Two-year outcomes of the ARTISAN-SNM study for the treatment of urinary urgency incontinence using the Axonics rechargeable sacral neuromodulation system

A prospective study to assess the effectiveness and safety of the BlueWind System in the treatment of patients diagnosed with urgency urinary incontinence

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB) affects one in six adults in Europe and the United States and impairs the quality of life of millions of individuals worldwide. When conservative management fails, third-line treatments including tibial neuromodulation (TNM) is often pursued. TNM has traditionally been accomplished percutaneously in clinic.

OBJECTIVE

A minimally invasive implantable device activated by a battery-operated external wearable unit has been developed for the treatment of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), mitigating the burden of frequent clinic visits and more invasive therapies that are currently commercially available.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, pivotal study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the device in adult females with UUI (i.e., wet OAB) (BlueWind Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation [iTNM] system; IDE number #G200013; NCT03596671). Results with the device were previously published under the name RENOVA iStim, which has been since renamed as the Revi™ System. Approximately 1-month post-implantation of the device, participants delivered therapy at their convenience and completed a 7-day voiding diary before visits 6- and 12-months post-treatment initiation. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were the proportion of responders to therapy ( ≥ 50% improvement on average number of urgency-related incontinence episodes) and incidence of adverse events from implantation to 12-month post-activation.

RESULTS

A total of 151 participants, mean age 58.8 (SD: 12.5), were implanted; 144 and 140 completed the 6- and 12-month visits, respectively. The participants demonstrated mean baseline of 4.8 UUI/day (SD 2.9) and 10 voids/day (SD 3.3). Six and 12-months post-activation, 76.4% and 78.4% of participants, respectively, were responders to therapy in an intent-to-treat analysis. Of the 139 participants with completed 12-month diaries, 82% were responders, 50% were classified as "dry" (on at least 3 consecutive diary days), and 93.5% of participants reported that their symptoms improved. No implanted participant experienced an SAE related to the procedure or device.

CONCLUSIONS

iTNM, delivered and powered by a patient-controlled external wearable communicating with an implant, demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in UUI symptoms and a high safety profile. This therapy highlights the value of patient-centric therapy for the treatment of UUI.

Faecal incontinence-a comprehensive review

Introduction

Faecal incontinence (FI) is a distressing and often stigmatizing condition characterised as the recurrent involuntary passage of liquid or solid faeces. The reported prevalence of FI exhibits considerable variation, ranging from 7 to 15% in the general population, with higher rates reported among older adults and women. This review explores the pathophysiology mechanisms, the diagnostic modalities and the efficiency of treatment options up to date.

Methods

A review of the literature was conducted to identify the pathophysiological pathways, investigation and treatment modalities.

Result and discussion

This review provides an in-depth exploration of the intricate physiological processes that maintain continence in humans. It then guides the reader through a detailed examination of diagnostic procedures and a thorough analysis of the available treatment choices, including their associated success rates. This review is an ideal resource for individuals with a general medical background and colorectal surgeons who lack specialized knowledge in pelvic floor disorders, as it offers a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of faecal incontinence (FI).

Longitudinal Fluctuations in Treatment Response After OnabotulinumToxinA and Sacral Neuromodulation for Refractory Urgency Incontinence

PURPOSE

We compared fluctuations in treatment response after onabotulinumtoxinA and sacral neuromodulation for urgency incontinence using Markov models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We fit data from a randomized trial to Markov models to compare transitions of success/failure over 6 months between 200 U onabotulinumtoxinA and sacral neuromodulation. Objective failure was <50% reduction in urgency incontinence episodes from baseline; subjective failure "strongly disagree" to "neutral" to the Patient Global Symptom Control questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 357 participants (median baseline daily urgency incontinence episodes 4.7 [IQR 3.7-6.0]) 61% vs 51% and 3.2% vs 6.1% reported persistent states of objective success and failure over 6 months after onabotulinumtoxinA vs sacral neuromodulation. Participants receiving onabotulinumtoxinA vs sacral neuromodulation had lower 30-day transition probabilities from objective and subjective success to failure (10% vs 14%, ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.55-0.95]; 14% vs 21%, ratio 0.70 [95% CI 0.51-0.89]). The 30-day transition probability from objective and subjective failure to success did not differ between onabotulinumtoxinA and sacral neuromodulation (40% vs 36%, ratio 1.11 [95% CI 0.73-1.50]; 18% vs 17%, ratio 1.14 [95% CI 0.65-1.64]).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 6 months after treatment, 2 in 5 women's symptoms fluctuate. Within these initial 6 months, women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA transitioned from success to failure over 30 days less often than sacral neuromodulation. For both treatments, there was an almost 20%-40% probability over 30 days that women returned to subjective and objective success after failure. Markov models add important information to longitudinal models on how symptoms fluctuate after urgency incontinence treatment.

