Clonal origins of human breast cancer

Current concepts in breast cancer genomics: An evidence based review by the CGC breast cancer working group

BACKGROUND

Genomic abnormalities in breast cancer have been described according to diverse conceptual frameworks, including histologic subtypes, clinical molecular subtypes, intrinsic DNA, RNA, and epigenetic profiles, and activated molecular pathways.

METHODS

The Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC) Breast Cancer Workgroup performed an evidence based literature review to summarize current knowledge of clinically significant genomic alterations in breast cancer using CGC levels of evidence. Targetable or disease-defining alterations were prioritized.

RESULTS

We summarized genomic alterations in breast cancer within a framework of existing clinical tools for diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic management. Using CGC levels of evidence, we catalog copy number profiles, gene expression profiles, and mutations in clinically significant genes. We also describe emerging molecular markers such as methylation profiling and immunotherapy biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

A summary of currently available information on breast cancer genomics will enhance precision medicine by serving as an interpretive resource for clinical laboratory geneticists, providing a foundation for future practice guidelines, and identifying knowledge gaps to address in future research.

Molecular Portrait of the Normal Human Breast Tissue and Its Influence on Breast Carcinogenesis

Normal human breast tissue consists of epithelial and nonepithelial cells with different molecular profiles and differentiation grades. This molecular heterogeneity is known to yield abnormal clones that may contribute to the development of breast carcinomas. Stem cells that are found in developing and mature breast tissue are either positive or negative for cytokeratin 19 depending on their subtype. These cells are able to generate carcinogenesis along with mature cells. However, scientific data remains controversial regarding the monoclonal or polyclonal origin of breast carcinomas. The majority of breast carcinomas originate from epithelial cells that normally express BRCA1. The consecutive loss of the BRCA1 gene leads to various abnormalities in epithelial cells. Normal breast epithelial cells also express hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 1α and HIF-2α that are associated with a high metastatic rate and a poor prognosis for malignant lesions. The nuclear expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in normal human breast tissue is maintained in malignant tissue as well. Several controversies regarding the ability of ER and PR status to predict breast cancer outcome remain. Both ER and PR act as modulators of cell activity in normal human breast tissue. Ki-67 positivity is strongly correlated with tumor grade although its specific role in applied therapy requires further studies. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncoprotein is less expressed in normal human breast specimens but is highly expressed in certain malignant lesions of the breast. Unlike HER2, epidermal growth factor receptor expression is similar in both normal and malignant tissues. Molecular heterogeneity is not only found in breast carcinomas but also in normal breast tissue. Therefore, the molecular mapping of normal human breast tissue might represent a key research area to fully elucidate the mechanisms of breast carcinogenesis.

Detecting intratumoral heterogeneity in routine breast-HER2 testing: low yield of testing multiple blocks

BACKGROUND

Intratumoral heterogeneity can lead to uncertainty in breast carcinoma HER2 testing, both with respect to pathology reporting and clinical significance. The standard practice is to perform breast biomarker testing on a single representative section of tumor; however, concern over heterogeneity often leads to testing on additional tissue blocks. Our objective was to assess the diagnostic yield of testing multiple blocks of a single invasive breast carcinoma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 139 consecutive cases (between 2006 and 2012) in which clinical HER2 testing was performed in multiple blocks. Tumor characteristics and HER2 studies (both immunohistochemistry and data from in situ hybridization) were reviewed. Regional differences in morphology and HER2 immunoreactivity were recorded. In situ hybridization was performed in 25 of 139 of the cases; patterns of genetic heterogeneity were reviewed. We audited discordances in HER2 result between blocks.

RESULTS

Testing of multiple blocks yielded no additional HER2 information in 134 (96.4%) of 139 cases. Morphologic differences or heterogeneity in HER2 expression was observed in 22 (15.8%) of 139 of cases. Only 5 of these showed differences in HER2 between blocks, of which 4 were associated with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry, and 4 were high-grade.

CONCLUSIONS

In the vast majority of cases, even those with heterogeneity, testing of a single block is sufficient for an accurate HER2 determination. High-grade tumors with equivocal HER2 status and observable heterogeneity are more likely to yield a different result on testing of additional blocks.

