Two-Year Results of Think Health! ¡Vive Saludable!: A Primary Care Weight-Management Trial

The Impact of Health Coaching on Weight and Physical Activity in Obese Adults: A Randomized Control Trial

Health Coaching (HC) is an evidence-based, patient-centered approach to assisting individuals in achieving their health-related goals. Studies have generally shown positive effects of HC on weight loss in obese adults. However, limitations do exist, that if addressed would further clarify HC's viability as a clinical, obesity treatment approach. To examine the effects of HC on weight loss, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and psychosocial constructs in obese adults. A randomized control trial with 44 [Mean body mass index (BMI) 36.5] middle-aged, White adults. Participants were randomly assigned to HC (n = 22) or control (n = 22) groups. A certified health coach provided bi-weekly, in-person and telehealth HC for 12 weeks. Percent excess weight loss was 15.7% in HC vs. 2.5% in controls (p< .001). The change in MVPA was significantly greater in HC (+50.3 min/wk) vs controls (+7.1 min/wk). Psychosocial constructs also changed more favorably in HC than controls. Health coaching is an effective approach for weight loss in obese adults. The results of this study support the consideration of HC as a treatment option for obese adults looking to lose weight.

Research Trends in Motivation and Weight Loss: A Bibliometric-Based Review

Obesity is a complex disease that, like COVID-19, has reached pandemic proportions. Consequently, it has become a rapidly growing scientific field, represented by an extensive body of research publications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to present the research trends in the scientific literature on motivation and weight loss. Because traditional knowledge synthesis approaches are not appropriate for analyzing large corpora of research evidence, we utilized a novel knowledge synthesis approach called synthetic knowledge synthesis (SKS) to generate new holistic insights into obesity research focusing on motivation. SKS is a triangulation of bibliometric analysis, bibliometric mapping, and content analysis. Using it, we analyzed the corpus of publications retrieved from the Scopus database, using the search string TITLE-ABS-KEY((obesity or overweight) and "weight loss" and motiv*) in titles, keywords, and abstracts, without any additional inclusion or exclusion criteria. The search resulted in a corpus of 2301 publications. The United States of America, the United Kingdom, and Australia were the most productive countries. Four themes emerged, namely, weight loss and weight-loss maintenance through motivational interventions, lifestyle changes supported by smart ICT, maintaining sustainable weight with a healthier lifestyle, and weight management on the level of primary healthcare and bariatric surgery. Further, we established that the volume of research literature is growing, as is the scope of the research. However, we observed a regional concentration of research and its funding in developed countries and almost nonexistent research cooperation between developed and less-developed countries.

Effectiveness of weight management interventions for adults delivered in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults with obesity delivered in primary care.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF STUDIES

Randomised controlled trials of behavioural weight management interventions for adults with a body mass index ≥25 delivered in primary care compared with no treatment, attention control, or minimal intervention and weight change at ≥12 months follow-up.

DATA SOURCES

Trials from a previous systematic review were extracted and the search completed using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PubMed, and PsychINFO from 1 January 2018 to 19 August 2021.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted with random effects models, and a pooled mean difference for both weight (kg) and waist circumference (cm) were calculated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was weight change from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcome was weight change from baseline to ≥24 months. Change in waist circumference was assessed at 12 months.

RESULTS

34 trials were included: 14 were additional, from a previous review. 27 trials (n=8000) were included in the primary outcome of weight change at 12 month follow-up. The mean difference between the intervention and comparator groups at 12 months was -2.3 kg (95% confidence interval -3.0 to -1.6 kg, I²=88%, P<0.001), favouring the intervention group. At ≥24 months (13 trials, n=5011) the mean difference in weight change was -1.8 kg (-2.8 to -0.8 kg, I²=88%, P<0.001) favouring the intervention. The mean difference in waist circumference (18 trials, n=5288) was -2.5 cm (-3.2 to -1.8 cm, I²=69%, P<0.001) in favour of the intervention at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioural weight management interventions for adults with obesity delivered in primary care are effective for weight loss and could be offered to members of the public.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021275529.

The Most Undertreated Chronic Disease: Addressing Obesity in Primary Care Settings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While obesity-related comorbidities are frequently addressed and treated in primary care (PC), obesity itself is undertreated. We review the current treatments for obesity and provide potential provider and system-level strategies for integrating weight management and improving longer term obesity care within PC settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

We now understand that the body develops multiple mechanisms to resist weight loss and promote weight regain, making both weight loss and weight loss maintenance challenging. Therefore, weight management often requires medically supervised interventions and should be treated on a long-term basis. However, there are multiple barriers to improving obesity care within PC settings. Clinically, utilizing strategies such as a shared decision-making approach and the 5As to discuss treatment options can facilitate formulating an obesity treatment plan. Utilizing telehealth, a team-based approach, and community partnering can increase patient access to intensive behavioral interventions. Future studies should evaluate other cost-effective methods to implement obesity care into the PC setting.

Primary care-based interventions for treatment of obesity: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to synthesise evidence from primary care-based interventions for the treatment of obesity in adults and the elderly.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Eight electronic databases (MEDLINE, Lilacs, Embase, Psycinfo, Cochrane, WHOLIS, Open Gray and Scholar Google) were searched. There was no limitation on publication period; articles published in English, Portuguese or Spanish were included. The selection, data extraction and quality analyses were performed by three reviewers.

