The role of pulse width manipulation compared to program changes alone for unsatisfactory sacral neuromodulation therapy: A retrospective matched-cohort analysis

Preliminary analysis of stimulation parameters for sacral neuromodulation in different indications: a multicenter retrospective cohort study from China

BACKGROUND

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective approach for treating lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), and stimulation programming is essential for successful treatment. However, research on SNM programming for various indications is limited. Thus, the authors aimed to determine whether there were differences in the stimulation parameters for different SNM indications and the appropriate programming recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients with LUTD who underwent SNM and completed internal pulse generator implantation. The parameters with the highest patient satisfaction or the most symptom improvement during the test period were considered optimal and used to set the programming after internal pulse generator implantation.

RESULTS

After screening, 282 patients were enrolled and categorized into four groups based on the following indications: refractory overactive bladder (OAB) ( n =61), neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (nLUTD) ( n =162), interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/BPS) ( n =24), and idiopathic nonobstructive urinary retention (NOUR) ( n =35). When analyzing the optimal stimulus parameters, disparities in the stimulation amplitude and pulse frequency were noted among the four groups. The stimulation amplitude in the nLUTD group was higher than that in the idiopathic NOUR group ( P =0.013). Differences in pulse frequency were observed between the refractory OAB and nLUTD groups ( P <0.001) and between the refractory OAB and idiopathic NOUR groups ( P =0.001). No differences in the electrode configuration or pulse width settings existed among the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The stimulation parameters for SNM varied among the different indications. For the initial programming of stage I, most patients are recommended to start with stimulation amplitudes below 2 V, although patients with nLUTD may benefit from higher amplitudes. A standard pulse width of 210 μs is recommended for all patients. However, for individuals experiencing nLUTD or idiopathic NOUR, the pulse frequency can begin above the standard 14 Hz but not exceed 50 Hz.

Effect of pulse width variations on sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder symptoms: A prospective randomized crossover feasibility study

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

The pulse width (PW) parameter in sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is understudied, with no evidence-based guidance available on optimal PW for urinary indications. The aim of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded, 3 × 3 cross over design study was to estimate the effect of two PW settings (60 µs, 420 µs) compared to the industry standard (210 µs) on SNM efficacy, quality of life, and device parameters in patients who were stable and satisfied with their SNM treatment.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Eligible patients were previously implanted and had urge incontinence or urgency-frequency with satisfaction on SNM at time of enrollment. Patients completed a 3-day voiding diary, validated questionnaires, and device interrogations with sensory threshold assessment at baseline and after a 4-week period on each of the three PW settings, to which they were randomized. Eighteen participants completed the study, as called for by power analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 68 years and implant duration at the time of participation was 4.4 years. While PW variations did not produce significant differences in overall objective outcomes, device parameters, including sensory threshold amplitude and battery life differed significantly. Shortened PW necessitated higher amplitude while conserving battery life. Stimulus sensation location, quality, and intensity did not differ between PW. Standard PW was chosen by 11 patients after the study, 5 chose extended, and 2 chose shortened. Those who chose alternative PW achieved significant reductions in urinary frequency from enrollment -2.23 voids/day (p = 0.015). Upon sub-analysis, patients reporting "much better" or "very much better" on extended PW achieved significant reductions in urinary frequency and nocturia at 5.6 and 0.4, compared to 8.5 and 2.16 at baseline (p = 0.005, p = <0.001). Whereas those reporting "much better" or "very much better" on shortened PW achieved significant reductions in urinary frequency at 5.15 compared to 7.35 (p = 0.026). There were no adverse events or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall SNM effectiveness was unchanged with alternative PW; however, 39% of patients preferred alternative to standard PW and achieved significant improvements in urinary symptoms with such. Shorter PW can also provide savings in estimated battery life without sacrificing therapeutic efficacy.

Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Objectives

In some patients treated for urinary or fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM) persistence of symptoms, a reduction in efficacy or adverse effects of stimulation can occur. In such situations, further programming of the SNM device can help resolve problems. Infrequently hardware failure is detected. This article aims to provide practical guidance to solve sub‐optimal outcomes (troubleshooting) occurring in the course of SNM therapy.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature review was performed. Collective clinical experience from an expert multidisciplinary group was used to form opinion where evidence was lacking.

Results

Circumstances in which reprogramming is required are described. Actions to undertake include changes of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency, and pulse width. Guidance in case of loss of efficacy and adverse effects of stimulation, developed by a group of European experts, is presented. In addition, various hardware failure scenarios and their management are described.

Conclusions

Reprogramming aims to further improve patient symptoms or ensure a comfortable delivery of the therapy. Initial changes of electrode configuration and adjustment of stimulation parameters can be performed at home to avoid unnecessary hospital visits. A logical and stepwise approach to reprogramming can improve the outcome of therapy and restore patient satisfaction.