Private Payer-Negotiated Rates for FDA-Approved Head and Neck Cancer Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy Agents

Assessing the Impact of the 340B Drug Pricing Program: A Scoping Review of the Empirical, Peer-Reviewed Literature

Policy Points The 340B Drug Pricing Program accounts for roughly 1 out of every 100 dollars spent in the $4.3 trillion US health care industry. Decisions affecting the program will have wide-ranging consequences throughout the US safety net. Our scoping review provides a roadmap of the questions being asked about the 340B program and an initial synthesis of the answers. The highest-quality evidence indicates that nonprofit, disproportionate share hospitals may be using the 340B program in margin-motivated ways, with inconsistent evidence for increased safety net engagement; however, this finding is not consistent across other hospital types and public health clinics, which face different incentive structures and reporting requirements.

CONTEXT

Despite remarkable growth and relevance of the 340B Drug Pricing Program to current health care practice and policy debate, academic literature examining 340B has lagged. The objectives of this scoping review were to summarize i) common research questions published about 340B, ii) what is empirically known about 340B and its implications, and iii) remaining knowledge gaps, all organized in a way that is informative to practitioners, researchers, and decision makers.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed, empirical 340B literature (database inception to March 2023). We categorized studies by suitability of their design for internal validity, type of covered entity studied, and motivation-by-scope category.

FINDINGS

The final yield included 44 peer-reviewed, empirical studies published between 2003 and 2023. We identified 15 frequently asked research questions in the literature, across 6 categories of inquiry-motivation (margin or mission) and scope (external, covered entity, and care delivery interface). Literature with greatest internal validity leaned toward evidence of margin-motivated behavior at the external environment and covered entity levels, with inconsistent findings supporting mission-motivated behavior at these levels; this was particularly the case among participating disproportionate share hospitals (DSHs). However, included case studies were unanimous in demonstrating positive effects of the 340B program for carrying out a provider's safety net mission.

CONCLUSIONS

In our scoping review of the 340B program, the highest-quality evidence indicates nonprofit, DSHs may be using the 340B program in margin-motivated ways, with inconsistent evidence for increased safety net engagement; however, this finding is not consistent across other hospital types and public health clinics, which face different incentive structures and reporting requirements. Future studies should examine heterogeneity by covered entity types (i.e., hospitals vs. public health clinics), characteristics, and time period of 340B enrollment. Our findings provide additional context to current health policy discussion regarding the 340B program.

Disulfidptosis in head and neck squamous carcinoma: Integrative bioinformatic and in-vitro analysis

BACKGROUND

Head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSC) is a prevalent global malignancy with limited treatment options, which necessitates the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Disulfidptosis, a recently discovered and unique cell death pathway, may offer promise as a treatment target in HNSC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) using multiple algorithms and developed a prognostic model based on a disulfidptosis-related gene index (DRGI). The model's predictive accuracy was assessed by ROC-AUC, and patients were stratified by risk scores. We investigated the tumor immune microenvironment, immune responses, tumorigenesis pathways, and chemotherapy sensitivity (IC50). We also constructed a diagnostic model using 20 machine-learning algorithms and validated PCBP2 expression through RT-qPCR and western blot.

RESULTS

We developed a 12-DRG DRGI prognostic model, classifying patients into high- and low-risk groups, with the high-risk group experiencing poorer clinical outcomes. Notable differences in tumor immune microenvironment and chemosensitivity were observed, with reduced immune activity and suboptimal treatment responses in the high-risk group. Advanced machine learning and in-vitro experiments supported DRGI's potential as a reliable HNSC diagnostic biomarker.

CONCLUSION

We established a novel DRGI-based prognostic and diagnostic model for HNSC, exploring its tumor immune microenvironment implications, and offering valuable insights for future research and clinical trials.