Complex regional telecoupling between people and nature revealed via quantification of trans‐boundary ecosystem service flows

Managing the supply-demand mismatches and potential flows of ecosystem services from the perspective of regional integration: A case study of Hangzhou, China

Regional integration is a development strategy that synergizes various components as a whole to maximize overall benefits. The natural heterogeneity and fluidity of ecosystem service (ES) make it a promising target for regional integration. However, the current focus on regional integration was more on the socio-economic factors rather than ecological resources, and the understanding of the supply-demand relationship and potential flow of ecosystem services was still limited. Therefore, we attempted to interpret ecological integration management by linking ES budgets, bundles, and flows in this study. The results showed that the spatial mismatches of ESs supply-demand were observed in all six selected ES types. Most of the ESs deficit regions were concentrated in urban centers, while ES surplus regions were scattered in surrounding rural areas. Multiple heterogeneous ES resources could ideally benefit an additional 0.13-4.84 million people in 9-70 townships through potential ES flows under ecological integration management. Therefore, we connected the service provisioning areas (SPAs) and service beneficiary areas (SBAs) with three types of ES flows and drew the potential provider-beneficiary relationship networks at the townships/bundles scale, demonstrating the interactive relationship of ecological integration within the region. On this basis, we also proposed the applicability matrix of governance tools for the first time according to the type of ES flows, and then put forward the corresponding governance opinions around the two aspects of "improving ES budges within clusters" and "strengthening ES flow among clusters". This study provided an ecological perspective for understanding regional integration, and relevant conclusions can inform environmental policy priorities for sustainable decision-making in urbanized areas.

Identifying priority areas for freshwater supply conservation integrating multi-scale freshwater flows

Identifying priority areas for conservation is an effective measurement for the sustainable provision of ecosystem services (ESs) under threats globally. Although many approaches have been developed to identify conservation priority areas by combining supply and demand of ESs, the integration of ESs flows into the identification still need further exploration. For ESs like freshwater supply services, the processes of freshwater flows across multiple scales are crucial. This study aimed to propose a new study framework to identify priority areas for freshwater supply conservation by integrating the multi-scale (i.e., sub-watershed, tributary, and mainstream) freshwater flows, using the Yangtze River Delta as the study area. The results suggested that spatial mismatches between the supply and demand of freshwater supply services existed at different scales. There were approximately 129, 58, and 55 pairs of freshwater flows in sub-watersheds, tributaries, and mainstreams, respectively, which transported 5.98 × 1010 m3, 2.07 × 1010 m3 and 2.50 × 1010 m3 of freshwater. The results of multi-scale freshwater flows were integrated into conservation target goals, and the identified priority areas for freshwater supply conservation were selected at three scales. The priority areas selected at the sub-watershed scale were the largest. Compared with the traditional method of identifying priority areas without considering freshwater flows, the priority areas identified in this study included both sites with a high supply capacity and sites with a relatively low supply capacity, as they were significant for meeting the local freshwater demand. The increasing understanding of freshwater flows and the integration of the flows for the identification of priority areas for freshwater supply conservation are important for the development of more practical and rational policies or ecological management for the sustainable conservation of ESs.