Differences in the incidence of urinary tract infections between neurogenic and non-neurogenic bladder dysfunction individuals performing intermittent catheterization

The bacterial displacement test: an in vitro microbiological test for the evaluation of intermittent catheters and urinary tract infection

AIMS

Intermittent catheters (ICs) are commonly used in bladder management, but catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) remain challenging. Insertion tips may reduce the risk of CAUTIs by minimizing bacterial transfer along the urinary tract. However, there are few laboratory tests to evaluate such technologies. We describe the use of an adapted in vitro urethra agar model to assess bacterial displacement by ICs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Simulated urethra agar channels (UACs) were prepared with catheter-specific sized channels in selective media specific to the challenge organisms. UACs were inoculated with Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis before insertion of ICs, and enumeration of UAC sections was performed following insertion. Four ICs were evaluated: Cure Catheter® Closed System (CCS), VaPro Plus Pocket™, Bard® Touchless® Plus, and SpeediCath® Flex Set. CCS demonstrated significantly reduced bacterial displacement along the UACs compared to the other ICs and was also the only IC with undetectable levels of bacteria toward the end of the UAC (representing the proximal urethra).

CONCLUSION

The bacterial displacement test demonstrated significant differences in bacterial transfer between the test ICs with insertion tips, which may reflect their different designs. This method is useful for evaluating CAUTI prevention technology and may help guide future technology innovations.

Summary of the 2024 Update of the European Association of Urology Guidelines on Neurourology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Most patients with neurourological disorders require lifelong medical care. The European Association of Urology (EAU) regularly updates guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of these patients. The objective of this review is to provide a summary of the 2024 updated EAU guidelines on neurourology.

METHODS

A structured literature review covering the timeframe 2021-2023 was conducted for the guideline update. A level of evidence and a strength rating were assigned for each recommendation on the basis of the literature data.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Neurological conditions significantly affect urinary, sexual, and bowel function, and lifelong management is required for neurourological patients to maintain their quality of life and prevent urinary tract deterioration. Early diagnosis and effective treatment are key, and comprehensive clinical assessments, including urodynamics, are crucial. Management should be customised to individual needs and should involve a multidisciplinary approach and address sexuality and fertility. Lifelong monitoring and follow-up highlight the importance of continuous care for neurourological patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The 2024 EAU guidelines on neurourology provide an up-to-date overview of available evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for neurourological patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Neurological disorders very frequently affect the lower urinary tract and sexual and bowel function and patients need lifelong management. We summarise the updated European Association of Urology guidelines on neurourology to provide patients and caregivers with the latest insights for optimal health care support.

Perspectives on technology: Single-use catheters - evidence and environmental impact

OBJECTIVE

To explore the data comparing single- vs multi-use catheters for clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC), consider if the widespread use of single-use catheters is warranted given the cost and environmental impact, and put forth ideas for future consideration.

METHODS

A primary literature review was performed in PubMed over the past 50 years. Studies that performed comparative analysis of single- and multi-use catheters were included in our review. All studies that reported on primary data were narratively summarised.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were identified that reported on primary data comparing single- and multi-use catheters. There was no appreciable evidence suggesting reusable multi-use catheters were inferior to single-use catheters from an infection or usability standpoint. In addition, the environmental and monetary burden of single-use catheters is significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The intermittent catheter landscape in the USA has a complex past: defined by policy, shaped by industry, yet characterised by a paucity of data demonstrating superiority of single-use over multi-use catheters. We believe that the aversion to reusable catheters by many patients and healthcare professionals is unwarranted, especially given the cost and environmental impact. Moving forward, better comparative data and more sustainable practices are needed.

Improved emptying performance with a new micro-hole zone catheter in adult male intermittent catheter users: A comparative multi-center randomized controlled cross-over study

AIMS

To confirm the improved performance of the micro-hole zone catheter (MHZC) compared to a conventional eyelet catheter (CEC) in male users of clean intermittent catheterizations (CICs).

