Cyclin D3 expression in primary Ta/T1 bladder cancer

Risk Classification of Bladder Cancer by Gene Expression and Molecular Subtype

This study evaluated a panel including the molecular taxonomy subtype and the expression of 27 genes as a diagnostic tool to stratify bladder cancer patients at risk of aggressive behavior, using a well-characterized series of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) as well as muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The study was conducted using the novel NanoString nCounter gene expression analysis. This technology allowed us to identify the molecular subtype and to analyze the gene expression of 27 bladder-cancer-related genes selected through a recent literature search. The differential gene expression was correlated with clinicopathological variables, such as the molecular subtypes (luminal, basal, null/double negative), histological subtype (conventional urothelial carcinoma, or carcinoma with variant histology), clinical subtype (NMIBC and MIBC), tumor stage category (Ta, T1, and T2–4), tumor grade, PD-L1 expression (high vs. low expression), and clinical risk categories (low, intermediate, high and very high). The multivariate analysis of the 19 genes significant for cancer-specific survival in our cohort study series identified TP53 (p = 0.0001), CCND1 (p = 0.0001), MKI67 (p < 0.0001), and molecular subtype (p = 0.005) as independent predictors. A scoring system based on the molecular subtype and the gene expression signature of TP53, CCND1, or MKI67 was used for risk assessment. A score ranging from 0 (best prognosis) to 7 (worst prognosis) was obtained and used to stratify our patients into two (low [score 0–2] vs. high [score 3–7], model A) or three (low [score 0–2] vs. intermediate [score 3–4] vs. high [score 5–7], model B) risk categories with different survival characteristics. Mean cancer-specific survival was longer (122 + 2.7 months) in low-risk than intermediate-risk (79.4 + 9.4 months) or high-risk (6.2 + 0.9 months) categories (p < 0.0001; model A); and was longer (122 + 2.7 months) in low-risk than high-risk (58 + 8.3 months) (p < 0.0001; model B). In conclusion, the molecular risk assessment model, as reported here, might be used better to select the appropriate management for patients with bladder cancer.

Prognostic significance of cyclin D3 expression in malignancy patients: a meta-analysis

Background

As a pivotal regulator, cyclin D3 gives play to a crucial value in conversion from the G1 stage to the S stage of cell cycle, which is implicated in tumor progression, especially proliferation and migration. Recent literatures have reported that cyclin D3 could predict survival time of malignancy patients. But, its prognostic role of cyclin D3 in neoplasms remains controversial.

Methods

Databases involving EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were carefully searched, and literatures investigating the prognostic effect of aberrantly expressing cyclin D3 among human cancers were collected for further analysis. We used both hazards ratios and its corresponding 95% confidence intervals to evaluate the connection among the survival rate of malignancy patients and the expression of cyclin D3.

Results

There were 13 eligible researches involving 16 cohorts and 2395 participants which were included in this study. The outcomes suggested that highly expressing cyclin D3 was significantly correlated with worse clinical prognosis of overall survival (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.31–2.69) and disease specific survival (HR 2.68; 95% CI 1.35–5.31). But there existed no significant connection between the elevated expression of cyclin D3 with disease free survival (HR 2.65; 95% CI 0.83–8.46), recurrence-free survival (HR 2.86; 95% CI 0.82–9.96) and progression-free survival (HR 5.24; 95% CI 0.46–60.25) of diffident kinds of malignancy patients. Moreover, we discovered that elevated cyclin D3 expression was significantly connected with decreased overall survival in lymphoma (HR 3.72; 95% CI 2.18–6.36) while no significant relevance between highly expressing cyclin D3 and the overall survival in breast cancer was obtained (HR 2.12; 95% CI 0.76–5.91).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrated that highly expressing cyclin D3 might be an unfavorable prognostic biomarker for various malignancy patients, which can make great contributions to the clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Prognostic role of cyclin D2/D3 in multiple human malignant neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cyclin D2/D3 (CCND2/3) are core components of the machinery that drives cell cycle progression and therefore, are associated with tumorigenesis. Currently, there are contradictory evidences on the function of CCND2/3 in tumorigenesis. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive meta‐analysis to derive a precise predictive value of CCND2/3 in various tumors. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science for eligible studies up to October 8, 2018. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of OS or DFS/PFS/RFS were calculated using Forest plot analysis to demonstrate their associations. A total of 14 studies were ultimately included in this meta‐analysis. Our results indicated CCND2/3 played an oncogenic role in all of the cancer patients (CCND2: pooled HR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.67‐2.93; CCND3: pooled HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.05‐5.03). In tumor subgroup, CCND2 was associated with shorter OS in patients with gastric cancer (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.66‐2.92), whereas it might be a tumor suppressor in NSCLC (HR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12‐0.64). In addition, CCND3 was correlated to reduced OS in breast cancer patients (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.52) and shorter DFS/PFS/RFS in bladder cancer patients (HR = 4.60, 95% CI: 1.89‐12.57). Taken together, CCND2/3 could be the promising biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of patients with malignant neoplasms.