Histopathologcial and clonal study of combined lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) clinically constitutes a risk factor for the subsequent development of either invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In order to approach the possibility of this common precursor of both ILC and IDC, we investigated combined lobular and ductal carcinomas. Thirty-two cases of lobular carcinoma were picked up out of 773 cases of operated breast carcinomas. The histopathological detailed re-examination using immunostain of E-cadherin and β-catenin revealed a rather high frequency of combined lobular carcinomas than previous reports. Clinicopathologically, combined lobular carcinomas were younger and smaller than pure lobular carcinomas, and the cytological atypia was relatively low. These results suggested that combined lobular carcinomas could be detected in the earlier stage of breast cancer. Furthermore, the lobular and ductal components of combined carcinomas coexisted in the neighborhood and were distributed contiguously. The immunohistochemical phenotypes of both components were accorded in most combined cases. A genetic analysis using methylation-specific PCR on the HUMARA gene demonstrated that the same allele was inactivated in both lobular and ductal components in all detectable cases of combined carcinoma. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that both lobular and ductal components of combined carcinomas are clonal and derived from the LCIS as the common precursor lesion, which may contradict the conventional concept that the lobular and ductal carcinomas arise from distinct differentiation pathways.

Axillary metaplastic breast carcinoma with ipsilateral pectoral invasive ductal carcinoma: an unusual presentation

We report a case of axillary metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) with triple negative (ER−/PR−/Her2−) phenotype, concurrent with multifocal invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of ipsilateral pectoral breast (ER+/PR+/Her2−) in a 60-year-old woman. The two tumors demonstrate different morphology, immunophenotype, and opposite response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of paclitaxol, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide. Methylation analysis of human androgen receptor (HUMARA) on X-chromosome identified monoclonal pattern of X-chromosome inactivation in MBC and mosaic pattern in the IDC. Stem cell origin of MBC is suggested in this case. Clinicopathological features, imaging findings, biological markers, chemoradiation management, and prognosis of MBC are reviewed in comparison to invasive ductal carcinoma. Our case and literature review suggest that traditional chemotherapy applicable to IDC is less effective towards MBC. However, new chemotherapy protocols targeting stem cell and multimodality management of MBC are promising. Recognition of unusual presentation of MBC will help tailor therapy towards tumor with worse prognosis.

Evidence for clonal fibroblast proliferation and autoimmune process in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis is an uncommon disease characterized by encasement of retroperitoneal structures by fibrosis and chronic inflammation. Multiple etiologies have been proposed. First, we investigated if idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis is a clonal fibroblast proliferation by performing X-chromosome inactivation analyses. Second, we sought to determine if idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis is an autoimmune or immunoglobulin G4-driven process. Thirty cases of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis, in whom known causes of retroperitoneal fibrosis were excluded and those for which paraffin blocks were available, were included in this study. We performed clonality analysis in 16 female patients. Genomic DNA samples were prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections using laser capture microdissection. Of the 16 cases, 15 were informative. Of 15 informative cases, 8 (53%) showed nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation or a clonal process. Of the 26 patients for which immunoglobulin G4 analysis was performed, 14 (54%) were positive for immunoglobulin G4-positive plasma cells, and all were negative for anaplastic lymphoma kinase. Of cases positive for immunoglobulin G4, the immunoglobulin G4:immunoglobulin G ratio ranged from 0.30 to 1.00 (mean, 0.80). Of the 12 patients for which both clonality analysis and immunoglobulin G4 analysis were performed, 4 (33%) were clonal and immunoglobulin G4 negative; 2 (17%), clonal and immunoglobulin G4 positive; 2 (17%), nonclonal and immunoglobulin G4 positive; and 4 (33%), nonclonal and immunoglobulin G4 negative. Our data indicate that a significant proportion (53%) of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis cases in women is associated with a clonal expansion of fibroblasts. In addition, a subset of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis cases could be classified in the immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing disease spectrum.