METHODS

Male self-catheterizing subjects, who used hydrophilic sleeved soft/flexible CIC as the only bladder emptying method, were enrolled into a multi-center, randomized, cross-over study performed across six European sites. Subjects tested the MHZC, featuring a drainage zone with 120 micro-holes and a CEC with two eyelets. The study consisted of four study visits (V0-V3), during which endpoints related to catheter performance (urinary flow-stops, bladder emptying, and intra-catheter pressure) were measured and two 4-week test periods at home (T1 and T2) where dipstick hematuria and user perception between catheters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-three male subjects with non-neurogenic and neurogenic bladder dysfunction (3:2) were enrolled. On average, catheterizations with the MHZC led to close to mean zero flow-stops compared to ≥1 flow-stops with the CEC, during both HCP- and self-led catheterizations (both p < 0.001). Residual urine at first flow-stop was significantly reduced for the MHZC compared to CEC (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, for HCP- and self-led catheterizations, respectively). This was substantiated by a significantly smaller pressure peak at first flow-stop, a proxy for minimized mucosal suction (both HCP- and self-led catheterizations, p < 0.001). After home-use catheterizations, dipstick hematuria was comparable between catheters, whereas catheterizations were associated with significantly improved perception in favor of MHZC regarding bladder emptying, less blocking sensation, and improved hygienic catheterization compared to the CEC.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the evidence of improved bladder emptying with the MHZC compared to a CEC without the need to reposition the catheter. The MHZC therefore offers an enhanced benefit for the dependent CIC user securing complete bladder emptying in an uninterrupted free flow and reducing the need to reposition the catheter during emptying.

Sustainability in Urology: Single-use Versus Reusable Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization

There is evidence that there is no difference in the incidence of urinary tract infections between multiple-use catheters that are cleaned after use and single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization. Despite the very significant economic and environmental advantages of multiple-use catheters, the single-use option is still promoted. The increasing focus on sustainability in urology may prompt a shift in practice to multiple-use catheters or other novel solutions in this setting. PATIENT SUMMARY: In intermittent catheterization, a patient or their caregiver periodically inserts a catheter to drain the bladder of urine. Single-use catheters are more expensive and have a greater impact on the environment than resuable catheters that are cleaned after use. To improve sustainability in health care, a switch from single-use to multiple-use catheters or other novel soultions for intermittent catheterization should be considered.

Risk factors for urinary tract infections associated with lower quality of life among intermittent catheter users

BACKGROUND

Evidence shows that intermittent catheterisation (IC) for bladder emptying is linked to urinary tract infections (UTIs) and poor quality of life (QoL).

AIM

To investigate the association between UTI risk factors and QoL and patient-reported UTIs respectively.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to IC users from 13 countries.

FINDINGS

Among 3464 respondents, a significantly poorer QoL was observed when experiencing blood in the urine, residual urine, bowel dysfunction, recurrent UTIs, being female, and applying withdrawal techniques. A lower UTI risk was found when blood was not apparent in urine (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.55-0.71), the bladder was perceived empty (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.96), not having bowel dysfunction (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.98), and being male (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.62-0.79).

CONCLUSION

This study underlines the importance of risk factors and their link to QoL and UTIs, highlighting the need for addressing symptoms before UTIs become problematic.

New Intermittent Urinary Micro-Hole Zone Catheter Shows Enhanced Performance in Emptying the Bladder: A Randomised, Controlled Crossover Study

