Clinical evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction for cerebral aneurysms

Modern acceleration in musculoskeletal MRI: applications, implications, and challenges

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for accurately diagnosing a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions due to its superior soft tissue contrast resolution. However, the long acquisition times of traditional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fast and turbo spin-echo (TSE) pulse sequences can limit patient access and comfort. Recent technical advancements have introduced acceleration techniques that significantly reduce MRI times for musculoskeletal examinations. Key acceleration methods include parallel imaging (PI), simultaneous multi-slice acquisition (SMS), and compressed sensing (CS), enabling up to eightfold faster scans while maintaining image quality, resolution, and safety standards. These innovations now allow for 3- to 6-fold accelerated clinical musculoskeletal MRI exams, reducing scan times to 4 to 6 min for joints and spine imaging. Evolving deep learning-based image reconstruction promises even faster scans without compromising quality. Current research indicates that combining acceleration techniques, deep learning image reconstruction, and superresolution algorithms will eventually facilitate tenfold accelerated musculoskeletal MRI in routine clinical practice. Such rapid MRI protocols can drastically reduce scan times by 80-90% compared to conventional methods. Implementing these rapid imaging protocols does impact workflow, indirect costs, and workload for MRI technologists and radiologists, which requires careful management. However, the shift from conventional to accelerated, deep learning-based MRI enhances the value of musculoskeletal MRI by improving patient access and comfort and promoting sustainable imaging practices. This article offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects, benefits, and challenges of modern accelerated musculoskeletal MRI, guiding radiologists and researchers in this evolving field.

Ultra-High-Resolution Time-of-Flight MR-Angiography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms, Alternative to Preinterventional DSA?

PURPOSE

The 3D time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3T shows high sensitivity for intracranial aneurysms but is inferior to three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) regarding aneurysm characteristics. We applied an ultra-high-resolution (UHR) TOF-MRA using compressed sensing reconstruction to investigate the diagnostic performance in preinterventional evaluation of intracranial aneurysms compared to conventional TOF-MRA and 3D-DSA.

METHODS

In this study 17 patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms were included. Aneurysm dimensions, configuration, image quality and sizing of endovascular devices were compared between conventional TOF-MRA at 3T and UHR-TOF with 3D-DSA as gold standard. Quantitatively, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared between TOF-MRAs.

RESULTS

On 3D-DSA, 25 aneurysms in 17 patients were detected. On conventional TOF, 23 aneurysms were detected (sensitivity: 92.6%). On UHR-TOF, 25 aneurysms were detected (sensitivity: 100%). Image quality was not significantly different between TOF and UHR-TOF (p = 0.17). Aneurysm dimension measurements were significantly different between conventional TOF (3.89 mm) and 3D-DSA (4.2 mm, p = 0.08) but not between UHR-TOF (4.12 mm) and 3D-DSA (p = 0.19). Irregularities and small vessels at the aneurysm neck were more frequently correctly depicted on UHR-TOF compared to conventional TOF. Comparison of the planned framing coil diameter and flow-diverter (FD) diameter revealed neither a statistically significant difference between TOF and 3D-DSA (coil p = 0.19, FD p = 0.45) nor between UHR-TOF and 3D-DSA (coil: p = 0.53, FD 0.33). The CNR was significantly higher in conventional TOF (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, ultra-high-resolution TOF-MRA visualized all aneurysms and accurately depicted aneurysm irregularities and vessels at the base of the aneurysm comparably to DSA, outperforming conventional TOF. UHR-TOF with compressed sensing reconstruction seems to represent a non-invasive alternative to pre-interventional DSA for intracranial aneurysms.

Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Techniques, Principles, and Applications

Several non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques have been developed, providing an attractive alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA and a radiation-free alternative to computed tomography (CT) CT angiography. This review describes the physical principles, limitations, and clinical applications of bright-blood (BB) non-contrast MRA techniques. The principles of BB MRA techniques can be broadly divided into (a) flow-independent MRA, (b) blood-inflow-based MRA, (c) cardiac phase dependent, flow-based MRA, (d) velocity sensitive MRA, and (e) arterial spin-labeling MRA. The review also includes emerging multi-contrast MRA techniques that provide simultaneous BB and black-blood images for combined luminal and vessel wall evaluation.

