Recommendations for photoprotection of parenteral nutrition for premature infants: An ASPEN position paper

Parenteral nutrition compatibility and stability: Practical considerations

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a complex preparation that contains multiple component products with the associated risk for incompatibilities and diminished stabilities when combined together as an admixture. Significant patient harm can result from prescribing, preparing, and administering PN without confirming compatibility and stability. Incompatibility or instability is rarely obvious to the unaided eye, so safe PN admixture relies on incorporating physicochemical properties of the included components into compatibility and stability decisions. Practices include applying active ingredient concentration limits to reduce risk for incompatibilities and instabilities. The purpose of the current article is to distill the wide-ranging information on PN compatibility and stability into a feasible blueprint that individual healthcare organizations can then use to design and implement practical initiatives. Compatibility and stability considerations can be incorporated into the routine tasks of PN prescribing, order reviewing, preparing, and administering. The focus of this review is on identifying potential physicochemical interactions that can be addressed at each step in the PN use process. Organizations should incorporate compatibility and stability considerations into the routine procedures and practices of all clinicians involved with PN therapy. Those clinicians in healthcare organizations and caregivers in the home should then be in a position to safely provide the appropriate PN admixtures in terms of compatibility and stability.

Parenteral nutrition insecurity: ASPEN survey to assess the extent and severity of parenteral nutrition access and reimbursement issues

BACKGROUND

Parenteral nutrition (PN) shortages and lack of qualified professional staff to manage PN impact safe, efficacious care and costs of PN. This American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)-sponsored survey assessed the frequency and extent to which PN access affects PN delivery to patients.

METHODS

Healthcare professionals involved with PN were surveyed. Questions were developed to characterize the respondent population and determine the extent and severity of PN access issues to components, devices, and healthcare professionals, as well as their effects on discharge and transfer issues. Reimbursement issues included cost, adequacy of therapy, and healthcare professional reimbursement. Burdens were types and frequency of errors, adverse events, and nutrition problems resulting from PN access issues. Impact on professionals and organizations was determined.

RESULTS

Respondents (N = 350) worked in hospitals (75%) and home infusion (25%). Per day, clinicians cared for <15 patients receiving PN. All age populations were represented. Respondents reported shortages of macronutrients (72%, 233 of 324) and micronutrients (91%, 297 of 324). Issues with access to healthcare workers were observed. PN access issues contribute to increased costs of PN, and knowledge regarding the current rate of PN reimbursement is limited. Respondents (75%, 197 of 261) observed an error due to PN access issues. Adverse events (57%, 149 of 259) were observed leading to temporary or permanent harm (24%, 61 of 259) as well as near death (4%, 9 of 259) and death (1%, 2 of 259). Providers reported time away from other job responsibilities and workplace stress.

CONCLUSION

PN access issues result in "PN insecurity" that negatively impacts patients and healthcare providers and leads to adverse events including death in patients receiving PN.

Administering Parenteral Nutrition in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Logistics, Existing Challenges, and a Few Conundrums

Use of parenteral nutrition (PN) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) requires evaluating the need for central venous catheters, potential drug incompatibilities, unintentional exposures, and suboptimal energy and nutrient intake during the transition to full enteral nutrition. Risks of photooxidation reactions in PN components, refeeding syndrome, and excess early amino acid intake should prompt the reevaluation of routine practices. The goal of this paper is to review the practicalities, challenges, and conundrums of administering PN in the NICU.

Parenteral Nutrition Overview

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a life-saving intervention for patients where oral or enteral nutrition (EN) cannot be achieved or is not acceptable. The essential components of PN are carbohydrates, lipids, amino acids, vitamins, trace elements, electrolytes and water. PN should be provided via a central line because of its hypertonicity. However, peripheral PN (with lower nutrient content and larger volume) can be administered via an appropriate non-central line. There are alternatives for the compounding process also, including hospital pharmacy compounded bags and commercial multichamber bags. PN is a costly therapy and has been associated with complications. Metabolic complications related to macro and micronutrient disturbances, such as hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and electrolyte imbalance, may occur at any time during PN therapy, as well as infectious complications, mostly related to venous access. Long-term complications, such as hepatobiliary and bone disease are associated with longer PN therapy and home-PN. To prevent and mitigate potential complications, the optimal monitoring and early management of imbalances is required. PN should be prescribed for malnourished patients or high-risk patients with malnutrition where the feasibility of full EN is in question. Several factors should be considered when providing PN, including timing of initiation, clinical status, and risk of complications.