Cytogenetic analysis of tumor clonality

All or almost all neoplasias subjected to systematic cytogenetic scrutiny have been found to harbor acquired chromosomal aberrations. The paradigm stemming from the study of hematopoietic malignancies and sarcomas is that cancers are of monoclonal origin (i.e., they have developed from a single transformed somatic progenitor) because all the neoplastic parenchyma cells share at least one primary chromosomal abnormality, with subsequent clonal evolution along the lines of Darwinian selection occurring among the various subclones carrying secondary aberrations. When carcinomas began to be studied more extensively by cytogenetic methods, however, sometimes many cytogenetically unrelated clones were found, in seeming contradiction to the monoclonal hypothesis. Also studies of multiple samples from the same patient led to a rethinking of what the cytogenetic evidence really revealed about tumor clonality, both in its early stages and during disease development. The observed cytogenetic heterogeneity in, for example, tumors of the breast and pancreas vastly surpasses that of leukemias, lymphomas, connective tissue tumors, or even most epithelial, including uroepithelial, tumors. Theoretical reasoning as well as the available experimental data we here review show that the clonal evolution of neoplastic cell populations follows either of four principal pathways: (1) initial monoclonality is retained throughout the entire course of the disease with no additional, secondary aberrations accrued as judged by karyotypic appearance; (2) tumorigenesis is monoclonal but additional aberrations develop with time leading to secondary clonal heterogeneity (clonal divergence); (3) polyclonal tumorigenesis exists from the beginning but is followed by an overall reduction in genomic complexity with time (clonal convergence) due to selection among cytogenetically unrelated clones during tumor progression, resulting in secondary oligo- or monoclonality; or (4) polyclonal tumorigenesis with early clonal convergence is followed by later clonal divergence due to the acquisition of additional cytogenetic changes by the clone(s) that survived during the middle phases of tumor progression. Further studies of individual tumor cells are necessary to elicit precise information about the cell-to-cell variability that exists in many, especially epithelial, neoplasms and which holds the key to a more profound understanding of the complex issue of tumor clonality during all stages of cancer development.

Cytogenetic polyclonality of breast carcinomas: association with clinico-pathological characteristics and outcome

Routinely used prognostic factors fail to predict clinical outcome in a significant proportion of breast cancer patients, implying that they can not detect some important biological characteristics. Chromosomal changes have been described in breast carcinomas for many years but their significance is not clear. We compared chromosomal changes with clinico-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome in 203 breast cancer patients with a follow-up of 9-18 years. Combining data from classical cytogenetics and flow cytometry revealed chromosomal abnormalities in 142 cases (70%). Of these, 51 (35.9%) contained two or more cytogenetically abnormal clones. Polyclonality was significantly associated with poor breast-cancer-specific survival (P = 0.03) within 5 years, independent of tumor size, lymph node metastases, and hormone receptors. Specific changes were similar to those previously described, but a new finding was a significant association between del 3p12p21 and poor survival. Polyclonality was significantly associated with TP53-mutations but not with a germline BRCA2 mutation. Less than one third of the polyclonal samples were identified by flow cytometry alone. Cytogenetic changes were detected in 17 out of 114 samples from non-tumorous tissue (15%), two of them identical with a clone in the corresponding tumor. Several samples contained clearly unrelated clones within the tumor and outside, implying either multifocal origin or early divergence. In conclusion, the common deletion on Chromosome 3p12p21 was associated with poor clinical outcome. Chromosomal polyclonality is common in breast carcinomas and predicts poor survival. Polyclonality was poorly detected by one-sample flow cytometry. Multiple sampling might improve the detection rate.

A rat mammary gland cancer cell with stem cell properties of self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation

The cancer stem cell hypothesis posits that tumors are derived from a single cancer-initiating cell with stem cell properties. The task of identifying and characterizing cancer-initiating cells with stem cell properties at the single cell level has proven technically difficult because of the scarcity of the cancer stem cells in the tissue of origin and the lack of specific markers for cancer stem cells. Here we show that a single LA7 cell, derived from rat mammary adenocarcinoma has: the ability to serially re-generate mammospheres in long-term non-adherent cultures, the differentiation potential to generate all the cell lineages of the mammary gland and branched duct-like structures that recapitulate morphologically and functionally the ductal–alveolar-like architecture of the mammary tree. The properties of self-renewal, extensive capacity for proliferation, multi-lineage differentiation and the tubular-like structure formation potential suggest that LA7 cells is a cancer stem model system to study the dynamics of tumor formation at the single cell level.

Serum epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2 expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer patients

Background

Breast tissue expression of the ERBB proto-oncogene family has been extensively studied. It was recently shown that expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; c-erbB-1) and epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2 (c-erbB-2) can be detected in the serum of breast cancer patients. The clinical relevance of this has not been fully established.

