Multilayer spectrum of intratumoral heterogeneity in basal bladder cancer

Recent contributions of single-cell and spatial profiling to the understanding of bladder cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current risk stratification and treatment decision-making for bladder cancer informed by histopathology as well as molecular diagnostics face limitations. This review summarizes recent advancements in single-cell and spatial omics methodologies for understanding bladder cancer biology and their potential impact on development of novel therapeutic strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial omics techniques offer unprecedented insights into various aspects of tumor microenvironment (TME), bladder cancer heterogeneity, cancer stemness, and cellular plasticity. Studies have identified multiple malignant cell subpopulations within tumors, revealing diverse transcriptional states and clonal evolution. Additionally, intratumor heterogeneity has been linked to tumor progression and therapeutic response. Immune cell composition analysis has revealed immunosuppressive features in the TME, impacting treatment response. Furthermore, studies have elucidated the role of cancer-associated fibroblasts and endothelial cells in shaping the tumor immune landscape and response to therapy.

SUMMARY

Single-cell and spatial omics technologies have revolutionized our understanding of bladder cancer biology, uncovering previously unseen complexities. These methodologies provide valuable insights into tumor heterogeneity and microenvironmental interactions, with implications for therapeutic development. However, challenges remain in translating research findings into clinical practice and implementing personalized treatment strategies. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation are essential for overcoming these challenges and leveraging the full potential of single-cell and spatial omics in improving bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Molecular Subtypes of Bladder Cancer: Component Signatures and Potential Value in Clinical Decision-making

Bladder cancer may be classified into "molecular subtypes" based on gene expression. These are associated with treatment response and patient outcomes. The gene expression signatures that define these subtypes are diverse, including signatures of epithelial differentiation, stromal involvement, cell cycle activity, and immune cell infiltration. Multiple different systems are described. While earlier studies considered molecular subtypes to be intrinsic properties of cancer, recent data have shown molecular subtypes change as tumors progress and evolve, and often differ between histologically distinct regions of a tumor. The data also indicate that some signatures that define molecular subtypes may be treated as independent continuous variables, rather than categorical subtypes, and these individual signatures may be more clinically informative. This review describes molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma, including histologic subtypes and tumors with divergent differentiation, and explores potential future uses in patient management.

International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Current Issues in Bladder Cancer. Working Group 4: Molecular Subtypes of Bladder Cancer-Principles of Classification and Emerging Clinical Utility

Molecular subtyping has been a major focus of bladder cancer research over the past decade. Despite many promising associations with clinical outcomes and treatment response, its clinical impact has yet to be defined. As part of the 2022 International Society of Urological Pathology Conference on Bladder Cancer, we reviewed the current state of the science for bladder cancer molecular subtyping. Our review included several different subtyping systems. We derived the following 7 principles, which summarize progress and challenges of molecular subtyping: (1) bladder cancer has 3 major molecular subtypes: luminal, basal-squamous, and neuroendocrine; (2) signatures of the tumor microenvironment differ greatly among bladder cancers, particularly among luminal tumors; (3) luminal bladder cancers are biologically diverse, and much of this diversity results from differences in features unrelated to the tumor microenvironment, such as FGFR3 signaling and RB1 inactivation; (4) molecular subtype of bladder cancer associates with tumor stage and histomorphology; (5) many subtyping systems include idiosyncrasies, such as subtypes recognized by no other system; (6) there are broad fuzzy borders between molecular subtypes, and cases that fall on these fuzzy borders are often classified differently by different subtyping systems; and (7) when there are histomorphologically distinct regions within a single tumor, the molecular subtypes of these regions are often discordant. We reviewed several use cases for molecular subtyping, highlighting their promise as clinical biomarkers. Finally, we conclude that data are currently insufficient to support the routine use of molecular subtyping to guide bladder cancer management, an opinion shared with the majority of conference attendees. We also conclude that molecular subtype should not be considered an "intrinsic" property of a tumor but should instead be considered the result of a specific laboratory test, performed using a specific testing platform and classification algorithm, validated for a specific clinical application.

