92 patients were collected during 2019. We constructed two DO event recognition models based on convolutional neural network (CNN) with 44 samples, and tested the model performance with the remaining 48 samples by comparing other four classical machine learning models. During the testing phase, we developed a threshold screening strategy to quickly filter out suspected DO event segments in each patient's UDS curve. If two or more DO event fragments are determined to be DO by the diagnostic model, the patient is diagnosed as having DO.

RESULTS

We extracted 146 DO event samples and 1863 non-DO event samples from the UDS curves of 44 patients to train CNN models. Through 10-fold cross-validation, the training accuracy and validation accuracy of our models achieved the highest accuracy. In the model testing phase, we used a threshold screening strategy to quickly screen out the suspected DO event samples in the UDS curve of another 48 patients, and then input them into the trained models. Finally, the diagnostic accuracy of patients without DO and patients with DO was 78.12% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Under the available data, the accuracy of the DO diagnostic model based on CNN is satisfactory. With the increase of the amount of data, the deep learning model is likely to have better performance.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This experiment was certified by the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200063467).

Use of Urinary Biomarkers in Discriminating Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome from Male Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions

To analyze the urinary biomarkers in men with lower urinary-tract symptoms (LUTS) and identify interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) from the other lower urinary-tract dysfunctions (LUTDs) by the levels of characteristic urinary biomarkers. In total, 198 men with LUTS were prospectively enrolled and urine samples were collected before intervention or medical treatment. Videourodynamic studies were routinely performed and the LUTDs were diagnosed as having bladder-outlet obstruction (BOO) such as bladder-neck dysfunction, benign prostatic obstruction, or poor relaxation of external sphincter (PRES); and bladder dysfunction such as detrusor overactivity (DO), hypersensitive bladder (HSB), and IC/BPS. Patients suspicious of IC/BPS were further confirmed by cystoscopic hydrodistention under anesthesia. The urine samples were investigated for 11 urinary inflammatory biomarkers including eotaxin, IL-6, IL-8, CXCL10, MCP-1, MIP-1β, RANTES, TNF-α, NGF, BDNF, and PGE2; and 3 oxidative stress biomarkers 8-OHdG, 8-isoprostane, and TAC. The urinary biomarker levels were analyzed between LUTD subgroups and IC/BPS patients. The results of this study revealed that among the patients, IC/BPS was diagnosed in 48, BOO in 66, DO in 25, HSB in 27, PRES in 15, and normal in 17. Patients with BOO had a higher detrusor pressure and BOO index than IC/BPS, whereas patients with IC/BPS, BOO, and DO had a smaller cystometric bladder capacity than the PRES and normal subgroups. Among the urinary biomarkers, patients with IC/BPS had significantly higher levels of eotaxin, MCP-1, TNF-α, 8-OHdG, and TAC than all other LUTD subgroups. By a combination of different characteristic urinary biomarkers, TNF-α, and eotaxin, either alone or in combination, had the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to discriminate IC/BPS from patients of all other LUTD subgroups, BOO, DO, or HSB subgroups. Inflammatory biomarker MCP-1 and oxidative stress biomarkers 8-OHdG and TAC, although significantly higher in IC/BPS than normal and PRES subgroups, did not have a diagnostic value between male patients with IC/BPS and the BOO, DO, or HSB subgroups. The study concluded that using urinary TNF-α and eotaxin levels, either alone or in combination, can be used as biomarkers to discriminate patients with IC/BPS from the other LUTD subgroups in men with LUTS.

Detrusor overactivity assessment using ultrasound bladder vibrometry

Objective. Detrusor overactivity (DO) is a urodynamic observation characterized by fluctuations in detrusor pressure (Pdet) of the bladder. Although detecting DO is important for the management of bladder symptoms, the invasive nature of urodynamic studies (UDS) makes it a source of discomfort and morbidity for patients. Ultrasound bladder vibrometry (UBV) could provide a direct and noninvasive means of detecting DO, due to its sensitivity to changes in elasticity and load in the bladder wall. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and applying UBV toward detecting DO.Approach. UBV and urodynamic study (UDS) measurements were collected in 76 neurogenic bladder patients (23 with DO). Timestamped group velocity squared (cg2) data series were collected from UBV measurements. ConcurrentPdetdata series were identically analyzed for comparison and validation. A processing approach is developed to separate transient fluctuations in the data series from the larger trend of the data and a DO index is proposed for characterizing the transient peaks observed in the data.Main Results.Applying the DO index as a classifier for DO produced sensitivities and specificities of 0.70 and 0.75 forcg2data series and 0.70 and 0.83 forPdetdata series respectively.Significance. It was found that DO can be feasibly detected from data series of timestamped UBV measurements. Collectively, these initial results are promising, and further refinement to the UBV measurement process is likely to improve and clarify its capabilities for noninvasive detection of DO.

