An assessment of techniques and practices used to elevate intra-abdominal pressure when assessing pelvic floor dysfunction

Technologies for Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Functionality: A Systematic Review

Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common problem in women and has a negative impact on their quality of life. The aim of this review was to provide a general overview of the current state of technology used to assess pelvic floor functionality. It also provides literature research of the physiological and anatomical factors that correlate with pelvic floor health. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and IEEE databases were searched for publications on sensor technology for the assessment of pelvic floor functionality. Anatomical and physiological parameters were identified through a manual search. In the systematic review, 114 publications were included. Twelve different sensor technologies were identified. Information on the obtained parameters, sensor position, test activities, and subject characteristics was prepared in tabular form from each publication. A total of 16 anatomical and physiological parameters influencing pelvic floor health were identified in 17 published studies and ranked for their statistical significance. Taken together, this review could serve as a basis for the development of novel sensors which could allow for quantifiable prevention and diagnosis, as well as particularized documentation of rehabilitation processes related to pelvic floor dysfunctions.

Assessment of the bearing-down manoeuvre in pregnancy and detection of paradoxical levator ani muscle contraction using 2D transperineal ultrasound and vaginal palpation: a concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability of vaginal palpation as a measure of the quality of the bearing-down manoeuvre (BDM) and the detection of a paradoxical levator ani muscle contraction (LAM) in pregnant women, compared with 2D transperineal ultrasound (TPUS).

DESIGN

Concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability study.

SETTING

Physiotherapy clinic.

POPULATION

Twenty pregnant women in their third trimester.

METHODS

The anterior posterior diameter (APD) was measured during the BDM using TPUS by one experienced physiotherapist. An APD that shortened by >2 mm from rest was described as LAM shortening, an APD that moved by 0-2 mm was described as no change and an APD that lengthened by >2 mm was described as LAM lengthening. Vaginal palpation described the LAM during the BDM as no movement, shortening or lengthening. Participants were allowed two attempts and the best attempt was measured.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

APD using TPUS and the assessor's subjective description of LAM during the BDM using vaginal palpation.

RESULTS

TPUS detected more paradoxical LAM contractions during the BDM than palpation. Agreement between vaginal palpation and TPUS assessment for BDM was poor. The Fleiss kappa coefficients were 0.457 (90% CI 0.16-0.71) between TPUS and one assessor and 0.326 (90% CI 0.01-0.6) between TPUS and the other assessor. In addition, inter-rater reliability was poor between observers palpating the BDM, with a Fleiss kappa coefficient of 0.375 (90% CI 0.13-0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find vaginal palpation of the BDM in pregnant women to have concurrent validity or inter-rater reliability. Clinicians should be aware of potential inaccuracies when palpating the BDM, and, where possible, seek an assessment via TPUS.

Stress incontinence combined score (SICS): A novel combined grading system to assess the severity of stress urinary incontinence in women

INTRODUCTION

Natural history of urinary incontinence (UI) in women is a less understood domain. Stratifying severity of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can be an important tool to understand the natural history, prognosticate the disease and plan optimal management. Present study was aimed to test a novel score (Stress Incontinence Combined score: SICS) with the currently popular tools International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) and Incontinence Symptom Index (ISI) scores.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective study conducted at a university teaching hospital, over a period of 2 years. After screening women for SUI, SICS was administered. The novel SICS score was then compared with ICIQ-UI SF and ISI.

RESULTS

A total of 1750 women, attending various OPDs in a tertiary care hospital, were screened for urinary incontinence. The prevalence of UI and SUI was 26.6% and 12.8% respectively. The agreement between ISI and SICS was 81.7%, while the ICIQ- UI SF agreed with the SICS in 80.8% of the cases. AUROC analysis done showed that a score of 10 or more on the SICS (total score 16) could diagnose high-grade SUI with a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 96% (Reference: ISI), and a sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 93% (Reference: ICIQ- UI SF) CONCLUSION: SICS is the first of its kind tool, developed to specifically grade the severity of SUI, while incorporating both subjective and objective measures, with excellent reliability and reproducibility.