Removal of Sacral Neuromodulation Devices Is an Office Procedure

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience removing sacral neuromodulation (SNM) components under local in the office. In some instances, SNM devices need to be removed. Traditionally, permanent lead and/or implantable pulse generator (IPG) removals are done in the operating room under sedation. However, it is our practice to perform this procedure in the office using only local anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review from 2017 to 2022 of SNM lead and IPG removals performed under local anesthesia in the office by a single surgeon. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and complications were reported.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2022, 41 SNM leads with and without IPGs were removed in the office using local anesthesia. 88% were female, mean age 66 ± 15.8years, and mean body mass index 28.6 (19.1-49.4). The most common indications for SNM treatment were urgency incontinence (56%) and nonobstructive urinary retention (24%). 44% (18/41) of SNM device removals were leads removed after failed stage I and 56% (23/41) were leads with IPGs removed most commonly for decreased efficacy (52%). In the latter group, median time to removal was 3.1 (0.3-12.3) years, and 52% (12/23) required a separate medial incision for lead retrieval. 9% (2/23) required fluoroscopy, of which, one was planned secondary to body mass index 49.4, and the other needed secondary to excessive scar tissue. No stage I failures required fluoroscopy. 7% (3/41) of leads required cutdown to the sacrum for removal with leads in place between 3.1 and 3.9years. All leads were removed completely intact and there were no complications.

CONCLUSION

Removal of SNM devices in the office using local anesthesia is effective, well-tolerated, and safe.

Treating and Managing Urinary Incontinence: Evolving and Potential Multicomponent Medical and Lifestyle Interventions

Incontinence is defined by either ICS 2002 or IUGA/ICS 2010 as the involuntary loss of urine and includes urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). It has a high worldwide prevalence with an associated impact on quality of life. Despite existing management options for the management of urinary incontinence, patients continue to be troubled by symptoms or side effects of existing treatment. There is therefore a requirement for ongoing research into treatment options for the management of UUI and SUI, that are more effective and tolerable to patients. Advances in treatment of UUI include a more selective beta 3 agonist, Vibegron, which has less impact on cardiac function than Mirabegron. Hormonal treatment, including Ospemifene and Prasterone, may improve GSM and in turn symptoms of UUI. There are advances in the types of neuromodulators available, including those that are rechargeable at home and are MRI safe. Laser has shown promising initial results. There is developing interest in the microbiome, and how this may impact future treatment modalities. Advances in treatment of SUI include the use of mobile health applications to support delivery of pelvic floor muscle training. Litoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, has shown promising results at phase III trials. Functional magnetic stimulation is being developed to improve contractility of pelvic floor muscles. We also discuss interventions that improve tissue elasticity and regeneration, such as platelet rich plasma, autologous stem cell transplantation, laser therapy and radiofrequency treatment, which show short term benefits.

Long-term functional results of transvaginal anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence; a retrospective case series

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We report our experience with a transvaginal approach with overlapping anal sphincter repair. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate long-term functional outcomes. Women who had undergone transvaginal anal sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence from July 2005 to July 2020 and attended a multidisciplinary team of urogynaecologists and colorectal surgeons at the Mercy Hospital Perineal clinic were included.

METHODS

One hundred seven women were included in the study with a median follow-up of 57.5 months. We analysed outcomes by comparing patient's St Mark's score difference before and after surgery. Meaningful clinical difference (MID) was set at 5 points; complications and patient demographics were recorded along with a question about whether they would recommend this treatment to a friend.

RESULTS

An improvement was seen in 69.3% of women with a marked improvement in 46.5%. Furthermore, 70% said they would recommend the procedure to a friend, if they were in a similar situation. Wound infection or partial perineal breakdown was reported in 45% of women but did not have a significant impact on outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal anal sphincter repair is associated with significant improvements in patients' St. Mark's score. Our data show that the long-term success rate of transvaginal/perineal AS repair may be better than previously reported in the literature with 70% of women satisfied at 57 months. Another benefit of the transvaginal route is the possibility of performing a pelvic floor and perineal repair at the time of surgery.

Sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder using the InterStim and BetterStim systems

This study aimed to evaluate differences in the clinical outcomes of different sacral neuromodulation systems (InterStim and BetterStim) used in the treatment of overactive bladder. Data from a previously established database of sacral neuromodulation in China (the InterStim system) and a 2020 clinical trial of the BetterStim system were screened. Patients with overactive bladder undergoing stage II implanted pulse generator implantation were selected for analysis and divided into InterStim and BetterStim system groups. Voiding diaries and subjective scores obtained preoperatively, after stage I tined-lead implantation (experience period), and after stage II implanted pulse generator implantation were compared between the two groups. This study included 113 patients with overactive bladder (43, InterStim system group; 70, BetterStim system group). Voiding diaries and subjective scores significantly improved in both the InterStim and BetterStim system groups over the treatment period. Specifically, the urination frequency (all P < 0.001), average voiding volume (all P < 0.001), and average urinary leakage (InterStim, P < 0.05; BetterStim, P < 0.01) in both groups significantly improved at different periods during treatment. At the same time, the urgency perception scale (P < 0.001) and OAB-related quality of life score (InterStim, P < 0.05; BetterStim, P < 0.01) also significantly improved. There was no significant difference in urination frequency at baseline between the two groups (P = 0.169). Urination frequency was significantly higher in the BetterStim system group than in the InterStim group during the experience period and at follow-up (P = 0.031, P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the number of urinary leakages between the different systems at baseline (P = 0.662), although this was higher in the InterStim system group during the experience period (P = 0.016), and the difference disappeared at the last follow-up (P = 0.565). There were significant differences in baseline urgency perception scale (P = 0.001) and OAB-related quality of life score (P < 0.001) between the two groups; however, these differences were not maintained at follow-up (P = 0.81, P = 0.479). Both sacral neuromodulation systems are safe and effective in treating overactive bladder. The InterStim system may be more beneficial for patients with dry overactive bladder. Satisfactory outcomes may be achieved with the BetterStim system in patients with wet overactive bladder. However, further studies are required to confirm this finding.

Sacral Neuromodulation with the InterStim System for Overactive Bladder: 3-Year Results from the French Prospective, Multicenter, Observational SOUNDS Study

BACKGROUND

SOUNDS strengthens the evidence basis of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for overactive bladder (OAB) through real-world data.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze diary-based effectiveness, quality of life (QoL), disease severity, symptom bother, and safety data for SNM with the InterStim system up to 3 yr after implantation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five representative French sites enrolled 291 patients with OAB followed according to the local standard of care. Overall, 229 patients received a de novo or replacement InterStim implant and had four follow-up visits, two within the first yr and annually thereafter. A total of 190 patients completed the fourth follow-up visit after a mean of 33.7 ± 3.7 mo.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The effectiveness outcomes measured were changes in daily voids and leaks and the therapy responder rates. Other outcomes included validated QoL data (Ditrovie and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaires), disease severity (Urinary Symptom Profile [USP]), symptom bother rated using a numeric rating scale (NRS), and safety data. Follow-up data were compared to baseline results using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Average daily voids and leaks were significantly reduced at all time points up to 3 yr after implantation (p < 0.05) except for voids at 21 mo in the group receiving a replacement device. The therapeutic response for urinary urge incontinence at the fourth follow-up was 72% for the de novo group and 86% for the replacement group. Disease-specific QoL (Ditrovie), OAB-specific symptom severity (USP domain 2), and NRS-rated disease bother were significantly improved at all visits (p < 0.001). Device- or procedure-related adverse events occurred in 49% of patients, with 68% of the events classified as minor (Clavien-Dindo grade I or II). Surgical revisions were performed in 33% of patients, including permanent removal in 13%, over a mean exposure time of 44.4 ± 15.3 mo.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the safety and effectiveness of SNM for OAB and improvements in QoL and disease bother in real life.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our study in French patients with overactive bladder showed that disease symptoms and bother were significantly reduced and quality of life was significantly improved over a study duration of approximately 3 yr after implantation of a device to stimulate nerves that control the bladder. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02186041.

Sacral neuromodulation: Rechargeable versus non-rechargeable device. What would the patient preferences be in France?