[Urodynamics: All the nurse needs to know]

Urodynamic (UD) is an exam intended to explore the mechanisms underlying lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urinary incontinence (UI). It involves the measurement of bladder and sphincter pressures using uretrovesical and rectal catheters with pressure transducers, but also the measurement of urinary flow and bladder sensation during filling. UD is far from being systematic in the assessment of LUTS or UI and must seek to tackle a specific clinical or therapeutic question. Thus, history taking, physical examination, voiding diary and questionnaires are essential prerequisites to UD per se. UD steps include a free (unintubated) uroflowmetry, a cystometry, post-void residual measurement±an urethral profilometry, a pressure-flow study or sensitization tests. The pressures are set to zero before to start the study and the validity of the equipment is tested. This control is continued throughout the procedure to ensure the quality of the recording. Any event (e.g., urine leakage, change of position, urgency) is noted during the study. A final report is made by the doctor. The competence of the nurse ensures the reliability, reproducibility and interpretability of the UD study and the nurse's humanity guarantee f an atmosphere as favourable as possible for this uncomfortable and invasive test.

Can clinical and urodynamic parameters predict the occurrence of neutralizing antibodies in therapy failure of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxin A injections in patients with spinal cord injury?

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to clarify whether clinical and/or urodynamic parameters could be used to infer the probability of neutralizing antibody (NAb) formation as a possible cause of therapy failure (non-response, NR) in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) due to acquired spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) treated with intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injections.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with SCI/D who underwent both intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxin A injections and the determination of neutralizing antibodies against BoNT-A between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2018. NR was defined as urodynamically confirmed persistent or reappearing NDO.

RESULTS

A total of 2700 BoNT-A injections in 414 patients were ascertained. In 69 patients with primary NR after the first BoNT-A injection (n = 6) or with secondary NR after more than one BoNT-A injection (n = 63), an antibody analysis was performed. Antibody examination showed 36 (52.2%) negative, 5 (7.2%) borderline and 14 (each 20.3%) each of positive and highly positive values. Subgroup analysis indicated a correlation between NAb formation and the duration of BoNT-A therapy (p = 0.015), the mean number of BoNT-A injections (p = 0.011) and the time interval between BoNT-A applications (< 7 months, p = 0.022). Urodynamic data analysis indicate significant differences with cut-off values of MCC (< 225 ml, p = 0.038) and MDP (> 45 cmH2O, p = 0.040). However, in the regression analysis models, the predictive value for the occurrence of NAb was too low (MCC: ROC AUC 0.62, MDP: ROC AUC 0.52) to distinguish with sufficient certainty between NAb-positive and NAb-negative NR patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite significant correlations, clinical and urodynamic parameters are only partially suitable for predicting antibody formation against BoNT-A.

Is urodynamic evaluation able to change and improve the management of women with idiopathic overactive bladder?

BACKGROUND

For women with overactive bladder (OAB), current guidelines recommend the use of urodynamic studies (UDS) only in complicated cases. This study aimed to investigate whether UDS can also be helpful in uncomplicated cases. Specific aims of the study were: 1) to evaluate objective benefit and subjective patient satisfaction with tailored treatment based on the UDS diagnosis compared to the outcomes of the pharmacological treatment only based on the symptoms; 2) to investigate the correlation between symptoms and UDS findings in women with uncomplicated idiopathic OAB symptoms; 3) to assess the ability of UDS to modify management decisions in these patients.