Methods

EGFR and HER2 immunoassays were conducted in blood from 57 patients in whom paired serum samples were available (from the times of primary and metastatic diagnoses), from 96 primary breast cancer patients and from 49 normal individuals. Of the 57 patients with paired serum samples, paired tissue samples for HER2 expression were available for eight.

Results

Serum levels of EGFR serum levels were significantly higher in normal individuals (median 75.3 ng/ml, range 43.2 to 114.2 ng/ml) than in patients with primary breast cancer (median 59.3 ng/ml, range 21.3 to 94.1 ng/ml; P < 0.001). In the paired serum samples, EGFR levels decreased significantly between the time of primary diagnosis (median 56.3 ng/ml, range 29.1 to 142.7 ng/ml) and metastatic diagnosis (median 30.9 ng/ml, range 10.9 to 106.4 ng/ml; P < 0.001). In six (11%) a change occurred from over-expression (>78 ng/ml) to normal expression. In contrast, no significant difference was seen in HER2 serum levels in normal individuals (median 12.2 ng/ml, range 7.8 to 20.9 ng/ml) and primary breast cancer patients (median 12.5 ng/ml, range 6.9 to 122.2 ng/ml; P = 0.511). However, in the paired serum samples, HER2 levels increased significantly between the time of primary (median 12.2 ng/ml, range 5.7 to 85.0 ng/ml) and metastasis (median 17.7 ng/ml, range 6.3 to 3,337.4 ng/ml; P < 0.001). HER2 over-expression (>15 ng/ml) was observed in 16 out of 57 patients (28%) at primary breast cancer diagnosis and in 31 out of 57 (54%) at metastasis. In 18 patients (32%) HER2 expression changed from normal to over-expression.

Conclusion

Decisions regarding the use of targeted therapies in the metastatic setting are often based on the oncogene expression of the primary tumour. Our results suggest that serum oncogene assessments may be complementary to this and could potentially widen the indications for these beneficial therapies.

Clonal diversity in carcinomas: its implications for tumour progression and the contribution made to it by epithelial-mesenchymal transitions

The progression of tumours to malignancy is commonly considered to arise through lineal evolution, a process in which mutations conferring pro-oncogenic cellular phenotypes are acquired by a succession of ever-more dominant clones. However, this model is at odds with the persistent polyclonality observed in many cancers. We propose that an alternative mechanism for tumour progression, called interclonal cooperativity, is likely to play a role at stages of tumour progression when mutations cause microenvironmental changes, such as occur with epithelial-mesenchymal transitions (EMTs). Interclonal cooperativity occurs when cancer cell-cancer cell interactions produce an emergent malignant phenotype from individually non-malignant clones. In interclonal cooperativity, the oncogenic mutations occur in different clones within the tumour that complement each other and cooperate in order to drive progression. This reconciles the accepted genetic and evolutionary basis of cancers with the observed polyclonality in tumours. Here, we provide a conceptual basis for examining the importance of cancer cell-cancer cell interactions to the behaviour of tumours and propose specific mechanisms by which clonal diversity in tumours, including that provided by EMTs, can drive the progression of tumours to malignancy.

Comparison of gene expression data from human and mouse breast cancers: identification of a conserved breast tumor gene set

The aim of our work was to establish a database for breast cancer gene expression data in order to compare human and mouse breast cancer. We identified human and mouse homologues genes and compared the expression profile of 24 human breast tumors with 6 WAP-SVT/t breast tumors (WAP-SVT/t animals, line 8). Our studies confirmed the heterogeneity in gene expression of human as well as mouse breast cancer cells. However, 63 genes were found to be differentially expressed (upregulated: 40; downregulated: 23 genes) in at least 75% of the breast tumors of both species. To differentiate between early and late events in tumor formation, we compared the 63 differentially expressed genes with a mouse data set obtained from hyperplastic mammary glands. This revealed that the majority of the early deregulated genes are cell proliferation specific. These early changes seem to be necessary although not sufficient for breast cancer formation. Late alterations concern mainly genes belonging to the category of cell communication and metabolism. Interestingly, most of the 63 conserved genes are commonly associated with tumorigenesis.

