Phase II study of gemcitabine in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute myelogenous leukemia (ADVL0022): a Children's Oncology Group Report

Resistance of Leukemia Cells to 5-Azacytidine: Different Responses to the Same Induction Protocol

Three AML cell variants (M/A, M/A* from MOLM-13 and S/A from SKM-1) were established for resistance by the same protocol using 5-azacytidine (AZA) as a selection agent. These AZA-resistant variants differ in their responses to other cytosine nucleoside analogs, including 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC), as well as in some molecular features. Differences in global DNA methylation, protein levels of DNA methyltransferases, and phosphorylation of histone H2AX were observed in response to AZA and DAC treatment in these cell variants. This could be due to changes in the expression of uridine-cytidine kinases 1 and 2 (UCK1 and UCK2) demonstrated in our cell variants. In the M/A variant that retained sensitivity to DAC, we detected a homozygous point mutation in UCK2 resulting in an amino acid substitution (L220R) that is likely responsible for AZA resistance. Cells administered AZA treatment can switch to de novo synthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides, which could be blocked by inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase by teriflunomide (TFN). This is shown by the synergistic effect of AZA and TFN in those variants that were cross-resistant to DAC and did not have a mutation in UCK2.

Significance of NOTCH1 mutations détections in T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical impact of neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1 (NOTCH1) mutations among patients with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL).

PATIENT AND METHODS

A cohort of 60 T-ALL cases was included in this study. Sanger sequencing were done for NOTCH1 exon 26, 27, and distal part of exon 34 expanding the sequences encoding transcription activation domain (TAD) and a peptide sequence rich in proline, glutamic acid, serine, threonine (PEST) domains in all studied T ALL patients at diagnosis.

RESULTS

NOTCH1 mutations was detected in 40 out of 60 T-ALL patients (66%). Mutations in T-ALL patients are deletions (22 mutations) and point mutation (10 mutations). NOTCH1 mutations was found to have no significant impact on clinical outcome and prognosis in T-ALL including overall survival, progression free survival, relapse and mortality (P> 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

NOTCH1 mutations were frequently detected in T All patients; however, these mutations did not affect the T ALL patient's outcome. The high prevalence of NOTCH1 mutations at diagnosis could be used for detection of minimal residual disease in T ALL.

A high-throughput screen indicates gemcitabine and JAK inhibitors may be useful for treating pediatric AML

Improvement in survival has been achieved for children and adolescents with AML but is largely attributed to enhanced supportive care as opposed to the development of better treatment regimens. High risk subtypes continue to have poor outcomes with event free survival rates <40% despite the use of high intensity chemotherapy in combination with hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Here we combine high-throughput screening, intracellular accumulation assays, and in vivo efficacy studies to identify therapeutic strategies for pediatric AML. We report therapeutics not currently used to treat AML, gemcitabine and cabazitaxel, have broad anti-leukemic activity across subtypes and are more effective relative to the AML standard of care, cytarabine, both in vitro and in vivo. JAK inhibitors are selective for acute megakaryoblastic leukemia and significantly prolong survival in multiple preclinical models. Our approach provides advances in the development of treatment strategies for pediatric AML.

A phase I/II study of gemcitabine during radiotherapy in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma

The purpose of this phase I/II, open-label, single-arm trial is to investigate the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose and preliminary efficacy of the potential radiosensitizer gemcitabine, administered concomitantly to radiotherapy, in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Six doses of weekly gemcitabine were administered intravenously, concomitantly to 6 weeks of hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Successive cohorts received increasing doses of 140, 175 and 200 mg/m² gemcitabine, respectively, following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation schedule without expansion cohort. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were monitored during treatment period. Clinical response was assessed using predefined case report forms and radiological response was assessed using the modified RANO criteria. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using PedsQL questionnaires. Between June 2012 and December 2016, nine patients were enrolled. Treatment was well tolerated, and no DLTs were observed up to the maximum dose of 200 mg/m². All patients experienced reduction of tumor-related symptoms. QoL tended to improve during treatment. PFS and MOS were 4.8 months (95% CI 4.0–5.7) and 8.7 months (95% CI 7.0–10.4). Classifying patients according to the recently developed DIPG survival prediction model, intermediate risk patients (n = 4), showed a PFS and MOS of 6.4 and 12.4 months, respectively, versus a PFS and MOS of 4.5 and 8.1 months, respectively, in high risk patient (n = 5). Gemcitabine up to 200 mg/m²/once weekly, added to radiotherapy, is safe and well tolerated in children with newly diagnosed DIPG. PFS and MOS were not significantly different from literature.

