A 6-month telephone-based weight loss intervention in overweight and obese subjects with idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Facilitators and Barriers to Weight Loss Among Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Little is known about motivation for weight loss and barriers to weight loss among patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Such information is crucial for developing tailored weight management recommendations and novel interventions.

METHODS

We administered a survey to patients with IIH presenting to neuro-ophthalmology clinics at The University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center (Michigan, USA) and St. Thomas' Hospital (London, England). Participants rated importance and motivation to lose weight (1-10 scale; 10 = extremely important/motivated). Facilitators and barriers to weight loss were assessed using open-ended survey questions informed by motivational interviewing methodology. Open-ended responses were coded by 2 team members independently using a modified grounded theory approach. Demographic data were extracted from medical records. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative responses.

RESULTS

Of the 221 (43 Michigan and 178 London) patients with IIH (Table 1), most were female (n = 40 [93.0%] Michigan and n = 167 [94.9%] London). The majority of patients in the United States were White (n = 35 [81.4%] Michigan), and the plurality were Black in the United Kingdom (n = 67 [37.6%] London]) with a mean (SD) BMI of 38.9 kg/m2 (10.6 kg/m2) Michigan and 37.5 kg/m2 (7.7 kg/m2) London. Participants' mean (SD) level of importance to lose weight was 8.5 (2.2) (8.1 [2.3] Michigan and 8.8 [2.1] London), but their mean (SD) level of motivation to lose weight was 7.2 (2.2) (6.8 [2.4] Michigan and 7.4 [2.1] London). Nine themes emerged from the 992 open-ended coded survey responses grouped into 3 actionable categories: self-efficacy, professional resources (weight loss tools, diet, physical activity level, mental health, and physical health), and external factors (physical/environmental conditions, social influences, and time constraints). Most responses (55.6%; n = 551) were about barriers to weight loss. Lack of self-efficacy was the most discussed single barrier (N = 126; 22.9% total, 28.9% Michigan, and 20.4% London) and facilitator (N = 77; 17.5% total, 15.9% Michigan, and 18.7% London) to weight loss. Other common barriers were related to physical activity level (N = 79; 14.3% total, 13.2% Michigan, and 14.8% London) and diet (N = 79; 14.3% total, 9.4% Michigan, and 16.3% London). Commonly reported facilitators included improvements in physical activity level (N = 73; 16.6% total, 18.5% Michigan, and 15.1% London) and dietary changes (N = 76; 17.2% total, 16.4% Michigan, and 17.9% London).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IIH believe weight loss is important. Self-efficacy was the single most mentioned important patient-identified barrier or facilitator of weight loss, but professional resource needs and external factors vary widely at the individual level. These factors should be assessed to guide selection of weight loss interventions that are tailored to individual patients with IIH.

Weight Management Interventions for Adults With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Practice Recommendations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is associated with obesity; however, there is a lack of clinical consensus on how to manage weight in IIH. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate weight loss interventions in people with IIH to determine which intervention is superior in terms of weight loss, reduction in intracranial pressure (ICP), benefit to visual and headache outcomes, quality of life, and mental health.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023339569). MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched for relevant literature published from inception until December 15, 2022. Screening and quality appraisal was conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Recommendations were graded using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were included. Bariatric surgery resulted in 27.2-27.8 kg weight loss at 24 months (Level 1- to 1++). Lifestyle weight management interventions resulted in between 1.4 and 15.7 kg weight loss (Level 2+ to 1++). Bariatric surgery resulted in the greatest mean reduction in ICP (-11.9 cm H2O) at 24 months (Level 1++), followed by multicomponent lifestyle intervention + acetazolamide (-11.2 cm H2O) at 6 months (Level 1+) and then a very low-energy diet intervention (-8.0 cm H2O) at 3 months (Level 2++). The least ICP reduction was shown at 24 months after completing a 12-month multicomponent lifestyle intervention (-3.5 cm H2O) (Level 1++). Reduction in body weight was shown to be highly correlated with reduction in ICP (Level 2++ to 1++).

DISCUSSION

Bariatric surgery should be considered for women with IIH and a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 since this had the most robust evidence for sustained weight management (grade A). A multicomponent lifestyle intervention (diet + physical activity + behavior) had the most robust evidence for modest weight loss with a BMI <35 kg/m2 (grade B). Longer-term outcomes for weight management interventions in people with IIH are required to determine whether there is a superior weight loss intervention for IIH.

Weight Loss in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Retrospective Review of Outcomes in the Clinical Setting

BACKGROUND

Weight loss is important in the management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH); however, extremely caloric restrictive diets have been used in published studies, which may not be practical for all patients. We aim to review the weight loss outcomes of IIH patients and weight loss methods used by patients who achieve clinical remission (CR) in a standard clinical setting.

METHODS

The medical records of IIH patients were retrospectively reviewed. Measures evaluated included: reported symptoms, visual acuity, retinal nerve fiber layer analysis, automated visual fields, optic disc appearance, and cessation of medications. Patients were divided into different outcome groups and weight changes were compared. Patients who achieved CR were contacted to assess weight loss methods used.

RESULTS

Of the 39 patients included in the analysis, 28 patients (71.8%) achieved CR with concomitant weight loss, 6 patients (15.4%) improved clinically with concomitant weight loss but did not achieve CR. Among the patients with CR, 10 patients (35.7%) were successfully weaned off their medications completely, whereas another 10 patients (35.7%) are in the process of this. Median weight loss from baseline to lowest weight for this group was 10.5 kg (11.5%) achieved using self-directed methods.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that a large proportion of IIH patients were able to achieve CR or improvement with self-directed weight loss regimens, reinforcing the evidence and the practicality of weight loss in the management of IIH in the clinical setting.