[The significance of "normal tissue" in the development of breast cancer: new concepts of early carcinogenesis]

Only little information on the primary molecularbiological events involved in early breast is available. In particular, the definition of postulated precursor lesions of invasive breast cancer, such as ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ, is under an intense, controversial discussion in terms of pathogenesis and tumor biology. The most recent research on biological regulation mechanisms and genetic alterations in morphologically normally appearing breast tissue give rise for a reinterpretation for the most common progression models of breast cancer. The detection of genetic alterations within normal breast tissue in particular challenges the commonly postulated relationship between invasive and in situ breast carcinomas on the one hand, and benign, proliferative breast lesions on the other. The concerns about these relationship are further supported by the description of different cellular compartments within the normal female breast, including a "progenitor cell compartment" with different cytokeratin expression patterns, which can be transferred towards well known or suspected precursor lesions of invasive and in situ breast cancer. The aim of this manuscript is to provide an overview of the most recent results and developments in breast pathology, and to describe the consequences of our changing understanding of breast carcinogenesis.

Prognostic gene expression signatures can be measured in tissues collected in RNAlater preservative

Gene expression signatures have the ability to serve in both prognostic and predictive capacities in patient management. The use of RNA as the starting material and the lability of this analyte, however, dictate that tissues must be snap-frozen or stored in a solution that can maintain the integrity of the RNA. We compared pairs of snap-frozen and RNAlater preservative-suspended tissue from 30 such paired lymph node-negative breast tumors and 21 such paired Dukes' B colon tumors. We assessed the correlation of gene expression profiles and prediction of recurrence based on two prognostic algorithms. Tissues stored in RNAlater preservative generated expression profiles with excellent correlation (average Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.97 and 0.94 for the breast and colon tumor pairs, respectively) compared to those produced by tissues that were snap-frozen. The correlation in the prediction of recurrence was 97% and 95% for the breast and colon tumor pairs, respectively, between these two types of tissue handling protocols. This novel finding demonstrates that prognostic signatures can be obtained from RNAlater preservative-suspended tissues, an important step in bringing gene expression signatures to the clinic.

Intratumoral DNA stem-line heterogeneity in superficial spreading melanoma

BACKGROUND

In primary melanomas, data on the degree of intratumoral heterogeneity to date have been lacking.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to investigate intratumoral DNA stem-line heterogeneity in superficial spreading melanoma (SSM).

METHODS

Multiple measuring fields of 54 SSMs (tumor thickness median 1.60 mm) were studied by DNA image cytometry to obtain data on the number of DNA stem lines per tumor, their ploidy characteristics, and intratumoral distribution. Results were compared with standard histopathological criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 54 SSMs were found to have two or three distinct proliferating tumor cell stem lines (1.46 +/- 0.57 per tumor). Stem lines appeared spatially separated in 22 of 23 SMMs. At least 3 measuring fields per tumor were necessary to identify all stem lines with a likelihood of 95%. DNA heterogeneity correlated with tumor thickness, but occurred in 5 of 19 cases of pT1 melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary SSMs can be regarded as potentially clonally unstable with a tendency for spatial separation of tumor cell stem lines.

Unlocking pathology archives for molecular genetic studies: a reliable method to generate probes for chromogenic and fluorescent in situ hybridization

Chromogenic (CISH) and fluorescent (FISH) in situ hybridization have emerged as reliable techniques to identify amplifications and chromosomal translocations. CISH provides a spatial distribution of gene copy number changes in tumour tissue and allows a direct correlation between copy number changes and the morphological features of neoplastic cells. However, the limited number of commercially available gene probes has hindered the use of this technique. We have devised a protocol to generate probes for CISH that can be applied to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections (FFPETS). Bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) containing fragments of human DNA which map to specific genomic regions of interest are amplified with phi29 polymerase and random primer labelled with biotin. The genomic location of these can be readily confirmed by BAC end pair sequencing and FISH mapping on normal lymphocyte metaphase spreads. To demonstrate the reliability of the probes generated with this protocol, four strategies were employed: (i) probes mapping to cyclin D1 (CCND1) were generated and their performance was compared with that of a commercially available probe for the same gene in a series of 10 FFPETS of breast cancer samples of which five harboured CCND1 amplification; (ii) probes targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 4 were used to validate an amplification identified by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a pleomorphic adenoma; (iii) probes targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and CCND1 were used to validate amplifications mapping to these regions, as defined by aCGH, in an invasive lobular breast carcinoma with FISH and CISH; and (iv) gene-specific probes for ETV6 and NTRK3 were used to demonstrate the presence of t(12;15)(p12;q25) translocation in a case of breast secretory carcinoma with dual colour FISH. In summary, this protocol enables the generation of probes mapping to any gene of interest that can be applied to FFPETS, allowing correlation of morphological features with gene copy number.

