1
|
Sjövall K, Ahlberg K, Fessé P, Fransson P, Kristensen I, Ohlsson-Nevo E, Åkeflo L, Langegård U. To become part of the team-patient experiences of participating in decision-making for a new treatment (proton beam therapy). Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:442. [PMID: 38890189 PMCID: PMC11189341 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08631-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to explore patients' experience of participation in the treatment decision of proton beam therapy versus conventional radiotherapy. BACKGROUND Proton beam therapy (PBT) has become a treatment option for some cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. The decision to give PBT instead of conventional radiotherapy (CRT) needs to be carefully planned together with the patient to ensure that the degree of participation is based on individuals' preferences. There is a knowledge gap of successful approaches to support patients' participation in the decision-making process, which is particularly important when it comes to the situation of having to choose between two treatment options such as PBT and CRT, with similar expected outcomes. METHOD We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected from interviews with patients who received PBT for their brain tumor. Transcribed verbatims from interviews with 22 patients were analyzed regarding experiences of participation in the decision-making process leading to PBT. FINDINGS Participants experienced their participation in the decision-making process to a varying degree, and with individual preferences. Four themes emerged from data: to be a voice that matters, to get control over what will happen, being in the hand of doctors' choice, and feeling selected for treatment. CONCLUSION A decision for treatment with PBT can be experienced as a privilege but can also cause stress as it might entail practical issues affecting everyday life in a considerable way. For the patient to have confidence in the decision-making process, patients' preferences, expectations, and experiences must be included by the healthcare team. Including the patient in the healthcare team as an equal partner by confirming the person enables and facilitates for patients' voice to be heard and reckoned with. Person-centered care building on a partnership between patients and healthcare professionals should provide the right basis for the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Sjövall
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, 291 88, Kristianstad, Sweden.
| | - K Ahlberg
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - P Fessé
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
| | - P Fransson
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - I Kristensen
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - E Ohlsson-Nevo
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - L Åkeflo
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - U Langegård
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sjövall K, Langegård U, Fransson P, Nevo-Ohlsson E, Kristensen I, Ahlberg K, Johansson B. Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic - challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:132. [PMID: 36759789 PMCID: PMC9909877 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10586-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ProtonCare Study Group (PCSG) was formed with the purpose to develop and implement a framework for evaluation of proton beam therapy (PBT) and the related care at a novel clinic (Skandionkliniken), based on patient reported data. METHOD A logic model framework was used to describe the process of development and implementation of a structured plan for evaluation of PBT for all diagnoses based on patient reported data. After the mission for the project was determined, meetings with networks and stakeholders were facilitated by PCSG to identify assumptions, resources, challenges, activities, outputs, outcomes, and outcome indicators. RESULT This paper presents the challenges and accomplishments PCSG made so far. We describe required resources, activities, and accomplished results. The long-term outcomes that were outlined as a result of the process are two; 1) Improved knowledge about health outcomes of patients that are considered for PBT and 2) The findings will serve as a base for clinical decisions when patients are referred for PBT. CONCLUSION Using the logical model framework proved useful in planning and managing the ProtonCare project. As a result, the work of PCSG has so far resulted in long-lasting outcomes that creates a base for future evaluation of patients' perspective in radiotherapy treatment in general and in PBT especially. Our experiences can be useful for other research groups facing similar challenges. Continuing research on patients´ perspective is a central part in ongoing and future research. Collaboration, cooperation, and coordination between research groups/networks from different disciplines are a significant part of the work aiming to determine the more precise role of PBT in future treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Sjövall
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, SE-291 88, Kristianstad, Sweden.
| | - U Langegård
- grid.8761.80000 0000 9919 9582Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Göteborg University, Box 457, SE- 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
| | - P Fransson
- grid.12650.300000 0001 1034 3451Department of Nursing, Umeå University, SE-90 187 Umeå, Sweden
| | - E Nevo-Ohlsson
- grid.15895.300000 0001 0738 8966School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden
| | - I Kristensen
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Systemic Radiation Therapy, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
| | - K Ahlberg
- grid.8761.80000 0000 9919 9582Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Göteborg University, Box 457, SE- 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
| | - B Johansson
- grid.8993.b0000 0004 1936 9457Blod- Och Tumörsjukdomar Administration, Uppsala University, SE- 51 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fiddimore E, Harrop E, Nelson A, Sivell S. "I don't want to hear statistics, I want real life stories": Systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient and caregiver experiences of Proton Beam Therapy. J Psychosoc Oncol 2022; 41:434-456. [PMID: 37155324 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2136997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) is an advanced form of radiotherapy, yet little evidence exists on patient experience to inform decision making and improve future care. We thematically synthesized the qualitative evidence of patient and caregivers' perceptions and experiences of PBT. LITERATURE SEARCH Five electronic databases were systematically searched, using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords. Two reviewers independently screened search results for qualitative studies relating to patients' and caregivers' experiences of PBT. The search generated 4,020 records, of which nine were eligible. Study quality (assessed by CASP checklist) varied. DATA SYNTHESIS Qualitative results were analyzed using thematic synthesis. Three main themes were generated: decision making and perceptions, living in the PBT "bubble," and coping with the cancer treatment journey. CONCLUSIONS PBT is not yet widely accessible worldwide, which uniquely influences the patient experience. Our review uncovers areas PBT providers could target to improve patient-centered care; however, additional primary qualitative research is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Fiddimore
- iBSc in Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Emily Harrop
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Stephanie Sivell
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ohlsson-Nevo E, Furberg M, Giørtz M, Johansson B, Kristensen I, Kunni K, Langegård U, Lysemose Poulsen R, Striem J, Tømmerås V, Wilhøft Kristensen A, Winther D, Sjövall K. Patients' perspective in the context of proton beam therapy: summary of a Nordic workshop. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1139-1144. [PMID: 32536238 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1762927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION On 15-16 November 2019, the Skandion Clinic in Sweden hosted the first Nordic workshop on 'Patients' perspective in proton beam therapy'. The workshop was conducted to describe and compare the patient care in PBT clinics in the Nordic countries and to initiate a collaboration, with the target to ensure patient participation and reduce the risk of inequity of access by lowering the barriers for accepting PBT in a distant clinic. The overarching aim of this workshop was to describe and compare the use of patients' perspectives in the Nordic PBT clinics. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twelve participants attended the workshop, representing Denmark, Norway and Sweden. The participants were registered nurses working in patient care, researchers, physicist and leaders of the Skandion Clinic. RESULTS The consensus of the workshop was that systematic use of patient experiences on individual and group level is essential for developing clinical practice and understanding the overall effects of PBT. A difference in how the Nordic countries use patient experiences in clinical practise was found. The importance of lowering the barriers for participation in national proton trials and proton treatment were emphasized, however, there is a lack of knowledge about individual and organizational barriers to accepting PBT, and further research is therefore needed. CONCLUSION Collaboration between the Nordic countries regarding patients' perspectives in the context of PBT is of importance to compare national differences as well as to find similarities, but most importantly to learn from each other and to improve patient care. Nordic collaboration with focus on systematic collection of patient-reported outcomes in the context of PBT is unique. Collaboration in research offers the possibility to increase the inclusion of patients' perspectives in study protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ohlsson-Nevo
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- ProtonCare Study Group
| | | | - Mette Giørtz
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgitta Johansson
- ProtonCare Study Group
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Section of Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- ProtonCare Study Group
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Ulrica Langegård
- ProtonCare Study Group
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Veronika Tømmerås
- Department of Radiation Physics, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Dorte Winther
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Katarina Sjövall
- ProtonCare Study Group
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Cancer Epidemiology and Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|