Vessel wall MR imaging in neuroradiology

Vessel wall MR imaging (VW-MRI) has been introduced into clinical practice and applied to a variety of diseases, and its usefulness has been reported. High-resolution VW-MRI is essential in the diagnostic workup and provides more information than other routine MR imaging protocols. VW-MRI is useful in assessing lesion location, morphology, and severity. Additional information, such as vessel wall enhancement, which is useful in the differential diagnosis of atherosclerotic disease and vasculitis could be assessed by this special imaging technique. This review describes the VW-MRI technique and its clinical applications in arterial disease, venous disease, vasculitis, and leptomeningeal disease.

Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 2 - Acceleration Methods and Implications for Individual Regions

BACKGROUND

 Recently introduced MRI techniques facilitate accelerated examinations or increased resolution with the same duration. Further techniques offer homogeneous image quality in regions with anatomical transitions. The question arises whether and how these techniques can be adopted for routine diagnostic imaging.

METHODS

 Narrative review with an educational focus based on current literature research and practical experiences of different professions involved (physicians, MRI technologists/radiographers, physics/biomedical engineering). Different hardware manufacturers are considered.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

 Compressed sensing and simultaneous multi-slice imaging are novel acceleration techniques with different yet complimentary applications. They do not suffer from classical signal-to-noise-ratio penalties. Combining 3 D and acceleration techniques facilitates new broader examination protocols, particularly for clinical brain imaging. In further regions of the nervous systems mainly specific applications appear to benefit from recent technological improvements.

KEY POINTS

  · New acceleration techniques allow for faster or higher resolution examinations.. · New brain imaging approaches have evolved, including more universal examination protocols.. · Other regions of the nervous system are dominated by targeted applications of recently introduced MRI techniques..

CITATION FORMAT

· Sundermann B, Billebaut B, Bauer J et al. Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 2 - Acceleration Methods and Implications for Individual Regions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1800-8789.

Follow-Up Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Coiling: Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Parallel Imaging Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography

The aim of our study was to compare compressed sensing (CS) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with parallel imaging (PI) TOF MRA in the evaluation of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization or stent-assisted coiling. We enrolled 22 patients who underwent follow-up imaging after intracranial aneurysm coil embolization. All patients underwent both PI TOF and CS TOF MRA during the same examination. Image evaluation aimed to compare the performance of CS to PI TOF MRA in determining the degree of aneurysm occlusion, as well as the depiction of parent vessel and vessels adjacent to the aneurysm dome. The reference standard for the evaluation of aneurysm occlusion was PI TOF MRA. The inter-modality agreement between CS and PI TOF MRA in the evaluation of aneurysm occlusion was almost perfect (κ  =  0.98, p  <  0.001) and the overall inter-rater agreement was substantial (κ  =  0.70, p  <  0.001). The visualization of aneurysm parent vessel in CS TOF images compared with PI TOF images was evaluated to be better in 11.4%, equal in 86.4%, and worse in 2.3%. CS TOF MRA, with almost 70% scan time reduction with respect to PI TOF MRA, yields comparable results for assessing the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms. Short scan times increase patient comfort, reduce the risk of motion artifacts, and increase patient throughput, with a resulting reduction in costs. CS TOF MRA may therefore be a potential replacement for PI TOF MRA as a first-line follow-up examination in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization.

Development of three-dimensional MR neurography using an optimized combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the cervical magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) imaging quality obtained with compressed sensing and sensitivity-encoding (compressed SENSE; CS-SENSE) technique in comparison to that obtained with the conventional parallel imaging (i.e., SENSE) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five healthy volunteers underwent a three-dimensional (3D) turbo spin-echo (TSE)-based cervical MRN examination using a 3.0 Tesla MR-unit. All MRN acquisitions were performed with CS-SENSE and conventional SENSE. We used four acceleration factors (4, 8, 16 and 32) in CS-SENSE. The image quality in MRN was evaluated by assessing the degree of cervical nerve depiction using the contrast ratio (CR) and contrast-noise ratio (CNR) between the cervical nerve and the background signal intensity and a visual scoring system (1: poor, 2: moderate, 3: good). In all of the CR, CNR and visual score, we calculated the ratio of the CS-SENSE-based MRN to that from SENSE-based MRN plus the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of these ratios.