Human breast epithelial stem cells and their regulation

This review summarizes the current evidence for the existence of human breast stem cells and the pathways involved in their regulation, and discusses how the disruption of these pathways may result in the generation of a population of cells with the capacity for unlimited self-renewal. Relevant data from mouse model systems are also discussed where appropriate. By understanding the molecular pathways that regulate self-renewal of normal mammary stem cells, it may be possible to target the activation of these pathways in breast tumours.

Growth and differentiation of progenitor/stem cells derived from the human mammary gland

Estrogen is necessary for the full development of the mammary gland and it is also involved in breast cancer development. We set out to identify and characterise progenitor/stem cells in the human mammary gland and to explore the role of estrogen in their proliferation and differentiation. Three candidate stem cell populations were isolated: double positive (DP) cells co-expressed the luminal and myoepithelial markers, EMA and CALLA, respectively, whereas double negative (DN) cells did not express these cell surface markers; side population (SP) cells were characterised by their differential ability to efflux the dye Hoechst 33342. The ABC transporter, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) was more highly expressed in SP cells than in non-SP cells and a specific BCRP inhibitor, Ko143, reduced SP formation, suggesting that BCRP confers the SP phenotype in mammary epithelial cells, as has been demonstrated in other tissues. Interestingly, SP cells were double negative for the EMA and CALLA antigens and therefore represent a separate and distinct population to DP cells. Single cell multiplex RT-PCR indicated that the SP and DN cells do not express detectable levels of ERalpha or ERbeta, suggesting that estrogen is not involved in their proliferation. DP cells expressed ERalpha but at a lower level than differentiated luminal cells. These findings invoke a potential strategy for the breast stem/progenitor cells to ignore the mitogenic effects of estrogen. All three cell populations generated mixed colonies containing both luminal and myoepithelial cells from a single cell and therefore represent candidate multipotent stem cells. However, DN cells predominately generated luminal colonies and exhibited a much higher cloning efficiency than differentiated luminal cells. Further characterisation of these candidate progenitor/stem cells should contribute to a better understanding of normal mammary gland development and breast tumorigenesis.

Polyclonal Development of Mouse Mammary Preneoplastic Nodules

Studies of cellular interactions are critical to the understanding of tumorigenesis. Although many studies have demonstrated a monoclonal composition of advanced neoplasms in humans and mice, the clonal composition of smaller, antecedent lesions has been studied less thoroughly. To examine the clonal development of breast cancer, we generated chimeric mammary glands using mouse mammary epithelium with an inherited predisposition for neoplasia. Analysis of whey acidic protein-transforming growth factor-alpha transgenic mouse mammary glands, chimeric for two different cell lineage markers, revealed that mammary ducts and alveoli are polyclonal, and putative early preneoplastic lesions, hyperplastic alveolar nodules (HANs), frequently are polyclonal. Furthermore, the chimeric patch patterns in individual HANs were similar to the patterns observed in pregnant chimeric mammary glands. Thus, polyclonality in HANs appears to reflect persistence of the polyclonal architecture of ducts and/or alveoli, suggesting that hyperplasia formation can be the result of non-cell autonomous local tissue microenvironmental influences on groups of cells, rather than clonal progression of a single initiated cell.

Cancer prevention and therapy: strategies and problems

During the next years, molecular diagnostic science and the pharmaceutical industry will face increasing demand for personalized medicine. Therapeutic treatments should be tailored to the needs of individual patient. Patients will inquire for information about potential tumor detection at an early stage when disease can be more likely to be arrested or cured with specific regimens of drug therapy. To respond to this demand, science and industry need to modulate therapeutic approaches to the continuous development of cancer. Now more than ever, it is necessary to fill the knowledge hiatus between the "beginning" and the "end" of cancer development, i.e we need to critically analyze the extensive multi-step process of cancer development that still remains poorly understood.

