Empowerment in the perioperative dialog

A qualitative study on patients' and health care professionals' perspectives regarding care delivered during CIED operation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has proven to be an invaluable tool in the practice of cardiology. Patients who have undergone CIED surgery with local anesthesia may result in fear, insecurity and suffering. Some studies have put efforts on ways to improve intraoperative experience of patients with local anesthesia, but researches concerning experiences of CIED patients during surgery is in its infancy.

METHODS

Based on semi-structured and in-depth interviews, a qualitative design was conducted in a tertiary general hospital in China from May 2022 to July 2023.Purposeful sampling of 17 patients received CIED surgery and 20 medical staff were interviewed. Thematic analysis with an inductive approach was used to identify dominant themes.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the data: (1) Safety and success is priority; (2) Humanistic Caring is a must yet be lacking; (3) Paradox of surgery information given; (4) Ways to improve surgery experiences in the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative care is significant for CIED surgery. To improve care experience during surgery, healthcare professionals should pay attention to patients' safety and the factors that affecting humanistic caring in clinical practice. In addition, information support should consider information-seeking styles and personal needs. Besides, the four approaches presented in this study are effective to improve the intraoperative care experience.

How nursing care is expressed among nurse anaesthetists in the perioperative context: A meta-ethnographic synthesis

AIM

To develop a conceptual framework describing nursing care from the anaesthesia nurse's perspective in the perioperative context.

BACKGROUND

Surgical patients find themselves in a vulnerable situation in need of advanced treatment and care. Nurse anaesthetists have a central role in reducing harm and enhance patient safety, in which person-centred care has been identified as a key component. However, they are challenged by productivity and efficiency demands leading to a potential risk to patient safety.

DESIGN

Noblit and Hare's interpretative meta-ethnography, directed by the eMERGe reporting guidance.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search of nine databases without year limitation. Fifteen studies published between 2002 and 2021 were found eligible for inclusion. Quality appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: being vigilant to keep safe from harm, strengthening patients' confidence, expressing courage to act and speak up, and endorsing team collaboration to achieve best practice. The themes were synthesised into the metaphor, 'Continuously assessing and acting according to the patients' needs in a holistic perspective'. A conceptual framework was developed, illustrating the interconnection between the different nursing expressions, as the nurse anaesthetists seek to care for the patient as a whole person.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse anaesthetists aim to deliver holistic nursing care. Nursing care is expressed at two levels, foregrounding and backgrounding anaesthetic nursing, in line with the philosophy of person-centred care. Nursing care in anaesthesia is a matter of how and why it is performed, expressed in attitudes toward the recipients of care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The framework may be used to inform educational programs and clinical practice in nurse anaesthesia and to promote person-centred care as a shared value across all levels involved in perioperative patient care.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Data were retrieved from already published literature.

Knowledge, safety, and teamwork: a qualitative study on the experiences of anaesthesiologists and nurse anaesthetists working in the preanaesthesia assessment clinic

Background

The preanaesthesia assessment clinic (PAC) has been shown to contribute to safe anaesthesia assessment in hospitals. In the PAC, patients are assessed with an interview and can also ask relevant questions about anaesthesia. The intention is to ensure that patients are comprehensively prepared for the surgery and hospital stay. Although earlier studies have assessed the effects of PAC, attitudes and satisfaction of the healthcare personnel working in PAC remain unknown. Thus, this study aimed to examine the experiences of anaesthesiologists and nurse anaesthetists working in PACs as well as to explore barriers and facilitators in this context.

Methods

A descriptive qualitative approach was used to explore the experiences of anaesthesiologists and nurse anaesthetists working in PACs. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted using face-to-face, telephone, or digital platforms in five hospitals in west, south, and north Norway between 2020 and 2021. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed according to Braun and Clarke’s six-steps semantic reflexive analysis.

Results

Four themes and nine subthemes were identified through an active analysis process, including developing competence in clinical anaesthesia practice, identifying barriers and facilitators influencing collaboration and teamwork, improving patient safety and outcomes through structured assessment, and identifying other organisational factors affecting the delivery of healthcare to surgical patients.