Expression of proteins FGFR3, PI3K, AKT, p21Waf1/Cip1 and cyclins D1 and D3 in patients with T1 bladder tumours: clinical implications and prognostic significance

OBJECTIVE

To determine the differential protein expression of biomarkers FGFR3, PI3K (subunits PI3Kp110α, PI3KClassIII, PI3Kp85), AKT, p21Waf1/Cip1 and cyclins D1 and D3 in T1 bladder cancer versus healthy tissue and to study their potential role as early recurrence markers.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a prospective study that employed a total of 67 tissue samples (55 cases of T1 bladder tumours that underwent transurethral resection and 12 cases of adjacent healthy mucosa). The protein expression levels were assessed using Western blot, and the means and percentages were compared using Student's t-test and the chi-squared test. The survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Greater protein expression was detected for FGFR3, PI3Kp110α, PI3KClassIII, cyclins D1 and D3 and p21Waf1/Cip1 in the tumour tissue than in the healthy mucosa. However, these differences were not significant for PI3Kp85 and AKT. We observed statistically significant correlations between early recurrence and PI3Kp110α, PI3KClassIII, PI3Kp85 and AKT (P=.003, P=.045, P=.050 and P=.028, respectively), between the tumour type (primary vs. recurrence) and cyclin D3 (P=.001), between the tumour size and FGFR3 (P=.035) and between multifocality and cyclin D1 (P=.039). The survival analysis selected FGFR3 (P=.024), PI3Kp110α (P=.014), PI3KClassIII (P=.042) and AKT (P=.008) as markers of early-recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increase in protein expression levels in bladder tumour tissue. The overexpression of FGFR3, PI3Kp110α, PI3KClassIII and AKT is associated with increased early-recurrence-free survival for patients with T1 bladder tumours.

Roles of Signal Transducer Pathways in Investigation of Biopsies from Patients with Bladder Tumors

Background:

The process of development of bladder cancer features alteration of normal biological conditions caused by changes in molecular pathways. Removing control over regulation of these pathways could lead to changes in signal transduction and abnormal regulation of genes. During tumor formation and progression, genes regulate critical cellular processes, involved in cell cycling, growth and death. Here we evaluated the expression and prognostic importance of FGFR1, HRAS, CCND1, CCND3, STAT3 and FAS genes.

Methods:

Tumor tissues of 44 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer were investigated for changes in expression levels of FGFR1, HRAS, CCND1, CCND3, FAS and STAT3 genes by the RT-PCR method. Signal transduction pathways and expression of individual genes related to these pathways were analyzed using the “One Sample Test”.

Results:

There were statistically significant changes in the expression levels of HRAS, CCND1, CCND3 and STAT3, but not FGFR1 and FAS genes. Examination of associations with age, gender, smoking, chemotherapy, tumor grade and tumor growth pattern using the “Independent Samples Test”, showed importance relations between the CCND1 gene and cigarette smoking and sex.

Conclusion:

Over-expression of HRAS, CCND1, CCND3 and STAT3 genes may play roles in bladder cancer development and progression, while cigarette smoking is significantly associated with CCND1 gene expression and consequently concluded to be contributing to the development of bladder cancer.

