Computational augmentation of neoplastic endometrial glands in digital pathology displays

Dynamic changes in AI-based analysis of endometrial cellular composition: Analysis of PCOS and RIF endometrium

Background

The human endometrium undergoes a monthly cycle of tissue growth and degeneration. During the mid-secretory phase, the endometrium establishes an optimal niche for embryo implantation by regulating cellular composition (e.g., epithelial and stromal cells) and differentiation. Impaired endometrial development observed in conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) contributes to infertility. Surprisingly, despite the importance of the endometrial lining properly developing prior to pregnancy, precise measures of endometrial cellular composition in these two infertility-associated conditions are entirely lacking. Additionally, current methods for measuring the epithelial and stromal area have limitations, including intra- and inter-observer variability and efficiency.

Methods

We utilized a deep-learning artificial intelligence (AI) model, created on a cloud-based platform and developed in our previous study. The AI model underwent training to segment both areas populated by epithelial and stromal endometrial cells. During the training step, a total of 28.36 mm2 areas were annotated, comprising 2.56 mm2 of epithelium and 24.87 mm2 of stroma. Two experienced pathologists validated the performance of the AI model. 73 endometrial samples from healthy control women were included in the sample set to establish cycle phase-dependent dynamics of the endometrial epithelial-to-stroma ratio from the proliferative (PE) to secretory (SE) phases. In addition, 91 samples from PCOS cases, accounting for the presence or absence of ovulation and representing all menstrual cycle phases, and 29 samples from RIF patients on day 5 after progesterone administration in the hormone replacement treatment cycle were also included and analyzed in terms of cellular composition.

Results

Our AI model exhibited reliable and reproducible performance in delineating epithelial and stromal compartments, achieving an accuracy of 92.40% and 99.23%, respectively. Moreover, the performance of the AI model was comparable to the pathologists' assessment, with F1 scores exceeding 82% for the epithelium and >96% for the stroma. Next, we compared the endometrial epithelial-to-stromal ratio during the menstrual cycle in women with PCOS and in relation to endometrial receptivity status in RIF patients. The ovulatory PCOS endometrium exhibited epithelial cell proportions similar to those of control and healthy women's samples in every cycle phase, from the PE to the late SE, correlating with progesterone levels (control SE, r2 = 0.64, FDR < 0.001; PCOS SE, r2 = 0.52, FDR < 0.001). The mid-SE endometrium showed the highest epithelial percentage compared to both the early and late SE endometrium in both healthy women and PCOS patients. Anovulatory PCOS cases showed epithelial cellular fractions comparable to those of PCOS cases in the PE (Anovulatory, 14.54%; PCOS PE, 15.56%, p = 1.00). We did not observe significant differences in the epithelial-to-stroma ratio in the hormone-induced endometrium in RIF patients with different receptivity statuses.

Conclusion

The AI model rapidly and accurately identifies endometrial histology features by calculating areas occupied by epithelial and stromal cells. The AI model demonstrates changes in epithelial cellular proportions according to the menstrual cycle phase and reveals no changes in epithelial cellular proportions based on PCOS and RIF conditions. In conclusion, the AI model can potentially improve endometrial histology assessment by accelerating the analysis of the cellular composition of the tissue and by ensuring maximal objectivity for research and clinical purposes.

AI-algorithm training and validation for identification of endometrial CD138+ cells in infertility-associated conditions; polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF)

Background

Endometrial CD138+ plasma cells serve as a diagnostic biomarker for endometrial inflammation, and their elevated occurrence correlates positively with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Infertility-related conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) are closely associated with systemic and local chronic inflammatory status, wherein endometrial CD138+ plasma cell accumulation could also contribute to endometrial pathology. Current methods for quantifying CD138+ cells typically involve laborious and time-consuming microscopic assessments of only a few random areas from a slide. These methods have limitations in accurately representing the entire slide and are susceptible to significant biases arising from intra- and interobserver variations. Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) for CD138+ cell identification could enhance the accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability of analysis.