AIMS

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a minimally invasive technique that provides effective treatment for the management of refractory overactive bladder (OAB), non-obstructive urinary retention (NOUR), and fecal incontinence (FI). This study assessed patient preferences between the currently available non-rechargeable SNM device and a new, full-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-safe, smaller, rechargeable device.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among French OAB, NOUR, FI patients, recruited via a market research vendor. To assess their preferences, patients were asked to indicate their level of agreement with 10 statements regarding the size of the device, its rechargeability, and the role of MRI using a 6-item Likert scale. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In all, 95 patients (68% women), mean age 50 years, were included in the study: 51% were treated for OAB; 44% received an oral treatment and 28% had SNM. Overall, 71% of the 95 patients indicated a preference for the new device; 75% considered that recharging the device would not impact their lifestyle; 74% believed that the smaller size of the rechargeable device would facilitate their choice to be treated with SNM; 80% found full-body MRI compatibility important.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients may prefer the new rechargeable SNM device over the current "standard". Compatibility with full-body MRI and the smaller device size seemed the key features of the newer device that would influence their choice of being treated with SNM. Future national and international recommendations should consider a shared decision-making process between the physician and the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Neuromodulation

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been available in the United States for more than 20 years and is a guideline-recommended therapy by both the American Urological Association and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, with proven long-term success for urinary urgency incontinence, urinary urgency frequency, nonobstructive urinary retention, and fecal incontinence. Initially the therapy involved a more invasive surgical approach that included a large cut down over the sacrum. This article reviews recent advancements in SNM therapy including updates in best practices for implant technique, technological innovations, and the new clinical literature relevant to contemporary practice.

Axonics® system for treatment of overactive bladder syndrome and urinary urgency incontinence

Introduction: Overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence affect millions of women and men and results in billions of dollars in health-care expenses. First- and second-line therapy includes behavioral modifications and/or pharmacotherapies however, many patients' symptoms remain or progress on these treatments. There has been concern regarding the detrimental side effects of the most widely prescribed medications for these bladder symptom management.Areas covered: As a result, there has been increased interest in continuous sacral neuromodulation, an FDA approved therapy for refractory urinary urgency and urge urinary incontinence. In this article, we specifically review current research on the efficacy and patient/provider satisfaction and safety profile of the Axonics® System. In addition, we address the current state of sacral neuromodulation and potential future direction and applicability.Expert opinion: The Axonics® system is a safe effective device for the treatment of overactive bladder and urinary urge incontinence. Additionally, it affords patient's the convenience of a rechargeable, compact, MRI safe system. It should be noted that the rechargeable system, while allowing for approximately 15 years of battery and lead life, may have its challenges in terms of charge burden. Furthermore, this system is easily adapted for experienced implanters of sacral neuromodulating devices.

Review of the rechargeable sacral neuromodulation system to treat refractory overactive bladder

Overactive bladder is a medical condition that requires management. If left untreated, it may severely affect quality of life. When first- and second-line treatments fail, sacral neuromodulation can be a safe and effective option for patients with refractory overactive bladder. This article reviews the rechargeable sacral neuromodulation (Axonics).

Two-year outcomes of the ARTISAN-SNM study for the treatment of urinary urgency incontinence using the Axonics rechargeable sacral neuromodulation system

AIMS

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a guideline-recommended treatment with proven therapeutic benefit for urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) patients. The Axonics® System is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved rechargeable SNM system and is designed to deliver therapy for a minimum of 15 years. The ARTISAN-SNM study was designed to evaluate UUI participants treated with the Axonics System. Two-year follow-up results are presented.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-nine UUI participants underwent implantation with the Axonics System. Therapeutic response rate, participant quality of life (QoL), and satisfaction were determined using 3-day voiding diaries, ICIQ-OABqol, and satisfaction questionnaires. Participants were considered responders if they had a 50% or greater reduction in UUI episodes post-treatment. As-treated and Completers analyses are presented.

RESULTS

At 2 years, 93% of the participants (n = 121 Completers at 2 years) were therapy responders, of which 82% achieved ≥ 75% reduction in UUI episodes and 37% were dry (100% reduction). Daily UUI episodes reduced from 5.6 ± 0.3 at baseline to 1.0 ± 0.2 at 2 years. Statistically significant improvements in ICIQ-OABqol were reported. All participants were able to recharge their device and 94% of participants reported that the recharging frequency and duration were acceptable. Participant demographics nor condition severity were correlated with clinical outcomes or recharging experience. No unanticipated or serious device-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

At 2 years, participants treated with the Axonics System demonstrated sustained safety and efficacy, high levels of satisfaction with therapy and recharging. Participant-related factors were not associated with efficacy or recharging outcomes, indicating the reported results are applicable to a diverse population.