Urinary Bladder Cancer: Biomarkers and Target Therapy, New Era for More Attention

Currently, bladder cancer (BCa) evaluation depends mainly on traditional clinicopathological parameters encompassing tumor stage and grade, which will not reflect the behavior of the disease. Diverse molecular alterations are responsible for the heterogeneous course. The differences in molecular pathogenesis between non-invasive BCa and invasive BCa have been recognized. Molecular biomarkers are promising to predict progression and survival. The management of advanced BCa remains somewhat primitive in comparison with other more common malignancies. This topic will discuss the molecular pathways, biomarkers and potential targets that may improve the outcome in BCa.

Understanding the molecular pathogenesis and prognostics of bladder cancer: an overview

The knowledge of cellular mechanisms in malignances of the bladder has grown exponentially. Molecular technologies have led to the discovery of the molecular pathways distinguishing low-and high-grade urothelial neoplasms. This trend portends the future in which the classification and diagnosis of the bladder tumors through morphologic analysis will be supported by molecular information correlating with prognosis and targeted therapy. This article outlines tumor molecular pathology of bladder cancer with an emphasis on several promising candidate biomarkers that may soon make their transition to the realm of clinical management of bladder cancer.

FGFR3 and Cyclin D3 as urine biomarkers of bladder cancer recurrence

AIM

To assess the diagnostic performance of FGFR3 and Cyclin D3 urinary protein levels in detecting bladder cancer recurrence.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Urine of 321 patients in follow-up for bladder cancer and 150 non-neoplastic urine controls was included. Cytology, cystoscopy and FGFR3 and Cyclin D3 expression by western blot were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred ten (34.3%) patients had evidence of tumor recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology/cystoscopy was 80 and 84%, and for FGFR3/Cyclin D3 was of 73 and 90%.

CONCLUSION

Combined urinary FGFR3/Cyclin D3 expression shows improved detection rates for bladder cancer recurrence with high specificity and sensitivity, and within the same range of detection shown by cystoscopy, therefore supporting its potential use as noninvasive diagnostic biomarker for bladder cancer recurrence.

Molecular biomarkers for predicting outcomes in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Molecular biomarkers are used routinely in the clinical management of several tumours such as prostate, colon, ovarian and pancreatic cancer but management decisions in bladder cancer remain dependent on clinical and pathological criteria, which are limited in their ability to predict outcomes. Molecular markers are urgently needed in detection, surveillance and prognostication of bladder cancer as well as to predict treatment response to intravesical and systemic therapies. Advances in cancer genomics and platforms for biomarker profiling have led to a plethora of biomarkers, which must now be rigorously validated in the clinical setting. Pre-clinical and clinical studies exploring the role of emerging targeted therapies to risk stratify and reduce cancer progression are also needed.

Biomarkers in bladder cancer: translational and clinical implications

Bladder cancer is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates. These tumors show vast heterogeneity reflected by diverse morphologic manifestations and various molecular alterations associated with these disease phenotypes. Biomarkers that prospectively evaluate disease aggressiveness, progression risk, probability of recurrence and overall prognosis would improve patient care. Integration of molecular markers with conventional pathologic staging of bladder cancers may refine clinical decision making for the selection of adjuvant and salvage therapy. In the past decade, numerous bladder cancer biomarkers have been identified, including various tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, growth factors, growth factor receptors, hormone receptors, proliferation and apoptosis markers, cell adhesion molecules, stromal factors, and oncoproteins. Recognition of two distinct pathways for urothelial carcinogenesis represents a major advance in the understanding and management of this disease. Nomograms for combining results from multiple biomarkers have been proposed to increase the accuracy of clinical predictions. The scope of this review is to summarize the major biomarker findings that may have translational and clinical implications.

Clinical applications of recent molecular advances in urologic malignancies: no longer chasing a "mirage"?

As our understanding of the molecular events leading to the development and progression of genitourologic malignancies, new markers of detection, prognostication, and therapy prediction can be exploited in the management of these prevalent tumors. The current review discusses the recent advances in prostate, bladder, renal, and testicular neoplasms that are pertinent to the anatomic pathologist.

