Comparison of Two Methods for Estimating the Tip Position of a Nasogastric Feeding Tube: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Deep Learning-Based Localization and Detection of Malpositioned Nasogastric Tubes on Portable Supine Chest X-Rays in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine: A Multi-center Retrospective Study

Malposition of a nasogastric tube (NGT) can lead to severe complications. We aimed to develop a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to localize NGTs and detect NGT malposition on portable chest X-rays (CXRs). A total of 7378 portable CXRs were retrospectively retrieved from two hospitals between 2015 and 2020. All CXRs were annotated with pixel-level labels for NGT localization and image-level labels for NGT presence and malposition. In the CAD system, DeepLabv3 + with backbone ResNeSt50 and DenseNet121 served as the model architecture for segmentation and classification models, respectively. The CAD system was tested on images from chronologically different datasets (National Taiwan University Hospital (National Taiwan University Hospital)-20), geographically different datasets (National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch (YB)), and the public CLiP dataset. For the segmentation model, the Dice coefficients indicated accurate delineation of the NGT course (National Taiwan University Hospital-20: 0.665, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.630-0.696; National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch: 0.646, 95% CI 0.614-0.678). The distance between the predicted and ground-truth NGT tips suggested accurate tip localization (National Taiwan University Hospital-20: 1.64 cm, 95% CI 0.99-2.41; National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch: 2.83 cm, 95% CI 1.94-3.76). For the classification model, NGT presence was detected with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): National Taiwan University Hospital-20: 0.998, 95% CI 0.995-1.000; National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch: 0.998, 95% CI 0.995-1.000; CLiP dataset: 0.991, 95% CI 0.990-0.992). The CAD system also detected NGT malposition with high accuracy (AUC: National Taiwan University Hospital-20: 0.964, 95% CI 0.917-1.000; National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch: 0.991, 95% CI 0.970-1.000) and detected abnormal nasoenteric tube positions with favorable performance (AUC: 0.839, 95% CI 0.807-0.869). The CAD system accurately localized NGTs and detected NGT malposition, demonstrating excellent potential for external generalizability.

Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia in elderly patients requiring mechanical ventilation through the detection in tracheal aspirates

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of tracheal aspirates α-amylase (AM), pepsin, and lipid-laden macrophage index (LLMI) in the early diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in elderly patients on mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Within 96 hours of tracheal intubation, tracheal aspirate specimens were collected from elderly patients on mechanical ventilation; AM, pepsin, and LLMI were detected, and we analyzed the potential of each index individually and in combination in diagnosing VAP.

RESULTS

Patients with VAP had significantly higher levels of AM, pepsin, and LLMI compared to those without VAP (P < 0.001), and there was a positive correlation between the number of pre-intubation risk factors of aspiration and the detection value of each index in patients with VAP (P < 0.001). The area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of AM, pepsin, and LLMI in diagnosis of VAP were 0.821 (95% CI:0.713-0.904), 0.802 (95% CI:0.693-0.892), and 0.621 (95% CI:0.583-0.824), the sensitivities were 0.8815, 0.7632, and 0.6973, the specificities were 0.8495, 0.8602, and 0.6291, and the cutoff values were 4,321.5 U/L, 126.61 ng/ml, and 173.5, respectively. The AUC for the combination of indexes in diagnosing VAP was 0.905 (95% CI:0.812-0.934), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.9211 and 0.9332, respectively. In the tracheal aspirate specimens, the detection rate of AM ≥ cutoff was the highest, while it was the lowest for LLMI (P < 0.001). The detection rates of AM ≥ cutoff and pepsin ≥ cutoff were higher within 48 hours after intubation than within 48-96 hours after intubation (P < 0.001). In contrast, the detection rate of LLMI ≥ cutoff was higher within 48-96 hours after intubation than within 48 hours after intubation (P < 0.001). The risk factors for VAP identified using logistic multivariate analysis included pre-intubation aspiration risk factors (≥3), MDR bacteria growth in tracheal aspirates, and tracheal aspirate AM ≥ 4,321.5 U/L, pepsin ≥ 126.61 ng/ml, and LLMI ≥ 173.5.