Epithelial carcinogenesis: challenging monoclonality

How carcinomas begin remains unclear, but experimental data do not entirely exclude the participation of more than one clone of neoplastic cells, even in relatively advanced epithelial tumour growth. Microdissection and new PCR clonality assays exploiting X-linked polymorphisms, some of which (including XIST) are expressed in RNA, create investigational opportunities complementary to other molecular analyses, but a reliable in situ assay of X-inactivation remains desirable. The necessity for stringent controls in clonality analysis is emphasized. While it may be possible to reconcile 'pluriclonal' (oligoclonal or polyclonal) carcinogenesis with widely accepted paradigms of genetic/epigenetic change and clonal selection in epithelial neoplasia, it deserves critical study as novel carcinogenic mechanisms would be implied.

X-inactivation patch size in human female tissue confounds the assessment of tumor clonality

Most models of tumorigenesis assume that tumors are monoclonal in origin. This conclusion is based largely on studies using X chromosome-linked markers in females. One important factor, often ignored in such studies, is the distribution of X-inactivated cells in tissues. Because lyonization occurs early in development, many of the progeny of a single embryonic stem cell are grouped together in the adult, forming patches. As polyclonality can be demonstrated only at the borders of X-inactivation patches, the patch size is crucial in determining the chance of demonstrating polyclonality and hence the number of tumors that need to be examined to exclude polyclonality. Previously studies using X-linked genes such as glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase have been handicapped by the need to destroy the tissues to study the haplotypes of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase [Fialkow, P.-J. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 458, 283-321] or to determine the restriction fragment length polymorphisms of X chromosome-linked genes [Vogelstein, B., Fearon, E. R., Hamilton, S. R. & Feinberg, A. P. (1985) Science 227, 642-645]. Here we visualize X-inactivation patches in human females directly. Results show that the patch size is relatively large in both the human colon and breast, confounding assessment of tumor clonality with traditional X-inactivation studies.

Analysis of the progression of fibroepithelial tumours of the breast by PCR-based clonality assay

Fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour of the breast are both fibroepithelial tumours. Although progression to epithelial malignancy has been described, the behaviour of most fibroadenomas is benign. Phyllodes tumours, on the other hand, can display locally destructive growth and can even metastasize. A relationship between the two tumours has been suggested in the literature. This study investigated the clonality of both the stroma and the epithelium of these fibroepithelial tumours and attempted to construct a model in which fibroadenoma can progress in both an epithelial and a stromal direction. Fibroadenomas (n=25) and phyllodes tumours (n=12) were selected for analysis. Tissue was microdissected and analysed for clonality using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay targeted at an X-linked polymorphic marker, the human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA). Nineteen fibroadenomas and nine phyllodes tumours could be analysed. Normal-appearing epithelium, hyperplastic epithelium, and stroma removed from fibroadenomas were polyclonal. As expected, carcinoma in situ (CIS) removed from four fibroadenomas was monoclonal. Three areas of apparent stromal expansion within fibroadenoma were monoclonal, suggesting stromal progression. Mostly, the stroma of phyllodes tumours was monoclonal and the epithelium polyclonal. In two cases, however, the epithelium seemed to be monoclonal, whereas in three other cases the stromal component was polyclonal. These findings indicate that fibroadenoma can progress in an epithelial direction to CIS and in a stromal direction to phyllodes tumour.

Clinicopathologic study of 123 cases of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas with special reference to multihormone production and clonality of the adenomas

BACKGROUND

Prolactinoma is the most invasive type of pituitary adenoma and is generally believed to be well-differentiated adenoma and to produce only prolactin (PRL). The factors related to the various biologic behaviors occurring in patients of different ages and sexes await clarification. Since different immunophenotypes of adenoma may show different biologic behaviors and responses to medical agents, the authors examined hormone production and tried to clarify the clonality of plurihormonal prolactinoma.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic factors were studied in 123 patients with prolactinomas (40 males and 83 females). The specimens were fixed in either 10% neutral buffered formalin or 70% alcohol and used for light microscopy. Alcohol-fixed tissue was used to extract DNA from 26 samples obtained from female patients for human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA) assay.