Molecular Pathology of Bladder Cancer

This article focuses on several promising candidate biomarkers that may soon make their transition to the realm of clinical management of bladder cancer. Presented are superficial and muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the genetic tests currently available in testing for diagnosis and prognosis of these diseases.

Emerging critical role of molecular testing in diagnostic genitourinary pathology

CONTEXT

The unprecedented advances in cancer genetics and genomics are rapidly affecting clinical management and diagnostics in solid tumor oncology. Molecular diagnostics is now an integral part of routine clinical management in patients with lung, colon, and breast cancer. In sharp contrast, molecular biomarkers have been largely excluded from current management algorithms of urologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss promising candidate biomarkers that may soon make their transition to the realm of clinical management of genitourologic malignancies. The need for new treatment alternatives that can improve upon the modest outcome so far in patients with several types of urologic cancer is evident. Well-validated prognostic molecular biomarkers that can help clinicians identify patients in need of early aggressive management are lacking. Identifying robust predictive biomarkers that will stratify response to emerging targeted therapeutics is another crucially needed development. A compiled review of salient studies addressing the topic could be helpful in focusing future efforts.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) search for published studies with the following search terms was conducted: molecular , prognostic , targeted therapy , genomics , theranostics and urinary bladder cancer , prostate adenocarcinoma , and renal cell carcinoma . Articles with large cohorts and multivariate analyses were given preference.

CONCLUSIONS

Our recent understanding of the complex molecular alterations involved in the development and progression of urologic malignancies is yielding novel diagnostic and prognostic molecular tools and opening the doors for experimental targeted therapies for these prevalent, frequently lethal solid tumors.

Molecular biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: are we there yet?

The unprecedented advances in cancer genetics and genomics are rapidly affecting the clinical management of solid tumors. Molecular diagnostics are now an integral part of routine clinical management for patients with lung, colon, and breast cancer. In sharp contrast, molecular biomarkers have been largely excluded from current management algorithms for urologic malignancies. The need for new treatment options that can improve upon the modest outcomes currently associated with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is evident, and validated prognostic molecular biomarkers that can help clinicians to identify patients in need of early, aggressive management are lacking. Robust predictive biomarkers that are able to forecast and stratify responses to emerging targeted therapies are also needed.

Cyclin D3 gene amplification in bladder carcinoma in situ

Carcinoma in situ (CIS) is a non-papillary high-grade, potentially aggressive, and unpredictable manifestation of bladder urothelial carcinoma. The aim of this study was to assess patterns of Cyclin D3 gene amplification in Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-treated CIS and correlate gene status with recurrence-free and progression-free survival. A sequential cohort series of 28 primary (isolated) or secondary (concomitant) bladder CIS samples in which there was enough tissue material to assess Cyclin D3 gene status by fluorescent in situ hybridization was the study group. Cyclin D3 gene amplification was present in 29% of secondary CIS; none of primary CIS samples had Cyclin D3 gene amplification. Cyclin D3 amplification was related to recurrence- (p = 0.046) and progression-free survival (p = 0.002). Type of bladder CIS (primary vs. secondary) was unrelated to recurrence- or progression-free survival in the current series. Cox's regression analysis selected Cyclin D3 as an independent predictor of progression-free survival (p = 0.041, relative risk = 61.503, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-274.710). None of primary CIS cases recurred on follow-up; nine secondary CIS recurred and four of them progressed to invasive bladder carcinoma HG T1 (n = 1), T2b N0M0 (n = 1), T3b N1M0 (n = 1) and T4aN1M1 (n = 1). Mean recurrence ± SD (months) occurred at 19.5 ± 2.06 (95% (confidence interval (CI)), 15.5-23.6); mean progression (months) occurred at 23.8 ± 1.46 (95% (CI), 20.9-26.7). Our study suggests that Cyclin D3 gene amplification might be a predictor of aggressiveness in BCG-treated CIS.