CONCLUSION

The detection of AM, pepsin, and LLMI in tracheal aspirates has promising clinical utility as an early warning biomarker of VAP in elderly patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Nasogastric tube insertion length measurement and tip verification in adults: a narrative review

Nasogastric feeding tube insertion is a common but invasive procedure most often blindly placed by nurses in acute and chronic care settings. Although usually not harmful, serious and fatal complications with misplacement still occur and variation in practice still exists. These tubes can be used for drainage or administration of fluids, drugs and/or enteral feeding. During blind insertion, it is important to achieve correct tip position of the tube ideally reaching the body of the stomach. If the insertion length is too short, the tip and/or distal side-openings at the end of the tube can be located in the esophagus increasing the risk of aspiration (pneumonia). Conversely, when the insertion length is too long, the tube might kink in the stomach, curl upwards into the esophagus or enter the duodenum. Studies have demonstrated that the most frequently used technique to determine insertion length (the nose-earlobe-xiphoid method) is too short a distance; new safer methods should be used and further more robust evidence is needed. After blind placement, verifying correct gastric tip positioning is of major importance to avoid serious and sometimes lethal complications.

Evolving Therapeutic Roles of Nasogastric Tubes: Current Concepts in Clinical Practice

Nasogastric tubes (NGT) have been in use for over 100 years and are still considered as essential and resuscitative tools in multiple medical specialties for acute and chronic care. They are vital for decompression of the stomach in the presence of bowel obstruction in the critically ill and useful as a conduit for the administration of medications and sometimes for short term parenteral nutrition. The placement of nasogastric tubes is relatively routine. However, they must be inserted and maintained safely and effectively to avoid serious and possibly even fatal associated complications. This review focuses on recent updates in research regarding nasogastric tubes. Cognizance of the recent advances in indications, contraindications, techniques of insertion, confirmation of correct positioning, securement, complications, management of complications, and state of the art research about the nasogastric tube is crucial for practitioners of all medical and surgical specialties.

A scoping review of clinical practices and adherence to UK national guidance related to the placement and position confirmation of adult nasogastric feeding tubes

INTRODUCTION

The administration of nutrition or medication into the lungs or pleura via a misplaced nasogastric feeding tube is considered a never event. Despite guidance from the National Patient Safety Agency and NHS Improvement this never event is regularly reported. Confirmation of correct placement and correct use of nasogastric tubes requires appropriate actions and decisions by a multidisciplinary team.

METHODS

A scoping review identified 43 records that discussed and supported nasogastric tube misplacement as a Never Event. Searches were completed using Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, British Nursing Index (BNI), as well as selected journals. A further manual search revealed 22 publicly available NHS Trust policies related to nasogastric feeding tube procedures. Items generated between 2011 and 2020 were considered eligible. A thematic analysis was completed to assess adherence to guidance and the practices in place across the NHS.

RESULTS

Three key themes were identified as part of the review: referral and authorisation of radiography, examination description, and visualisation of the nasogastric tube tip. Large variations in practice were identified. While there is recognition of national guidance, records showed inconsistency and lacked the required detail to ensure patient safety.

CONCLUSION

Despite classification as a never event, it is apparent that there is still room for improvement and further guidance in ensuring patient safety with respect to nasogastric tube insertion.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Practice requires further standardisation whilst also ensuring optimisation and safety. Guidance should address in depth imaging authorisation, language and exact standards of acceptability for imaging the full length of the nasogastric tube.

Optimal Insertion Depth of Gastric Decompression Tube with a Thermistor for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position

Monitoring core temperature is crucial for maintaining normothermia during general anesthesia. Insertion of a gastric decompression tube (GDT) may be required during laparoscopic surgery. Recently, a newly designed GDT with a thermistor for monitoring esophageal temperature has been introduced. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the optimal insertion depth of a GDT with a thermistor. Forty-eight patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position were included in the study. The GDT was inserted to a depth of nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance (NEX) + 12 cm and withdrawn sequentially, 2 cm at a time, at 5-min intervals. Temperatures of the GDT thermistor were compared with the core temperature of the tympanic membrane (TM) using Bland and Altman analysis. The correlation between optimal insertion depth of the GDT and anatomical distance (cricoid cartilage to the carina, CCD; carina to the left hemidiaphragm, CLHD) was evaluated, and a mathematical model to predict the optimal insertion depth of the GDT with a thermistor was calculated. Temperatures of TM and GDT thermistor at NEX + 4 cm showed good agreement and strong correlation, but better agreement and stronger correlation were seen at the actual location with the most minor temperature differences. The optimal insertion depth of the GDT was estimated as -15.524 + 0.414 × CCD - 0.145 × CLHD and showed a strong correlation with the actual GDT insertion depth (correlation coefficient 0.797, adjusted R² = 0.636). The mathematical formula using CCD and CLHD would be helpful in determining the optimal insertion depth of a GDT with a thermistor.

