What developments are needed to achieve less-invasive urodynamics? ICI-RS 2019

Diagnoses and Treatment Recommendations-Interrater Reliability of Uroflowmetry in People with Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Uroflowmetry (UF) is an established procedure in urology and is recommended before further investigations of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). Some authors even consider using UF instead of urodynamics (UD). Studies on the interrater reliability of UF regarding treatment recommendations are rare, and there are no relevant data on people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The aim of this study was to investigate the interrater reliability (IRR) of UF concerning diagnosis and therapy in PwMS prospectively.

METHODS

UF of 92 PwMS were assessed by 4 raters. The diagnostic criteria were normal findings (NFs), detrusor overactivity (DO), detrusor underactivity (DU), detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). The possible treatment criteria were as follows: no treatment (NO), catheter placement (CAT), alpha-blockers, detrusor-attenuating medication, botulinum toxin (BTX), neuromodulation (NM), and physiotherapy/biofeedback (P/BF). IRR was assessed by kappa (κ).

RESULTS

κ of diagnoses were NFs = 0.22; DO = 0.17; DU = 0.07; DSD = 0.14; and BOO = 0.18. For therapies, the highest κ was BTX = 0.71, NO = 0.38 and CAT = 0.44.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high influence of the individual rater. UD should be subject to the same analysis and a comparison should be made between UD and UF. This may have implications for the value of UF in the neuro-urological management of PwMS, although at present UD remains the gold standard for the diagnostics of NLUTD in PwMS.

Repeatability of Ultrasound-Defined Bladder Shape Metrics in Healthy Volunteers

Purpose

Patients and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Detrusor overactivity assessment using ultrasound bladder vibrometry

Objective. Detrusor overactivity (DO) is a urodynamic observation characterized by fluctuations in detrusor pressure (Pdet) of the bladder. Although detecting DO is important for the management of bladder symptoms, the invasive nature of urodynamic studies (UDS) makes it a source of discomfort and morbidity for patients. Ultrasound bladder vibrometry (UBV) could provide a direct and noninvasive means of detecting DO, due to its sensitivity to changes in elasticity and load in the bladder wall. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and applying UBV toward detecting DO.Approach. UBV and urodynamic study (UDS) measurements were collected in 76 neurogenic bladder patients (23 with DO). Timestamped group velocity squared (cg2) data series were collected from UBV measurements. ConcurrentPdetdata series were identically analyzed for comparison and validation. A processing approach is developed to separate transient fluctuations in the data series from the larger trend of the data and a DO index is proposed for characterizing the transient peaks observed in the data.Main Results.Applying the DO index as a classifier for DO produced sensitivities and specificities of 0.70 and 0.75 forcg2data series and 0.70 and 0.83 forPdetdata series respectively.Significance. It was found that DO can be feasibly detected from data series of timestamped UBV measurements. Collectively, these initial results are promising, and further refinement to the UBV measurement process is likely to improve and clarify its capabilities for noninvasive detection of DO.

Recent advances in urodynamics in women

Urodynamics is the study of the storage and evacuation of urine from the urinary tract. The aim is to reproduce the patient’s symptoms and provide a pathophysiological explanation for them by identifying all factors that contribute to the lower urinary tract dysfunction, including those that are asymptomatic. Urodynamics consists of various tests, each of which is designed to assess a different aspect of lower urinary tract function. There is a lack of evidence regarding when urodynamics should be used in the non-neurogenic bladder. Some small randomised controlled trials suggest that urodynamics does not alter the outcome of surgery for stress urinary incontinence when compared with office evaluation alone. However, this is widely felt to be inaccurate and many health-care professionals still advocate the use of urodynamics prior to any invasive treatment, especially surgery on the lower urinary tract. There have been few technological advances in urodynamics in recent years. Air-charged rather than fluid-filled catheters were thought to help reduce artefact, but the evidence is unclear, and there is doubt over their accuracy. Ambulatory urodynamics is carried out over a longer period of time, enabling physiological bladder filling, but it remains invasive and artificial. To attempt to replicate symptoms more accurately, there have been efforts to develop wireless devices to measure detrusor pressure directly. These may be promising but are far from suitable in humans at present. Urodynamics continues to provide useful information for assessing lower urinary tract function, but further large studies are required to assess its value and develop innovations to improve the accuracy of the tests and acceptability to patients.