METHODS

Women presenting to our clinic with a history of uncomplicated OAB symptoms for the past three months or more, and who completed the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), were considered for this study. We proposed UDS to all participants. In women who accepted UDS (group 1), management decisions were made on the basis of urodynamic findings and post-treatment evaluation was scheduled at three months. The outcomes of treatments in these patients were compared to the results in women who did not accept UDS and who received pharmacological treatment symptoms-based (group 2). Objective outcomes were based on completion of a 3-day micturition diary. Subjective outcomes were captured using the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OABq-SF), the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale, and a patient satisfaction scale.

RESULTS

A total of 680 women were enrolled in the study; 478 underwent UDS and 202, at the contrary, declined UDS. In 53.6% of cases, UDS led to modification of the proposed management approach. At the 3-month follow-up, the overall patient satisfaction rate in group 1 and group 2 was 77% and 65.8%, respectively (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that OAB management tailored according to the UDS diagnosis results in higher subjective satisfaction if compared with a pharmacological treatment symptoms-based. Our study confirmed a lack of correlation between OAB symptoms and the urodynamically proven diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO). It also suggested that UDS can determine the underlying pathophysiology of every woman with OAB syndrome, whether complicated or uncomplicated, allowing treatment to be appropriately tailored with better results.

Role of videourodynamic study in precision diagnosis and treatment for lower urinary tract dysfunction

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are complicated and cannot be used alone to diagnose lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTDs) and guide treatment. Patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), impaired detrusor contractility, and hypersensitive bladder might present with voiding predominant symptoms, whereas patients with detrusor overactivity (DO), dysfunctional voiding, or BOO might also present with storage symptoms. To clearly identify the pathophysiology of LUTD, a comprehensive urodynamic study (UDS) including pressure flow and image during the storage and emptying phases, naming videourodynamic study (VUDS), is necessary. This study is especially mandatory in the diagnosis of (1) male LUTS refractory to medical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, (2) female voiding dysfunction and urinary retention, (3) diagnosis of overactive bladder syndrome refractory to first-line medication, (4) management of female stress urinary incontinence and postoperative LUTS, (5) diagnosis and management of neurogenic LUTD, (6) pediatric urinary incontinence and enuresis, (7) geriatric urinary incontinence, and (8) recurrent bacterial cystitis. Although VUDS should not be used as a screening test for any LUTS, it should be considered when the initial management cannot relieve LUTS, or when invasive surgical procedure is planning to undertake for patients with refractory LUTS. VUDS should be recommended as the second-line investigation when the initial diagnosis and treatment based on the symptoms alone or noninvasive tests fail to improve LUTS.

Impact of urodynamic evaluation on the treatment of women with idiopathic overactive bladder: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common clinical condition affecting women. The impact of urodynamics (UDS) on the management of idiopathic OAB in women is highly debated. This systematic review analyzes the impact of UDS on the choice and on the outcomes of treatment of female idiopathic OAB.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search in the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement to identify clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines on female OAB and UDS published from 2000. A total of 1554 records were initially identified and 12 articles were included in the final qualitative synthesis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

UDS represents the main tool to diagnose detrusor overactivity (DO) in OAB female patients which is considered one of the major OAB underlying pathophysiology factor. UDS can underline the presence of voiding dysfunction that could be considered as another underlying cause of uncomplicated female OAB. On the basis of this urodynamic findings, we can better define different aspects of OAB syndrome leading to a more tailored and proper treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

UDS can have a useful role in the diagnosis of idiopathic OAB in women given the possibility to gain a precise diagnosis and, therefore, a tailored treatment based on the underlying cause. The integration of clinics with UDS and all the other diagnostic available tools is desirable.

Precision medicine in the diagnosis and treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) are highly prevalent in men and the incidence increases with aging. The pathophysiology of male LUTSs might be bladder outlet dysfunctions such as bladder neck (BN) dysfunction, benign prostatic obstruction, and poor relaxation of external sphincter and bladder dysfunctions such as detrusor overactivity (DO), detrusor underactivity, DO, and inadequate contractility. Male LUTSs include voiding and storage symptoms, and precision diagnosis should not be done based on the symptoms alone. Videourodynamic study provides a thorough look at the bladder and bladder outlet and can clearly demonstrate the underlying pathophysiology when the initial medication fails to relieve LUTS. Medical treatment should be given based on the underlying pathophysiology of LUTS, and surgical intervention to remove prostate should only be performed when a definite bladder outlet obstruction due to prostatic obstruction has been confirmed by invasive urodynamic study.