Phase I and Phase II Objective Response Rates are Correlated in Pediatric Cancer Trials: An Argument for Better Clinical Trial Efficiency

Although many phase I trials report tumor response, formal analysis of efficacy is deferred to phase II. We reviewed paired phase I and II pediatric oncology trials to ascertain the relationship between phase I and II objective response rate (OR%). Single-agent phase I trials were paired with corresponding phase II trials (comparable study drug, dosing schedule, and population). Phase I trials without efficacy data or a matching phase II trial were excluded. OR% was tabulated for all trials, and phase II authors' subjective conclusions regarding efficacy were documented; 35 pairs of trials were analyzed. The correlation between phase I and II OR% was 0.93. Between phase II studies with a "positive" conclusion versus a "negative" one, there was a statistically significant difference in mean phase I OR% (32.0% vs. 4.5%, P<0.001). Thirteen phase II studies were undertaken despite phase I OR% of 0%; only 1 had a "positive" conclusion, and none exceeded OR% of 15%. OR% are highly correlated between phase I and II pediatric oncology trials. Although not a formal measure of drug efficacy, phase I OR% may provide an estimate of phase II response, inform phase II study design, and should be given greater consideration.

Integrating pharmacogenetics into gemcitabine dosing--time for a change?

Increasing the efficacy of anticancer agents and avoiding toxic effects is a critical issue in clinical oncology. Identifying biomarkers that predict clinical outcome would ensure improved patient care. Gemcitabine is widely used to treat various solid tumors as a single agent or in combination with other drugs. The therapeutic index of gemcitabine is narrow, and abnormal pharmacokinetics leading to changes in plasma exposure is a major cause of adverse effects. A number of biomarkers have been proposed to predict efficacy of gemcitabine, focusing on molecular determinants of response identified at the tumor level. Genetic and functional deregulations that affect the disposition of a drug could be the reason for life-threatening adverse effects or treatment failure. In particular, deregulation of cytidine deaminase, the enzyme responsible for detoxification of most nucleotide analogs, should be examined. Identifying and validating biomarkers for pharmacogenetic testing before administration of gemcitabine is a step towards personalized medicine.

Phase II study of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in relapsed or refractory paediatric solid malignancies: An innovative therapy for children with Cancer European Consortium Study

AIM

To assess objective response rates after 4 cycles of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid tumours.

METHODS

This multicentre, non-randomised Phase II study included five strata: neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, medulloblastoma and other CNS tumours strata with two-stage Simon designs and a miscellaneous, extra-cranial solid tumour stratum with descriptive design. Eligibility criteria included: age 6 months to 21 years; measurable, relapsed or refractory solid malignancy; no more than one previous salvage therapy. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at 1000 mg/m(2) over 100 min followed by oxaliplatin at 100mg/m(2) over 120 min on Day 1 of a 14-d cycle. Tumour response was assessed every 4 cycles according to WHO criteria.

RESULTS

Ninety-three out of 95 patients enrolled in 25 centres received treatment: 12 neuroblastoma; 12 osteosarcoma; 14 medulloblastoma; 13 other CNS tumours and 42 miscellaneous non-CNS solid tumours. Median age was 11.7 years (range, 1.3-20.8 years). Tumour control (CR+PR+SD) at 4 cycles was obtained in 30/93 evaluable patients (32.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 22.9-42.7%), including four PR: 1/12 patients with osteosarcoma, 1/12 with medulloblastoma, 1/12 with rhabdomyosarcoma and 1/4 with other sarcoma. Five out of 12 eligible patients with neuroblastoma experienced stable disease. During a total of 481 treatment cycles (median 4, range 1-24 per patient), the most common treatment-related toxicities were haematologic (leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) and neurological (dysesthesia, paresthesia).