Methods

Here, an AI algorithm was developed to identify CD138+ plasma cells within endometrial tissue. The AI model comprised two layers of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN1 was trained to segment epithelium and stroma across 28,363 mm2 (2.56 mm2 of epithelium and 24.87 mm2 of stroma), while CNN2 was trained to distinguish stromal cells based on CD138 staining, encompassing 7345 cells in the object layers (6942 CD138- cells and 403 CD138+ cells). The training and performance of the AI model were validated by three experienced pathologists. We collected 193 endometrial tissues from healthy controls (n = 73), women with PCOS (n = 91), and RIF patients (n = 29) and compared the CD138+ cell percentages based on cycle phases, ovulation status, and endometrial receptivity utilizing the AI model.

Results

The AI algorithm consistently and reliably distinguished CD138- and CD138+ cells, with total error rates of 6.32% and 3.23%, respectively. During the training validation, there was a complete agreement between the decisions made by the pathologists and the AI algorithm, while the performance validation demonstrated excellent accuracy between the AI and human evaluation methods (intraclass correlation; 0.76, 95% confidence intervals; 0.36-0.93, p = 0.002) and a positive correlation (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient: 0.79, p < 0.01). In the AI analysis, the AI model revealed higher CD138+ cell percentages in the proliferative phase (PE) endometrium compared to the secretory phase or anovulatory PCOS endometrium, irrespective of PCOS diagnosis. Interestingly, CD138+ percentages differed according to PCOS phenotype in the PE (p = 0.03). On the other hand, the receptivity status had no impact on the cell percentages in RIF samples.

Conclusion

Our findings emphasize the potential and accuracy of the AI algorithm in detecting endometrial CD138+ plasma cells, offering distinct advantages over manual inspection, such as rapid analysis of whole slide images, reduction of intra- and interobserver variations, sparing the valuable time of trained specialists, and consistent productivity. This supports the application of AI technology to help clinical decision-making, for example, in understanding endometrial cycle phase-related dynamics, as well as different reproductive disorders.

Unveiling the Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most widespread endocrine and metabolic disorders affecting women of reproductive age. Major symptoms include hyperandrogenism, polycystic ovary, irregular menstruation cycle, excessive hair growth, etc., which sometimes may lead to more severe complications like infertility, pregnancy complications and other co-morbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, sleep apnea, etc. Early detection and effective management of PCOS are essential to enhance patients' quality of life and reduce the chances of associated health complications. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have recently emerged as a popular methodology in the healthcare industry for diagnosing and managing complex diseases such as PCOS. AI utilizes machine learning algorithms to analyze ultrasound images and anthropometric and biochemical test result data to diagnose PCOS quickly and accurately. AI can assist in integrating different data sources, such as patient histories, lab findings, and medical records, to present a clear and complete picture of an individual's health. This information can help the physician make more informed and efficient diagnostic decisions. This review article provides a comprehensive analysis of the evolving role of AI in various aspects of the management of PCOS, with a major focus on AI-based diagnosis tools.

Endometrial Pipelle Biopsy Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Feasibility Study

Endometrial biopsies are important in the diagnostic workup of women who present with abnormal uterine bleeding or hereditary risk of endometrial cancer. In general, approximately 10% of all endometrial biopsies demonstrate endometrial (pre)malignancy that requires specific treatment. As the diagnostic evaluation of mostly benign cases results in a substantial workload for pathologists, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted preselection of biopsies could optimize the workflow. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of AI-assisted diagnosis for endometrial biopsies (endometrial Pipelle biopsy computer-aided diagnosis), trained on daily-practice whole-slide images instead of highly selected images. Endometrial biopsies were classified into 6 clinically relevant categories defined as follows: nonrepresentative, normal, nonneoplastic, hyperplasia without atypia, hyperplasia with atypia, and malignant. The agreement among 15 pathologists, within these classifications, was evaluated in 91 endometrial biopsies. Next, an algorithm (trained on a total of 2819 endometrial biopsies) rated the same 91 cases, and we compared its performance using the pathologist's classification as the reference standard. The interrater reliability among pathologists was moderate with a mean Cohen's kappa of 0.51, whereas for a binary classification into benign vs (pre)malignant, the agreement was substantial with a mean Cohen's kappa of 0.66. The AI algorithm performed slightly worse for the 6 categories with a moderate Cohen's kappa of 0.43 but was comparable for the binary classification with a substantial Cohen's kappa of 0.65. AI-assisted diagnosis of endometrial biopsies was demonstrated to be feasible in discriminating between benign and (pre)malignant endometrial tissues, even when trained on unselected cases. Endometrial premalignancies remain challenging for both pathologists and AI algorithms. Future steps to improve reliability of the diagnosis are needed to achieve a more refined AI-assisted diagnostic solution for endometrial biopsies that covers both premalignant and malignant diagnoses.