RESULTS

Sixty one cases (50%) were pure prolactinoma and 62 cases (50%) were plurihormonal prolactinoma. Spearman rank correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between age and serum PRL level (P = 0.0002), age and tumor volume (P < 0.0001), and tumor volume and serum PRL level (P < 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis showed a significant correlation only between tumor volume and serum PRL level. The Mann-Whitney U test revealed that prolactinomas associated with higher PRL levels, larger adenomas, and higher ages were significantly more invasive to the cavernous sinus and that male patients had significantly higher PRL levels and larger adenomas. The HUMARA assay disclosed that 11 of 13 plurihormonal prolactinomas (85%) were compatible with monoclonal origin.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggest that not only can various hormones other than PRL be secreted by prolactinoma, but also that most multihormone-producing prolactinomas are monoclonal in origin.

Loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in histologically normal breast epithelium is distinct from loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in co-existing carcinomas

To better understand early steps in human breast carcinogenesis, we examined allele imbalance or loss of heterozygosity (LOH), in co-existing normal-appearing breast epithelium and cancers. We microdissected a total of 173 histologically normal ducts or terminal ductolobular units (TDLUs) and malignant epithelial samples from 18 breast cancer cases, and examined their DNA for LOH at 21 microsatellite markers on 10 chromosome arms. Fourteen of 109 (13%) normal ducts/TDLUs, from 8 of 18 (44%) cases, contained LOH. The location of these 14 ducts/TDLUs appeared unrelated to distance from the cancer. LOH in normal-appearing epithelium involved only single markers, whereas LOH in cancers commonly encompassed all informative markers on a chromosome arm. In only 1 of 14 (7%) ducts/TDLUs with LOH, was the same LOH seen in the co-existing cancer. Global differences in LOH per arm in normal-appearing tissue were not demonstrated, but less LOH was seen at 11q and 17p than at 1q (P = 0.002), 16q (P = 0.01), and possibly 17q (P = 0.06). These results indicate that in a large fraction of women with breast cancer, histologically normal breast epithelium harbors occult aberrant clones. Individual clones rarely are precursors of co-existing cancers. However, they might constitute a reservoir from which proliferative lesions or second cancers develop once additional genetic abnormalities occur, they could contribute to intratumoral genetic heterogeneity, and they are consistent with a role for genetic instability early in tumorigenesis.

Cytogenetic clues to breast carcinogenesis

The somatic mutation theory of cancer maintains that tumorigenesis is driven by genetic alterations, many of which are visible cytogenetically. We have examined breast cancer by chromosome banding analysis after short-term culturing of tumor cells and here review our findings in 322 karyotypically abnormal samples obtained since 1992 from 256 patients. The screening capabilities of this technique enabled us to identify several cytogenetic subgroups of breast cancer, to study the intratumor heterogeneity of breast carcinomas, and to compare primary tumors with their metastases. Using chromosome abnormalities as clonality markers, we could determine on an individual basis when multiple, ipsilateral or bilateral breast, tumors were independent de novo carcinomas and when they resulted from the spreading of a single malignant clone within one breast or from one breast to the other. The distribution of chromosomal breakpoints and genomic gains and losses is clearly nonrandom in breast cancer, something that can guide further investigations using molecular methods. Based on the total dataset, we propose a multipathway model of mammary carcinogenesis that takes into consideration the genetic heterogeneity revealed by the karyotypic findings and review the karyotypic-pathologic correlations and the possible clinical applications of the cytogenetic knowledge.

Are some breast carcinomas polyclonal in origin?

This editorial comments on the important study by Going et al. published in the present issue of the Journal [1]. Using a molecular genetic assay based on the X-chromosome inactivation principle, they found that 4 out of 12 breast carcinomas examined exhibited what the authors call "clonal mosaicism" that is, two or more monoclonal samples were mosaic (polyclonal) in respect of X chromosome inactivation between separate, morphologically homogeneous tumour areas. The authors very carefully discuss potential methodological errors that could have led to this surprising finding, which seems to run counter to the almost unanimously held conviction that carcinomas are monoclonal in origin, but none of these potential errors would explain the results. As often in such situations, the authors prudently state that further studies using independent analytical techniques are necessary to find out whether a significant proportion of mammary carcinomas are indeed polyclonal. However, there already exists a substantial body of evidence from cytogenetic studies of breast cancers indicating that many of them are polyclonal. Although there is still room for interpretation and some doubt remains as to exactly which role should be ascribed to the observed clonal heterogeneity in our models of carcinogenesis, it seems obvious that more attention than before ought to be paid to this now well documented fact.