Significant Published Articles in 2021 for Pharmacy Nutrition Support Practice

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to assist the pharmacist engaged in nutrition support therapy in staying current with pertinent literature. Methods: Several clinical pharmacists engaged in nutrition support therapy compiled a list of articles published in 2021 considered important to their clinical practice. The citation list was compiled into a single spreadsheet where the author participants were asked to assess whether the article was considered important to nutrition support pharmacy practice. A culled list of publications was then identified whereby at least 5 out of the 8 author participants considered the paper to be important. Guideline and consensus papers from professional organizations, important to practice but not ranked, were also included. Results: A total of 211 articles were identified; 8 from the primary literature were voted by the group to be of high importance. An additional 18 guidelines, position, recommendation, or consensus papers were also identified. The top-ranked articles from the primary literature were summarized and a narrative regarding its implications to pharmacy nutrition support practice were provided. Conclusion: We recommend that pharmacists engaged in nutrition support therapy be familiar with these articles as it pertains to their practice.

A quality by design approach for the qualification of automating compounding device for parenteral nutrition

Automated compounding device (ACD) are increasingly used for parenteral nutrition (PN) bag production, and their acquisition must be sufficiently thought. The law requires the qualification of these ACD, but did not specify the tests to be performed. The quality by design (QbD) risk based approach allowed to define the quality target product profile in order to acquire the best ACD for each unit, and thanks a risk analysis permitted to define the critical quality attributes (CQA). These CQA will allowed to define tests performed during qualification. The ACD qualified was a 12 pump volumetric system. The CQA for PN bags consisted in sterile, precisely and accurately production with enough stability. During operational qualification volumetric accuracy test was performed, and during the performance qualification: flush volume, media fill, microbiological integrity of environment, sterility of control bag and production test were performed. At the end, all tests were conclusive (excepted for some results mostly due to analytical bias) and the ACD was considered to produce sterile bags in a control environment, precisely (relative standard deviation < 4%) and accurately (mean bias < 1% for weight and < 7% for other controls) with a sufficient stability. The QbD risk based approach allowed to acquire the best ACD for our need, and qualify relevant elements regarding the production process.

Light protection of parenteral nutrition, cholestasis, and other prematurity-related morbidities in premature infants

INTRODUCTION

Parenteral Nutrition (PN) can lead to intestinal failure associated liver disease (IFALD). There are no human studies to date studying specifically the benefits of light-protection on neonatal IFALD. Recently, the European Medicines Agency and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) both recommended full light protection of PN to reduce the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of light-protecting PN on the incidence of cholestasis and peak direct bilirubin levels in premature infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of preterm infants requiring PN for a minimum of 2 weeks with or without light-protection. After light protection of the PN solution, primary outcomes (including cholestasis and direct bilirubin levels) of both groups were compared. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), sepsis and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 50 preterm infants <37 weeks gestation were included, 25 infants in each group. There was a statistically significant decrease in the rate of cholestasis (12 vs. 3, p = 0.005), median peak direct bilirubin levels (1.7 vs. 0.9 mg/dL, p = 0.02) and total bilirubin levels (4.1 vs. 3.4, p = 0.05) in the light-protection group compared to no light-protection group. There was a decrease in the incidence of severe BPD (with an increase of mild BPD, resulting in the same overall BPD rate) in the light-protection compared to no light-protection group (7 vs. 15, p = 0.0223). There was no difference in NEC, ROP, sepsis or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports that the practice of light-protecting PN may reduce the incidence of IFALD in premature infants. Moreover, there was a trend toward decreased incidence of severe BPD in the light-protection group. Further light protection studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Parenteral nutrition compatibility and stability: A comprehensive review

Several guidance documents support best practices across the stages of the parenteral nutrition (PN)-use process to optimize patient safety. The critical step of PN order verification and review by the pharmacist requires a contextual assessment of the compatibility and stability implications of the ordered PN prescription. This article will provide working definitions, describe PN component characteristics, and present a wide-ranging representation of compatibility and stability concerns that need to be considered prior to preparing a PN admixture. This paper has been approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

ASPEN lipid injectable emulsion safety recommendations part 2: Neonate and pediatric considerations

Lipid injectable emulsions (ILEs) are complex pharmaceutical formulations intended as a source of energy and fatty acids for parenteral nutrition (PN) therapy. Part 1 of this series addressed issues associated with and safety recommendations pertaining to adult ILE use. Part 2 addresses ILE safety in neonatal and pediatric patients. Considerations for ILE use in the neonatal and pediatric populations differ from those of adults. For example, these patients often require higher doses compared with adult counterparts to support growth, development, and daily metabolic needs. ILE is also frequently administered as a separate infusion as opposed to in a total nutrient admixture owing to compatibility and stability issues and limitations to intravenous access in the neonatal and pediatric populations. ILE is the most frequent PN ingredient associated with PN errors occurring in the administration, prescribing, and transcribing processes. Concerns exist with use of in-line filters and repackaging of commercial products for infusion. ILE use in neonatal and pediatric patients has been associated with both minor and major adverse effects, which most often occur with doses exceeding manufacturer recommendations. Gaps in ILE best practices for neonatal and pediatric patients predispose to errors in the PN use system. This paper describes safe-use considerations for ILE products available in the United States in neonatal and pediatric patients, including indications, prescribing, order review, preparation, administration, and monitoring. This paper has been approved by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Board of Directors.