RESULTS

In the multiple comparison of MRN images with the control of conventional SENSE-based MRN, both the quantitative CR values and the visual score for the CS-SENSE factors of 16 and 32 were significantly lower, whereas the CS-SENSE factors of 4 and 8 showed a non-significant difference. In addition, the quantitative CNR values obtained with the CS-SENSE factors of 4 and 8 were significantly higher than that obtained with the conventional SENSE-based MRN while the CS-SENSE factor of 32 was significantly lower, in contrast, the CS-SENSE factors of 16 showed a non-significant difference. For CS-SENSE factors of 4 and 8, all ratios of the CS-SENSE-based MRN values for CR, CNR and visual scores to those from SENSE-based MRN were above 0.95.

CONCLUSION

CS-SENSE-based MRN can accomplish fast scanning with sufficient image quality when using a high acceleration factor.

Compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with high spatial resolution for evaluating intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Compressed sensing is used for accelerated acquisitions with incoherently under-sampled k-space data, and intracranial time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography is suitable for compressed sensing. Compressed sensing time-of-flight is beneficial in decreasing acquisition time and increasing spatial resolution while maintaining acquisition time. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of compressed sensing time-of-flight with high spatial resolution and compare with parallel imaging time-of-flight using digital subtraction angiography as a reference.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 39 patients with 46 intracranial aneurysms underwent parallel imaging and compressed sensing time-of-flight in the same imaging session and digital subtraction angiography before or after magnetic resonance angiography. The overall image quality, artefacts and diagnostic confidence were assessed by two observers. The contrast ratio, maximal aneurysm diameters and diagnostic performance were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compressed sensing time-of-flight showed significantly better overall image quality, degree of artefacts and diagnostic confidence in both observers, with better inter-observer agreement. The contrast ratio was significantly higher for compressed sensing time-of-flight than for parallel imaging time-of-flight in both observers (source images, P < 0.001; maximum intensity projection images, P < 0.05 for both observers); however, the measured maximal diameters of aneurysms were not significantly different. Compressed sensing time-of-flight showed higher sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values for detecting aneurysms than parallel imaging time-of-flight in both observers, with better inter-observer agreement. Compressed sensing time-of-flight was preferred over parallel imaging time-of-flight by both observers; however, parallel imaging time-of-flight was preferred in cases of giant and large aneurysms.

CONCLUSIONS

Compressed sensing-time-of-flight provides better image quality and diagnostic performance than parallel imaging time-of-flight. However, neuroradiologists should be aware of under-sampling artefacts caused by compressed sensing.

Novel Ultrafast Spiral Head MR Angiography Compared to Standard MR and CT Angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracranial vessel imaging by time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) is one of the most frequently performed investigations in clinical neuroradiology. Particularly in the acute setting, fast imaging is needed for diagnostics, with a sequence ideally depicting even small vessels. The purpose of this study was to compare image and diagnostic quality of a novel ultrashort TOF-MRA sequence accelerated by spiral imaging (TOF-Spiral-short) to a standard TOF-MRA sequence accelerated by compressed sensing (TOF-CS) and to CT angiography (CTA).

METHODS

Forty-one patients (36.6% showing vessel pathologies) who had undergone TOF-CS (acquisition duration: 4 minutes 8 seconds), TOF-Spiral-short (acquisition duration: 51 seconds; spiral imaging [accelerating factor 1.3], decreased field of view [accelerating factor 1.2], and increased voxel size [accelerating factor 3.3]), and CTA were retrospectively evaluated. Assessment of image quality, diagnostic confidence, and quantification of stenosis or aneurysm diameter were performed by two readers.

RESULTS

Image quality at the skull base was slightly reduced with TOF-Spiral-short compared to CTA and TOF-CS (P < .05). Delineation of small intracranial vessels was improved by TOF-Spiral-short compared to CTA (P < .0001). In TOF-Spiral-short, diagnostic confidence was not reduced compared to TOF-CS in patients with vessel pathologies. We observed no significant difference in quantitative pathology assessment between TOF-Spiral-short and the other two modalities. TOF-Spiral-short enabled the correct identification of all vessel pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerating TOF-MRA of brain-feeding arteries by a novel ultrashort spiral imaging sequence shows adequate image quality and sufficient diagnostic performance. Thus, TOF-Spiral-short holds potential for fast and reliable diagnostics of vessel pathologies, particularly in the acute setting.

Evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous shunts: a comparison of parallel imaging time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) and compressed sensing TOF-MRA to digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE

Time-of-flight (TOF)-MR angiography (MRA) is an important imaging sequence for the surveillance and analysis of cerebral arteriovenous shunt (AVS), including arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF). However, this technique has the disadvantage of a relatively long scan time. The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy between compressed sensing (CS)-TOF and conventional parallel imaging (PI)-TOF-MRA for detecting and characterizing AVS.

METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board for human studies. Participants comprised 56 patients who underwent both CS-TOF-MRA and PI-TOF-MRA on a 3-T MR unit with or without cerebral AVS between June 2016 and September 2018. Imaging parameters for both sequences were almost identical, except the acceleration factor of 3× for PI-TOF-MRA and 6.5× for CS-TOF-MRA, and the scan time of 5 min 19 s for PI-TOF-MRA and 2 min 26 s for CS-TOF-MRA. Two neuroradiologists assessed the accuracy of AVS detection on each sequence and analyzed AVS angioarchitecture. Concordance between CS-TOF, PI-TOF, and digital subtraction angiography was calculated using unweighted and weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Both CS-TOF-MRA and PI-TOF-MRA yielded excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting intracranial AVS (reviewer 1, 97.3%, 94.7%; reviewer 2, 100%, 100%, respectively). Interrater agreement on the angioarchitectural features of intracranial AVS on CS-MRA and PI-MRA was moderate to good.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of CS-TOF-MRA is comparable to that of PI-TOF-MRA in detecting and classifying AVS with a reduced scan time under 2.5 min.

7T versus 3T MR Angiography to Assess Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Aneurysm size and neck measurements are important for treatment decisions. The introduction of 7T magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) led to new possibilities assessing aneurysm morphology and flow due to the higher signal-to-noise ratio. However, it is unknown if the size measurements on 7T MRA are similar to those on the standard 3T MRA. This study aimed to compare aneurysm size measurements between 7T and 3T MRA.

METHODS

We included 18 patients with 22 aneurysms who underwent both 3T and 7T MRA. Three acquisition protocols were compared: 3T time of flight (TOF), 7T TOF, and 7T contrast-enhanced MRA. Each aneurysm on each protocol was measured by at least two experienced neuroradiologists. Subsequently, the differences were evaluated using scatterplots and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of agreement.

RESULTS

There was a good agreement among the neuroradiologists for the height and width measurements (mean ICC: .78-.93); the neck measurements showed a moderate agreement with a mean ICC of .57-.72. Between the MR acquisition protocols, there was a high agreement for all measurements with a mean ICC of .81-.96. Measurement differences between acquisition protocols (0-2.9 mm) were in the range of the differences between the neuroradiologists (0-3.6 mm).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that 7T MRA, both nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced, has a high agreement in aneurysm size measurements compared to 3T. This suggests that 7T is useful for reliable aneurysm size assessment.

Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition in subtraction-based magnetic resonance angiography to assess saccular unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 3 Tesla

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical utility of pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition in subtraction-based magnetic resonance angiography (PETRA-MRA) and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) to evaluate saccular unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).

METHODS

A total of 49 patients with 54 TOF-MRA-identified saccular UIAs were enrolled. The morphologic parameters, contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNRs), and sharpness of aneurysms were measured using PETRA-MRA and TOF-MRA. Two radiologists independently evaluated subjective image scores, focusing on aneurysm signal homogeneities and sharpness depictions using a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, poor; 1, not assessable. PETRA-MRA and TOF-MRA acoustic noises were measured.

