1
|
Bagher-Ebadian H, Brown SL, Ghassemi MM, Nagaraja TN, Movsas B, Ewing JR, Chetty IJ. Radiomics characterization of tissues in an animal brain tumor model imaged using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI. Sci Rep 2023; 13:10693. [PMID: 37394559 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37723-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Here, we investigate radiomics-based characterization of tumor vascular and microenvironmental properties in an orthotopic rat brain tumor model measured using dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Thirty-two immune compromised-RNU rats implanted with human U-251N cancer cells were imaged using DCE-MRI (7Tesla, Dual-Gradient-Echo). The aim was to perform pharmacokinetic analysis using a nested model (NM) selection technique to classify brain regions according to vasculature properties considered as the source of truth. A two-dimensional convolutional-based radiomics analysis was performed on the raw-DCE-MRI of the rat brains to generate dynamic radiomics maps. The raw-DCE-MRI and respective radiomics maps were used to build 28 unsupervised Kohonen self-organizing-maps (K-SOMs). A Silhouette-Coefficient (SC), k-fold Nested-Cross-Validation (k-fold-NCV), and feature engineering analyses were performed on the K-SOMs' feature spaces to quantify the distinction power of radiomics features compared to raw-DCE-MRI for classification of different Nested Models. Results showed that eight radiomics features outperformed respective raw-DCE-MRI in prediction of the three nested models. The average percent difference in SCs between radiomics features and raw-DCE-MRI was: 29.875% ± 12.922%, p < 0.001. This work establishes an important first step toward spatiotemporal characterization of brain regions using radiomics signatures, which is fundamental toward staging of tumors and evaluation of tumor response to different treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Bagher-Ebadian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
- Department of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
- Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
| | - Stephen L Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Mohammad M Ghassemi
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Tavarekere N Nagaraja
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - James R Ewing
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bagher-Ebadian H, Brown SL, Ghassemi MM, Nagaraja TN, Valadie OG, Acharya PC, Cabral G, Divine G, Knight RA, Lee IY, Xu JH, Movsas B, Chetty IJ, Ewing JR. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI estimation of vascular parameters using knowledge-based adaptive models. Sci Rep 2023; 13:9672. [PMID: 37316579 PMCID: PMC10267191 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36483-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
We introduce and validate four adaptive models (AMs) to perform a physiologically based Nested-Model-Selection (NMS) estimation of such microvascular parameters as forward volumetric transfer constant, Ktrans, plasma volume fraction, vp, and extravascular, extracellular space, ve, directly from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI raw information without the need for an Arterial-Input Function (AIF). In sixty-six immune-compromised-RNU rats implanted with human U-251 cancer cells, DCE-MRI studies estimated pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters using a group-averaged radiological AIF and an extended Patlak-based NMS paradigm. One-hundred-ninety features extracted from raw DCE-MRI information were used to construct and validate (nested-cross-validation, NCV) four AMs for estimation of model-based regions and their three PK parameters. An NMS-based a priori knowledge was used to fine-tune the AMs to improve their performance. Compared to the conventional analysis, AMs produced stable maps of vascular parameters and nested-model regions less impacted by AIF-dispersion. The performance (Correlation coefficient and Adjusted R-squared for NCV test cohorts) of the AMs were: 0.914/0.834, 0.825/0.720, 0.938/0.880, and 0.890/0.792 for predictions of nested model regions, vp, Ktrans, and ve, respectively. This study demonstrates an application of AMs that quickens and improves DCE-MRI based quantification of microvasculature properties of tumors and normal tissues relative to conventional approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Bagher-Ebadian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
- Department of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
- Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
| | - Stephen L Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Mohammad M Ghassemi
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Tavarekere N Nagaraja
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Olivia Grahm Valadie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Prabhu C Acharya
- Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA
| | - Glauber Cabral
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - George Divine
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Robert A Knight
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Ian Y Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Jun H Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - James R Ewing
- Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khodadadi Shoushtari F, Sina S, Dehkordi ANV. Automatic segmentation of glioblastoma multiform brain tumor in MRI images: Using Deeplabv3+ with pre-trained Resnet18 weights. Phys Med 2022; 100:51-63. [PMID: 35732092 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of deep learning algorithms in automated segmentation of magnetic resonance brain images for determining the enhanced tumor, the peri-tumoral edema, the necrotic/ non-enhancing tumor, and Normal tissue volumes. METHODS AND MATERIALS A new deep neural network algorithm, Deep-Net, was developed for semantic segmentation of the glioblastoma tumors in MR images, using the Deeplabv3+ architecture, and the pre-trained Resnet18 initial weights. The MR image Dataset used for training the network was taken from the BraTS 2020 training set, with the ground truth labels for different tumor subregions manually drawn by a group of expert neuroradiologists. In this work, two multi-modal MRI scans, i.e., T1ce and FLAIR of 293 patients with high-grade glioma (HGG), were used for deep network training (Deep-Net). The performance of the network was assessed for different hyper-parameters, to obtain the optimum set of parameters. The similarity scores were used for the evaluation of the optimized network. RESULTS According to the results of this study, epoch #37 is the optimum epoch giving the best global accuracy (97.53%), and loss function (0.14). The Deep-Net sensitivity in the delineation of the enhanced tumor is more than 90%. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the Deep-Net was able to segment GBM tumors with high accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sedigheh Sina
- Nuclear Engineering Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran; Radiation Research Center, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Azimeh N V Dehkordi
- Department of Physics, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|