The accuracy of methods for determining the internal length of a nasogastric tube in adult patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Blind insertion of nasogastric (NG) tubes is performed for several reasons: nutrition and medication administration, gastric aspiration/decompression, and other, diagnostic reasons. Accidental intraesophageal and intestinal placement is common, and increases the risk of serious complications. Therefore, accurate determination of the internal length of the NG tube before placement is considered a prerequisite for achieving correct gastric positioning.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify, assess, and summarize the evidence on the accuracy of methods for determining the internal length of an NG tube in adults.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science were searched up to 31 January, 2022. Studies were eligible when reporting data on the accuracy of methods for determining internal NG tube length in adults. Study selection, risk-of-bias assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by 2 investigators. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross Sectional Studies. A narrative synthesis of the results was then conducted.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included in this review. All studies were observational, cross-sectional in nature, except for 1 randomized controlled trial. Ten methods for determining the internal length of an NG tube were described. Correctly positioned NG tubes ranged from 13% to 99%. Results showed that the tip of the nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance (NEX) + 10 cm (mean: 59.9-60.7 cm) and (NEX × 0.38696) + 30.37 + 6 cm (mean: 56.6-56.7 cm) could potentially result in accuracy as high as 97.4% and 99.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data do not provide conclusive evidence of 100% accuracy in finding a correctly placed NG tube when using a method for determining the internal length. Blind placement, using any of the documented methods, cannot be considered safe without additional verification of tube tip positioning. Furthermore, using any of these 10 methods does not reduce the risk of pulmonary intubation.This systematic review was registered at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ as CRD42021243180.

Bedside ultrasonography for the confirmation of nasogastric tube placement: agreement between nurse and physician

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the agreement between nurse and physician in verifying the positioning of the nasogastric tube by ultrasonography and describe the difficulties faced by nurse in performing the technique. Method Cross-sectional study conducted in 2021, including critical patients after nasogastric tube insertion who were independently evaluated by a nurse and physician, using bedside ultrasonography. The tube was considered adequately positioned when viewed in infradiaphragmatic location in the topography of the stomach. Results In the 30 peer evaluations there was almost perfect agreement (k = 0.93; 95%CI: 0.65 - 0.99). In only one case the nurse was uncertain about the positioning. Some difficulties were reported: abdominal distention (n=2), gas interposition (n=3) and patient movement during the exam (n=2). Conclusion A trained nurse obtained very similar results to those found by a physician in identifying the nasogastric tube placement by means of ultrasonography, suggesting a reproducible and safe technique.

Ultrassonografia à beira do leito para localização da sonda nasoenteral: concordância entre enfermeiro e médico

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a concordância entre enfermeiroe médico na determinação da localizaçãoda sonda enteral por ultrassonografia e descrever as dificuldades encontradas pelo enfermeiro na execução da técnica. Método Estudo transversal, realizado em 2021, incluindo pacientes críticos após a inserção dasondaenteral, avaliados de modo independente por enfermeiro e médico, utilizando ultrassonografia à beira do leito. A sonda foi considerada adequadamente posicionada quando visualizada em posição infradiafragmática na topografia do estômago. Resultados Nos 30 pares de avaliações houve concordância quase perfeita (k = 0,93; IC95%: 0,65 - 0,99). Em apenas um caso houve dúvida do enfermeiro sobre o posicionamento. As dificuldades relatadas foram:distensão abdominal (n=2), interposição de gás (n=3) e movimentação do paciente durante o exame (n=2). Conclusão Um enfermeiro capacitadoobteve resultados semelhantes aos encontrados por um médico na identificação do posicionamento da sondaenteral por meio de ultrassonografia, sugerindo tratar-se de uma técnica reprodutível e segura.

Diagnostic accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide detection in determining correct placement of nasogastric tube: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Misplacement of the nasogastric tube in the respiratory tract could cause serious complications and even death. Thus, nasogastric tube verification is necessary for optimal patient safety and comfort. Although end-tidal carbon dioxide detection is considered an effective approach to determine nasogastric tube location, there is a paucity of up-to-date evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To review the diagnostic accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide detection in determining inadvertent airway intubation and verifying correct placement of nasogastric tubes.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched clinical trials that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of colorimetric capnometry or capnography in detecting nasogastric tubes located in the airway and differentiating between inadvertent airway intubation and correct nasogastric tube placement in any adult care setting. Four English language databases - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL - and four Chinese language databases - China Biomedical Literature Database, WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Airiti Library - were searched from July 2009 to March 2021. Clinical trial registration databases and reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were also searched. Two reviewers extracted the data of all included studies using a data extraction form. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality independently with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. We conducted meta-analysis using the hierarchical bivariate model and estimated the pool sensitivity and specificity of capnography and colorimetric capnometry. Forest plots were generated to display the results. Heterogeneity was investigated by meta-regression. The certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.