RESULTS

All aneurysms were detected with PETRA-MRA. The morphologic parameters of 15 patients evaluated with PETRA-MRA were more closely correlated with those receiving computed tomography angiography over those receiving TOF-MRA. No significant differences between PETRA-MRA and TOF-MRA parameters were seen in the 54 UIAs (p > 0.10), excluding those with inflow angles (p < 0.05). In four patients with inflow angles on PETRA-MRA, the angles were more closely related to those of digital subtraction angiography than those of TOF-MRA. CNRs between TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA were comparable (p = 0.068), and PETRA-MRA sharpness values and subjective image scores were significantly higher than those of TOF-MRA (p < 0.001). Inter-observer agreements were excellent for both PETRA-MRA and TOF-MRA (intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.90 and 0.97, respectively). The acoustic noise levels of PETRA-MRA were much lower than those of TOF-MRA (59 vs.73 dB, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PETRA-MRA, with better visualization of aneurysms and lower acoustic noise levels than TOF-MRA, showed a superior diagnostic performance for depicting saccular UIAs.

Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study

Objectives

Non-Cartesian Spiral readout can be implemented in 3D Time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) with short acquisition times. In this intra-individual comparison study we evaluated the clinical feasibility of Spiral TOF MRA in comparison with compressed sensing accelerated TOF MRA at 1.5T for intracranial vessel imaging as it has yet to be determined.

Materials and methods

Forty-four consecutive patients with suspected intracranial vascular disease were imaged with two Spiral 3D TOFs (Spiral, 0.82x0.82x1.2 mm³, 01:32 min; Spiral 0.8, 0.8x0.8x0.8 mm^3, 02:12 min) and a Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D TOF (CS 3.5, 0.82x0.82x1.2 mm³, 03:06 min) at 1.5T. Two neuroradiologists assessed qualitative (visualization of central and peripheral vessels) and quantitative image quality (Contrast Ratio, CR) and performed lesion and variation assessment for all three TOFs in each patient. After the rating process, the readers were questioned and representative cases were reinspected in a non-blinded fashion. For statistical analysis, the Friedman and Nemenyi post-hoc test, Kendall W tests, repeated measure ANOVA and weighted Cohen's Kappa tests were used.

Results

The Spiral and Spiral 0.8 outperformed the CS 3.5 in terms of peripheral image quality (p<0.001) and performed equally well in terms of central image quality (p>0.05). The readers noted slight differences in the appearance of maximum intensity projection images. A good to high degree of interstudy agreement between the three TOFs was observed for lesion and variation assessment (W = 0.638, p<0.001 –W = 1, p<0.001). CR values did not differ significantly between the three TOFs (p = 0.534). Interreader agreement ranged from good (K = 0.638) to excellent (K = 1).

Conclusions

Compared to the CS 3.5, both the Spiral and Spiral 0.8 exhibited comparable or better image quality and comparable diagnostic performance at much shorter acquisition times.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Computed Tomography Angiography Stereoscopic Cerebral Vascular Models

In this paper, we will discuss and compare the stereoscopic models developed from two types of radiographic data, Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) images and Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) images. Stereoscopic models were created using surface or volume segmentation and semi-auto combined segmentation techniques. Although, the CTA data were found to improve the speed and quality of constructing virtual vascular models compared to conventional CT data, small blood vessels were difficult to capture during the imaging and reconstruction process thereby limiting the fidelity of the stereoscopic models. Thus, high contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) images offer better resolution to visualize and capture the smaller branches of the cerebral vasculature than CTA images.

Improving the Otsu method for MRA image vessel extraction via resampling and ensemble learning

Accurate extraction of vessels plays an important role in assisting diagnosis, treatment, and surgical planning. The Otsu method has been used for extracting vessels in medical images. However, blood vessels in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) image are considered as a sparse distribution. Pixels on vessels in MRA image are considered as an imbalanced data in classification of vessels and non-vessel tissues. To extract vessels accurately, a novel method using resampling technique and ensemble learning is proposed for solving the imbalanced classification problem. Each pixel is sampled multiple times through multiple local patches within the image. Then, vessel or non-vessel tissue is determined by the ensemble voting mechanism via a p-tile algorithm. Experimental results show that the proposed method is able to outperform the traditional Otsu method by extracting vessels in MRA images more accurately.

Accelerated Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction for the Evaluation of Intracranial Arteries

OBJECTIVE

To compare the image quality of three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction (sparse TOF) with that of conventional TOF MRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 56 patients who had undergone sparse TOF MRA for intracranial artery evaluation on a 3T MR scanner. Conventional TOF MRA scans were also acquired from 29 patients with matched acquisition times and another 27 patients with matched scanning parameters. The image quality was scored using a five-point scale based on the delineation of arterial vessel segments, artifacts, overall vessel visualization, and overall image quality by two radiologists independently, and the data were analyzed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Contrast ratios (CRs) of vessels were compared using the paired t test. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the kappa test.

