Non-myeloablative transplantation for severe congenital neutropenia

Successful second hematopoietic cell transplantation in severe congenital neutropenia

Allogeneic HCT is curative for SCN; however, a standard conditioning regimen or intensity has not been established. We describe a patient with SCN associated with c.1A>G (M1V) mutation in ELANE gene resulting in refractoriness to G-CSF, who received reduced-intensity HCT and developed secondary graft failure requiring a second myeloablative HCT. This case suggests that M1V mutation confers a poor G-CSF response and HCT using the best available donor is beneficial.

Case Reports of Severe Congenital Neutropenia Treated With Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation With Reduced-intensity Conditioning

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment for severe congenital neutropenia (SCN). However, a standard conditioning regimen and donor source have not been established. We report 3 consecutive cases of SCN who were successfully treated by cord blood transplantation (CBT) with reduced-intensity conditioning consisting of fludarabine, melphalan, and low-dose total body irradiation. All cases achieved complete donor chimerism without severe infectious complications and have maintained normal neutrophil counts for between 3 and 9 years after CBT. These results suggest that CBT with reduced-intensity conditioning can be an alternative therapy for SCN when human leukocyte antigen-matched bone marrow donor is unavailable.

Stem cell transplantation in severe congenital neutropenia: an analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment of severe congenital neutropenia (SCN), but data on outcome are scarce. We report on the outcome of 136 SCN patients who underwent HSCT between 1990 and 2012 in European and Middle East centers. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 82%, and transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 17%. In multivariate analysis, transplants performed under the age of 10 years, in recent years, and from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors were associated with a significantly better OS. Frequency of graft failure was 10%. Cumulative incidence (day +90) of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 2-4 was 21%. In multivariate analysis, HLA-matched related donor and prophylaxis with cyclosporine A and methotrexate were associated with lower occurrence of acute GVHD. Cumulative incidence (1 year) of chronic GVHD was 20%. No secondary malignancies occurred after a median follow-up of 4.6 years. These data show that the outcome of HSCT for SCN from HLA-matched donors, performed in recent years, in patients younger than 10 years is acceptable. Nevertheless, given the TRM, a careful selection of HSCT candidates should be undertaken.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe congenital neutropenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative option for patients with severe congenital neutropenia (SCN). Transplant success is dependent on identifying at-risk patients and proceeding to transplant before the development of severe infections or malignant transformation. This review focuses on recent advancements in risk stratification of SCN patients, indications for HCT, and review of published transplant studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with poor neutrophil response despite high doses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are at greatest risk for malignant transformation. Other studies demonstrate elevated risk with mutations in the G-CSF receptor gene and a specific mutation in the ELANE gene. These patients are at high-risk of sepsis or leukemia development and should proceed to transplant with best available donor. As recent published studies demonstrate, HCT is highly successful in patients without leukemia and, therefore, may be considered in selected low-risk patients given the life-long risk of malignancy and infection.

SUMMARY

The decision whether to proceed to HCT in healthy patients maintained on G-CSF is difficult. As transplant-related mortality continues to decrease, the role of transplant in SCN is likely to expand to more patients.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in severe congenital neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) is an immunodeficiency characterized by disturbed myelopoiesis and an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <0.5 × 10(9)/L. SCN is also a premalignant condition; a significant proportion of patients develop myelodysplastic syndrome or leukemia (MDS/L). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for SCN.

PROCEDURE

Since 2004, eight HSCT have been performed in seven patients at our center. The indications were transformation to MDS/L (n = 2), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF3R) mutation(s) (n = 2), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) resistance (n = 2), and at the patient's own request (n = 1).

RESULTS

The mean age at transplantation was 13 years (2.8-28 years) (mean follow-up 32 months, range 21-60). Three patients harbored ELANE mutations, three HAX1 mutations, and in one patient no causative mutation was identified. Two of the ELANE mutations were novel mutations. Three patients initially received myeloablative conditioning and four had reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Three grafts were from HLA-identical siblings, three from matched unrelated donors and two were cord blood units. Engraftment occurred in all patients. Two of seven (29%) patients died; both had MDS/L and both were among the three that underwent myeloablative conditioning. One patient has chronic GVHD 2 years post-transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of HSCT should be explored further in patients with SCN. In particular, the influence of the conditioning regime needs to be evaluated in a larger cohort of patients.

Unrelated cord blood transplantation in children with severe congenital neutropenia

SCN is an inherited hematological disorder with severe neutropenia and recurrent infections. Although there are some reports that recombinant rhG-CSF improves clinical outcome, allogeneic HSCT appears to be the only curative treatment for these patients. We report here two children with SCN successfully treated by CBT from unrelated donors. They were refractory to rhG-CSF treatment and have no identical family donor. Bu + CY were given as conditioning. Case 1 and Case 2 received 6/6 and 5/6 HLA-matched unrelated umbilical cord blood, respectively. The number of infused nucleated cells was 6, 18 x 10(7)/kg and CD34(+) cell number was 3, 74 x 10(5)/kg in Case 1. Those cell numbers were 8, 8 x 10(7)/kg and 5, 34 x 10(5)/kg for Case 2, respectively. Neutrophil/platelet engraftments were 45/49 days in Case 1 and 24/36 days in Case 2. Grade II cutaneous acute GVHD was seen in Case 2 that was treated successfully with prednisolone. Both patients are well with normal hematological findings and full donor chimerism for post-transplant 20 and 24 months, respectively. We conclude that UCB can be considered as a safe source of stem cell in patients with SCN who need urgent HSCT.

Unrelated cord blood transplantation for severe congenital neutropenia: report of two cases with very different transplant courses

SCN is characterized by neutropenia, life-threatening infections, and progression to myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myelogenous leukemia. The only curative option is SCT, but few reports using UCB as a stem cell source exist. Here, we report two SCN patients transplanted with UCB. Patient 1 was transplanted at seven yr of age due to increasingly large injections of G-CSF (>100 microg/kg/day) and the risk of developing leukemia. He engrafted promptly and is clinically well and immune reconstituted >2 yr post-transplant. Patient 2 underwent UCB SCT at nine months of age for recurrent severe infections, despite high doses of G-CSF. He rejected his first graft, having 100% host cells on day +35, and immediately underwent a second UCB SCT. He engrafted but experienced late graft rejection six months after the second transplant. He received a third UCB SCT following a more immunosuppressive conditioning regimen. His course was complicated by HHV-6 viremia and gut GVHD, but he is now clinically well and has 99% donor engraftment >20 months post-transplant. We conclude that UCB is an acceptable stem cell source for SCN patients, but conditioning must be adequately immunosuppressive to ensure engraftment in patients without prior chemotherapy.