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common and troublesome complications of clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC) in individuals suffering from incomplete bladder emptying, which may exacerbate the underlying disease and lead to hospitalisation. Aside from the design of the intermittent catheter and its handling, a recent review highlighted residual urine as one of several UTI risk factors. A new urinary intermittent catheter with multiple micro-holes has been developed for improved bladder emptying. In a controlled crossover study, adult male CIC users were randomised for a health care professional-led catheterisation with the new micro-hole zone catheter (MHZC) and a conventional eyelet catheter (CEC) in two individual test visits to compare the number of flow-stops and the residual urine at the first flow-stop as co-primary endpoints. In 42 male CIC users, the MHZC resulted in significantly fewer flow-stop episodes compared to the CEC (mean 0.17, 95% CI [0.06, 0.45] vs. mean 1.09, 95% CI [0.75, 1.6], respectively; p < 0.001) and significantly less residual urine at the first flow-stop (mean 5.10 mL, SE [1.14] vs. mean 39.40 mL, SE [9.65], respectively; p < 0.001). No adverse events were observed in this study. The results confirm the enhanced performance of the MHZC compared to a CEC, ensuring an uninterrupted free urine flow with no need to reposition the catheter until the bladder is thoroughly empty.

Internal and External Barriers to Bladder Management in Persons with Neurologic Disease Performing Intermittent Catheterization

People living with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) often have to use clean intermittent catheters (CIC) to manage their bladder function. The use of catheters presents multiple unique challenges, based on both the person's inherent characteristics and on the external limitations imposed by public toilets. We review the impact of age, sex, upper limb function, caregiver assistance, time required to perform CIC, and urinary incontinence on CIC in NLUTD, with special reference to their interaction with societal and public health factors. Public toilet limitations, such as lack of availability, adequate space and special accommodation for CIC, cleanliness, and catheter design are also reviewed. These potential barriers play a significant role in the perception and performance of bladder care in people living with NLUTD.

Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Patients, Risk Factors, and Efficacy of Low Dose Prophylactic Antibiotics Therapy

BACKGROUND

Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) occurs in sizable percentages of patients after a single episode and is a frequent cause of primary healthcare visits and hospital admissions, accounting for up to one quarter of emergency department visits. We aim to describe the pattern of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis prescription for recurrent urinary tract infections, in what group of adult patients they are prescribed and their efficacy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all adult patients diagnosed with single and recurrent symptomatic urinary tract infection in the period of January 2016 to December 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients with a single UTI episode and 227 patients with recurrent UTI episodes were included. Risk factors for recurrent UTI included diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, and use of immunosuppressive drugs, renal transplant, any form of urinary tract catheterization, immobilization and neurogenic bladder. E. coli infections were the most prevalent organism in patients with UTI episodes. Prophylactic antibiotics were given to 55% of patients with UTIs, Nitrofurantoin, Bactrim or amoxicillin clavulanic acid. Post renal transplant is the most frequent reason to prophylaxis antibiotics (44%). Bactrim was more prescribed in younger patients (P < 0.001), in post-renal transplantation (P < 0.001) and after urological procedures (P < 0.001), while Nitrofurantoin was more prescribed in immobilized patients (P = 0.002) and in patients with neurogenic bladder (P < 0.001). Patients who received continuous prophylactic antibiotics experienced significantly less episodes of urinary tract infections (P < 0.001), emergency room visits and hospital admissions due to urinary tract infections (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite being effective in reducing recurrent urinary tract infection rate, emergency room visits and hospital admissions due to UTI, continuous antibiotic prophylaxis was only used in 55% of patients with recurrent infections. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was the most frequently used prophylactic antibiotic. Urology and gynecological referral were infrequently requested as part of the evaluation process for patients with recurrent UTI. There was a lack of use of other interventions such as topical estrogen in postmenopausal women and documentation of education on non-pharmacological methods to decrease urinary tract infections.