RESULTS

A literature search retrieved 6464 publications, of which 5120 publications were excluded after reading the title/abstract and 293 after reading the full text. In total, 56 publications, representing 72 interventions were included. All studies were published between 2000 and 2020. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries. The mean duration of interventions was 11.5 months (SD: 7.5), ranging from 3 to 44 months. Most interventions were effective for body mass index reduction, weight loss and waist circumference change.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that most interventions were effective for outcomes analysed in adults and the elderly. We also found some literature gaps, such as the need to implement and evaluate obesity after intervention and the requirement to carry out more studies in low- and middle-income countries.

Nutritional intervention strategies for the management of overweight and obesity in primary health care: A systematic review with meta-analysis

A systematic review with meta-analysis (MA) was conducted to synthesize the effectiveness of nutrition intervention strategies for managing overweight and obesity in the adult population attending primary health care. Relevant articles were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane and LILACS databases from inception to January 2020. Seventy studies were identified: 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 25 uncontrolled before-after studies (UBAs). The MA of nutritional intervention revealed a reduced average estimate of the effect on weight in RCTs (weighted mean differences [WMD] = -1.80 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.40 to -1.19), BMI (WMD = -0.80 kg/m² , 95% CI, -1.11 to -0.49), and WC (WMD = -2.28 cm, 95% CI, -3.06 to -1.49); and for UBAs showed reductions in weight (WMD = -4.17 kg; 95% CI, -5.18 to -1.70), BMI (WMD = -1.26 kg/m² ; 95% CI, -1.81 to -0.72) and (WMD = -2.90 cm; 95%CI, -4.21 to -1.59). There was no association between treatment effect and follow-up for both designs. Nutritional interventions alone yielded a higher but nonsignificant average reduction on weight when compared with combined components intervention. Interventions delivered through individual or group sessions showed a similar positive effect on weight decrease. The dietary prescription approach yielded a greater effect on weight loss than did the behavioural approaches but only in UBA studies.

The Brain Health Champion study: Health coaching changes behaviors in patients with cognitive impairment

INTRODUCTION

Converging evidence suggests that increasing healthy behaviors may slow or prevent cognitive decline.

METHODS

We piloted a six-month, randomized, controlled investigation of 40 patients with mild dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or subjective cognitive decline. The intervention consisted of weekly motivational interviewing phone calls and three visits with a "Brain Health Champion" health coach, who guided participants to achieve personalized goals. Changes in behavior were measured using validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

Compared with the standard-of-care control group, Brain Health Champion participants had statistically significant and clinically meaningful increases in physical activity (Cohen's d = 1.37, P < .001), adherence to the Mediterranean diet (Cohen's d = 0.87, P = .016), cognitive/social activity (Cohen's d = 1.09, P = .003), and quality of life (Cohen's d = 1.23, P < .001). The magnitude of behavior change strongly predicted improvement in quality of life.

DISCUSSION

Our results demonstrate the feasibility and potential efficacy of a health coaching approach in changing health behaviors in cognitively impaired and at-risk patients.

A Protocol to Deliver Intensive Behavioral Therapy (IBT) for Obesity in Primary Care Settings: The MODEL-IBT Program

OBJECTIVE

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) initiated coverage of intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) for obesity in 2011, providing beneficiaries 14 to 15 brief, individual counseling visits in 6 months. CMS offered general recommendations for delivering IBT but did not provide an evidence-based treatment protocol, which was the objective of the present research.

METHODS

This review describes the evidence that CMS considered in developing its IBT benefit. It also examines weight losses produced by the intensive lifestyle intervention in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), as well an adapted version of the DPP delivered (for the first 6 months) on the visit schedule recommended by CMS. This new protocol, which was evaluated in a recent randomized trial, provided 14 visits in the first 24 weeks, with 7 additional monthly visits through week 52.

RESULTS

As reported previously, the 50 participants with obesity assigned to the new IBT protocol lost a mean of 5.4% of their initial weight at week 24; 46% of participants lost ≥ 5% of their baseline weight. At 1 year, the mean loss was 6.1%, and 44% of participants lost ≥ 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

With these generally favorable results, the IBT protocol is being posted online for practitioners and researchers to use.

Overcoming Inequities in Obesity: What Don't We Know That We Need to Know?

Efforts to combat the U.S. obesity epidemic have been ongoing in earnest for nearly two decades, informed by a substantial body of knowledge and guided by numerous programmatic and policy recommendations. Yet, although there are some bright spots, I sense frustration in the public health community with the overall lack of clear progress in lowering high obesity prevalence. The fact that something is missing from current approaches is undeniable and must be a continued source of inquiry. This commentary focuses attention on an aspect that is especially concerning-inequities that predispose to a notably higher obesity prevalence in U.S. racial/ethnic minority populations compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Critical analyses of what we are doing now can point the way to improvements in both individually oriented and policy, systems, and environmental change strategies to overcome the epidemic. Success will require working with communities to co-design relevant and realistic interventions as well as broader social changes that address underlying causes.

Primary Care Interventions for Obesity: Review of the Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the results of randomized controlled trials that have evaluated the efficacy of behavioral interventions for obesity in primary care settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most studies have found that high-intensity behavioral counseling (providing 12 or more sessions per year, as defined by the US Preventative Services Task Force), when delivered in-person, by phone, or electronically, produced clinically meaningful weight loss (4 to 7 kg). Low- to moderate-intensity behavioral counseling and counseling that did not include behavioral strategies (e.g., motivational interviewing) produced modest losses of 1 to 2 kg. The addition of weight loss medication increased mean losses relative to behavioral treatment alone. Consistent with national guidelines, the largest weight losses were achieved with high-intensity counseling, either alone or in combination with obesity pharmacotherapy. Primary care providers can support their patients by inviting them to discuss their weight concerns and referring interested individuals to appropriate interventions.