Study of onset time-shift and injection duration in DCE-MRI: a comparison of a reference region model with the general kinetic model

A linear algorithm of the reference region model for DCE-MRI is robust and relaxes requirements for temporal resolution

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) has utility for improving clinical diagnoses of solid tumors, and for evaluating the early responses of anti-angiogenic chemotherapies. The Reference Region Model (RRM) can improve the clinical implementation of DCE-MRI by substituting the contrast enhancement of muscle for the Arterial Input Function that is used in traditional DCE-MRI methodologies. The RRM is typically fitted to experimental results with a non-linear least squares algorithm. This report demonstrates that this algorithm produces inaccurate and imprecise results when DCE-MRI results have low SNR or slow temporal resolution. To overcome this limitation, a linear least-squares algorithm has been derived for the Reference Region Model. This new algorithm improves accuracy and precision of fitting the Reference Region Model to DCE-MRI results, especially for voxel-wise analyses. This linear algorithm is insensitive to injection speeds, and has 300- to 8000-fold faster calculation speed relative to the non-linear algorithm. The linear algorithm produces more accurate results for over a wider range of permeabilities and blood volumes of tumor vasculature. This new algorithm, termed the Linear Reference Region Model, has strong potential to improve clinical DCE-MRI evaluations.

A comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging-derived measurements in patients with cervical cancer

This work is to compare the kinetic parameters derived from the DCE-CT and -MR data of a group of 37 patients with cervical cancer. The modified Tofts model and the reference tissue method were applied to estimate kinetic parameters. In the MR kinetic analyses using the modified Tofts model for each patient data set, both the arterial input function (AIF) measured from DCE-MR images and a population-averaged AIF from the literature were applied to the analyses, while the measured AIF was used for the CT kinetic analysis. The kinetic parameters obtained from both modalities were compared. Significant moderate correlations were found in modified Tofts parameters [volume transfer constant(K(trans) ) and rate constant (k(ep) )] between CT and MR analysis for MR with the measured AIFs (R = 0·45, P<0·01 and R = 0·40, P<0·01 in high-K(trans) region; R = 0·38, P<0·01 and R = 0·80, P<0·01 in low-K(trans) region) as well as with the population-averaged AIF (R = 0·59, P<0·01 and R = 0·62, P<0·01 in high-K(trans) region; R = 0·50, P<0·01 and R = 0·63, P<0·01 in low-K(trans) region), respectively. In addition, from the Bland-Altman plot analysis, it was found that the systematic biases (the mean difference) between the modalities were drastically reduced in magnitude by adopting the population-averaged AIF for the MR analysis instead of the measured ones (from 51·5% to 18·9% for K(trans) and from 21·7% to 4·1% for k(ep) in high-K(trans) region; from 73·0% to 29·4% for K(trans) and from 63·4% to 24·5% for k(ep) in low-K(trans) region). The preliminary results showed the feasibility in the interchangeable use of the two imaging modalities in assessing cervical cancers.

Permeability assessment of the focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Focused ultrasound (FUS) in conjunction with microbubbles has been shown to successfully open the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in the mouse brain. In this study, we compute the BBB permeability after opening in vivo. The spatial permeability of the BBB-opened region was assessed using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). The DCE-MR images were post-processed using the general kinetic model (GKM) and the reference region model (RRM). Permeability maps were generated and the K(trans) values were calculated for a predefined volume of interest in the sonicated and the control area for each mouse. The results demonstrated that K(trans) in the BBB-opened region (0.02 +/- 0.0123 for GKM and 0.03 +/- 0.0167 min(-1) for RRM) was at least two orders of magnitude higher when compared to the contra-lateral (control) side (0 and 8.5 x 10(-4) +/- 12 x 10(-4) min(-1), respectively). The permeability values obtained with the two models showed statistically significant agreement and excellent correlation (R(2) = 0.97). At histological examination, it was concluded that no macroscopic damage was induced. This study thus constitutes the first permeability assessment of FUS-induced BBB opening using DCE-MRI, supporting the fact that the aforementioned technique may constitute a safe, non-invasive and efficacious drug delivery method.