Conclusions

Working in the PAC contributed to competence development among the personnel. Additionally, teamwork was considered important for the proper functioning of the PAC. Patient safety was perceived as improved owning to the structured assessment in PAC, with patients getting the opportunity to improve their knowledge and being more involved in the upcoming anaesthesia.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01852-w.

Safeguarding the patient: a grounded theory study of registered nurse anesthetists' main concerns in the process of extubation in the anesthesia setting

Background

The process of extubation is complex as it takes place in the technical and challenging environment of the operating room. The extubation is related to complications of varying severity and a critical moment for the patient, who is in a vulnerable condition when emerging from anesthesia. Registered Nurse Anesthetists (RNAs) in Sweden have specialist training and performs extubations independently or in collaboration with an anesthesiologist.

Aim

To obtain a deeper understanding of Registered Nurse Anesthetists’ main concerns and how they resolve these in the process of extubation when caring for a patient during general anesthesia.

Participants

A total of 17 RNAs, eight male and nine female, were included in the study. Twelve RNAs in the first step of data collection (I); and five RNAs the second step of data collection (II).

Method

A classic grounded theory approach with a qualitative design was used for this study.

Findings

The RNAs’ main concern in the process of extubation were Safeguarding the patient in a highly technological environment, which the solved by Maintaining adaptability. Facilitators as well as challenges affected how the RNAs solved their main concern and represented the categories: ‘Having a back-up plan’, ‘Getting into the right frame of mind’, ‘Evaluating the patient’s reactions’, ‘Using one’s own experience’, ‘Dealing with uncertainty’, ‘Pressure from others’, and ‘Being interrupted’. The theory, Safeguarding the patient in the process of extubation, emerged.

Conclusion

To be able to safeguard the patient in a highly technological environment, the RNAs must oscillate between facilitators and challenges. By maintaining adaptability, the RNAs resolved the difficulties of oscillating, indicating a need for finding a balance between maintaining attentiveness on what is important to keep the patient safe in the process of extubation and all of the disturbances present in the OR.

Training for Awareness, Resilience and Action (TARA) for medical students: a single-arm mixed methods feasibility study to evaluate TARA as an indicated intervention to prevent mental disorders and stress-related symptoms

BACKGROUND

Medical students have a higher risk for depression, anxiety, stress-related symptoms, burnout, and suicide, and more rarely seek professional help or treatment than the general population. Appeals are being made to address the mental health and resilience of physicians-to-be. The novel program Training for Awareness, Resilience, and Action (TARA) was originally developed to treat depressed adolescents, targeting specific neuroscientific findings in this population. TARA has shown feasibility and preliminary efficacy in clinically depressed adolescents and corresponding brain-changes in mixed community adolescent samples. The present study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of TARA as a potential indicated prevention program for symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and burnout in Swedish medical students.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm trial with 23 self-selected students in their early semesters of medical school (mean age 25.38 years, 5 males and 18 females), with or without mental disorders. All participants received TARA. Self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, perceived stress and psychological inflexibility were collected before (T0) and after the intervention (T1). Qualitative data on the participants' experiences of TARA were collected in focus-group interviews conducted halfway through the program and upon completion of the program. Individual interviews were also conducted 2 years later. Qualitative content analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The mean attendance rate was 61.22% and the dropout rate was 17.40%. The Child Session Rating Scale administered after every session reflected an overall acceptable content, mean total score 34.99 out of 40.00. Trends towards improvement were seen across all outcome measures, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety (t = 1.13, p = 0.29) and Depression (t = 1.71, p = 0.11) subscales, Perceived Stress Scale (t = 0.67, p = 0.51) and Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for youth (t = 1.64, p = 0.10). None of the participants deteriorated markedly during the intervention. Qualitative content analysis resulted in a main theme labeled: "An uncommon meeting-ground for personal empowerment", with 4 themes; "Acknowledging unmet needs", "Entering a free zone", "Feeling connected to oneself and others" and "Expanding self-efficacy".

CONCLUSION

TARA is feasible and acceptable in a mixed sample of Swedish medical students. The students' reports of entering an uncommon meeting-ground for personal empowerment supports effectiveness studies of TARA in this context.