Feasibility of coronary endothelial function assessment using arterial spin labeled CMR

Non-contrast myocardial perfusion in rest and exercise stress using systolic flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate systolic flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) during rest and exercise stress using 2RR (two cardiac cycles) or 1RR intervals between inversion pulse and imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1RR and 2RR FAIR was implemented on a 3T scanner. Ten healthy subjects were scanned during rest and stress. Stress was performed using an in-bore ergometer. Heart rate, mean myocardial blood flow (MBF) and temporal signal-to-noise ratio (TSNR) were compared using paired t tests.

RESULTS

Mean heart rate during stress was higher than rest for 1RR FAIR (85.8 ± 13.7 bpm vs 63.3 ± 11.1 bpm; p < 0.01) and 2RR FAIR (83.8 ± 14.2 bpm vs 63.1 ± 10.6 bpm; p < 0.01). Mean stress MBF was higher than rest for 1RR FAIR (2.97 ± 0.76 ml/g/min vs 1.43 ± 0.6 ml/g/min; p < 0.01) and 2RR FAIR (2.8 ± 0.96 ml/g/min vs 1.22 ± 0.59 ml/g/min; p < 0.01). Resting mean MBF was higher for 1RR FAIR than 2RR FAIR (p < 0.05), but not during stress. TSNR was lower for stress compared to rest for 1RR FAIR (4.52 ± 2.54 vs 10.12 ± 3.69; p < 0.01) and 2RR FAIR (7.36 ± 3.78 vs 12.41 ± 5.12; p < 0.01). 2RR FAIR TSNR was higher than 1RR FAIR for rest (p < 0.05) and stress (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

We have demonstrated feasibility of systolic FAIR in rest and exercise stress. 2RR delay systolic FAIR enables non-contrast perfusion assessment during stress with relatively high TSNR.

Myocardial arterial spin labeling in systole and diastole using flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery with parallel imaging and compressed sensing

Quantitative myocardial perfusion can be achieved without contrast agents using flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) arterial spin labeling. However, FAIR has an intrinsically low sensitivity, which may be improved by mitigating the effects of physiological noise or by increasing the area of artifact-free myocardium. The aim of this study was to investigate if systolic FAIR may increase the amount of analyzable myocardium compared with diastolic FAIR and its effect on physiological noise. Furthermore, we compare parallel imaging acceleration with a factor of 2 with compressed sensing acceleration with a factor of 3 for systolic FAIR. Twelve healthy subjects were scanned during rest on a 3 T scanner using diastolic FAIR with parallel imaging factor 2 (FAIR-PI2_D ), systolic FAIR with the same acceleration (FAIR-PI2_S ) and systolic FAIR with compressed sensing factor 3 (FAIR-CS3_S ). The number of analyzable pixels in the myocardium, temporal signal-to-noise ratio (TSNR) and mean myocardial blood flow (MBF) were calculated for all methods. The number of analyzable pixels using FAIR-CS3_S (663 ± 55) and FAIR-PI2_S (671 ± 58) was significantly higher than for FAIR-PI2_D (507 ± 82; P = .001 for both), while there was no significant difference between FAIR-PI2_S and FAIR-CS3_S . The mean TSNR of the midventricular slice for FAIR-PI2_D was 11.4 ± 3.9, similar to that of FAIR-CS3_S, which was 11.0 ± 3.3, both considerably higher than for FAIR-PI2_S, which was 8.4 ± 3.1 (P < .05 for both). Mean MBF was similar for all three methods. The use of compressed sensing accelerated systolic FAIR benefits from an increased number of analyzable myocardial pixels compared with diastolic FAIR without suffering from a TSNR penalty, unlike systolic FAIR with parallel imaging acceleration.

Current and novel imaging techniques to evaluate myocardial dysfunction during hemodialysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients on hemodialysis have significantly higher rates of cardiovascular mortality resulting from a multitude of myocardial dysfunctions. Current imaging modalities allow independent assessment of cardiac morphology, contractile function, coronary arteries and cardiac perfusion. Techniques such as cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging have been available for some time, but have not yet had widespread adoption because of technical limitations related to cardiac motion, radiation exposure and safety of contrast agents in kidney disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT imaging can be used to acquire high-resolution cardiac images, which simultaneously allow the assessment of coronary arteries and the quantitative measurement of myocardial perfusion. The advancement of recent CT scanners and cardiac protocols have allowed noninvasive imaging of the whole heart in a single imaging session with minimal cardiac motion artefact and exposure to radiation.

SUMMARY

DCE-CT imaging in clinical practice would allow comprehensive evaluation of the structure, function, and hemodynamics of the heart in a short, well tolerated scanning session. It is an imaging tool enabling the study of myocardial dysfunction in dialysis patients, who have greater cardiovascular risk than nonrenal cardiovascular disease populations, both at rest and under cardiac stress associated with hemodialysis itself.