Non-Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Recurrent UTIs in Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (NAPRUN): Study Protocol for a Prospective, Longitudinal Multi-Arm Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) reliant on intermittent self-catheterization for bladder emptying are at an increased risk of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). So far, the most common practice in the prevention of rUTIs is long-term low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis, phytotherapy, and immunomodulation, whereby antibiotic prophylaxis inevitably leads to the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens and difficulty in treating infections. Therefore, non-antibiotic alternatives in the prevention of rUTIs are urgently required. We aim to identify the comparative clinical effectiveness of a non-antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction who practice intermittent self-catheterization.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this multi-centre, prospective longitudinal multi-arm observational study, a total of 785 patients practising intermittent self-catheterisation due to NLUTD will be included. After inclusion, non-antibiotic prophylaxis regimens will be instilled with either UroVaxom^® (OM-89) standard regimen, StroVac^® (bacterial lysate vaccine) standard regimen, Angocin^®, D-mannose (oral dose 2 g), bladder irrigation with saline (once per day). The management protocols will be pre-defined, but the selection of the protocol will be at the clinicians' discretion. Patients will be followed for 12 months from the onset of the prophylaxis protocol. The primary outcome is to identify the incidence of breakthrough infections. The secondary outcomes are adverse events associated with the prophylaxis regimens and the severity of breakthrough infections. Other outcomes include the exploration of change in susceptibility pattern via the optional rectal and perineal swab, as well as health-related quality of life over time (HRQoL), which will be measured in a random subgroup of 30 patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the ethical review board of the University Medical Centre Rostock (A 2021-0238 from 28 October 2021). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant meetings.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

German Clinical Trials Register: Number DRKS00029142.

Burden of illness among intermittent catheter users with non-neurogenic urinary retention in Denmark

BACKGROUND

Urinary retention (UR) caused by non-neurogenic conditions is a frequent disorder often requiring the use of intermittent catheterization (IC). This study examines the burden of illness among subjects with an IC indication due to non-neurogenic UR.

METHODS

Health-care utilization and costs were extracted from Danish registers (2002-2016) related to the first year after IC training and compared to matched controls.

RESULTS

A total of 4,758 subjects with UR due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 3,618 subjects with UR due to other non-neurological conditions were identified. Total health-care utilization and costs per patient-year were significantly higher compared to matched controls (BPH: 12,406 EUR vs 4,363, p < 0.000; other non-neurogenic causes: 12,497 EUR vs 3,920, p < 0.000) and driven mainly by hospitalizations. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were the most frequent bladder complications often requiring hospitalization. The inpatient costs per patient-year for UTIs were significantly higher for cases than controls (BPH: 479 EUR vs 31, p < 0.000; other non-neurogenic causes: 434 EUR vs 25, p < 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of illness caused by non-neurogenic UR with need for IC was high and essentially driven by hospitalizations. Further research should clarify if additional treatment measures may reduce the burden of illness in subjects suffering from non-neurogenic UR using IC.

Time trade-off study to establish utility decrements in individuals with a spinal cord injury who perform intermittent catheterisation

AIMS

To generate utility decrements for three attributes associated with catheterisation for individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI): the process of catheterisation, the physical impact of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and worry associated with hospitalisation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Health state vignettes comprising various levels of the three attributes were developed. Two cohorts of respondents, corresponding to people with SCIs and a sample broadly representative of the UK population, were presented with nine vignettes (three vignettes for the mild, moderate and severe health states in addition to a random set of six vignettes). It was assumed no or a nominal decrement was associated with the mild health state. Utility decrements were derived from analysing the data obtained from the online time trade-off (TTO). A proportion of the SCI cohort (n = 57) also completed the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

RESULTS

Utility decrements were generated using statistical models for the general population (n = 358), the SCI population (n = 48) and the two populations combined (merged model, n = 406). Results from the two cohorts showed minimal differences. For the merged model, SCI status was not statistically significant. All interaction terms, excluding SCI and the severe level of the physical attribute, were not statistically significant. Compared to the mild level, the greatest utility decrement calculated was the severe level of the emotional (worry) attribute (0.09, p < 0.001) for the SCI population. A significant decrement of 0.02 (p <0.001) was calculated for the moderate level of the emotional attribute for all models. The mean utility score for those with SCI having completed the EQ-5D-5L was 0.371.

LIMITATIONS

Modest sample size of respondents from the SCI population (n = 48).

CONCLUSIONS

Worry associated with hospitalisation had the greatest impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The catheterisation process, such as the lubrication and repositioning of the catheter, also impacted on patients' HRQoL.