Artificial intelligence deep learning model assessment of leukocyte counts and proliferation in endometrium from women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To study whether artificial intelligence (AI) technology can be used to discern quantitative differences in endometrial immune cells between cycle phases and between samples from women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS controls. Only a few studies have analyzed endometrial histology using AI technology, and especially, studies of the PCOS endometrium are lacking, partly because of the technically challenging analysis and unavailability of well-phenotyped samples. Novel AI technologies can overcome this problem.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

University hospital-based research laboratory.

PATIENT(S)

Forty-eight women with PCOS and 43 controls. Proliferative phase samples (26 control and 23 PCOS) and luteinizing hormone (LH) surge timed LH+ 7-9 (10 control and 16 PCOS) and LH+ 10-12 (7 control and 9 PCOS) secretory endometrial samples were collected during 2014-2019.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Endometrial samples were stained with antibodies for CD8+ T cells, CD56+ uterine natural killer cells, CD68+ macrophages, and proliferation marker Ki67. Scanned whole slide images were analyzed with an AI deep learning model. Cycle phase differences in leukocyte counts, proliferation rate, and endometrial thickness were measured within the study populations and between the PCOS and control samples. A subanalysis of anovulatory PCOS samples (n = 11) vs. proliferative phase controls (n = 18) was also performed.

RESULT(S)

Automated cell counting with a deep learning model performs well for the human endometrium. The leukocyte numbers and proliferation in the endometrium fluctuate with the menstrual cycle. Differences in leukocyte counts were not observed between the whole PCOS population and controls. However, anovulatory women with PCOS presented with a higher number of CD68+ cells in the epithelium (controls vs. PCOS, median [interquartile range], 0.92 [0.75-1.51] vs. 1.97 [1.12-2.68]) and fewer leukocytes in the stroma (CD8%, 3.72 [2.18-4.20] vs. 1.44 [0.77-3.03]; CD56%, 6.36 [4.43-7.43] vs. 2.07 [0.65-4.99]; CD68%, 4.57 [3.92-5.70] vs. 3.07 [1.73-4.59], respectively) compared with the controls. The endometrial thickness and proliferation rate were comparable between the PCOS and control groups in all cycle phases.

CONCLUSION(S)

Artificial intelligence technology provides a powerful tool for endometrial research because it is objective and can efficiently analyze endometrial compartments separately. Ovulatory endometrium from women with PCOS did not differ remarkably from the controls, which may indicate that gaining ovulatory cycles normalizes the PCOS endometrium and enables normalization of leukocyte environment before implantation. Deviant endometrial leukocyte populations observed in anovulatory women with PCOS could be interrelated with the altered endometrial function observed in these women.

Histopathologic diagnosis of endometrial precancers: Updates and future directions

Early detection of endometrial cancer, especially its precancers, remains a critical and evolving issue in patient management and the quest to decrease mortality due to endometrial cancer. Due to many factors such as specimen fragmentation, the confounding influence of endogenous or exogenous hormones, and variable or overlapping histologic features, identification of bona fide endometrial precancers and their reliable discrimination from benign mimics remains one of the most challenging areas in diagnostic pathology. At the same time, the diagnosis of endometrial precancer, or the presence of suspicious but subdiagnostic features in an endometrial biopsy, can lead to long clinical follow-up with multiple patient visits and serial endometrial sampling, emphasizing the need for accurate diagnosis. Our understanding of endometrial precancers and their diagnosis has improved due to systematic investigations into morphologic criteria, the molecular genetics of endometrial cancer and their precursors, the validation of novel biomarkers and their use in panels, and more recent methods such digital image analysis. Although precancers for both endometrioid and non-endometrioid carcinomas will be reviewed, emphasis will be placed on the former. We review these advances and their relevance to the histopathologic diagnosis of endometrial precancers, and the recently updated 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumors.