Is postal follow-up of childhood cancer survivors worthwhile?

Survivors of childhood cancer lost to follow-up can be re-engaged into active long-term follow-up by a postal health questionnaire intervention

Lifelong long-term follow-up (LTFU) is recommended for all survivors of childhood cancer. National guidelines recommend risk-stratified levels of follow-up by a multidisciplinary team, in an age-appropriate environment. Many survivors do not participate in long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To re-engage childhood cancer survivors lost to follow-up in late effects programmes by means of postal questionnaire.

POPULATION AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of all children (<19 years) diagnosed with cancer in a single institution in the UK between 1971 and 2003. All lost to follow-up survivors (not seen in clinic >2 years) were sent a postal health and well-being questionnaire.

RESULTS

831 patients were diagnosed with childhood cancer between 1971 and 2003, with 575 long-term survivors (overall survival rate 69%). Information was available on 550 survivors (males 290 (53%), median age (range) at review 18.8 (5.4-44.2) years and at diagnosis 5.0 (0.0-18.8) years, and disease free survival (range) was 10.8 (1.0-37.4) years. Of the 550 survivors, 256 (46%) were lost to follow-up. 99 (39%) of lost to follow-up survivors returned completed postal questionnaires (58% female). 45% of responders reported at least one late effect, 36% mild-moderate, and 8% severe-life threatening. 19% reported two or more late effects. 74% of all childhood cancer survivors are now in active follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half (46%) of all long-term survivors of childhood cancer are lost to follow-up, Postal follow-up is an effective means of re-engaging more than one third of survivors of childhood cancer in active long-term follow-up, half of whom had at least one late effect.

Fifty years of paediatric malignant bone tumours in the West Midlands, UK, 1957-2006: incidence, treatment and outcome

Malignant bone tumours in the paediatric age group (0-14 years) are uncommon; various aetiological theories exist and few reports of incidence, age and sex distributions have been published. We examined the incidence of childhood malignant bone tumours in one large single region of the UK over an extended period of 50 years. The West Midlands specialist regional children's tumour registry holds data on all malignancies and benign brain tumours in children under 15 years in the West Midlands region, which has a population of around 1 million children. Demographic and clinical data have been abstracted and diagnoses reviewed by a panel of expert pathologists. During the period 1957-2006, 259 cases of malignant paediatric bone tumours were diagnosed. There were 153 osteosarcomas, 78 Ewing sarcomas and 28 other primary bone tumours. The overall age standardised rate was 4.66, with no increase over time, although there was a significant increase in the incidence of Ewing sarcomas in the period 1965-92. Sixty-eight per cent of tumours were in patients over 10 years, whereas the incidence in patients under 10 years showed a non-significant increase. Survival rates increased dramatically post-chemotherapy introduction, with Ewing sarcoma demonstrating better survival overall. This is a large study giving an overview of malignant bone tumours in the childhood population of a single region over an extended period, showing results consistent with national reports. It also examines late effects, which were mostly mobility/orthopaedic, although almost one-fifth of patients had cardiac problems and five went on to develop second malignancies.