CONCLUDING STATEMENT

The gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination administered in a bi-weekly schedule has acceptable safety profile with limited activity in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumours.

Implementing Good Clinical Practice in Two Noncommercial Phase II Studies in Children with Cancer

BACKGROUND

In noncommercial clinical drug research the implementation of the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) has been criticized for introducing unnecessary bureaucracy at the expense of scientific activity, especially when small populations such as children or patients with orphan diseases are concerned.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 2003 to September 2005, we conducted two prospective open-label multicenter phase II studies in pediatric oncology. Aside from medical questions, these studies set out to explore the requirements according to the essential standards of the ICH-GCP Guideline in anticipation of the implementation of the EU Regulation in German Drug Law in August 2004; the latter, prospective investigation was initiated by the Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (KKS).

RESULTS

The main GCP requirements were systematically reviewed and critically discussed by focusing mainly on the situation of noncommercial pediatric drug research.

CONCLUSION

While putting GCP into practice in academic research increases costs, the challenge will be to apply these guidelines to good effect, for better quality and increased evidence.

Phase II study of gemcitabine in children with solid tumors of mesenchymal and embryonic origin

The therapeutic benefit and side-effect profile of gemcitabine in adults with relapsed solid tumors is well known. So far, few data are available about its significance in pediatric relapsed solid tumors. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine in children, the drug was administered by intravenous short-term infusion over 30 min at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks as one cycle in children with relapsed solid tumor of embryonic or mesenchymal origin. From May 2003 to September 2004, 14 male and six female patients (2-23, median 15.8 years) were recruited for this prospective open-label phase II study (two-step Simon design). The patients suffered from rhabdomyosarcoma (n=8), Ewing's sarcoma (n=4), osteosarcoma (n=2), neuroblastoma (n=3), hepatoblastoma (n=2) and nephroblastoma (n=1). Median duration of therapy was 27.5 days (7-99), corresponding to 4.0 (2-11) infusions of gemcitabine. Two patients (neuroblastoma and Ewing) had stable disease documented for 69 and 70 days, whereas no objective responses were observed. In 34/94 administered infusions; doses had to be reduced or omitted for grade 3-4 hematotoxicity. Minimal activity was observed in this cohort of children with a wide spectrum of mesenchymal and embryonic tumors. Given the relatively low dose of gemcitabine administered, this study does not exclude the possibility of activity at higher doses. Secondly, the tolerability of gemcitabine in children was consistent with that expected in adults. For further studies in this population, we recommend the use of gemcitabine in combination with other agents.

A new, simple method for quantifying gemcitabine triphosphate in cancer cells using isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography

A deoxycytidine analog, gemcitabine (dFdC), is effective for treating solid tumors and hematological malignancies. After being transported into cancer cells, dFdC is phosphorylated to dFdC triphosphate (dFdCTP), which is subsequently incorporated into the DNA strand, thereby inhibiting DNA synthesis. Intracellular dFdCTP is the critical determinant for dFdC cytotoxicity, so therapeutic drug monitoring or in vitro testing of the capability of cancer cells to accumulate dFdCTP may be informative for optimizing dFdC administration. We have developed a new isocratic-elution high-performance liquid chromatography method for quantifying dFdCTP in cancer cells. Samples (500 microL) were eluted isocratically using 0.06 M Na(2)HPO(4) (pH 6.9) containing 20% acetonitrile, at a constant flow rate of 0.7 mL/min and at ambient temperature. Separation was carried out using an anion-exchange column (TSK gel DEAE-2SW; 250 mm x 4.6 mm inside diameter, particle size 5 microL) and monitored at 254 nm. The standard curve was linear with low within-day and interday variability. The lower detection limit (20 pmol) was as sensitive as that of the previous gradient-elution method. dFdCTP was well separated from other nucleoside triphosphates. The method could measure dFdCTP in cultured or primary leukemic cells treated in vitro with dFdC. The method was also applicable to simultaneous determination of dFdCTP and cytarabine triphosphate, the results of which demonstrated ara-CTP production augmented by dFdC pretreatment. Thus, our isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography assay method will be of great use because of its sensitivity and simplicity as well as its applicability to biological materials.