D-type cyclins in superficial and muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma: correlation with clinicopathological data and prognostic significance

PURPOSE

To elucidate the role of D-type cyclins in both superficial (Ta-T1) and muscle-invasive (T2-T4) urothelial carcinomas (UCs), investigating their potential prognostic usefulness.

METHODS

Paraffin-embedded tissues from 157 patients with bladder UC were immunostained for cyclins D1, D2 and D3.

RESULTS

Cyclin D1 expression positively correlated with D2 and negatively with D3. Cyclin D1 expression decreased with increasing grade (P = 0.0001) and tumour T-category in the entire cohort and in muscle-invasive carcinomas (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0033). Cyclin D2 correlated with grade (P = 0.0005) and T-category (P = 0.0078), a relationship which remained significant in muscle-invasive (P = 0.0135). Cyclin D3 immunoreactivity increased with histologic grade and T-category in the entire cohort (P = 0.0001 in both relationships), in superficial (P = 0.0034) and in muscle-invasive carcinomas (P = 0.0036, respectively). Survival analysis in superficial tumours showed that higher cyclin D1 (P = 0.0001) and higher cyclin D3 levels (P = 0.0032) were correlated with a lesser probability of survival. In muscle-invasive tumours, lower cyclin D1 (P = 0.0234), and D2 (P = 0.0424) and higher cyclin D3 (P = 0.0322) correlated with shortened survival. In multivariate analysis in superficial tumours only cyclin D3 expression remained significant. Cyclin D3 expression also retained its adverse significance in muscle-invasive tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin D1 overexpression seems to be more important during early T-categories of bladder carcinogenesis, whereas cyclin D3 is implicated in the acquisition of a more aggressive phenotype. Cyclin D3 overexpression emerges as an independent adverse prognostic marker in both superficial and muscle-invasive tumours. Cyclin D1 is an independent indicator of shortened survival only in muscle-invasive tumours.

Molecular biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: challenges in clinical use

Conventional clinical and pathological parameters are limited in their capacity to detect patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) who are at high risk for recurrence or mortality. The assessment of molecular biomarkers in surgical UCB specimens offers additional information on the biology of the disease, and might improve the prediction of oncologic end points. A wide range of candidate biomarkers, including key cell-cycle regulators, apoptotic markers and specific growth factors, have been reported to be of prognostic value. To date, however, no molecular biomarker for UCB has been introduced into clinical practice, mainly owing to insufficient validation and the absence of prospective studies. Knowledge about the value of molecular biomarkers in predicting the response to adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapies is also lacking. Prospective trials need to be initiated in high-risk patients selected on the basis of the expression patterns of molecular biomarkers that have already passed the initial steps towards clinical utility.

Expression of the endothelin axis in noninvasive and superficially invasive bladder cancer: relation to clinicopathologic and molecular prognostic parameters

BACKGROUND

The endothelin (ET) axis plays a role in cancer biology and plays a potential role as a target for molecular therapy in urogenital tumours. Alterations of several proteins of the ET axis were detected in invasive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the potential role of the expression of ET axis proteins compared to other prognostic parameters (kinase inhibitor 67 [Ki-67], tumour protein 53 [TP53], and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene [FGFR3] mutations) in noninvasive and invasive bladder cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Tissue microarrays from 154 consecutive patients with pTa-pT2 urothelial bladder cancer were immunohistochemically stained for endothelin 1 (ET-1), endothelin A and B receptors (ET(A)R, ET(B)R), TP53, and Ki-67. FGFR3 mutations were detected by SNaPshot analysis.

MEASUREMENTS

The results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and disease-specific survival, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Proteins of the ET axis were frequently expressed in bladder cancer (ET-1 in 62% of tumours, ET(A)R in 93% of tumours, and ET(B)R in 84% of tumours). ET-1 expression was strongly correlated with tumour stage (p=0.015), histologic grade (p=0.008), and low proliferation status (p=0.003). ET(A)R immunostaining was only associated with low proliferation status (p=0.015). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significantly longer overall survival for patients with ET-1-expressing tumours (p=0.007). A significantly longer disease-free survival was found in patients with ET(A)R-expressing tumours (p=0.040), whereas ET(B)R expression was significantly correlated to a longer disease-free survival only in subgroups of patients with multifocal tumours (p=0.031), low proliferation index (Ki-67 ≤10; p=0.050), low TP53 expression (≤10; p=0.018), and tumours with an FGFR3 mutation (p=0.026). In the global model for recurrence-free survival, only high-grade (p=0.048) and negative ET(A)R immunoreactivity (p=0.048) were correlated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to other factors, particularly age at diagnosis and growth pattern, lack of ET-1 expression may be an independent negative prognostic factor for the overall-survival probability of bladder cancer patients. Lack of ET(A)R expression may be an independent negative marker for recurrence-free survival.

Molecular markers in bladder cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bladder cancer is a diverse disease whose molecular phenotypes are being elucidated. In this review, we summarize currently known molecular pathways and associated markers in bladder cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic and epigenetic aberrations have been closely associated with tumor pathogenesis and prognosis. Cell cycle markers have been most extensively studied. More recently, apoptotic and angiogenic pathways are being investigated. Studying the role of multiple concurrent molecular alterations improves the prognostic ability of these markers. The use of tissue microarrays and high-throughput molecular profiling is accelerating the discovery of new markers.

SUMMARY

Molecular biology is paramount to our understanding of bladder cancer pathogenesis. The search for new markers, and elucidating cross-talk between markers in different pathways, is warranted. Molecular markers have the potential benefit of improving detection, prognosis and treatment of bladder cancer. In addition, understanding the molecular profile of the individual patient could usher us into a new era of improving prediction of the natural history of the disease and providing a more personalized and tailored treatment. Prospective trials are still needed, however, to objectively establish the true benefit of these markers in prognostic and therapeutic arenas.

Molecular markers for bladder cancer: the road to a multimarker approach

Bladder cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with almost 14,000 patients dying from this disease in the USA alone. Because of the need for long-term and frequent follow-up, as well as the paucity of sensitive and specific noninvasive tests, bladder cancer management has the highest cost per patient among all cancer types. Several molecular markers, especially members of the cell cycle regulation and apoptosis pathways, have been investigated. However, no individual marker has been prognostically powerful enough to change clinical management. The combined analysis of a panel of markers spanning different pathways is the most promising approach. We give an overview of the most important molecular markers functioning in crucial pathways and focus on their role in multimarker analysis.

Expression and prognostic significance of cyclin D3 in ovarian adenocarcinomas

Abnormal expression of cell cycle regulators may contribute to malignant transformation. However, the clinical significance of the expression of cyclin D3 in ovarian cancer remains undefined. We therefore conducted a retrospective investigation to address the role of this cell-cycle protein in this tumor. In our study, paraffin-embedded tissue from 109 nonbenign epithelial ovarian tumors, including 17 tumors of low malignant potential and 92 primary adenocarcinomas, was stained immunohistochemically for cyclin D3. Most of the cases had previously been stained for pRb, p21Cip1, p27Kip1, p53, and Ki-67 antigen. Expression of cyclin D3 was correlated with clinicopathologic features, the expression of other cell cycle regulators, and postoperative survival of patients. Cyclin D3 levels were significantly higher in tumors of low malignant potential than in adenocarcinomas (P = 0.0002). In the latter group, cyclin D3 expression decreased with increasing grade (P = 0.0004) and advancing stage (P = 0.0315). Cyclin D3 expression positively correlated with pRb, p21Cip1, and p27Kip1 levels (P = 0.0021; P = 0.0036; P < 0.0001, respectively) and negatively with p53 and Ki-67 (P = 0.0003; P < 0.0001). Absent cyclin D3 expression was an important indicator of poor survival in univariate analysis in the entire cohort (P > 0.00010) and in the platinum-treated patients (P = 0.001) and in multivariate analysis (P = 0.044). Our results demonstrate that absent or decreased cyclin D3 expression is adversely related to several clinicopathologic indicators of aggressiveness in ovarian adenocarcinomas and is combined with a better prognosis, suggesting that cyclin D3 may have a biological role distinct from that of other G1 cyclins which is possibly regulated through interaction with other cell cycle genes.