RESULTS

Compared with conventional TOF at the same spatial resolution, sparse TOF with an acceleration factor of 3.5 could reduce acquisition time by 40% and showed comparable image quality. In addition, when compared with conventional TOF with the same acquisition time, sparse TOF with an acceleration factor of 5 could also achieve higher spatial resolution, better delineation of vessel segments, fewer artifacts, higher image quality, and a higher CR (p < 0.05). Good-to-excellent interobserver agreement (κ: 0.65-1.00) was obtained between the two radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional TOF, sparse TOF can achieve equivalent image quality in a reduced duration. Furthermore, using the same acquisition time, sparse TOF could improve the delineation of vessels and decrease image artifacts.

Clinical Evaluation of Highly Accelerated Compressed Sensing Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Time-of-flight MR angiography is the preferred imaging technique to assess intracranial arterial stenosis but is limited by a relatively long acquisition time. Compressed sensing provides an innovative approach in undersampling k-space to minimize the data-acquisition time. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of compressed sensing TOF for detecting intracranial arterial stenosis by comparison with conventional parallel imaging TOF-MRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Compressed sensing TOF and parallel imaging TOF were performed in 22 patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. The MRA scan times were 2 minutes and 31 seconds and 4 minutes and 48 seconds for compressed sensing TOF and parallel imaging TOF, respectively. The reconstructed resolutions were 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 and 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.6 mm³ for compressed sensing TOF and parallel imaging TOF, respectively. The diagnostic quality of the images and visibility of the stenoses were independently ranked by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the type of method and were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Concordance was calculated with the Cohen κ. Edge sharpness of the arteries and the luminal stenosis ratio were analyzed and compared using a paired-sample t test.

RESULTS

The interrater agreement was good to excellent. Compressed sensing TOF resulted in image quality comparable with that of parallel imaging TOF but boosted confidence in diagnosing arterial stenoses (P = .025). The edge sharpness of the intracranial arteries for compressed sensing TOF was significantly higher than that for parallel imaging TOF (P < .001). The luminal stenosis ratio on compressed sensing TOF showed no significant difference compared with that on parallel imaging TOF.

CONCLUSIONS

Compressed sensing TOF both remarkably reduced the scan time and provided adequate image quality for the diagnosis of intracranial arterial stenosis.

Magnetic resonance angiography with compressed sensing: An evaluation of moyamoya disease

Compressed sensing (CS) reconstructions of under-sampled measurements generate missing data based on assumptions of image sparsity. Non-contrast time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) is a good candidate for CS based acceleration, as MRA images feature bright trees of sparse vessels over a well-suppressed anatomical background signal. A short scan time derived from CS is beneficial for patients of moyamoya disease (MMD) because of the frequency of MR scans. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of TOF-MRA with CS in the evaluation of MMD. Twenty-two patients were examined using TOF-MRA with CS (CS-TOF) and parallel imaging (PI-TOF). The acceleration factors were 3 (CS3) and 5 (CS5) for CS-TOF, and 3 (PI3) for PI-TOF. Two neuroradiologists evaluated the MMD grading according to stenosis/occlusion scores using the modified Houkin’s system, and the visibility of moyamoya vessels (MMVs) using a 3-point scale. Concordance was calculated with Cohen’s κ. The numbers of MMVs in the basal ganglia were compared using Bland-Altman analysis and Wilcoxon’s signed-rank tests. MRA scan times were 4:07, 3:53, and 2:42 for PI3, CS3, and CS5, respectively. CS-reconstruction completed within 10 minutes. MMD grading and MMV visibility scales showed excellent correlation (κ > .966). Although the number of MMVs was significantly higher in CS3 than in PI3 (p < .0001) and CS5 (p < .0001), Bland-Altman analysis showed a good agreement between PI3, CS3, and CS5. Compressed sensing can accelerate TOF-MRA with improved visualization of small collaterals in equivalent time (CS3) or equivalent results in a shorter scan time (CS5).