The use of nutrition support near the end of life for hospitalized patients with advanced cancer at a reference center: Two realities

Malnutrition management and the application of medical nutrition therapy in hospitalized patients at the end of life

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine the prevalence of malnutrition risk in hospitalized patients at the end of life (EOL), (2) to evaluate which nutritional interventions are administered in hospitalized end-of-life patients with malnutrition risk and (3) to assess the association of end-of-life care and the administration of medical nutrition therapy in patients with malnutrition risk.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional multi-center study SETTING: Hospital PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized adult patients MEASUREMENTS: Based on the valid and reliable questionnaire of the Nursing Quality Measurement 2.0 (LPZ), the parameters of demographic data, medical diagnoses, end-of-life phase, care dependency, malnutrition risk according to the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and nutritional interventions conducted in patients at risk of malnutrition were assessed. Descriptive statistics and statistical tests were conducted. Logistic regression models were established to identify odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) for the association of end-of-life care and the provision of medical nutrition therapy. This was done separately for oral nutritional supplements (ONS), enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition as the respective dependent variables.

RESULTS

Of all 12,947 participants, 706 (5.5%) were in an end-of-life phase. The prevalence of malnutrition risk in end-of-life patients was 41.1% compared to 24.7% in other patients (p < 0.001). End-of-life patients with malnutrition risk received more nutritional interventions than other patients with malnutrition risk. The regression models showed that being at the end of life (CI 1.30, 2.63; p < 0.001), being treated by a dietitian (OR 6.02; CI 4.86, 7.45; p < 0.001), suffering from dementia (OR 1.85; CI 1.10, 3.12; p = 0.02) or cancer (OR 1.56; CI 1.25, 1.96; p < 0.001) increased the chance of receiving oral nutritional supplements. For receiving parenteral nutrition, being at the end of life (OR 1.68; CI 1.04, 2.71; p = 0.04), being treated by a dietitian (OR 5.80; CI 4.07, 8.25; p < 0.001), surgery within the previous two weeks (OR 1.58; CI 1.09, 2.30; p = 0.02), younger age (OR 0.99; CI 0.98, 1.00; p = 0.04), care dependency (OR 0.97; CI 0.96, 0.98; p < 0.001), suffering from a disease of the digestive system (OR 2.92; CI 2.07, 4.11; p < 0.001) or cancer (OR 2.44; CI 1.71, 3.49; p < 0.001) were independent predictors. Being at the end of life did not influence the application of enteral nutrition.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that nutritional interventions are often applied in end-of-life patients admitted to general hospitals. Being at the end of life was positively associated with the application of oral nutritional supplementation and parenteral nutrition. This data does not allow a conclusion about the appropriateness of using medical nutrition therapy in this study sample. Judging the appropriateness of medical nutrition therapy at the end of life is challenging because of the high variability of prognostication as well as the wishes and needs of the specific patients and their relatives that influences the appraisal of adequate interventions. Every decision about nutrition and hydration in end-of-life patients should be a shared decision and be based on advanced care planning principles.

Nutritional support in palliative cancer care: quality of life in oral versus tube feeding

BACKGROUND

Nutritional support (NS) offered through oral nutritional supplements (ONS) or enteral nutrition (EN) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) is a controversial topic in patients with cancer receiving palliative care (PC).

AIMS

To compare the QoL of patients without and with use of NS, including ONS or EN in patients with incurable cancer receiving PC.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis with patients that were evaluated at PC Unit between June 2021 and February 2023. QoL was assessed using the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15. Patients were classified into three groups according to the NS: ONS (n=72; 33%), EN (n=61; 28%) and control group (CG) (n=87; 39%), the last one being formed by patients not using NS. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to verify the association of the domains of QoL with the type of NS.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients were included, with a median age of 64 (58-70) years, predominantly male (54.1%). The EN group had worse scores in physical function when compared with the ONS group (p=0.037) and appetite loss when compared with the CG (p=0.013). The ONS (OR: 2.70; 95% CI 1.32 to 5.49) and EN groups (OR: 2.61; 95% CI 1.24 to 5.49) were independently associated with a higher chance of presenting appetite loss in relation to the CG.

CONCLUSION

In general, there was no difference in the QoL of patients using NS when compared with patients not using NS. However, patients using NS have more chance of having appetite loss.

