Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey

Essentials of genomics in nursing undergraduate education: A discussion paper

AIM

To map the 2021 American Association of Colleges of Nursing Essentials to the American Nurses Association Essentials of Genomic Nursing for all nurses and provide resources for nursing faculty to support the seamless integration of genomics into existing undergraduate curricula.

BACKGROUND

Since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, rapid advancements in genomic science leading to practical applications of genomics have revolutionized all areas of healthcare. Nursing is built on foundational life sciences, including genomics. As the largest segment of the healthcare workforce, who spend the most time with patients and families, nurses play a critical role in healthcare teams integrating genomic knowledge into patient care to improve health and well-being. Consequently, nurses must be equipped with foundational genomic knowledge and skills during their undergraduate education. However, there is wide variability in whether and how nursing programs have incorporated genomics into their curricula. Additionally, nursing faculty may have limited knowledge of foundational genomic concepts and lack confidence in teaching genomics.

DESIGN

Discussion paper METHODS: We aligned domains from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing Essentials and American Nurses Association Essentials of Genomic Nursing.

RESULTS

A map illustrating alignment in multiple areas, which provide examples of ways to integrate genomics into existing nursing curricula.

CONCLUSION

Although based on domains developed in the United States, the map, curricular resources, example learning outcomes, and clinical vignettes can be used by nursing faculty globally to prepare future nurses who are competent in providing genomics-informed nursing care on entry-to-practice.

A systematic review of genomic education for nurses and nursing students: Are they sufficient in the era of precision health?

BACKGROUND

Integration of genomic content into nursing curricula and continuing education is limited.

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to identify educational strategies to deliver genomics content.

METHODS

CINAHL Plus, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2003 through July 6, 2023. The three domains of learning: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor were used to categorize educational outcomes. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the data using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

DISCUSSION

Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment for bias was conducted independently; study quality ranged from fair to poor. No study used a complete psychometrically tested instrument to measure genomic cognitive or affective knowledge; none measured the psychomotor domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective strategies to deliver genomic education are a priority. Development of reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of educational interventions, including the psychomotor skills needed for practice.

The Canadian Landscape of Genetics and Genomics in Nursing: A Policy Document Analysis

BACKGROUND

Genetics and genomics (GG) are transforming approaches to healthcare in Canada and around the globe. Canadian nurses must be prepared to integrate GG in their practice, but modest research in this area suggests that Canadian nurses have limited GG competency. Countries that have integrated GG across nursing provided guidance to nurses about the practice implications of GG through regional nursing policy documents. These documents propelled action to integrate GG across nursing. Little is known about the GG content in the nursing policy document infrastructure in Canada.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the guidance for GG-informed nursing practice as provided by Canadian nursing organizations in official professional documents.

METHODS

Qualitative document analysis was used. A hybrid inductive/deductive analysis approach was used to analyze findings within the diffusion of innovation theory framework.

RESULTS

There is an overall lack of depth and breadth of Canadian nursing documents that include content related to GG. Of the (n  =  37) documents analyzed, four themes were generated including (a) GG guidance in nursing education; (b) regulators' requirements for foundational GG knowledge, (c) Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) as an early catalyst to GG integration; and (d) early adopters in speciality practice.

CONCLUSION

There are opportunities to enhance the guidance available to Canadian nurses for the application of GG, through documents of nursing professional associations, nursing education accreditation organizations, and regulatory bodies. Findings suggest oncology and perinatal nurses are the early adopters which is an important consideration in future strategies to implement GG into Canadian nursing.

Genomic Literacy among Nurses in Jordan: A Population-based Study

The current study aimed to measure genomic literacy among Jordanian nurses by evaluating their understanding of key genomic concepts and how they view genomics in nursing practice. Descriptive, Cross-sectional, and Correlational designs were used in this study. A descriptive design was used using the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory (GNCI©), a 31-item instrument. Data were collected from a total of 751 participants. A total of 406 participants were female, and 395 (52.6%) were single. The mean score of the genome basics was 2.33, ranging from 0 to 13. The mean score of the knowledge about mutation was 0.57, ranging from 0 to 3. At the same time, the mean score for inheritance and genomic healthcare was 1.74 and 1.53, respectively. Nurses working in the oncology center had the highest genomic knowledge score (mean = 7.05, SD = 4.24) compared with nurses in other healthcare sectors (p =  < .001). There is a low level of genomic literacy among Jordanian nurses. Nurses must have sufficient genomic literacy to provide the best nursing care to patients, their families, and the community. Jordanian nurse authorities must develop competencies representing a minimum standard of care to provide competent genomic and genetically focused care.