Long-term effects of weight-reducing diets in people with hypertension

BACKGROUND

All major guidelines for antihypertensive therapy recommend weight loss. Dietary interventions that aim to reduce body weight might therefore be a useful intervention to reduce blood pressure and adverse cardiovascular events associated with hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objectives To assess the long-term effects of weight-reducing diets in people with hypertension on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and adverse events (including total serious adverse events, withdrawal due to adverse events, and total non-serious adverse events). Secondary objectives To assess the long-term effects of weight-reducing diets in people with hypertension on change from baseline in systolic blood pressure, change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure, and body weight reduction.

SEARCH METHODS

For this updated review, the Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to April 2020: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2020, Issue 3), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers about further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 24 weeks' duration that compared weight-reducing dietary interventions to no dietary intervention in adults with primary hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed risks of bias and extracted data. Where appropriate and in the absence of significant heterogeneity between studies (P > 0.1), we pooled studies using a fixed-effect meta-analysis. In case of moderate or larger heterogeneity as measured by Higgins I2, we used a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

This second review update did not reveal any new trials, so the number of included trials remains the same: eight RCTs involving a total of 2100 participants with high blood pressure and a mean age of 45 to 66 years. Mean treatment duration was 6 to 36 months. We judged the risks of bias as unclear or high for all but two trials. No study included mortality as a predefined outcome. One RCT evaluated the effects of dietary weight loss on a combined endpoint consisting of the necessity of reinstating antihypertensive therapy and severe cardiovascular complications. In this RCT, weight-reducing diet lowered the endpoint compared to no diet: hazard ratio 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.87). None of the trials evaluated adverse events as designated in our protocol. The certainty of the evidence was low for a blood pressure reduction in participants assigned to weight-loss diets as compared to controls: systolic blood pressure: mean difference (MD) -4.5 mm Hg (95% CI -7.2 to -1.8 mm Hg) (3 studies, 731 participants), and diastolic blood pressure: MD -3.2 mm Hg (95% CI -4.8 to -1.5 mm Hg) (3 studies, 731 participants). We judged the certainty of the evidence to be high for weight reduction in dietary weight loss groups as compared to controls: MD -4.0 kg (95% CI -4.8 to -3.2) (5 trials, 880 participants). Two trials used withdrawal of antihypertensive medication as their primary outcome. Even though we did not consider this a relevant outcome for our review, the results of these RCTs strengthen the finding of a reduction of blood pressure by dietary weight-loss interventions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this second update, the conclusions remain unchanged, as we found no new trials. In people with primary hypertension, weight-loss diets reduced body weight and blood pressure, but the magnitude of the effects are uncertain due to the small number of participants and studies included in the analyses. Whether weight loss reduces mortality and morbidity is unknown. No useful information on adverse effects was reported in the relevant trials.

Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Advances in ophthalmic diagnostics and results of interventional clinical trials are shifting diagnosis and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) to be more technology- and evidence-based. In this article, the evidence supporting current diagnostic criteria, evaluation, and medical and surgical management of IIH are reviewed.

Telephone based weight loss intervention: Relevance for developing countries

Obesity is a major public health challenge not only for developed but developing countries as well. The World Health Organization recommends the immediate use of effective, efficient and widely accessible weight loss interventions. Telephone based weight loss intervention could provide a cheaper and wider reach of obese participants. Previous systematic reviews on telephone based weight loss interventions either excluded studies that had obese participants with co-morbidities or were silent on their inclusion. Obese/overweight individuals with co-morbidities constitute an important population in any weight loss intervention study due to the strong association of obesity with major chronic health conditions. This paper, reviews the efficacy of telephone based weight loss intervention solely in overweight/obese individuals with obesity related diseases and discusses its relevance for developing countries.

A 6-month telephone-based weight loss intervention in overweight and obese subjects with idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Objectives

The purpose of this paper is to measure the change in body weight after a 6‐month telephone‐based weight loss intervention in overweight and obese subjects with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and mild visual loss randomized to receive either acetazolamide or placebo.

Methods

One hundred sixty‐five subjects with IIH, aged 29.1 ± 7.5 (mean ± SD) and BMI 39.9 + 8.3 kg/m², enrolled at 38 academic and private practice sites in North America, participated in this trial. This was a randomized, double‐masked, placebo‐controlled trial of acetazolamide in subjects with IIH and mild visual loss. All participants received a reduced‐sodium, weight‐reduction diet and a 6‐month telephone‐based weight loss intervention. Six‐month changes from baseline in body weight, perimetric mean deviation as assessed by automated perimetry and quality of life using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 and the 36‐item Short Form Health Survey were measured.

Results

Mean percent weight change at 6 months was −5.9% ± 6.7% of initial body weight overall, −3.5% ± 5.9% in the placebo group and −7.8% ± 6.8% in the acetazolamide group. Weight change was not associated with changes in either mean deviation or quality of life scores.

Conclusion

Patients with IIH and mild visual loss assigned to either acetazolamide or placebo, all of whom received a 6‐month telephone‐based weight loss intervention, lost an average of 5.9% of initial body weight, consistent with NHLBI guidelines of 5% to 10% of body weight loss for clinically significant health benefit.