What is a Bladder Cancer Molecular Subtype? - Counterpoint

In an accompanying paper, Mattias Höglund discusses on what is a bladder cancer molecular subtype. He emphasizes the need to consider the aim of tumor classification, which is obviously critical to the approach. He also focuses on considering primarily the identity features of the neoplastic cells. Here, we provide a counterpoint. While largely agreeing with his views, we underline that other parameters that may vary in a spatial or temporal scale, and the tumor microenvironment, can also provide relevant information to render tumor classifications clinically useful. Furthermore, tumor heterogeneity and evolution during the disease course - natural or under therapeutic pressure - should be considered.

Transcriptomic Profiling of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Bladder Cancer Consensus Classification Relevance, Molecular Heterogeneity, and Differential Immune Signatures

Analyses of large transcriptomics data sets of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) have led to a consensus classification. Molecular subtypes of upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are less known. Our objective was to determine the relevance of the consensus classification in UTUCs by characterizing a novel cohort of surgically treated ≥pT1 tumors. Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), subtype markers GATA3-CK5/6-TUBB2B in multiplex, CK20, p16, Ki67, mismatch repair system proteins, and PD-L1 were evaluated. Heterogeneity was assessed morphologically and/or with subtype IHC. FGFR3 mutations were identified by pyrosequencing. We performed 3'RNA sequencing of each tumor, with multisampling in heterogeneous cases. Consensus classes, unsupervised groups, and microenvironment cell abundance were determined using gene expression. Most of the 66 patients were men (77.3%), with pT1 (n = 23, 34.8%) or pT2-4 stage UTUC (n = 43, 65.2%). FGFR3 mutations and mismatch repair-deficient status were identified in 40% and 4.7% of cases, respectively. Consensus subtypes robustly classified UTUCs and reflected intrinsic subgroups. All pT1 tumors were classified as luminal papillary (LumP). Combining our consensus classification results with those of previously published UTUC cohorts, LumP tumors represented 57.2% of ≥pT2 UTUCs, which was significantly higher than MIBCs. Ten patients (15.2%) harbored areas of distinct subtypes. Consensus classes were associated with FGFR3 mutations, stage, morphology, and IHC. The majority of LumP tumors were characterized by low immune infiltration and PD-L1 expression, in particular, if FGFR3 mutated. Our study shows that MIBC consensus classification robustly classified UTUCs and highlighted intratumoral molecular heterogeneity. The proportion of LumP was significantly higher in UTUCs than in MIBCs. Most LumP tumors showed low immune infiltration and PD-L1 expression and high proportion of FGFR3 mutations. These findings suggest differential response to novel therapies between patients with UTUC and those with MIBC.

Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Molecular Subtypes in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer-An Extensive Multiregional Immunohistochemical Analysis

BACKGROUND

Molecular bladder cancer (BC) subtypes define distinct biological entities and were shown to predict treatment response in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The extent of intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) might affect subtyping of individual patients.

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively assess the ITH of molecular subtypes in a cohort of muscle-invasive BC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 251 patients undergoing radical cystectomy were screened. Three cores of the tumor center (TC) and three cores of the invasive tumor front (TF) of each patient were assembled in a tissue microarray. Molecular subtypes were determined employing 12 pre-evaluated immunohistochemical markers (FGFR3, CCND1, RB1, CDKN2A, KRT5, KRT14, FOXA1, GATA3, TUBB2B, EPCAM, CDH1, and vimentin). A total of 18 072 spots were evaluated, of which 15 002 spots were assessed based on intensity, distribution, or combination.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Allocation to one of five different molecular subtypes-urothelial like, genomically unstable, small-cell/neuroendocrine like, basal/squamous cell carcinoma like, and mesenchymal like-was conducted for each patient for the complete tumor, individual cores, TF, and TC separately. The primary objective was to assess the ITH between the TF and TC (n = 208 patients). The secondary objective was the evaluation of multiregion ITH (n = 191 patients). An analysis of the composition of ITH cases, association with clinicopathological parameters, and prognosis was conducted.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

ITH between the TF and TC was seen in 12.5% (n = 26/208), and ITH defined by at least two different subtypes of any location was seen in 24.6% (n = 47/191). ITH was more frequent in locally confined (pT2) versus advanced (pT ≥3) BC stages (38.7% vs 21.9%, p = 0.046), and pT4 BC presented with significantly more basal subtypes than pT2 BC (26.2% vs 11.5%, p = 0.049). In our cohort, there was no association of subtype ITH with prognosis or accumulation of specific molecular subtypes in ITH cases. The key limitations were missing transcriptomic and mutational genetic validation as well as investigation of ITH beyond subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Several molecular subtypes can be found in nearly every fourth case of muscle-invasive BC, when using immunohistochemistry. ITH must be given due consideration for subtype-guided strategies in BC. Genomic validation of these results is needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Different molecular subtypes can be found in many cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This might have implications for individualized, subtype-based therapeutic approaches.

