Urodynamic factors associated with the large capacity bladder and incomplete emptying after prolapse repair (2009-2015)

Urodynamic and urethral pressure profilometry findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction treated with surgical urethrolysis

INTRODUCTION

Long-term urodynamic (UDS) and urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an anti-incontinence (AI) procedure have been poorly characterized. We report our 10-year UDS findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction after AI procedure, who underwent urethrolysis.

METHODS

We identified sequential records containing urethrolysis current procedural terminology codes over a 10-year period. Records of women with preoperative UDS were reviewed for demographics, UDS tracing, and outcomes following urethrolysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five women (mean age 60 years) had voiding phase dysfunction and underwent urethrolysis at a mean of 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-61) after AI procedure. Preoperatively, six (24%) women required intermittent catheterization. Free uroflowmetry revealed a mean maximum peak flow (Qmax) of 9.6 ml/s (IQR 7.0-11.0), voided volume of 137 ml (IQR 81-169), and postvoid residual of 167 ml (IQR 43-288). UDS revealed a mean UPP length of 24 mm (IQR 20-27), UPP closure pressure of 78 cmH2O (IQR 59-103), detrusor pressure at maximum flow (Pdet@Qmax) of 31 cmH2O (IQR 19-43), Qmax of 7.9 ml/s (IQR 5.0-12.0), bladder outlet obstruction index of 15 (IQR 0-34), and bladder contractility index of 71 (IQR 60-81). UPP length was significantly associated (Pearson correlation, p<0.05) with bladder outlet obstruction index (r=0.80), Pdet@Qmax (r=0.75), and time since AI procedure (r=-0.70). UPP closure pressure was significantly associated with age (r=-0.64), volume of first (r=-0.64) and strong (r=-0.78) desire, and capacity (r=-0.71). Following urethrolysis, spontaneous voiding was achieved in 23 (92%) women at followup (mean 308 days).

CONCLUSIONS

UPP may help characterize outlet parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an AI procedure, who ultimately undergo urethrolysis.

Postoperative Urinary Retention

ABSTRACT

This clinical consensus statement on the management of postoperative (<6 weeks) urinary retention (POUR) reflects statements drafted by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society's POUR writing group. The writing group used a modified Delphi process to evaluate statements developed from a structured literature search and assessed for consensus. After the definition of POUR was established, a total of 37 statements were assessed in the following 6 categories: (1) incidence of POUR, (2) medications, (3) patient factors, (4) surgical factors, (5) urodynamic testing, and (6) voiding trials. Of the 37 original statements, 34 reached consensus and 3 were omitted.

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BLADDER DIARY AND URODYNAMIC STUDY TO IDENTIFY LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS

Objective: To identify the similarity of lower urinary tract symptoms presented in the urodynamic study compared to the urinary diary. Method: This is a comparative study carried out in an urodynamics clinic in southern Santa Catarina, Brazil, with 44 patients who underwent the examination. Data collection was carried out by applying a questionnaire and a 72-hour bladder diary and comparing it with the findings of the urodynamic study using the SPSS for Windows and Stata/SE v.14.1 programs. Results: The bladder diary showed high specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy for identifying detrusor hyperactivity and stress urinary incontinence. There was no difference for bladder capacity (p* 0.198). It pointed to bladder sensitivity with a volume smaller than that presented by the urodynamic study (p*<0.001). It was able to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that were not present in the urodynamic study. Conclusion: The bladder diary was effective for identifying lower urinary tract symptoms and can be used to define first-line treatment with a broader range of population diagnosis, shorter time between complaints and treatment, cost reduction for the system, and less discomfort for the patient.

ESTUDO COMPARATIVO ENTRE DIÁRIO VESICAL E ESTUDO URODINÂMICO PARA IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE SINTOMAS DO TRATO URINÁRIO INFERIOR

Objetivo:Avaliar a efetividade do diário vesical para identificar sintomas do trato urinário inferior, em comparação ao estudo urodinâmico. Método: Trata-se de estudo observacional de corte transversal realizado em uma clínica de urodinâmica do sul catarinense com 44 pacientes submetidos ao exame. A coleta de dados deu-se por aplicação de questionário de dados epidemiológicos e de sintomas e diário vesical de 72 horas e comparação deste com os achados do estudo urodinâmico por meio do programa Stata/SE v.14.1. Resultados: O diário vesical apresentou alta especificidade, sensibilidade e acurácia para identificação de hiperatividade detrusora e incontinência urinária de esforço. Não apresentou diferença para capacidade vesical (p* 0,198) e apontou sensibilidade vesical com volume menor do que o apresentado pelo estudo urodinâmico (p*<0,001). Foi capaz de identificar sintomas de trato urinário inferior que não haviam se revelado no estudo urodinâmico. Conclusão: O diário vesical mostrou-se tão efetivo quanto o estudo urodinâmico para identificação de sintomas de trato urinário inferior, podendo ser utilizado para definição de tratamento de primeira linha com maior abrangência de diagnóstico populacional, menor tempo entre queixa e tratamento, redução de custo para o sistema e menor desconforto para o paciente.