RESULTS

Of 1,155 records identified, seven new studies were added to this update and a total of 16 studies were analysed in the systematic review. The total absolute number of true positive, false negative, true negative, and false positive observations were 142, 6, 1,500, and 65 respectively. Low to very low certainty of evidence indicated that the use of colorimetric capnometry or capnography is potentially an effective method in differentiating between respiratory and nasogastric tube placement for critically ill adult patients. Pooled results (13 studies, 1,541 intubations) for sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [0.88, 0.99]) and 0.99 (95% confidence interval [0.96, 1.00]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorimetric capnometry and capnography may have the potential to be of high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of inadvertent airway nasogastric tube placements in critically ill adults. More evidence is required to generalize the updated findings to different types of patients and settings.

Nutritional Support in the Intensive Care Unit: Implications for Nursing Care From Evidence-Based Guidelines and Supporting Literature

Several nursing practices are related to oral, enteral, or parenteral feeding on the intensive care unit. Nurses are the group of health care professionals who provide 24-hour care for patients. Therefore, they play a key role in not only identifying nutritional problems but also in ensuring the success of nutritional therapy by implementing evidence-based feeding protocols and ongoing care for (par)enteral access devices. Having an up-to-date evidence-based knowledge about nutritional support can increase safety and quality of care and can contribute to better outcomes. In this narrative review, the most recent European intensive care unit nutrition guidelines and related research are highlighted, and where appropriate, specific applications for nursing practice are described.

Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 2: Peri- and post-procedural management. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

ESGE recommends the "pull" technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer ("push") technique for PEG placement in cases where the "pull" method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed "blindly" at the patient's bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3 - 4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1 - 2 cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

Continuous enteral protease inhibition as a novel treatment for experimental trauma/hemorrhagic shock

PURPOSE

Trauma and hemorrhagic shock (T/HS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Existing treatment options are largely limited to source control and fluid and blood repletion. Previously, we have shown that enteral protease inhibition improves outcomes in experimental models of T/HS by protecting the gut from malperfusion and ischemia. However, enteral protease inhibition was achieved invasively, by laparotomy and direct injection of tranexamic acid (TXA) into the small intestine. In this study, we tested a minimally invasive method of enteral protease inhibitor infusion in experimental T/HS that can be readily adapted for clinical use.

METHODS

Wistar rats were exsanguinated to a mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) of 40 mmHg, with laparotomy to induce trauma. Hypovolemia was maintained for 120 min and was followed by reperfusion of shed blood. Animals were monitored for an additional 120 min. A modified orogastric multi-lumen tube was developed to enable rapid enteral infusion of a protease inhibitor solution while simultaneously mitigating risk of reflux aspiration into the airways. The catheter was used to deliver TXA (T/HS + TXA) or vehicle (T/HS) continuously into the proximal small intestine, starting 20 min into the ischemic period.

RESULTS

Rats treated with enteral protease inhibition (T/HS + TXA) displayed improved outcomes compared to control animals (T/HS), including significantly improved MABP (p = 0.022) and lactate (p = 0.044). Mass spectrometry-based analysis of the plasma peptidome after T/HS indicated mitigation of systemic proteolysis in T/HS + TXA.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive, continuous enteral protease inhibitor delivery improves outcomes in T/HS and is readily translatable to the clinical arena.

Factors associated with insufficient nasogastric tube visibility on X-ray: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Chest X-ray imaging is frequently used for verifying the position of a blindly inserted nasogastric tube. A high-quality X-ray increases the likelihood of conclusive visibility of tube tip positioning, thus avoiding risks due to a misplaced tube (e.g., pulmonary intubation, pneumothorax, small bowel insertion). Therefore, this study aims to determine patient-related and environmental factors affecting the visibility of nasogastric tubes on X-ray in adults.

METHODS

A retrospective descriptive analysis of routinely collected clinical data was performed on all included patients (N = 215) from a prospective randomized trial in a general hospital. A chest X-ray was taken of each patient needing a nasogastric feeding tube, after which visibility and positioning of the tube on X-ray was independently evaluated by 3 radiologists.

RESULTS

In 14.9% (n = 32) of all patients, image quality was insufficient, so no conclusive visibility of nasogastric tube positioning could be found. A patient-related predictor regression model (sex, age, body mass index) explained 21% of variance for an insufficient visibility of the nasogastric tube (Nagelkerke R² = 0.21). An environmental factor regression model demonstrates a guidewire being inside the tube or not during X-ray as a predictor for a conclusive visibility on X-ray.

CONCLUSIONS

High body mass index, male sex, and the absence of a guidewire inside the nasogastric tube at the time of chest X-ray are associated with a risk of insufficient visibility of the tube on X-ray. Patient profiles can be defined in which supplementary attention is needed when obtaining chest X-rays whose purpose is to confirm nasogastric tube positioning.

KEY POINTS

• The quality of chest X-rays to confirm the positioning of nasogastric tubes in adults can be improved considerably. • There are several factors influencing the confirmation of nasogastric tube positioning on X-ray. • Defining patient profiles at risk for an insufficient visibility of the tube on X-ray will indirectly contribute to an improvement of the chest X-ray quality.

Development and validation of two aspiration prediction models in patients receiving nasogastric feeding

AIM

To develop and validate two aspiration prediction models in patients receiving nasogastric feeding.

BACKGROUND

Aspiration is one of the most serious complications of nasogastric feeding. However, there is a lack of aspiration prediction models for nasogastric feeding.

METHODS

A total of 515 patients receiving nasogastric feeding were randomly selected for this unmatched case-control study, with 103 patients in the case group and 412 patients in the control group. Logistic regression was used to develop nomogram and Classification And Regression Tree (CART) models. The performances of the models were internally validated using 1,000 bootstrapped samples.

RESULTS

The predictive accuracy of the CART model (94.5%) was higher than that of the nomogram model (89.1%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CART model (0.96) was slightly higher than that of the nomogram model (0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The intubation depth, number of comorbidities, aspiration history, indwelling days, food type and the use of sedative-hypnotics may be used to identify aspiration risk.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

Two aspiration prediction models are provided for nurses to evaluate aspiration risk and increase the quality of nursing management.

Methods of Estimating Nasogastric Tube Length: All, Including "NEX," Are Unsafe

BACKGROUND

Predominance of blind feeding tube placement makes esophageal tube misplacement and aspiration risk commonplace. Accurate estimation of nose-to-stomach length could reduce this risk. Standards for estimating this length were audited against the length measured from guided tube placement.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center observational study used electromagnet-guided tube placement to measure the length from nose to gastric body flexure as part of routine care. This measurement was used to audit standard equations used to estimate this length from external measures: xiphisternum-ear-nose + 10 cm (XEN+10), nose-ear-xiphisternum (NEX), and Hanson_A and Hanson_B.

RESULTS

From April 23, 2015, to March 2, 2020, measurements were obtained from 200 primary tube placements. Median length to the gastric body flexure (61 cm) was significantly different from that to the pre-gastroesophageal junction flexure (48 cm) or lengths predicted by NEX (51 cm) or Hanson_A (50.5 cm) and Hanson_B (56.1 cm) (all P < .00001) but similar to XEN+10 (61 cm). Esophageal placement was a potential risk for all methods (NEX: 96.3%, Hanson_A: 99.5%, Hanson_B: 86.9%, XEN+10: 43.2%) and a definite risk for most (NEX and Hanson_A: 14.9%, Hanson_B: 1%, XEN+10: 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

NEX and Hanson methods of predicting the length from nose to gastric body flexure are too short and risk esophageal misplacement. XEN+10 reduces but does not eliminate this risk. External measurement predictions are clinically unsafe as a guide blind tube placement. Guided placement is recommended.

Accuracy of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining nasogastric feeding tube insertion length in intensive care unit patients: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

As nasogastric feeding tube insertion is a frequently applied, non-risk-free nursing technique, a high level of evidence-based nursing care is required. Little evidence is available regarding the accurate determination of the insertion length of nasogastric feeding tubes. The method of using the nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance as measurement is inadequate and not supported by evidence. Findings from a recent randomized trial led to an alternative calculation: the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula: (nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance × 0.38696) + 30.37 + 6 cm.

OBJECTIVES

To test the accuracy of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining the required nasogastric feeding tube insertion length in adults admitted on an intensive care unit and to investigate the probability to successfully obtain gastric aspirate for pH measurement.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-center observational study.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Adult intensive care unit patients in a general hospital (N = 218) needing a small-bore nasogastric feeding tube were included between March and September 2018. Correct tip positioning was defined as a tube tip located > 3 cm under the lower esophageal sphincter. Tip positioning was verified using X-ray.

RESULTS

All nasogastric feeding tube tips were correctly positioned > 3 cm under the lower esophageal sphincter. The chance of successfully obtaining gastric aspirate within 2 h after placement of the tube was 77.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

With all tips positioned > 3 cm in the stomach and zero tubes migrating back into the esophagus, the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula can be considered a more accurate method to determine nasogastric feeding tube insertion length.