Integrated molecular and pharmacological characterization of patient-derived xenografts from bladder and ureteral cancers identifies new potential therapies

Background

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are molecularly heterogeneous. Despite chemotherapies, immunotherapies, or anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) treatments, these tumors are still of a poor outcome. Our objective was to develop a bank of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) recapitulating the molecular heterogeneity of MIBC and UTUC, to facilitate the preclinical identification of therapies.

Methods

Fresh tumors were obtained from patients and subcutaneously engrafted into immune-compromised mice. Patient tumors and matched PDXs were compared regarding histopathology, transcriptomic (microarrays), and genomic profiles [targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)]. Several PDXs were treated with chemotherapy (cisplatin/gemcitabine) or targeted therapies [FGFR and epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibitors].

Results

A total of 31 PDXs were established from 1 non-MIBC, 25 MIBC, and 5 upper urinary tract tumors, including 28 urothelial (UC) and 3 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Integrated genomic and transcriptomic profiling identified the PDXs of three different consensus molecular subtypes [basal/squamous (Ba/Sq), luminal papillary, and luminal unstable] and included FGFR3-mutated PDXs. High histological and genomic concordance was found between matched patient tumor/PDX. Discordance in molecular subtypes, such as a Ba/Sq patient tumor giving rise to a luminal papillary PDX, was observed (n=5) at molecular and histological levels. Ten models were treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and we did not observe any association between subtypes and the response. Of the three Ba/Sq models treated with anti-EGFR therapy, two models were sensitive, and one model, of the sarcomatoid variant, was resistant. The treatment of three FGFR3-mutant PDXs with combined FGFR/EGFR inhibitors was more efficient than anti-FGFR3 treatment alone.

Conclusions

We developed preclinical PDX models that recapitulate the molecular heterogeneity of MIBCs and UTUC, including actionable mutations, which will represent an essential tool in therapy development. The pharmacological characterization of the PDXs suggested that the upper urinary tract and MIBCs, not only UC but also SCC, with similar molecular characteristics could benefit from the same treatments including anti-FGFR for FGFR3-mutated tumors and anti-EGFR for basal ones and showed a benefit for combined FGFR/EGFR inhibition in FGFR3-mutant PDXs, compared to FGFR inhibition alone.

Are We Ready to Implement Molecular Subtyping of Bladder Cancer in Clinical Practice? Part 2: Subtypes and Divergent Differentiation

Following several attempts to achieve a molecular stratification of bladder cancer (BC) over the last decade, a "consensus" classification has been recently developed to provide a common base for the molecular classification of bladder cancer (BC), encompassing a six-cluster scheme with distinct prognostic and predictive characteristics. In order to implement molecular subtyping (MS) as a risk stratification tool in routine practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been explored as a readily accessible, relatively inexpensive, standardized surrogate method, achieving promising results in different clinical settings. The second part of this review deals with the pathological and clinical features of the molecular clusters, both in conventional and divergent urothelial carcinoma, with a focus on the role of IHC-based subtyping.

Are We Ready to Implement Molecular Subtyping of Bladder Cancer in Clinical Practice? Part 1: General Issues and Marker Expression

Bladder cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with highly variable clinical and pathological features, and resulting in different outcomes. Such heterogeneity ensues from distinct pathogenetic mechanisms and may consistently affect treatment responses in single patients. Thus, over the last few years, several groups have developed molecular classification schemes for BC, mainly based on their mRNA expression profiles. A “consensus” classification has recently been proposed to combine the published systems, agreeing on a six-cluster scheme with distinct prognostic and predictive features. In order to implement molecular subtyping as a risk-stratification tool in routine practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been explored as a readily accessible, relatively inexpensive, standardized surrogate method, achieving promising results in different clinical settings. The first part of this review deals with the steps resulting in the development of a molecular subtyping of BC, its prognostic and predictive implications, and the main features of immunohistochemical markers used as surrogates to stratify BC into pre-defined molecular clusters.