The role of palliative care in relapsed and metastatic head and neck cancer patients in a single ESMO integrated oncology and palliative care centre

BACKGROUND

Palliative care (PC) for patients with advanced cancer improves symptom management and quality of life and may promote home deaths. Limited data are available regarding PC in advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. The aim of this study was to describe the type of care and modalities of integration of specialized PC in a population of relapsed and/or metastatic head and neck cancer patients, followed in a single institution over 4 years.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2019, data on patients with relapsed and/or metastatic head and neck cancer not suitable for curative treatment diagnosed at the Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland were reviewed retrospectively. Site, type and lines of treatment, treatment response, referral to specialist palliative care (yes or no), type of symptoms, tracheostomy and/or feeding-tube presence, and site of death were documented. Comparisons were made between patients benefitting from PC integration vs standard care.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients with relapsed/metastatic HNC were identified, 63 (73.3%) of whom were referred to specialized PC. Patients were mainly men (66, 76.7%), with a median age of 69 years (range 44-95). The most common site of tumour was the oropharynx (31, 36%), followed by the larynx (21, 24.4%), oral cavity (19, 22.1%), hypopharynx (14, 16.3%), and unknown primary (1, 1.2%). Forty-four patients (51.2%) were treated with systemic treatment. The median time interval between the diagnosis and palliative care referral was 1.7 months. At the time of our analysis, 69 patients had died (58 in the PC group and 11 in the non-PC group). Fifteen patients (25.9%) in the PC group and 4 (36.4%) in the non-PC group had received aggressive treatment (chemotherapy, tracheostomy and/or feeding tube) in the last month of life, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.44). There was no difference in the incidence of home death (19.1% PC group vs 9.1% non-PC group, p = 0.67) or presence of caregiver (69.8% PC group vs 78.2% non-PC group, p = 0.58) between groups, while palliative care was associated with more opioid use (90.5% vs 17.4%, p < 0.0001). Patients in the PC group had a shorter survival compared to the non-PC group (5.7 vs 19.9 months, p = 0.0063).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients appear to be at risk of receiving inappropriate invasive treatments close to death and of dying in hospital settings. Further research is needed to investigate how early PC may affect decision-making around treatments and improve HNC patients' holistic wellbeing.

Effects of specialised nutritional interventions in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review

Objective

To evaluate current evidence of the effect of specialised nutritional interventions on nutritional status, survival, quality of life and measures of functionality in patients with incurable cancer.

Methods

Systematic literature review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, LILACS and Cochrane Library databases. Clinical studies that evaluated different specialised nutritional interventions, such as nutritional counselling, oral nutritional supplementation (ONS), enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN), were eligible. Only studies classified as being of high methodological quality (ie, low or moderate risk of bias) were included.

Results

A total of 22 studies reporting on 2448 patients were deemed eligible. Five types of specialised nutrition were observed: mixed (multimodal nature, ie, dietary counseling, ONS, physical activity and/or drugs) (n=12), ONS (n=5), PN (n=3), EN (n=1) and multidisciplinary team counselling (n=1). Benefits of any kind from the interventions were reported in 14 (63.6%) studies, mainly resulting from mixed intervention. Nutritional status improved in 12 (60.0%) of 20 studies and quality of life improved in eight (50.0%) of 16 studies. Few studies have evaluated the influence of nutritional interventions on survival and measure of functionality, and have not shown improvement in these outcomes.

Conclusion

Despite the limited evidence, specialised nutritional interventions can yield positive effects for patients with incurable cancer, mainly in their nutritional status and quality of life.

Kidney Function Worsening Is Linked to Parenteral-Nutrition-Dependent Survival in Palliative Care Patients

BACKGROUND

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is frequently administered in palliative care patients suffering from cachexia. The evidence regarding the use of PN in terminally ill patients is scarce. Routine laboratory parameters might help to decide whether to start or forgo PN, which could decrease overtreatment at the end of life. Kidney failure was frequently associated with survival. However, a relation between kidney function parameters and parenteral nutrition has not been observed thus far. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze kidney function parameters in palliative care patients under PN, as well as the relation between these parameters and overall survival.

METHODS

Patients who were admitted to the Department of Palliative Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna were screened for PN treatment. Whether kidney function parameters at baseline or their dynamics over the course of two weeks were associated with survival was assessed with descriptive and interferential statistics.

RESULTS

In total, 113 of 443 palliative care patients were administered parenteral nutrition for the first time. The overall survival (OS) for all patients with increased kidney function parameters at baseline was lower (creatinine: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.808, p < 0.001; urea: HR = 1.033, p < 0.001; uric acid HR = 1.055, p = 0.015). No significant increase in creatinine blood levels was observed in the first 2 weeks after the initiation of PN when compared to the non-PN group (p = 0.86). However, if creatinine blood levels increased within the PN group, lower overall survival was found (HR = 2.046, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Increased kidney function parameters, such as creatinine, urea and uric acid, might be used as negative prognostic markers in palliative care patients under PN. Moreover, an increase in creatinine during the administration of parenteral nutrition in the first 2 weeks is linked to worse outcomes. These findings may help future studies to establish objective markers for clinicians to determine whether to start or end PN in palliative cancer patients and decrease potential overtreatment at the end of life.