Current State of Genomics in Nursing: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Provider Oriented (Clinical and Educational) Outcomes (2012-2022)

In the 20 years since the initial sequencing of the human genome, genomics has become increasingly relevant to nursing. We sought to chart the current state of genomics in nursing by conducting a systematic scoping review of the literature in four databases (2012-2022). The included articles were categorized according to the Cochrane Collaboration outcome domains/sub-domains, and thematic analysis was employed to identify key topical areas to summarize the state of the science. Of 8532 retrieved articles, we identified 232 eligible articles. The articles primarily reported descriptive studies from the United States and other high-income countries (191/232, 82%). More than half (126/232, 54.3%) aligned with the "healthcare provider oriented outcomes" outcome domain. Three times as many articles related to the "knowledge and understanding" sub-domain compared to the "consultation process" subdomain (96 vs. 30). Five key areas of focus were identified, including "nursing practice" (50/126, 40%), "genetic counseling and screening" (29/126, 23%), "specialist nursing" (21/126, 17%), "nurse preparatory education" (17/126, 13%), and "pharmacogenomics" (9/126, 7%). Only 42/126 (33%) articles reported interventional studies. To further integrate genomics into nursing, study findings indicate there is a need to move beyond descriptive work on knowledge and understanding to focus on interventional studies and implementation of genomics into nursing practice.

Genetics and genomics knowledge and competency of Chinese nurses based on the theory of diffusion of innovation: A descriptive cross-sectional study

Background

Nurses are responsible for providing genetics and genomics health care services, including disease risk assessment, medical referrals, and advocating for communities and individuals who probably benefit from genomics and genetics services.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate Chinese nurses' understanding and previous training in genomics and genetics. Additionally, we aimed to understand the degree to which Chinese nurses use genomics and genetics knowledge in their daily practice and to assess the learning needs regarding genomics and genetics.

Method

This study utilized the design of a descriptive cross-sectional study. From January 18 to March 15, 2022, 406 registered nurses from the Shandong province of China working in clinical institutions and with good English proficiency were recruited as study subjects. Nurses' demographic data and data related to genetic knowledge and competency were collected using the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) questionnaire. Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests were utilized to investigate the descriptive statistics and non-normally distributed data.

Results

There are 406 nurses from Shandong Province, China participated in the study. Among them, BSN degrees accounted for 83.7%. Female nurses accounted for 96.8%, and 40% are clinical nurses. Among such nurses, 65.5% reported that genetics was involved in their nursing courses, and 56.2% planned to study more knowledge associated with genetics. The mean knowledge score was 7.35 (out of 12). Nurses' gender, primary role, genomics education, and experience caring for patients with common diseases influenced nurses' scores on genetic and genomics knowledge.

Conclusion

The genomics knowledge and competency of Chinese nurses need to be further improved. Incorporating genomics into the standard nursing curriculum can effectively reduce the knowledge gap. Simultaneously, it is also necessary to improve the attention of senior nurses and nursing managers to genomics nursing and improve the clinical practice environment.

Faculty education to improve integration of genomics education in nursing curriculum

Nurses play a crucial role in providing healthcare and need to possess essential knowledge and skill to integrate genomics into practice. Nursing faculty is charged with the education of nurses however, studies show the majority of faculty in the United States is ill-prepared to teach genetics/genomics concepts. Our aim was to increase genetics/genomics content in our college's nursing curriculum by bolstering our faculty knowledge and confidence through the implementation of a face-to-face educational program. Therefore, we launched an intentional, strategic plan in fall 2017. First a comprehensive review of the college's undergraduate nursing curriculum for genetics/genomics content was conducted. Five development workshops on genetics/genomics were delivered over an academic year with knowledge and confidence in genetics/genomics was measured pre- and post-workshops. After the workshops, faculty revised curriculum and added genetics/genomics content to align with the competencies. Participants in the end-of-program survey reported higher confidence levels in all genomics-related tasks and answered more knowledge-based items, as compared to participants in the pre-workshop survey. Changes to the curriculum were made to integrate genetics/genomics in BSN courses and an online genetics course was developed. Genetics/genomics workshops can improve faculty knowledge and confidence and facilitate the integration of genetic/genomic content in undergraduate nursing curricula.

Test/Retest Reliability of a Turkish Version of the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey

Background and Purpose: The Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) was developed to evaluate the use of genetics in clinical practice. This study aimed to translate the GGNPS into Turkish and perform the test/retest reliability. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional research design was used to collect data. Data were collected two times with ~3-7 weeks apart by using RedCap software. Results: At Time 1, a total of 385 nurses completed the survey; at Time 2, 88 nurses completed the retest survey. Findings show that one item has a slight agreement, 9 items fair agreements and 18 items moderate agreements, and 19 items substantial agreements between Times 1 and 2. Conclusions: The Turkish version of GGNPS appears to be a reliable instrument.

Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes, Confidence, and Practices with Genetics and Genomics: A Theory-Informed Integrative Review Protocol

Introduction: As key healthcare providers, nurses require genomic competency to fulfil their professional obligations in the genomic era. Prior research suggests that nurses have limited competency with genomics-informed practice. Concepts in the Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory (i.e., knowledge, attitudes, and attributes of innovation adopters) provide a framework to understand the process of adoption of innovations, such as genomics, across organizations. We aim to synthesize what is known about the adoption of genomics across nursing within the DOI framework to identify gaps and opportunities to enact sustained adoption of genomics in nursing. Methods and analysis: An integrative literature review, following Whittemore and Knafl’s five steps, will be conducted to evaluate qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method primary studies that meet inclusion and exclusion criteria. The MEDLINE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Sociological Abstracts electronic databases will be searched in addition to the ancestry search method. Two researchers will perform independent screening of studies, quality appraisal using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool, and data analysis using the narrative synthesis method. Disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. Findings in this review could be used to develop theory- and evidence-informed strategies to support the sustained adoption of genomics in nursing.

Genetics and Genomics Teaching in Nursing Programs in a Latin American Country

Although the importance of genetics and genomics in nursing education has been widely recognized, surveys carried out in several countries show that these subjects are still limited in nursing undergraduate programs. In Latin America, the teaching of genetics and genomics in nursing programs has never been previously documented. Considering this scenario, we aimed to investigate how genetics and genomics have been taught in undergraduate nursing programs in Brazil. A total of 138 undergraduate nursing program coordinators and 49 faculty members were recruited to participate in this cross-sectional study. After IRB approval, data were collected using an online survey, covering curriculum design, faculty credentials, genetics and/or genomics teaching, as well as their impressions regarding the document “Essential Nursing Competencies and Curricula Guidelines for Genetics and Genomics”. Genetics is taught in most of the investigated courses (67.3%), mainly by biologists (77.6%), with master’s degree (83.7%), and with the syllabus mainly focused on molecular biology. More instructors agreed with Competency 2 (C2) which refers to advocating for clients’ access to desired genetic/genomic services and/or resources including support groups as well as C23 which refer to using health promotion/disease prevention practices that incorporate knowledge of genetic and genomic risk factors, than coordinators. That is, the participants’ type of appointment (instructors vs. coordinators) had a significant effect on their agreement level with competencies C2 (χ² = 6.23, p = 0.041) and C23 (χ² = 9.36, p = 0.007). Overall, a higher number of participants with both master’s and Ph.D. degrees significantly agreed with competencies C2, C4, which refer to incorporating genetic and genomic technologies and information into registered nurse practice, and C5—demonstrating in practice the importance of tailoring genetic and genomic information and services to clients based on their culture, religion, knowledge level, literacy, and preferred language, when compared to those with Ph.D. only, and those with a master’s degree only (χ² = 8.73, p = 0.033; χ² = 8.61, p = 0.033; χ² = 8.61, p = 0.033, respectively). Our results support reflections on ways to prepare the nursing workforce to deliver personalized nursing care. Additionally, they can be an aid in establishing guidelines for the undergraduate nursing curricula in Brazil and in other Portuguese-speaking countries, as well as in Latin America.

Genetics and genomic competency of Turkish nurses: A descriptive cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Nurses have essential roles in genetic related healthcare, including risk assessment, referring individuals to genetics services, advocating for and educating individual, families, and communities who might benefit from genetic services.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the genetics and genomic competency of Turkish nurses.

DESIGN

A descriptive cross sectional research design was used to collect data.

SETTING

Totally 385 nurses working in clinical or academic settings in Turkey were recruited between 20 January and 20 April 2020.

METHODS

Data were collected using socio-demographic characteristics form and Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey on 20 January-20 April 2020. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for data analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 385 nurses participated in this study. Most, 44.9% had a BSN degree, 42.1% were clinical nurses. Of the nurses, 34.5% reported that they had genetics included in their nursing curriculum, and 74.0% intended to learn more about genetics. The mean knowledge score was 9.36/12. Gender, primary role of nurses, and whether to see patients actively in practice were the factors effecting knowledge score of nurses in genetic and genomics.

CONCLUSIONS

Turkish nurses' genomics skills need additional development and integration of genomics to the nursing curriculum can be effective to decrease their knowledge gaps. Clinical nurses' genomic competency should improve to increase the nursing care quality.

Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey

Aim

To psychometrically test the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) for evidence of content, face and construct validity.

Design

This study was a secondary data analysis.

Method

Data collected from the Method for Introducing a New Competency into Nursing Practice (MINC) study were used to evaluate the GGNPS for evidence of construct validity via structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis. Face validity was evaluated via feedback from practicing RNs without specific experience with or knowledge of genetics/genomics. Content validity was evaluated via content expert feedback and assessment of a content validity index.

Results

The thresholds for evidence of content and face validity were met. However, we found less evidence for construct validity of the GGNPS; an exploratory factor analysis, conducted to gain additional insight into the theorized latent constructs, determined that the variables were more interrelated that previously predicted.