Molecular Oncology of Bladder Cancer from Inception to Modern Perspective

Within the last forty years, seminal contributions have been made in the areas of bladder cancer (BC) biology, driver genes, molecular profiling, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets for improving personalized patient care. This overview includes seminal discoveries and advances in the molecular oncology of BC. Starting with the concept of divergent molecular pathways for the development of low- and high-grade bladder tumors, field cancerization versus clonality of bladder tumors, cancer driver genes/mutations, genetic polymorphisms, and bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) as an early form of immunotherapy are some of the conceptual contributions towards improving patient care. Although beginning with a promise of predicting prognosis and individualizing treatments, "-omic" approaches and molecular subtypes have revealed the importance of BC stem cells, lineage plasticity, and intra-tumor heterogeneity as the next frontiers for realizing individualized patient care. Along with urine as the optimal non-invasive liquid biopsy, BC is at the forefront of the biomarker field. If the goal is to reduce the number of cystoscopies but not to replace them for monitoring recurrence and asymptomatic microscopic hematuria, a BC marker may reach clinical acceptance. As advances in the molecular oncology of BC continue, the next twenty-five years should significantly advance personalized care for BC patients.

Molecular Subtypes as a Basis for Stratified Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer-A Narrative Review

There are no established biomarkers to guide patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Recent studies suggest that molecular subtype classification holds promise for predicting chemotherapy response and/or survival benefit in this setting. Here, we summarize and discuss the scientific literature examining transcriptomic or panel-based molecular subtyping applied to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patient cohorts. We find that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the basal subtype of muscle-invasive bladder cancer responds well to chemotherapy, since only a minority of studies support this conclusion. More evidence indicates that luminal-like subtypes may have the most improved outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are also conflicting data concerning the association between biopsy stromal content and response. Subtypes indicative of high stromal infiltration responded well in some studies and poorly in others. Uncertainties when interpreting the current literature include a lack of reporting both response and survival outcomes and the inherent risk of bias in retrospective study designs. Taken together, available studies suggest a role for molecular subtyping in stratifying patients for receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The precise classification system that best captures such a predictive effect, and the exact subtypes for which other treatment options are more beneficial remains to be established, preferably in prospective studies.

Tumor Heterogeneity and Consequences for Bladder Cancer Treatment

Simple Summary

Bladder cancer is a heterogeneous disease that is composed of epithelia with varying transcriptional, mutational and lineage signatures. The epithelia of bladder tumors can also undergo pronounced changes in transcriptional and phenotypical qualities in response to progression, treatment related stresses and cues from the tumor microenvironment (TME). We hypothesize that changes in epithelial tumor heterogeneity (EpTH) occur due to the evolving content of epithelial subpopulations through both Darwinian and Lamarckian-like natural selection processes. We further conjecture that lineage-defined subpopulations can change through nongenomic and genomic cellular mechanisms that include cellular plasticity and acquired driver mutations, respectively. We propose that such processes are dynamic and contribute towards clinical treatment challenges including progression to drug resistance. In this article, we assess mechanisms that may support dynamic tumor heterogeneity with the overall goal of emphasizing the application of these concepts to the clinical setting.

Abstract

Acquired therapeutic resistance remains a major challenge in cancer management and associates with poor oncological outcomes in most solid tumor types. A major contributor is tumor heterogeneity (TH) which can be influenced by the stromal; immune and epithelial tumor compartments. We hypothesize that heterogeneity in tumor epithelial subpopulations—whether de novo or newly acquired—closely regulate the clinical course of bladder cancer. Changes in these subpopulations impact the tumor microenvironment including the extent of immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapeutics. Mechanisms driving epithelial tumor heterogeneity (EpTH) can be broadly categorized as mutational and non-mutational. Mechanisms regulating lineage plasticity; acquired cellular mutations and changes in lineage-defined subpopulations regulate stress responses to clinical therapies. If tumor heterogeneity is a dynamic process; an increased understanding of how EpTH is regulated is critical in order for clinical therapies to be more sustained and durable. In this review and analysis, we assess the importance and regulatory mechanisms governing EpTH in bladder cancer and the impact on treatment response.